SURVEILLANCE OR SUPPORT? A SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEW OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SUPPORTED PROCTORED ONLINE EXAMS
Abstract
Proctored online exams have become widespread, especially after COVID-19, increasing exam security and efficiency. In recent years, artificial intelligence developments have increased these systems’ importance by expanding their use. Accordingly, this study aims to provide an in-depth understanding of the conceptual structure of artificial intelligence-supported proctored online examination (AI-SPOE) research. Systematic literature review and text mining were used as methods. Thirty-two studies in Scopus and Web of Science databases were analyzed according to the PRISMA technique. While all the studies were examined in the context of content analysis, abstracts and keywords of the relevant studies were analyzed by text mining. The current study found it effective in increasing academic integrity and exam security, but problems such as privacy violations, exam anxiety, and algorithmic biases were encountered. Although methods such as biometric verification and behaviour analysis successfully detect cheating, technical difficulties, and false positives negatively affect the user experience. In the future, more inclusive designs, transparent algorithms, and alternative evaluation methods are suggested. In conclusion, the study emphasizes the potential of AISPOE systems and highlights the importance of ethical and technical improvements.
Keywords
Artificial intelligence, ai, online exam, proctored exam, higher education
References
- Abozaid, A., & Atia, A. (2022, July). Multi-modal online exam cheating detection. In 2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
- Abu-Ein, A. A., & Masadeh, A. E. (2023, July). Face recognition method for online exams. In 2023 3rd International Conference on Electrical, Computer, Communications and Mechatronics Engineering (ICECCME) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
- Al Rousan, M., & Intrigila, B. (2020). A comparative analysis of biometrics types: Literature review. Journal of Computer Science, 16(12), 1778-1788. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2020.217.224
- Ananiadou, S., Rea, B., Okazaki, N., Procter, R., & Thomas, J. (2009). Supporting systematic reviews using text mining. Social Science Computer Review, 27(4), 509–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944 39309332293
- Audrin, C., & Audrin, B. (2022). Key factors in digital literacy in learning and education: A systematic literature review using text mining. Education and Information Technologies, 27(6), 7395-7419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10832-5