İlköğretim Öğrencilerine ve Ailelerine Yönelik “Bilgisayar Destekli Ders Çalışma ve Öğrenme Stratejileri Eğitiminin” Başarıya Etkisi

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın temel amacı, ilköğretim 8. sınıf öğrencilerine ve ailelerine verilen “Bilgisayar Destekli Ders Çalışma ve Öğrenme Stratejileri Eğitiminin” öğrencilerin ders çalışma becerileri ile akademik başarılarına etkisini belirlemektir. Deneysel türde yapılan bu araştırmada, Adana DSİ İlköğretim Okulu’nun 8-D sınıfı Deney, 8-C sınıfı ise Kontrol grubu olarak belirlenmiş ve uygulama sonunda okul başarı puanları arasında farklılık olup-olmadığı Kovaryans Analizi (ANCOVA) ile araştırılmıştır. Ayrıca öğrencilerin araştırma öncesi ve sonrası ders çalışma ve öğrenme konusundaki düşüncelerinin değişip-değişmediği eşli gruplar t-testi analizi ile belirlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, Deney Grubu öğrencilerinin Kontrol Grubundaki öğrencilere göre başarı puanlarında anlamlı bir farklılık olduğu (p= .028), ayrıca uygulama sonunda Deney Grubundaki öğrencilerin “Ders Çalışma ve Öğrenme Becerileri” konusundaki düşüncelerinin anlamlı düzeyde değiştiği gözlenmiştir.

Keywords

• ders çalışma becerileri,öğrenme stratejileri,bilgisayar destekli eğitim.

The Effects of “Computer Supported Study Skills and Learning Strategies Training” Involving Primary School Students and Their Parents on Success

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to identify the effect of “Computer Supported Studying and Learning Strategies Training”, which are offered to 8th grade students and their families, to students’ studying, learning skills and their academic successes. In this experimental study, 8-D class students of DSİ Primary School were determined to be the Experimental, 8-C class students were determined to be the Control Group. At the end of the implementation, Co-variance Analysis (ANCOVA) was used to explore whether there were any differences between the school grades of these groups. Besides, and paired-groups t-test analysis was conducted to determine if there was any difference between the students’ ideas before and after the application. As a result, there has been a significant difference between grades of the students, (p=.028). Also, according to paired-groups t-test, the ideas of experimental group about “Studying and Learning Skills” have been found to be significantly different.

Keywords

• study skills,learning strategies,computer supported training

References

1. Allen, A.J. (2003). The Perceptions of Effects of a Study Skills Course, “Dynamics of Effective Study”, on the Academic Achievement of African American Students at a Dedicated Academic Magnet High School, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Loussiana State University, ProQuest Document ID: 953960731, [Online]: Retrieved on 20-July- 2008, at URL: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=953960731&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=42980 &RQT=309&VName=PQD
2. Applefield, J.M.; Huber, R. & Moallem, M. (2001). Constructivism in Theory and Practice ; Toward a Better Understanding. High School Journal, 00181498, Dec2000/Jan2001, Vol: 84, Issue: 2, [Online]: Retrieved on 24-June-2008, at URL: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=eric&AN=EJ787337& ;lang=tr&site=ehost-live
3. Brooks, J.G.; Brooks, M.G. (2001). The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
4. Claire, E.W.; Palmer, D.R.& Shulte, A.C.(2002). LASSI, Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (2th Ed). Florida: H&H Publishing Company, Inc.
5. Coman, M.J.& Heavers, K.L.(1998). How to Improve Your Study Skills (2th Ed.). Illınois: National Textbook Company.
6. Cottrell, S.(1999). The Study Skills Handbook,New York: Palgrave
7. Coupal, L.V.(2004). Constructivist learning theory and human capital theory: shifting political and educational frameworks for teachers’ ICT profesional development. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol: 35, No: 5, 587-596.
8. Delucchi, J., Rohwer, W., & Thomas, J. (1987). Study-time allocation as a function of grade level and course characteristics. Contemporaray Educational Psychology, 12, 365- 380.

