Avrupa’nın Hibrid Rejimlerinde İnsan Hakları ve AB Etkisinin Sınırları

Öz

Dünyada insan haklarının durumunu ölçen çeşitli uluslararası endeksler bulunmaktadır. Bu endekslerin sunduğu veriler insan hakları üzerine sistematik karşılaştırmalı analizler yapmayı olanaklı hale getirmiştir. Böyle bir karşılaştırmayı Avrupa’nın hibrid rejimleri özelinde yapmayı hedefleyen bu çalışma, Batı Balkanlar ve Doğu Avrupa’da yer alan 8 ülkeye (Sırbistan, Bosna-Hersek, Karadağ, Ukrayna, Moldova, Kuzey Makedonya, Arnavutluk ve Kosova) odaklanmakta ve Özgürlük Evi’nin Dünyada Özgürlükler (Freedom in the World) endeksinin 2017-2024 raporlarında bu ülkelerle ilgili insan hakları boyutundaki değerlendirmeleri baz almaktadır. Bu ülke grubunun insan hakları açısından gösterdikleri gerileme, ilerleme veya durağanlığın karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi, bu dönüşümlerin muhtemel nedenlerini tartışan literatüre ışık tutacaktır. Bu ülkelerin tamamının Avrupa Birliği (AB) ile çeşitli seviyelerde entegrasyon süreçleri devam etmektedir. Bu bağlamda, bu çalışmaya konu olan ülkelerin bazı içsel dinamikleri ile AB süreçlerinin, bu ülkelerde insan haklarının korunmasına etkisi karşılaştırmalı olarak mercek altına alınacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• insan hakları
• Batı Balkanlar
• Hibrid rejimler
• Avrupa Birliği
• demokratik gerileme

Human Rights in Europe's Hybrid Regimes and the Limits of the EU Influence

Öz

There are various international indices that measure the status of human rights in the world. The data provided by these indices have made it possible to conduct systematic comparative analysis on human rights. This study aims to make such a comparison specifically for Europe's hybrid regimes and focuses on 8 countries in the Western Balkans and Eastern Europe (Serbia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Ukraine, Moldova, North Macedonia, Albania and Kosovo). The analysis is based on the human rights assessments of these countries in the 2017-2024 reports of the Freedom House's Freedom in the World Index. A comparative examination of the decline, progress or stagnation of this group of countries in terms of human rights will shed light on the literature discussing the possible reasons for these transformations. All of these countries are continuing their integration processes with the European Union (EU) at various levels. In this context, some internal dynamics of the countries subject to this study and the impact of EU processes on the protection of human rights in these countries will be examined comparatively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Human rights
• Western Balkans
• hybrid regimes
• European Union
• democratic backsliding

Kaynakça

1. Anghel, Veronica, ve Jelena Džankić. “Wartime EU: consequences of the Russia – Ukraine war on the enlargement process”. Journal of European Integration 45, sy 3 (03 Nisan 2023): 487-501. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2023.2190106.
2. Atatorun, Mustafa, ve Sinan Veziroğlu. “Liberal Kozmopolitanizm ve Avrupa Birliği : Ukrayna ve Moldova’nın Adaylık Statüsü Üzerine Bir Eleştiri”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 23, sy 1 (06 Haziran 2024): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.1368657.
3. Börzel, Tanja A. “When Europeanization Hits Limited Statehood: The Western Balkans as a Test Case for the Transformative Power of Europe”. İçinde European Integration and Transformation in the Western Balkans. Routledge, 2013.
4. Cianetti, Licia, James Dawson, ve Seán Hanley. “Rethinking ‘democratic backsliding’ in Central and Eastern Europe – looking beyond Hungary and Poland”. İçinde Rethinking “Democratic Backsliding” in Central and Eastern Europe. Routledge, 2019.
5. Demi̇rtaş, Birgül. “AB’nin Dönüştürücü Gücü ve Batı Balkanlar’da Demokratikleşme Süreci: Başarılanlar ve Başarılamayanlar”. İçinde Hukuki, Siyasi ve İktisadi Yönleriyle Avrupa Bütünleşmesinde Son Gelişmeler ve Türkiye-AB İlişkileri Ataum 30. Yıl Armağanı. Ankara Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2018.
6. “Democracy Report 2024: Democracy Winning and Losing at the Ballot”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://www.v-dem.net/documents/44/v-dem_dr2024_highres.pdf.
7. Diamond, Larry. Developing Democracy: Toward Consolidation. JHU Press, 1999.
8. Doris Malaj, ve Elena Polo. “An Evidence-Based Analysis of The EU’s Hampered Transformative Power In The Western Balkans”. Journal of Liberty and International Affairs 9, sy 3 (2023): 215-33. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1210090.

