Reactive-Proactive Aggression and Cognitive Flexibility in Adolescents: The Mediating Role of Anger

Öz

This study aimed to examine the mediator role of anger between high school students' level of reactive and proactive aggression and cognitive flexibility. The study sample is composed of high school students studying in Erzincan in the 2018-2019 academic year and determined via the convenient sampling method. There were 505 participants (F= 227, M= 278) between the ages of 15 and 19. The study data were collected using the Reactive-Proactive Aggressiveness Scale, Trait Anger-Anger Expression Scale, Cognitive Flexibility Scale, and a personal information form developed by the researchers. A correlational survey model was adopted in the study. The data were analyzed using correlation, t-test, and the procedure of bootstrapping to test the mediating effect. It was concluded that there were relations between reactive-proactive aggression, anger, and cognitive flexibility at a statistically significant level. Independent samples t-test analysis showed that boys got higher scores on both reactive and proactive aggression. Lastly, it was found out that anger has a mediating effect on the relationship between cognitive flexibility and reactive and proactive aggression. The study findings are expected to contribute to identifying the factors that cause aggression in adolescents and effective intervention methods regarding these factors. All the findings obtained from the research were discussed within the framework of the relevant literature.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Anger
• Cognitive flexibility
• Proactive aggression
• Reactive aggression

Ergenlerde Reaktif-Proaktif Saldırganlık ve Bilişsel Esneklik: Öfkenin Aracı Rolü

Öz

Bu araştırmada lise öğrencilerinin reaktif-proaktif saldırganlık ve bilişsel esneklik düzeyleri arasında, öfkenin aracı rolü incelenmiştir. Araştırmanın katılımcıları Erzincan ilinde 2018-2019 yılı içerisinde öğrenim görmekte olan ve uygun örnekleme yöntemine göre belirlenen lise öğrencilerinden oluşmaktadır. Katılımcıların yaş aralığı 15-19 olup, 227’si kız ve 278’i erkek olmak üzere toplam 505 kişidir. Araştırmada Reaktif-Proaktif Saldırganlık Ölçeği, Sürekli Öfke ve Öfke İfade Tarzı Ölçeği, Bilisşel Esneklik Ölçeği ve araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan kişisel bilgi formu kullanılmıştır. Araştırma ilişkisel araştırma modeli üzerine kurgulanmıştır ve araştırmadan elde edilen veriler korelasyon analizi, ilişkisiz ölçümler için t-testi ve aracılık testi için ise regresyon temelli bootstrapping yöntemi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmada reaktif-proaktif sadırganlık, öfke ve bilişsel esneklik arasında anlamlı ilişkiler saptanmıştır. Bağımsız örneklem t testi sonucuna göre cinsiyet açısından her iki saldırganlık düzeyinde erkekler lehine anlamlı farklılık belirlenmiştir. Bilişsel esneklik, sürekli öfke, dışa yönelmiş öfke ve öfke kontrol reaktif saldırganlığı; bilişsel esneklik, sürekli öfke ve dışa yönelmiş öfke proaktif saldırganlığı anlamlı şekilde yordadığı belirlenmiştir. Son olarak ise, bilişsel esneklik ve reaktif ve proaktif saldırganlık arasındaki ilişkide öfkenin aracı etki gösterdiği belirlenmiştir. Araştırmadan elde edilen sonuçların ergenlerde saldırganlığa neden olan etmenler ve bu etmenlere ilişkin etkin müdahale yöntemlerinin belirlenmesi açısından katkı sağlayacağı düşünülmektedir. Araştırmadan elde edilen bütün bulgular ilgili alanyazın çerçevesinde tartışılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Bilişsel esneklik
• Öfke
• Proaktif saldırganlık
• Reaktif saldırganlık

Kaynakça

1. Anderson, C. A., & Bushman, B. J. (2002). Human aggression. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 27 -51. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/full/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135231.
2. Anderson, C. A., & Huesmann, L. R. (2003). Human aggression: A social-cognitive view. Hogg & J. Cooper (Eds.). Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 296-323). Sage Publications.
3. Arriaga, P. & Aguiar, C. (2019). Gender differences in aggression: The role of displaying facial emotional cues in a competitive situation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(5), 421-429. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12568.
4. Averilli J. R. (1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. New York, NY: Springer-Veriag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-5743-1.
5. Aydın, A. ve Akgün, S. (2014). Ergenlikte reaktif-proaktif saldırganlık, öfke ve narsisizm ilişkisi. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 29(73), 44-56. https://bursa.psikolog.org.tr/tr/yayinlar/dergiler/1031828/tpd1300443320140000m000054.pdf.
6. Ayub, N., Kimong, P. J. & Ahmad, P. H. M. (2020). The relationship between anger and aggression among drug-dependent males. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 10(2), 51-56. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijssh.2020.10.2.1013.
7. Balcıoğlu, I. (2000). Biyolojik, sosyolojik, psikolojik açıdan şiddet. Yüce Yayım.
8. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A social learning analysis. Prentice Hall PTR.

9. Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator and mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistic considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
10. Bedel, A. ve Ulubey, E. (2015). Ergenlerde başa çıkma stratejilerini açıklamada bilişsel esnekliğin rolü. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(55), 291-300.
11. Brugman, S., Lobbestael, J., Arntz, A., Cima, M., Schuhmann, T., Dambacher, F., & Sack, A. (2014). Identifying cognitive predictors of reactive and proactive aggression. Aggressive behavior, 41(1), 51-64. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21573.
12. Card, N. A. & Little, T.D. (2006). Proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: A meta-analysis of differential relations with psychosocial adjustment. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 30(5), 466-480. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406071904.
13. Carver, C. E. & Harmon-Jones, E. (2009). Anger is an approach-related affect: Evidence and implications, Psychological Bulletin, 135(2), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013965.
14. Cenkseven-Önder, F., Avcı, R. ve Çolakkadıoğlu, O. (2016). Validity and reliability of the reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire in turkish adolescents. Academic Journals, 11, 20, 1931-1943. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2937.
15. Chesebro, J. L. & Martin, M. M. (2003). The relationship between conversational sensitivity, cognitive flexibility, verbal aggressiveness and indirect interpersonal aggressiveness. Communication Research Reports, 20(2), 143-150. https://doi.org/10.1080/08824090309388810.
16. Connor, D. F., Steingard, R. J., Anderson, J. J., & Melloni Jr., R. H. (2003). Gender differences in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Psychiatry & Human Development, 33(4), 279–294. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1023084112561.
17. Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating. Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson Press.
18. Crick, N. R. & Dodge, K. A. (1996). Social information-processing mechanisms in reactive and proactive aggression. Child Development, 67, 993-1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1996.tb01778.x.
19. Çelikkaleli, Ö. (2014). Bilişsel Esneklik Ölçeği’nin Geçerlik ve Güvenirliği. Eğitim ve Bilim, 39(176) 339-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.3466.
20. Deffenbacher, J. L. (2011). Cognitive-behavioral conceptualization and treatment of anger. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 18, 212-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2009.12.004.
21. De Castro B. O., Merk, W. V., Koops, W., Veerman, J. W. ve Bosch, J. D. (2005). Emotions in social information processing and their relations with reactive and proactive aggression in referred aggressive boys. Journal Clinical Child Adolescent Psychology, 34(1), 105-16. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_10.
22. Diril, A. (2011). Lise öğrencilerinin bilişsel esneklik düzeylerinin sosyo-demografik değişkenler ve öfke düzeyi ile öfke ifade tarzları arasındaki ilişki açısından incelenmesi. (Yüksek lisans tezi), Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.3489.
23. Dodge, K. A. (1991). The structure and function of Reactive and Proactive Aggression. In D. J. Pepler & K. H. Rubin (Eds.), The development and treatment of childhood aggression (pp. 201 – 218). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
24. Dodge, K. A. & Coie, J. D. (1987). Social information processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children’s peer groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 1146-1158. https://psycnet.apa.org/buy/1988-09195-001.
25. Ellis, M. L., Weiss, B. & Lochman, J. E. (2009). Executive functions in children: Associations with aggressive behavior and appraisal processing. Journal of abnormal child psychology, 37(7), 945-956. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-009-9321-5.
26. Elske, H. (2011). Executive functioning in relation to proactive and reactive aggression in childhood and adolescence, Developmental Psychopathology in Education and Child Studies, (Unpublished master's Thesis). Leiden Universty. Netherland.
27. Feindler, L. E. & Engel, C. E. (2011). “Assessment and intervention for adolescents with anger and aggression difficulties in school settings”, Psychology in the Schools, 48(3), p. 243-253. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20550.
28. Hay, D. (2017). The early development of human aggression. Child Development Perspectives, 11, 102–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12220.
29. Hecht, L. K. & Latzman, D. R. (2017). Exploring the differential associations between components of executive functioning and reactive and proactive aggression, Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 40(1), 62-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2017.1314450.
30. Hubbard, J. A., Dodge, K. A., Coie, C. & Schwartz, D. (2001). The dyadic nature of social information processing in boys’ reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(2), 268-280. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.2.268.
31. Hubbard, J. A., Smithmyer, C. M., Ramsden, S. R., Parker, E. H., Flanagan, K. D., Dearing, K. F, Relyea, N. & Simons, R. F. (2002). Observational, physiological, and self-report measures of children’s anger: Relations to reactive versus proactive aggression. Child Development, 73(4), 1101-1118. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8624.00460.
