Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

The Effect of Organizational Culture Types on Innovation Organizational Role and Regulatory Role of Trust and Implicit Information Sharing

Year 2019, Volume: 13 Issue: 19, 1864 - 1892, 30.09.2019
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.552817

Abstract

Organizational culture is the element that connects the aims of employees to achieve their level of excellence by reflecting the organizational image. If the environment and organizational culture are not conductive to feed these talents (fear of failure and change, focus on financial controls and risk reduction etc), innovation cannot develop within organizations and individuals. An organizational culture which supports innovation processes will be able to demonstrate the ability to cope with uncertainties and to perceive information from the environment as an opportunity, not as a threat (Szczepańska-Woszczynaa, 2015) Information is an important source for innovative activities. Effective information management is accepted as an important method in increasing the innovative capacity of a company. Innovativeness emphasizes the central importance of information in general, and the transfer of knowledge between different actors involved in the innovation system in particular; development of new capacities and insights leads to the improvement of innovative performance. If this information is not transferred and shared with other company employees, neither performance nor firm innovation capacity can be developed .In a certain sense, innovativeness will create a value by the distribution and assimilation of information within the organization. The aim of this study is to determine the regulatory effect of the sharing of trust and knowledge in the relationship between organizational culture and innovativeness. The sample of the study consists of bank employees in the city centrum of Malatya. According to the results of the analysis, implicit information sharing does not have a regulatory effect on the innovative tendency of the organizational culture types. Organizational trust has a regulatory role in the innovation relationship between the type of culture and the type of supportive culture.

