Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Joe Penhall’un Aşk ve Anlayış adlı oyununda modern hilebaz karakter

Year 2021, Issue: Ö9, 184 - 192, 21.08.2021
https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.981526

Abstract

Çağdaş İngiliz-Avusturalyalı oyun yazarı ve senarist Joe Penhall’un oyunu Aşk ve Anlayış (2004), modern dünyanın karmaşasını ve yoğun iş hayatı ve iletişimsizlik yüzünden sevgili olan iki genç doktor Neal ve Rachel’in ayrılığını resmetmektedir. Oyun ayrıca manipulatif, narsist, çıkarcı ve düzenbaz karakter ile hilebaza benzeyen yalnız ve depresif Richie karakterini bize tanıtmaktadır. Hilebaz karakter, edebiyatta ve kültürde farklı kimliklerle ve farklı kılıklarla ortaya çıkan arketip bir karakterdir ve eğlenceli, haylaz ve akıllı bir kişiliğe bürünmüştür; dahası hilebaz karakter hayatta kalmayı ve her koşulu kendi çıkarına kullanmayı başarmaktadır. Mitolojide, edebiyatta ve halk hikâyelerinde Dionysus, Pan, Prometheus ve Nasrettin Hoca ve beyaz perdede Jack Sparrow, Joker ve Maske gibi birçok tanınmış şahsiyet; belirli ölçüdeki kurnazlıkları, hilekârlıkları ve muziplikleri ile hilebaz karakter için örnek olarak gösterilebilmektedir. Bu makalede inceleneceği üzere, Penhall’un oyununda Richie’yi, ahlak dışı kurnazlığı, hedonizmi, sığlığı ve acınası yalnızlığı ile hilebaz karakterin modern versiyonu olarak okumak mümkündür.

References

  • Cashford, J. (2015) “How Hermes and Apollo came to love each other in the Homeric Hymn to Hermes: imagination and form in Ancient Greece and modern psyche”, Ancient Greece, Modern Psyche: Archetypes Evolving (Ed: Virginia Beane Rutter, Thomas Singer), London and New York: Routledge.
  • Collins English Dictionary (collinsdictionary.com), “Trickster definition and meaning” https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/trickster. accessed date: 15.02.2021.
  • Das, C, (1993). Folklores of Mankind, Institute of Oriental and Orissan Studies.
  • Freeman, Z. (2014). “Review: Love and Understanding”, Redtwist Theatre, Newcity Stage, (773)728-7529.
  • https://www.newcitystage.com/2014/03/03/review-love-and-understandingredtwist-theatre/. accessed date: 12.03.2021.
  • Gilles, M, A., Mahood, A. (2007). Modernist Literature an Introduction, Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
  • Hyde, L. (1999). Trickster Makes This World: Mischief, Myth, and Art, (Foreword: Michael Chabon ). New York: North Point Press.
  • Jung, C. G (1933). Modern Man in Search of a Soul, U.S.: Harcourt, Brace & World.
  • ------------(1972) “On the Psychology of the Trickster Figure”, The Trickster, (Ed.: Paul Radin), New York: Schocken Books,
  • ------------ (1968), Man and his Symbols, New York: Anchor Press. Klapp, O. E. (1954). “The Clever Hero”, Journal of American Folklore, American Folklore Society,67(263). Margot, E., Clark, E. E. (2003). Voices of the Winds: Native American Legends. Castle Books. p. 5. ISBN 0785817166.
  • Morgan, W. (2013), The Trickster Figure in American Literature, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Penhall, J. (1999). Love and Understanding, New York: Dramatists Play Service Inc.
  • Radin, P. (1972) “The Trickster: A Study in American Indian Mythology”, New York: Schocken Books.
  • Wolf, M. (1997). “Love and Understanding”, Variety https://variety.com/1997/legit/reviews/love-and-understanding-1117432635/. accessed date: 20.02.2021.

Modern Trickster in Joe Penhall’s Love and Understanding

Year 2021, Issue: Ö9, 184 - 192, 21.08.2021
https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.981526

Abstract

Contemporary English-Australian playwright and screenwriter Joe Penhall’s play Love and Understanding (2004) depicts the chaos of modern world and the disintegration of the two young doctors Neal and Rachel as lovers because of their busy works and miscommunication. This play also introduces us the lonely and depressive Richie who resembles ‘trickster’ with his manipulative, narcistic, self-seeking, tricky character. Trickster as a character in literature and culture is an archetypical figure who mostly appears in many different identities and disguises and adorns with amusing, mischievous and clever personality; moreover, trickster achieves to survive and to arrange all the affairs for his/her own hand. Many well-known personalities such as Dionysus, Pan, Prometheus and Nasreddin Hodja in mythology, literature or folk tales, and Jack Sparrow, The Joker or The Mask in movies can be cited as examples for trickster being cunning, cheater and rogue to some degree. As it will be analysed in this essay, in Penhall’s play, Richie can be read as the modern version of trickster with his decadent slyness, hedonism, shallowness and piteous loneliness.

References

  • Cashford, J. (2015) “How Hermes and Apollo came to love each other in the Homeric Hymn to Hermes: imagination and form in Ancient Greece and modern psyche”, Ancient Greece, Modern Psyche: Archetypes Evolving (Ed: Virginia Beane Rutter, Thomas Singer), London and New York: Routledge.
  • Collins English Dictionary (collinsdictionary.com), “Trickster definition and meaning” https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/trickster. accessed date: 15.02.2021.
  • Das, C, (1993). Folklores of Mankind, Institute of Oriental and Orissan Studies.
  • Freeman, Z. (2014). “Review: Love and Understanding”, Redtwist Theatre, Newcity Stage, (773)728-7529.
  • https://www.newcitystage.com/2014/03/03/review-love-and-understandingredtwist-theatre/. accessed date: 12.03.2021.
  • Gilles, M, A., Mahood, A. (2007). Modernist Literature an Introduction, Edinburg: Edinburg University Press.
  • Hyde, L. (1999). Trickster Makes This World: Mischief, Myth, and Art, (Foreword: Michael Chabon ). New York: North Point Press.
  • Jung, C. G (1933). Modern Man in Search of a Soul, U.S.: Harcourt, Brace & World.
  • ------------(1972) “On the Psychology of the Trickster Figure”, The Trickster, (Ed.: Paul Radin), New York: Schocken Books,
  • ------------ (1968), Man and his Symbols, New York: Anchor Press. Klapp, O. E. (1954). “The Clever Hero”, Journal of American Folklore, American Folklore Society,67(263). Margot, E., Clark, E. E. (2003). Voices of the Winds: Native American Legends. Castle Books. p. 5. ISBN 0785817166.
  • Morgan, W. (2013), The Trickster Figure in American Literature, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Penhall, J. (1999). Love and Understanding, New York: Dramatists Play Service Inc.
  • Radin, P. (1972) “The Trickster: A Study in American Indian Mythology”, New York: Schocken Books.
  • Wolf, M. (1997). “Love and Understanding”, Variety https://variety.com/1997/legit/reviews/love-and-understanding-1117432635/. accessed date: 20.02.2021.
There are 14 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Linguistics, Literary Theory
Journal Section World languages, cultures and litertures
Authors

Kadriye Bozkurt This is me 0000-0001-5219-5629

Publication Date August 21, 2021
Published in Issue Year 2021 Issue: Ö9

Cite

APA Bozkurt, K. (2021). Modern Trickster in Joe Penhall’s Love and Understanding. RumeliDE Dil Ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi(Ö9), 184-192. https://doi.org/10.29000/rumelide.981526