Our journal, primarily aimed at publishing in theological sciences, aims to publish in the fields of history, art, philosophy, literature and religious education of the social sciences. In particular, it pursues an interdisciplinary point of view in the field of religion, where these sub-domains intersect with theological sciences.
Journal of the Near East University Islamic Research Center (YDUISTEM) covers academic studies concerning the legacy and future of Islamic thought and civilization, prepared in the field of theology and social sciences that deal with the basic problems of these fields from a scientific point of view and offer solutions to this issue. These articles are can be written; research articles, translations, case presentations, research notes, conference and conference texts, book, congress, symposium and panel introductions, book and thesis reviews, literature reviews, simplifications, scientific interviews, in the form of introductions about contemporary and past scientists.
Our journal accepts the articles online through the DergiPark system at https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/yaduitmed
Authors are required to upload the following wet signed copyright transfer form and similarity report to the system in wet signed form.
ETHICAL PRINCIPLES
The Journal of Near East University Islamic Research Center expects all stakeholders to bear the ethical responsibilities described below within the scope of publication ethics.
The ethical duties and responsibilities adopted by the Journal of the The Journal of Near East University Islamic Research Center have been prepared by taking into account the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines and policies.
ETHICAL STATEMENT
STUDIES REQUIRING ETHICS COMMITTEE APPROVAL
RESPONSIBILITIES
Editors' responsibilities
Responsibilities of referees
- Contribution to Editors' Decisions
The peer-review process assists the editor and editorial board in making the editor's decisions. It can also serve the author in the preparation of the manuscript.
- Promptness
Any selected reviewer who is not qualified to review the research or is written in a paper or knows that immediate review will be impossible should notify the editor and seek hisforgiveness from the review process.
- Security
All manuscripts received for review should be treated as confidential documents. They should respect privacy and not share article information except as permitted by the editor. Referees should not use any name, information or symbol that would reveal their identities on the article file and in their reports.
While examining the Word file, they should remove their personal information from the settings section. In addition, it is recommended to use names such as users and referees who will not disclose their identities when monitoring changes on the file.
"Author and last saver" information should be checked in the properties section of the Word file, and there should not be any name, information or symbol that would reveal the identity of the reviewer.
- Objectivity Standards
Comments should be made objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not appropriate. Referees should express their opinions with supporting evidence.
- Acceptance of Resources
Reviewers should identify cases where the published work cited in the article is not cited in the reference section. Other publications should specify whether the derived observations or variables are at their source. Reviewers will notify the editor that there is significant similarity or overlap between the articles under consideration and other printed articles with personal information.
- Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
Information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for any advantage. Unpublished material described in a submitted article may not be used in the editor's or his assistants' own research. Reviewers should not consider articles with conflicts of interest related to competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or affiliated authors, companies, or institutions.
Authors' duties
- Reporting Standards
Authors should provide an accurate description of the work done and an objective discussion of its importance. Basic data should be correctly displayed in the article. An article should contain sufficient detail and references to allow understanding. Fraudulent or knowingly false statements create unethical behavior and are unacceptable.
- Ethics Committee Permission and Research Permission
Ethics committee approval should be obtained separately for studies and for clinical and experimental studies on humans and animals that require an ethics committee decision, and this approval should be stated and documented in the article. Articles should include a statement about compliance with Research and Publication Ethics. In studies that require ethics committee permission, information about the permission (name of the committee, date and number) should be included in the method section and also on the first/last page of the article. In case reports, information about signing the informed consent/consent form should be included in the article.
- Data Access and Storage
Authors may be required to submit raw data in connection with an article for editorial review and, if appropriate, should be prepared to provide public access to this data and, in any event, to store such data for a reasonable period of time after publication.
- Authenticity, Plagiarism, and Acceptance of Sources
Authors should ensure that their work is original, and if authors have used the work and/or words of others, they should be cited appropriately. Publications that were influential in determining the nature of the reported work should also be noted. Plagiarism constitutes any unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable. The similarity report should be taken from the similarity programs provided by universities such as iThencitace, Turnitin, intihal.net and uploaded to the system by the author at the time of article submission. The article's similarity rate is at most 20%; a maximum similarity rate of 2% with another study, including the author's own work; for studies produced from open access master's and doctoral theses, the similarity rate with their own thesis should be at most 5%.