References

  • Akkoç, İ. (2012). Gelişim kültürü ve etik iklimin yenilikçiliğe etkisinde dağıtım adaletinin rolü. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(3), 45-60.
  • Alexe, C.-G. ve Alexe, C-M. (2017). Similarities and differentiations at the level of the industriesin acquiring an organizational culture in innovatio., Procedia Manufacturing, 22 , 317–324.
  • Chen, Y., Podolski, E.J., Veeraraghavan, M.(2017), National culture and corporate innovation, Pacific- Basin Finance Journal, 43, 173-187.
  • Delbufalo, E. (2017). The effects of suppliers’ trust on manufacturers’ innovation capability: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Production Planning & control, The Management of operatıon, 28(14), 1165–1176.
  • Demircan, N. (2003), Örgütsel güvenin bir ara değişken olarak örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi: eğitim sektöründe bir uygulama. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gebze İleri Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Gebze.
  • Dyer, J. H., ve W. Chu. (2003) The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and ımproving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14 (1), 57–68.
  • Göksel, A., Aydıntan, B. ve Bingöl, D. (2010). Örgütlerde bilgi paylaşım davranışı: Sosyal sermaye boyutundan bir bakış. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 65(4), 87-109.
  • Green, W., ve Cluely, R. (2014). The field of radical innovation: Making sense of organizational cultures and radical innovation, Industrial Marketing Management, 43(8), 1343–1350.
  • Hamdoun, M., Jabbour,C. J. C., ve Othman, H. B.(2018). Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Impacts of quality and environmental management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 193,759-777.
  • Hu, M. L. M., Horng, J. S., ve Sun, Y. H. C.(2009). Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance, Tourism Management, 30, 41-50.
  • Hussein, N., Omara, S., Noordin, F. ve Amir, I. N.(2016). Learning organization culture, organizational performance and organizational ınnovativeness in a public ınstitution of higher education in Malaysia: A Preliminary Study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 512 – 519.
  • Jones, G. E. (2017). Knowledge sharing and technological innovation: The effectiveness of trust, training, and good communication, Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1-15.
  • Karagöz, Y.(2016). Spss 23 ve Amos 23 uygulamalı istatistiksel analizler. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık
  • Knack, S. ve Keefer, P. (1997) Does social capital have an economic payoff? a cross-country ınvestigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (4), 1251–1288.
  • Kostis, P. C., Kafka, K. I. ve Petrakis, P. E. (2018). Cultural change and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, 88(3), 306-313.
  • Kremer, H., Villamor, I. ve Aguinis, H. (2019). Innovation leadership: Best-practice recommendations for promoting employee creativity. Voice, And Knowledge Sharing, 62, 65—74.
  • Krot, K., ve Lewicka, D. (2011). Innovation and organisational trust: Study of firms in Poland. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 10 (1), 43-59.
  • Lau, C-M. ve Ngo, H.-Y., (2004) The HR system, organizational culture, and product innovation, International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 685-703, December.
  • Lai, C-S., Chen, C-S. Chiu., C,-J. ve Pai, D-C. (2011). The impact of trust on the relationship between inter-organisational collaboration and product innovation performance. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(1), 65–74.
  • Liao, C., ve Chuang, S.H.(2006). Exploring the role of knowledge management for enhancing firm’s ınnovation and performance. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Mardania, A., Nikoosokhan, S., Moradi, M. ve Doustar, M. (2018). The relationship between knowledge management and ınnovation performance. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29 (1), 12–26.
  • Madhavan, R., ve Grover, R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. Journal of Marketing, 62, 1-12.
  • Murphy, J. T. (2002). Networks, trust, and innovation in Tanzania's manufacturing sector. World Development, Elsevier, 30 (4), 591-619.
  • Naranjo-Valenciaa, J. C. Jiménez-Jiménez, D. ve Sanz-Valle, R. (2016). Studying the links between organizational culture, innovation, and performance in Spanish companies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48(1), 30-41.
  • Özkan, Ö. ve Turunç, Ö. (2015). Örgüt kültürü ile yenilikçilik ilişkisinde rekabet şiddetinin düzenleyici etkisi: Savunma sanayinde bir uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (1), 339-363.
  • Petrakis, P. E. Kostis, P. C. ve Valsamis, D. G. (2015). Innovation and competitiveness: Culture as a long-term strategic instrument during the European Great Recession, Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, 68 (7), 1436-1438.
  • Petrakis, P. E., Kostis, P. C. ve Valsamis, D. G. (2015). Innovation and competitiveness: Culture as a long-term strategic instrument during the European Great Recession. Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, 68 (7), 1436-1438.
  • Polat, M. ve Arabacı, B. (2015). Enformasyon kuramı bağlamında sosyal ağlar, örgütsel belirsizlik ve eğitim: Kavramsal bir analiz, Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(37), 797-809.
  • Rehman, W. U. l. Ilyas, M. ve Asghar, N. (2015). Knowledge sharıng, knowledge management strategy and performance. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 53 (2 ),177-202.
  • Ruppel, C. P., ve Harrington, S. J. (2000). The relationship of communication, ethical work climate, and trust to commitment and innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 25 (4), 313-328.
  • Sako, M., and S. Helper. (1998) Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive ındustry in Japan and the United States. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 34 (3), 387–402.
  • Sankowska, A. (2016). How organizational trust affects the market position: The Mediating Role of Innovativeness and Operational Efficiency, 26(61), 9-23.
  • Sezgin, O.B., Uçar, Z., Duygulu, E.(215), Güven, yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisinde bilgi paylaşımının aracılık rolü, İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (2), 1-20.
  • Shahzad, F., Xiu, G.Y. ve Shahbaz, M. (2017). Organizational culture and innovation performance in Pakistan's software industry. Technology in Society, 51, 66-67.
  • Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Heijden, B. I.J.M V. D. ve Farrell, M. (2017), Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67–77.
  • Szczepańska-Woszczynaa, K. (2015), Organizational culture and innovation, Procedia Economics and Finance, 396 – 402.
  • Verdu-Jover, A. J. Lirios. A-S. ve Gomez-Gras, J.-M.(2018). Adaptive culture and product/service innovation outcomes. European Management Journal, 36 (3), 330-340.
  • Wang., C., ve Hu, O. (2017). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1-13.
  • Wallach, E.J. (1983) Individuals and organizations: The cultural match. Training and Development Journal, 37, 29-36.
  • https://tbb.(2017) TBB veri sistemi, www. org.tr/tr/bankacilik/banka-ve-sektor-bilgileri/banka-bilgileri/banka-ve-sube-sayilari/70 E.tarihi 27.8.2019

Örgüt Kültür Tiplerinin Yenilikçiliğe Etkisi Örgüte Güvenin ve Örtülü Bilgi Paylaşımının Düzenleyici Rolü

Year 2019, Volume: 13 Issue: 19, 1864 - 1892, 30.09.2019
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.552817

