Candidates for the Journal of STEAM Education must be prepared in accordance with APA 7 described in the 7th edition of the Publication Manuel Psychological. (https://apastyle.apa.org/)

Note to Authors

Authors should check that the article is in compliance with journal publication policy and editorial rules. The manuscripts that are not prepared in accordance with the publication policy and writing rules of the journal will be returned to the author.

Use the template on the page Link. 

The conformity of the studies to be submitted to the Journal with the Ethical Principles is extremely important for the journal's understanding of publication. 

The Journal of STEAM Education (J-STEAM) Publication Ethics Principles have been prepared in line with the principles (http://publicationethics.org) that the Committee on Publication Ethics (Committee on Publication Enthics/COPE Code of Conduct) created by bringing together the COPE guidelines in 1999, the ethical principles developed in 2003 and the best practice guidelines developed in 2007 and finalised at the meeting on 7 March 2011.

Authors' Responsibilities
It should be ensured by the author that the referenced article has the originality of the content, the way of transferring all the cited or quoted information is not against the ethical rules and that it is fully transferred. Ethics committee approval should be obtained for all disciplines, this approval should be stated and documented in the article. The names of the authors should not be specified during the evaluation process. The submitted article should not be sent to another journal for evaluation. If conflict of interest is foreseen, the rules specified in the journal rules will apply. Only the names of the authors who contributed to the study should be included in the study; unrelated names should not be added. The referees have the right to request additional information about the studies, in such cases the requested information must be submitted by the authors. Authors should not reach the appointed referees in any way to influence the process.

Responsibilities of Reviewers
The reviewers should be impartial and make the assessments confidential. The reviewer should only accept applications related to the field to which they are related. The language being assessed should not be offensive or insulting and should aim to use constructive and courteous language. The evaluations made are only for the content of the study, and the religion, gender, race, origin, political, commercial, etc. factors should not affect the assessment. Studies accepted for evaluation should be examined within the specified time and ethical rules. In cases where conflict of interest is foreseen, the work should be rejected, and the editor of the journal should be informed. Authors' credentials should not be accessed and the evaluation process of the author's application whose identity information was revealed in any way should be canceled. No information about the rejected work should be shared.

Editor's Responsibilities
In case the submitted article passes the pre-review process, the editor should appoint an impartial and double-blind referee in the relevant field. The editor must be objective with all submissions. The editor must act responsibly for conflict of interest or controversial submissions. The editor must ensure that the application processes take place within the specified period. The editor must ensure that all processes continue within the framework of ethical rules.

Copyright Form:  Link