Evaluation of the Effects of Foreign Trade on Mark-up ın Turkish Manufacturing Industry

Öz

In terms of examining the effects of foreign trade on firm behavior and market structure, the effects of foreign trade on mark-up is one of the major interests of both theoretical and applied international economics literature. In this context, the aim of this study is examining the impacts of foreign trade on mark-ups for 189 sub-sectors of Turkish manufacturing industry by using panel data analysis during the 2004-2015 period. The results show that there is a positive relationship between mark-up and import penetration rate in total and competitive manufacturing sectors, and a negative relationship between mark-ups and export intensity. Additionally, sectoral real exchange rate, concentration ratio and total employment variables also have a positive effect on mark-ups in all manufacturing industry sub-sectors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mark-Up,Foreign Trade,Sectoral Real Exchange Rate,GMM

Türkiye İmalat Sanayii’nde Dış Ticaretin Mark-up Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Dış ticaretin, firma davranışları ve piyasa yapısı üzerindeki etkilerinin incelenmesi bakımından, dış ticaretin mark-up üzerindeki etkileri hem teorik hem de uygulamalı uluslararası iktisat yazınının önemli ilgi alanlarından birisidir. Bu bağlamda çalışmanın amacı, Türkiye İmalat Sanayii’nin 189 alt sektöründe dış ticaretin mark-up üzerindeki etkisini, 2004-2015 yılları için panel veri analiz yöntemi kullanarak tahmin etmektedir. Sonuçlar, Türkiye İmalat Sanayii’nde mark-up ile ithalat penetrasyon oranı arasında pozitif, mark-up ve ihracat yoğunluğu arasında negatif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca sektörel reel döviz kuru, yoğunlaşma oranı ve toplam istihdam değişkenlerinin ise mark-up üzerinde pozitif bir etkisi olduğu görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mark-up,Dış Ticaret,Sektörel Reel Döviz Kuru,GMM

Kaynakça

1. Amidei, F. B., & Gomellini, M. (2014). Direct measures of competition and Italian industry performance. In The Long Run. Conference, “Mercato E Crescıta In Italia: Il Lungo Perıodo”, 29-30 October 2014, Roma.
2. Arellano, M. (1987). Practitioners’corner: Computing robust standard errors for within‐ groups estimators. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 49(4), 431-434.
3. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277-297.
4. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the ınstrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29-51.
5. Aslan, A., & F. Kula (2008). Dış ticaret serbestisinin Türk İmalat Sanayi fiyat maliyet marjları üzerindeki etkisi, İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(13), 175-192.
6. Baldwin, R. E., & Venables, A. J. (1995). Regional economic ıntegration. Handbook of International Economics, 3, 1597-1644.
7. Baltagi, B. H., & Wu, P. X. (1999). Unequally spaced panel data regressions with AR(1) disturbances. Econometric Theory, 15(6), 814-823.
8. Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., & Kortum, S. (2003). Plants and productivity ın ınternational trade. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1268-1290

9. Brandt, L., Van Biesebroeck, J., Wang, L., & Zhang, Y. (2017). WTO accession and performance of Chinese manufacturing firms. American Economic Review, 107(9), 2784-2820.
10. Chen, N., Imbs, J., & Scott, A. (2009). The dynamics of trade and competition. Journal of International Economics, 77(1), 50-62.
11. De Loecker, J., & Warzynski, F. (2012). Markups and firm-level export status. American Economic Review, 102(6), 2437-71.
12. De Loecker, J., Goldberg, P. K., Khandelwal, A. K., & Pavcnik, N. (2016). Prices, markups, and trade reform. Econometrica, 84(2), 445-510.
13. Edmond, C., Midrigan, V., & Xu, D. Y. (2012). Competition, markups, and the gains from international trade. NBER Working Paper No. 18041.
14. Epifani, P., & Gancia, G. (2011). Trade, markup heterogeneity and misallocations. Journal of International Economics, 83(1), 1-13.
15. Fedderke, J., Kularatne, C., & Mariotti, M. (2007). Mark-up pricing ın South African Industry. Journal of African Economies, 16(1), 28-69.
16. Foroutan, F. (1991). Foreign trade and its relation to competition and productivity in Turkish Industry. The World Bank, Paper No. 604.
17. Gunay, A., Metin-Ozcan, K., & Yeldan, E. (2005). Real wages, profit margins and inflation in Turkish manufacturing under post-liberalization. Applied Economics, 37(16), 1899-1905.
18. Hornok, C., & Muraközy, B. (2015). Markup and productivity of exporters and importers, Iehas Discussion Papers, No. Mt-Dp-2015/30.
19. Jägerstedt, H. (2016). On The Link Between Innovation, Markups And Exporting. Master Thesis, Lund University.
20. Keisuke, K. (2018). Markups, City Size, and Exports: Evidence from Japan. RIETI Discussion Paper Series, No. 18017.
21. Konings, J., Van Cayseele, P., & Warzynski, F. (2001). The dynamics of ındustrial markups ın two small open economies: Does national competition policy matter?. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(5), 841-859.
22. Lapham, B. (2015). International Trade with Firm Heterogeneity: Theoretical Developments and Policy Implications. Redesigning Canadian Trade Policies For New Global Realities.
23. Lee, S., & Choi, Y. S. (2011). Export ıntensity, markup & productivity: Micro-evidence from the Korean manufacturing. ERIA Research Project Report 2011, No. 3.
24. Li, Y., & Miao, Z. (2018). Trade costs, import penetration, and markups. MPRA Paper No. 85690.
25. Liu, H., Xu, M., & Zhong, T. (2019). Import competition and export markups: Evidence from Chinese multi-product exporters. Annals Of Economics & Finance, 20(1), 357-385.
26. Martín, L. M., & Rodríguez, D. R. (2010). Export activity, persistence and mark-ups. Applied Economics, 42(4), 475-488.
27. Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity, Econometrica, 71(6), 1695-1725.
28. Melitz, M. J., & Ottaviano, G. I. (2008). Market size, trade, and productivity. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(1), 295-316.
29. Metin-Özcan, K., Voyvoda, K., & Yeldan, E. (2002). The impact of the liberalization program on the price-cost margin and investment of Turkey’s Manufacturing sector after 1980, Emerging Markets Finance And Trade, 38(5), 72-103.
30. Mıhçı, S., & Wigley, A. A. (2002). Dış ticaret serbestisinin Türk İmalat Sanayi sektörleri üzerindeki yoğunlaşma ve karlılık etkileri, Gazi Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, 5(3), 77-91.
31. Mıhçı, S., & Wigley, A. A. (2003). Avrupa Birliği ile Gümrük Birliği’nin Türk İmalat Sanayi alt sektörleri üzerinde karlılık etkileri, İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 71-89.
32. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper No. 1229.
33. Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to. “Difference” and “system” GMM in Stata. Working Paper, 103.
34. Tamminen, S. (2014). Heterogeneous Firms, Mark-Ups and Income Inequality. Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University School of Economics.
35. Taymaz, E., Voyvoda, E., & Yılmaz, K. (2008). Türkiye imalat sanayiinde yapısal dönüşüm, üretkenlik ve teknolojik değişme dinamikleri. Economic Research Center Working Papers in Economics, 106K050.
36. Yalçın, C., (2000). Price-cost margins and trade liberalization in Turkish manufacturing ındustry: A panel data analysis. Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey, Research Department Working Paper, Ankara.
37. Yentürk, H. (1997). Türk İmalat Sanayiinde Ücretler, İstihdam ve Birikim. Friedericht Ebert Shifting Araştırma Sonuçları, İstanbul.