Abstract

Örgüt kültürü, çalışanların amaçlarını, örgüt imajını yansıtarak daha sonraki mükemmellik seviyelerine ulaşmak için bağlayan unsurdur. Eğer çevre ve örgüt kültürü bu yetenekleri beslemeye elverişli değilse (başarısızlık ve değişim korkusu, finansal kontrollere odaklanma ve riskin azaltılması ) vb  inovasyon örgütlerde ve bireylerde gelişemez. İnovasyon süreçlerini destekleyen bir örgüt kültürü belirsizliklerle başa çıkma yeteneğini gösterebilecek ve çevreden gelen bilgileri tehdit olarak değil de bir fırsat olarak algılama yeteneğine sahip olacaktır (Szczepańska-Woszczynaa, 2015) Bilgi, yenilikçi faaliyetleri için önemli bir kaynaktır. Etkili bilgi yönetimi, bir firmanın yenilikçi kapasitesini arttırmada önemli bir yöntem olarak kabul edilir. Yenilikçilik genel olarak bilginin merkezi önemini ve özellikle yenilikçilik sistemine dahil olan farklı aktörler arasındaki bilgi transferini vurgulamaktadır; Yeni kapasitelerin ve içgörülerin geliştirilmesi, yenilikçi performansının iyileştirilmesine yol açmaktadır. eğer bu bilgi aktarılmaz ve diğer şirket çalışanlarıyla paylaşılmazsa, ne performans ne de firma inovasyon kapasitesi geliştirilemez. Bir bağlamda yenilikçilik bilginin örgüt içinde yayılması ve özümsenmesi ile değer yaratacaktır. Bu araştırmanın amacı örgüt kültür tipleri yenilikçilik ilişkisinde güven ve bilgi paylaşımının düzenleyici etkisini belirlemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini Malatya il merkezindeki banka çalışanları oluşturmaktadır. Analiz sonuçlarına göre örtülü bilgi paylaşımı, örgüt kültür tiplerinin yenilikçi eğilimi etkilemesinde düzenleyici etki rolüne sahip değildir. Örgüt kültür tiplerinden destekleyici kültür tipi yenilikçilik ilişkisinde yönetsel güvenin düzenleyici rolü vardır.