9. Durakçay, Fulya Akgül, ve Sedef Eylemer. “Avrupa Birliği’nin Demokrasi Teşviki: Temel Stratejiler ve Yaklaşımlar”. Ankara Avrupa Çalışmaları Dergisi 21, sy 1 (05 Ağustos 2022): 1-42. https://doi.org/10.32450/aacd.1148588.
10. Economist Intelligence Unit. “Democracy Index 2023”. Erişim 23 Ekim 2024. https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2023/.
11. “Enlargement Strategy 2009-2010 | EUR-Lex”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/enlargement-strategy-2009-2010.html.
12. European Commission. 2024 Rule of Law Report: The rule of law situation in the European Union. Erişim 23 Ekim 2024. https://commission.europa.eu/publications/2024-rule-law-report-communication-and-country-chapters_en.
13. Freedom House. “Albania: Freedom in the World 2021 Country Report”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/albania/freedom-world/2021.
14. Freedom House. “Albania: Freedom in the World 2024 Country Report”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/albania/freedom-world/2024.
15. Freedom House. “Bosnia and Herzegovina: Freedom in the World 2024 Country Report”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/bosnia-and-herzegovina/freedom-world/2024.
16. Freedom House. “Freedom in the World Research Methodology”. Erişim 23 Ekim 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/reports/freedom-world/freedom-world-research-methodology.
17. Freedom House. “Kosovo: Freedom in the World 2020 Country Report”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/kosovo/freedom-world/2020.
18. Freedom House. “Kosovo: Freedom in the World 2024 Country Report”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/kosovo/freedom-world/2024.
19. Freedom House. “Moldova: Freedom in the World 2024 Country Report”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/moldova/freedom-world/2024.
20. Freedom House. “Montenegro: Freedom in the World 2020 Country Report”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/montenegro/freedom-world/2020.
21. Freedom House. “Montenegro: Freedom in the World 2024 Country Report”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/montenegro/freedom-world/2024.
22. Freedom House. “North Macedonia: Freedom in the World 2024 Country Report”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/north-macedonia/freedom-world/2024.
23. Freedom House. “Serbia: Freedom in the World 2019 Country Report”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/serbia/freedom-world/2019.
24. Freedom House. “Serbia: Freedom in the World 2024 Country Report”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/serbia/freedom-world/2024.
25. Freedom House. “Ukraine: Freedom in the World 2024 Country Report”. Erişim 01 Kasım 2024. https://freedomhouse.org/country/ukraine/freedom-world/2024.
26. Gafuri, Adea, ve Meltem Muftuler-Bac. “Caught between stability and democracy in the Western Balkans: a comparative analysis of paths of accession to the European Union”. East European Politics 37, sy 2 (03 Nisan 2021): 267-91. https://doi.org/10.1080/21599165.2020.1781094.
27. Juncos, Ana E. “Resilience as the new EU foreign policy paradigm: a pragmatist turn?” European Security 26, sy 1 (02 Ocak 2017): 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2016.1247809.
28. Levitsky, Steven, ve Lucan A. Way. “Elections Without Democracy: The Rise of Competitive Authoritarianism”. Journal of Democracy 13, sy 2 (2002): 51-65. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/1/article/17196.
29. Merkel, Wolfgang. “Embedded and Defective Democracies”. Politička misao : časopis za politologiju 41, sy 3 (2004): 80-104. https://hrcak.srce.hr/en/clanak/35657%3F.
30. Morlino, Leonardo. “Are There Hybrid Regimes? Or Are They Just an Optical Illusion?” European Political Science Review 1, sy 2 (Temmuz 2009): 273-96. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773909000198.