- Multi, Redundant, or Simultaneous Broadcasting
An author should generally not publish articles that describe the same research as more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same article to more than one journal at the same time brings unethical publishing behavior. In general, an author should not submit manuscripts that have been previously published in another journal.
Any other non-copyrighted material may not be published elsewhere. Also, manuscripts reviewed by the journal should not be resubmitted to copyrighted publications. However, by submitting a manuscript, the author(s) retain the rights to the published material. The copyright remains with the authors (CC-BY) so they can decide on the eventual republishing of their text. The primary reference should be cited in the secondary publication.
- Article Authoring
Authorship should be limited to those who have made significant contributions to the thinking, design, execution or interpretation of the reported work. All contributors must be listed as co-authors. The author ensures that all contributing authors and intruders are included in the author list. Where others are involved in certain aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. All co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the article and have agreed to submit it for publication.
- Disclosure and Conflict of Interest
All authors must include a statement explaining financial or other financial conflicts of interest that could be interpreted to affect the conclusions or interpretation of their paper. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed. Potential conflicts of interest should be disclosed at the earliest possible stage. Readers should be informed about who is funding the research and the role of the funders in the research.
- Implementing the Referee's Suggestions (Correction Sheet) or Not Implementing (Objection)
If the referees have made suggestions about the article, the author either accepts these suggestions and applies the corrections or does not accept the referee's suggestions. If the referee accepts his suggestions, he should prepare a correction sheet showing the changes he made on the article, and should explain the changes he made in the article in this table. If the referee does not accept his proposals for various reasons, he should present these objections with justification. In both cases, the decision center is the editor and the editorial board.
- Fundamental Errors in Published Works
When an author detects a major inaccuracy or inaccuracy in his published work, he must immediately notify the editor or publisher and work with the editor to retract or correct his paper. If the editor or publisher learns of a published work containing a material error from a third party, the author must immediately retract or correct the article or prove the objectivity of the objective document to the editor.
- Double-Blind Refereeing
Since double-blind refereeing is applied in our journal, author information should not be written in the article file.
PUBLICATION POLICY
- The Journal of Near East University Islamic Research Center is a scientific peer-reviewed journal. It is published in print and electronic media. It is published as one volume and two issues per year, as December and June and December issues. A special issue can be printed according to the decision of the editorial board. It broadcasts in Turkish, English, Arabic, Persian and French.
- Journal editorial board members can send texts to the journal, but they cannot take part in the publication processes during the period when the text is being evaluated.
Changes made in journal publication policies and processes are announced on the journal's official website.
- The average evaluation period of the articles submitted to our journal is two months. The pre-control phase is 7 days, the referee evaluation process is 45 days, and the editing phase is 7 days.
All authors accept and undertake the following items;
- The submitted article is the original work of the author(s) and they do not plagiarize,
- All authors have participated in this study individually and they take all responsibility for this study,
- All authors have seen and approved the final version of the submitted article,
- The article has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere,
- They accept and undertake that the text, figures and documents in the article do not violate the "Copyrights" of other persons.
- It cannot be proposed to withdraw or change the author responsibilities of a work whose evaluation process has begun (such as adding an author, changing the order of authors, removing an author).
FINANCIAL POLICY
- The Journal of Near East University Islamic Research Center is an open access journal, no fee is charged for the journal.
- No fee is paid to the author for the published texts.
- No fee is paid to the editorial board and referees.
- All financial and legal copyright transactions of the translations are done by the article author.
- No financial support is provided to the author/translator for copyright and any other fees.
- The author is deemed to have accepted all financial, legal and scientific responsibility from the date he sent his article/translation to the Journal of Near East University Islamic Research Center.
REFEREE POLICY
- In the Journal of Near East University Islamic Research Center, a double-blind refereeing system is applied.
- Confidentiality is essential in referee reports; For this reason, the names of the referees are not included in the tag of the journal.
- More than one article can The Journal of Near East University Islamic Research Center bye sent to a referee in one issue.
The Journal of the The Journal of Near East University Islamic Research Center is an open access journal, no fee is charged for the journal.
No fee is paid to the author for the published texts.
No fee is paid to the editorial board and referees.
All financial and legal copyright transactions of the translations are done by the article author.
No financial support is provided to the author/translator for copyright and any other fees.
The author is deemed to have accepted all financial, legal and scientific responsibility from the date he sent his article/translation to the Journal of Near East University Islamic Research Center.
Journal of Near East University Faculty of Theology is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY NC).