References

  • Akkoç, İ. (2012). Gelişim kültürü ve etik iklimin yenilikçiliğe etkisinde dağıtım adaletinin rolü. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(3), 45-60.
  • Alexe, C.-G. ve Alexe, C-M. (2017). Similarities and differentiations at the level of the industriesin acquiring an organizational culture in innovatio., Procedia Manufacturing, 22 , 317–324.
  • Chen, Y., Podolski, E.J., Veeraraghavan, M.(2017), National culture and corporate innovation, Pacific- Basin Finance Journal, 43, 173-187.
  • Delbufalo, E. (2017). The effects of suppliers’ trust on manufacturers’ innovation capability: an analysis of direct versus indirect relationships. Production Planning & control, The Management of operatıon, 28(14), 1165–1176.
  • Demircan, N. (2003), Örgütsel güvenin bir ara değişken olarak örgütsel bağlılık üzerindeki etkisi: eğitim sektöründe bir uygulama. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Gebze İleri Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Gebze.
  • Dyer, J. H., ve W. Chu. (2003) The role of trustworthiness in reducing transaction costs and ımproving performance: Empirical evidence from the United States, Japan, and Korea. Organization Science, 14 (1), 57–68.
  • Göksel, A., Aydıntan, B. ve Bingöl, D. (2010). Örgütlerde bilgi paylaşım davranışı: Sosyal sermaye boyutundan bir bakış. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 65(4), 87-109.
  • Green, W., ve Cluely, R. (2014). The field of radical innovation: Making sense of organizational cultures and radical innovation, Industrial Marketing Management, 43(8), 1343–1350.
  • Hamdoun, M., Jabbour,C. J. C., ve Othman, H. B.(2018). Knowledge transfer and organizational innovation: Impacts of quality and environmental management, Journal of Cleaner Production, 193,759-777.
  • Hu, M. L. M., Horng, J. S., ve Sun, Y. H. C.(2009). Hospitality teams: Knowledge sharing and service innovation performance, Tourism Management, 30, 41-50.
  • Hussein, N., Omara, S., Noordin, F. ve Amir, I. N.(2016). Learning organization culture, organizational performance and organizational ınnovativeness in a public ınstitution of higher education in Malaysia: A Preliminary Study. Procedia Economics and Finance, 37, 512 – 519.
  • Jones, G. E. (2017). Knowledge sharing and technological innovation: The effectiveness of trust, training, and good communication, Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1-15.
  • Karagöz, Y.(2016). Spss 23 ve Amos 23 uygulamalı istatistiksel analizler. Ankara: Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık
  • Knack, S. ve Keefer, P. (1997) Does social capital have an economic payoff? a cross-country ınvestigation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 112 (4), 1251–1288.
  • Kostis, P. C., Kafka, K. I. ve Petrakis, P. E. (2018). Cultural change and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, 88(3), 306-313.
  • Kremer, H., Villamor, I. ve Aguinis, H. (2019). Innovation leadership: Best-practice recommendations for promoting employee creativity. Voice, And Knowledge Sharing, 62, 65—74.
  • Krot, K., ve Lewicka, D. (2011). Innovation and organisational trust: Study of firms in Poland. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 10 (1), 43-59.
  • Lau, C-M. ve Ngo, H.-Y., (2004) The HR system, organizational culture, and product innovation, International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 13(6), pages 685-703, December.
  • Lai, C-S., Chen, C-S. Chiu., C,-J. ve Pai, D-C. (2011). The impact of trust on the relationship between inter-organisational collaboration and product innovation performance. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23(1), 65–74.
  • Liao, C., ve Chuang, S.H.(2006). Exploring the role of knowledge management for enhancing firm’s ınnovation and performance. Proceedings of the 39th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
  • Mardania, A., Nikoosokhan, S., Moradi, M. ve Doustar, M. (2018). The relationship between knowledge management and ınnovation performance. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29 (1), 12–26.
  • Madhavan, R., ve Grover, R. (1998). From embedded knowledge to embodied knowledge: New product development as knowledge management. Journal of Marketing, 62, 1-12.
  • Murphy, J. T. (2002). Networks, trust, and innovation in Tanzania's manufacturing sector. World Development, Elsevier, 30 (4), 591-619.
  • Naranjo-Valenciaa, J. C. Jiménez-Jiménez, D. ve Sanz-Valle, R. (2016). Studying the links between organizational culture, innovation, and performance in Spanish companies. Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología, 48(1), 30-41.
  • Özkan, Ö. ve Turunç, Ö. (2015). Örgüt kültürü ile yenilikçilik ilişkisinde rekabet şiddetinin düzenleyici etkisi: Savunma sanayinde bir uygulama. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 20 (1), 339-363.
  • Petrakis, P. E. Kostis, P. C. ve Valsamis, D. G. (2015). Innovation and competitiveness: Culture as a long-term strategic instrument during the European Great Recession, Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, 68 (7), 1436-1438.
  • Petrakis, P. E., Kostis, P. C. ve Valsamis, D. G. (2015). Innovation and competitiveness: Culture as a long-term strategic instrument during the European Great Recession. Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, 68 (7), 1436-1438.
  • Polat, M. ve Arabacı, B. (2015). Enformasyon kuramı bağlamında sosyal ağlar, örgütsel belirsizlik ve eğitim: Kavramsal bir analiz, Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8(37), 797-809.
  • Rehman, W. U. l. Ilyas, M. ve Asghar, N. (2015). Knowledge sharıng, knowledge management strategy and performance. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 53 (2 ),177-202.
  • Ruppel, C. P., ve Harrington, S. J. (2000). The relationship of communication, ethical work climate, and trust to commitment and innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 25 (4), 313-328.
  • Sako, M., and S. Helper. (1998) Determinants of trust in supplier relations: Evidence from the automotive ındustry in Japan and the United States. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 34 (3), 387–402.
  • Sankowska, A. (2016). How organizational trust affects the market position: The Mediating Role of Innovativeness and Operational Efficiency, 26(61), 9-23.
  • Sezgin, O.B., Uçar, Z., Duygulu, E.(215), Güven, yenilikçi iş davranışı ilişkisinde bilgi paylaşımının aracılık rolü, İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 16 (2), 1-20.
  • Shahzad, F., Xiu, G.Y. ve Shahbaz, M. (2017). Organizational culture and innovation performance in Pakistan's software industry. Technology in Society, 51, 66-67.
  • Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Heijden, B. I.J.M V. D. ve Farrell, M. (2017), Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance: The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67–77.
  • Szczepańska-Woszczynaa, K. (2015), Organizational culture and innovation, Procedia Economics and Finance, 396 – 402.
  • Verdu-Jover, A. J. Lirios. A-S. ve Gomez-Gras, J.-M.(2018). Adaptive culture and product/service innovation outcomes. European Management Journal, 36 (3), 330-340.
  • Wang., C., ve Hu, O. (2017). Knowledge sharing in supply chain networks: Effects of collaborative innovation activities and capability on innovation performance. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1, 1-13.
  • Wallach, E.J. (1983) Individuals and organizations: The cultural match. Training and Development Journal, 37, 29-36.
  • https://tbb.(2017) TBB veri sistemi, www. org.tr/tr/bankacilik/banka-ve-sektor-bilgileri/banka-bilgileri/banka-ve-sube-sayilari/70 E.tarihi 27.8.2019
There are 40 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Gül Gün 0000-0002-6231-3921

Publication Date September 30, 2019
Acceptance Date September 11, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019 Volume: 13 Issue: 19

Cite

APA Gün, G. (2019). Örgüt Kültür Tiplerinin Yenilikçiliğe Etkisi Örgüte Güvenin ve Örtülü Bilgi Paylaşımının Düzenleyici Rolü. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 13(19), 1864-1892. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.552817