31. Müller, Patrick, Karolina Pomorska, ve Ben Tonra. “The Domestic Challenge to EU Foreign Policy-Making: From Europeanisation to de-Europeanisation?” Journal of European Integration 43, sy 5 (04 Temmuz 2021): 519-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2021.1927015.
32. Önsoy, Murat, ve Gürol Baba. “One Size Does Not Fit All: An Analysis of US and EU Democracy Promotion in the Western Balkans”. Gazi Akademik Bakış 11, sy 22 (10 Haziran 2018): 15-39. https://doi.org/10.19060/gav.437759.
33. Petrovic, Milenko, ve Nikolaos Tzifakis. “A geopolitical turn to EU enlargement, or another postponement? An introduction”. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 29, sy 2 (03 Nisan 2021): 157-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2021.1891028.
34. Raik, Kristi, Steven Blockmans, Anna Osypchuk, ve Anton Suslov. “EU Policy towards Ukraine: Entering Geopolitical Competition over European Order”. The International Spectator 59, sy 1 (02 Ocak 2024): 39-58. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932729.2023.2296576.
35. Rrapaj Kolasi, Jonilda. “Balkanlarda Avrupa Birliği’nin Demokrasi Teşviki Politikalarının Sınırlılıkları: Yakınsama ve Yol Ayrımı Arasında Arnavutluk”. Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 16 Mayıs 2024, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.33630/ausbf.1319620.
36. Schimmelfennig, Frank, ve Ulrich Sedelmeier. “The Europeanization of Eastern Europe: the external incentives model revisited”. Journal of European Public Policy 27, sy 6 (02 Haziran 2020): 814-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2019.1617333.
37. Shyrokykh, Karina. “Compromising on Values? Human Rights Pressure and Competing Interests of the European Union in the Former Soviet States”. European Foreign Affairs Review 23, sy 1 (01 Şubat 2018). https://kluwerlawonline.com/api/Product/CitationPDFURL?file=Journals\EERR\EERR2018007.pdf.
38. ———. “Effects and side effects of European Union assistance on the former Soviet republics”. Democratization 24, sy 4 (07 Haziran 2017): 651-69. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2016.1204539.
39. Smith, Nicholas Ross, Nina Markovic Khaze, ve Maja Kovacevic. “The EU’s stability-democracy dilemma in the context of the problematic accession of the Western Balkan states”. Journal of Contemporary European Studies 29, sy 2 (03 Nisan 2021): 169-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1823823.
40. Szymański, Adam. “De-Europeanization and De-Democratization in the EU and Its Neighborhood”. Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej 15, sy 2 (2017): 187-211. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=899119.
41. Tomini, Luca, ve Seda Gürkan. “Contesting the EU, Contesting Democracy and Rule of Law in Europe. Conceptual Suggestions for Future Research”. Içinde Illiberal Trends and Anti-EU Politics in East Central Europe, editör Astrid Lorenz ve Lisa H. Anders. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-54674-8.
42. “V-Dem”. Erişim 23 Ekim 2024. https://www.v-dem.net/.
43. Wigell, Mikael. “Mapping ‘Hybrid Regimes’: Regime Types and Concepts in Comparative Politics”. Democratization 15, sy 2 (01 Nisan 2008): 230-50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510340701846319.
44. Zakaria, Fareed. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy”, t.y.
45. Zweers, Wouter, Giulia Cretti, Myrthe de Boon, Alban Dafa, Strahinja Subotić, Milena Muk, Arber Fetahu, Ardita Abazi, Emina Kuhinja, ve Hata Kujraković. “The EU as a Promoter of Democracy or ‘Stabilitocracy’ in the Western Balkans?” The Clingendael Institute, Şubat 2022. https://www.thinkforeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/The-EU-as-a-promoter-of-democracy-or-stabilitocracy_2eproef.pdf.