9. Dodge, J. (1994). The Study Skills Handbook, More Than 75 Strategies for Better Learning. New York: Scholastic Inc.
10. Duffy, T.M.; Cunningham, D.J.(1996). Constructivism: Implications for the Design and Delivery of Instruction. Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, (170-198). (Ed.David H. Jonassen); New York: Macmillan Libraray Reference, Simon& Schuster Macmillan.
11. Fraenkel, J.R.; Wallen N.E.(1993). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (2th Ed.) New York: Mc.Graw-Hill Book Co.
12. Frender, G.(2004). Learning to Learn. Nashville, Tennessee: Incentive Publications.
13. Grabinger, R.J.(1996). Rich Environments for Active Learning, Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. (665- 692). (Ed.David H. Jonassen); New York: Macmillan Libraray Reference, Simon& Schuster Macmillan.
14. Grimes, S. (1995). Targeting Academic Programs to Student Diversity Utilizing Learning Style and Learning Startegies. Journal of College Student Development, 36, 422-429.
15. Hanley, S.(1994).”Maryland Collaborative for Teacher Preparation”.{Online]: Retrieved on 01- August- 2008, at URL: http://www.inform.umd.edu/UMS+State/UMDProjects/MCTP/essays/Constructivis m.txt
16. Hein, G.E. (1991). CECA (Internationa Committee of Museum Educators) Conference, 15-22 October, 1991, Jerusalem, Israel.
17. Hofer, B.K.; Yu, S.L.; & Pintrich, P,R.(1998). Teaching college students to be self regulated learners . In D.H.Schunk&B.J.Zimmerman (Ed), Self-Regulated Learning From Teaching to Self-Reflective Practice (pp.57-85), The Guilford Press, NY.
18. Hoover, J. J. (1989). Study skills. Strategies for teaching learners with special needs (4th ed.). 362-377. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company.
19. Jones,C.H., Slate, J.R.&Kyle, A.(1992). Study skills of teacher education students. Teacher Education, 28(1), 7-15.
20. Kus-Patena, S.(2003) The Effects of Learning Strategy Instruction on College Students Who are Placed at Risk of Failure, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, The University of Akron. (ProQuest document ID: 765020871), [Online]: Retrieved on 01-August- 2008, at URL: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=765020871&sid=4&1Fmt=2&clientld=42980 &RQT=309&VName=PQD
21. Karasar, N.(1995). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi. (7. Baskı). Ankara: 3 A Araştırma Eğitim Danışmanlık Ltd.Şti.
22. Kutlu, M.O.; Canbolat, M. (2007). Okulda ve Sınavlarda Adım Adım Başarı (3. Baskı). Konya: Çizgi Kitabevi Yayınevi.
23. Lehsin, C.B.; Pollock J. & Reigeluth, C.M.(1992). Instructional Design Strategies and Tactics. New Jersey Educational Technology Publications.
24. Luckie, W.R.; Smethurst , W.(1998). Study Power,, Study Skills to İmprove Your Learning and Your Ggrades. Cambridge, Massachuetts: Brookline Boks.
25. Malena, R.F. (1984). Effects of a Specific Study Skills Program On Seventh-Grade Students’Achievement. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Arizona State University. (ProQuest document ID: 794449281), [Online]: Retrieved on 01-August- 2008, at URL
26. http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=749449281&sid=1&Fmt=2&clientId=42980 &RQT=309&VName=PQD .
27. Maxwell-Maher, M.(2000). An Examination of the Effects of Combining Study Skills Training with Counseling to İncrease Academic Performance and School Success, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis. Duquesne University. (ProQuest document ID: 731937731), [Online]: Retrieved on 14-August- 2008, at URL: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=731937731&sid=2&Fmt=2&clientId=42980 &RQT=309&VName=PQD
28. Mundsack, A., Deese, J. & Deese, E. K. (2003). How to Study (5th. Ed.), New York: McGraw- Hill Companies, Inc.
29. Ornstein, A.(1994). Homework, Studying and Note-Taking; Essential Skills for Students, NASSP Bulletin, 58-70.
30. Pessin, M. Y. (1991). Portfolio assessment as a means of eveluating the effects of an interactive learning-study strategies program integrated within a departmentalized sixth- grade, Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Hofstra University. (ProQuest document ID: 745675811), [Online]: Retrieved on 07-July- 2007, at URL: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=745675811&sid=3&Fmt=2&clientId=42980 &RQT=309&VName=PQD
31. Pintrich, P.R. (1995). Understanding self-regulated Learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 63, 3-14.
32. Ramsey, R.D.(2000). 501 Ways to Boost Your Child’s Success in School. İllionis: Contemporaray Publishing Group Inc.
33. Roberts, J.M.(1999). Effective Study Skills. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., A Simon & Schuster Company.
34. Rowntree, D.(1998). Learn How to Study (4th. ed). Exeter: BPC Wheatons Ltd.
35. Saban, A. (2000). Öğrenme-Öğretme Süreci. Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Şti.
36. Semones, J.K.(1991). Effective Study Skills; A Step by Step System for Achieving Success in School. Orlando, Florida: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, İnc., Sounders College Publishing
37. Smith, M.; Teske, R.& Gossmeyer, M. (2000). İmproving Student Achievement Through The Enhancement of Study Skills. An Action Research Project Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the School of Education in Partial Fulfillment of the Requiremenets fort he Degree of the Master of Arts in Teaching and Leadership, Saint Xavier University&SkyLight Professional Development Field_Based Masters Program. (ERIC Document Reprodoction Service No. ED441256), [Online]: Retrieved on 04-August- 2008, at URL: http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2sql/content_storage_01/0000019b /80/16/37/50.pdf
38. Vanderstoep, S.W.& Pintrich, P.R.(2003). Learning to Learn. New Jersey: Pearson Education İnc.
39. Watts, M. (1999). A course for critical constructivism through action research; a care study from biology. Research and Science & Technological Education, 17, 5-18
40. Weinstein, E.C.; Palmer, D.R.; Shulte, A.C.(2002). LASSI, Learning and Study Strategies Inventory (2th Ed.). Florida: H&H Publishing Company, Inc.
41. Windschitl, M.(1999). The chalenges of sustaining a constructivist classroom culture. Phi Delta Kappa, 80, 751-756.
42. Wiswell, L.M. (2005). Achievement and Retention of First-Semester Nursing Students: The Effects of a Study Skills Course. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, University of Southern California. (ProQuest document ID: 1176532451), [Online]: Retrieved on 18-July- 2007, at URL: http://proquest.umi.com/pqdweb?did=1176532751&sid=2&Fmt=2&clientId=42980 &RQT=309&VName=PQD
43. Yılmaz, K. (2008). Constructivism: Its Theoretical Underpinnings, Variations, and Implications for Classroom Instruction, Educational Horizons, Vol: 86, No: 3, pp.161-172.