Since digital images are frequently stored and
transmmited across a communication channel in
JPEG format, a given digital image
watermarking algorithm must be robust against
JPEG compression. In this study, robustness of
various digital image watermarking algorithms
on JPEG compression was investigated. For this
purpose, two methods commonly used in the
literature called CDMA and image tiling were
applied in the spatial and frequency domains.
Two dimensional discrete cosine transform
(DCT) and discrete Fourier transform (DFT)
were used as the frequency transformations. After
extensive simulations, it was observed that
spatial domain CDMA gives the best result.
Sayısal bir görüntü genellikle JPEG formatında saklandığından ve bir haberleşme kanalından iletildiğinden verilen bir sayısal görüntü damgalama algoritması JPEG sıkıştırmasına karşı dayanıklı olmalıdır. Bu çalışmada çeşitli sayısal görüntü damgalama algoritmalarının JPEG sıkıştırmasına karşı dayanıklılığı araştırılmıştır. Bu amaçla literatürde yaygın olarak kullanılan CDMA ve görüntü bölme teknikleri kullanılarak damgalar uzaysal ve frekans domeninde eklenmiştir. Frekans dönüşümleri olarak iki boyutlu ayrık kosinüs dönüşümü (DCT) ve ayrık Fourier dönüşümü (DFT) kullanılmıştır. Yapılan detaylı simülasyonla sonucunda piksel uzayında CDMA metodunun en iyi sonucu verdiği görülmüştür.
Other ID | JA37GU74KH |
---|---|
Journal Section | Makaleler(Araştırma) |
Authors | |
Publication Date | June 24, 2016 |
Published in Issue | Year 2006 Volume: 2 Issue: 1 - Volume: 2 Issue: 1 |
Article Acceptance
Use user registration/login to upload articles online.
The acceptance process of the articles sent to the journal consists of the following stages:
1. Each submitted article is sent to at least two referees at the first stage.
2. Referee appointments are made by the journal editors. There are approximately 200 referees in the referee pool of the journal and these referees are classified according to their areas of interest. Each referee is sent an article on the subject he is interested in. The selection of the arbitrator is done in a way that does not cause any conflict of interest.
3. In the articles sent to the referees, the names of the authors are closed.
4. Referees are explained how to evaluate an article and are asked to fill in the evaluation form shown below.
5. The articles in which two referees give positive opinion are subjected to similarity review by the editors. The similarity in the articles is expected to be less than 25%.
6. A paper that has passed all stages is reviewed by the editor in terms of language and presentation, and necessary corrections and improvements are made. If necessary, the authors are notified of the situation.
. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.