32. Hubbard, J. A., McAuliffe, M. D., Morrow, M. T., & Romano, L. J. (2010). Reactive and proactive aggression in childhood and adolescence: Precursors, outcomes, processes, experiences, and measurement. Journal of Personality, 78(1), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00610.x.
33. Jambon, M., Colasante, T., Peplak, J. & Malti, T. (2019). Anger, sympathy, and children’s reactive and proactive aggression: Testing a differential correlate hypothesis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology. 47, 1013-1024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-018-0498-3.
34. Kutlu S. H. (2018). Ergenlerde bağlanma, şiddete maruz kalma yaşantıları ile saldırganlık arasındaki ilişkide bilişsel esnekliğin doğrudan ve dolaylı rolü. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi.
35. Lochman, J., Barry, T., Powell, N. & Young, L. (2010). Anger and Aggression. In D. W. Nangle, D. J. Hansen, C. A. Erdley, & P. J. Norton (Eds.), Practitioner’s guide to empirically based measures of social skills (pp. 155–166). Springer.
36. Maaike, R. (2012). Executive functions as the mechanisms underlying proactive and reactive aggression in child and adolescent boys. (Unpublished master's Thesis). Leiden University. Netherland. https://studenttheses.universiteitleiden.nl/access/item%3A2631224/view.
37. Maneiro, L., Cutrín, O., & Gómez-Fraguela, X. A. (2020). Gender differences in the personality correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in a Spanish sample of young adults. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 13, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520957697.
38. Martin, M. M., Anderson, C. M. & Thweatt, K. S. (1998). Aggressive communication traits and their relationship with the cognitive flexibility scale and the communication flexibility scale. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 13(3), 34-45. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Matthew-Martin.
39. Martin, M. M. & Rubin, R. B. (1995). A new measure of cognitive flexibility. Psychological Reports, 76, 623-626. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.623.
40. Martin, R., Watson, D. & Wan, C. K. (2000). A three‐factor model of trait anger: Dimensions of affect, behavior, and cognition. Journal of Personality, 68(5), 869-897. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00119.
41. McMillan, J. H. & Schumacher, S. (2006). Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry (6th ed.). Pearson. Merk, W. W., Orobio de Castro, B., Koops, W. & Matthys, W. (2005). The distinction between reactive and proactive aggression: Utility for theory, diagnosis and treatment? European Journal of Developmental Psychology 2(2), 197-220. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620444000300.
42. Mialkowski, J. E. (2000). Effect of family expressiveness and humor on adolescent aggression. (Unpublished master's Thesis).Truman State University, United States.
43. Miller, J. D. ve Lynam, D. R. (2006). Reactive and proactive aggression: Similarities and differences. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 1469–1480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2006.06.004.
44. Moore, C. C., Hubbard, J. A., Bookhout, M. K. & Mlawer, F. (2019). Relations between reactive and proactive aggression and daily emotions in adolescents, Journal Of Abnormal Child Psychology, 47(9):1495-1507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-019-00533-6.
45. Oostermeijer, S., Smeets, K. C., Jansen, L. M. C., Jambroes, T., Rommelse, N. N. J., Scheepers, F. E., Buitelaar, J. K., & Popma, A. (2017). The role of self-serving cognitive distortions in reactive and proactive aggression. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health : CBMH, 27(5), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbm.2039.
46. Orobio de Castro, B., Merk, W., Koops, W., Veerman, J. W. & Bosch, J. D. (2005). Emotions in social information processing and their relations with reactive and proactive aggression in referred aggressive boys. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 34, 105-116. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15374424jccp3401_10.
47. Ögel, K., Tarı, I. ve Eke-Yılmazçetin, C. (2006). Okullarda suç ve şiddeti önleme. İstanbul: Yeniden Sağlık ve Eğitim Derneği, 17, 1-65. http://www.ogelk.net/Dosyadepo/vio14.pdf.
48. Özdoğan, A. Ç. ve Önder, F. C. (2018). Ergenlerde reaktif-proaktif saldırganlık ile ebeveyn duygusal erişilebilirliği: Duygu düzenleme güçlüğünün aracı rolü. Eğitim ve Bilim, 43(194), 207-223. http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7576.
49. Özer, A.K. (1994). Sürekli öfke (SL-ÖFKE) ve öfke ifade tarzı (ÖFKE-TARZ) ölçekleri ön çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 9, 26-35. https://doi.org/10.17051/.527165.
50. Özgür, G., Yörükoğlu, G. ve Baysan-Arabacı, L. (2011). Lise öğrencilerinin şiddet algıları, şiddet eğilim düzeyleri ve etkileyen faktörler. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, 2(2), 53-60. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Leyla-Baysan-Arabaci/publication/281648029.
51. Pahlavan, F., Mouchiroud, C. & Nemlaghi-Manis, E. (2012). Does experience of failure decrease executive, regulatory abilities and increase aggression?: Affective-cognitive regulation of aggressive behaviors. Global Journal of Health Science, 4(6), 60-68. https://doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v4n6p60.
52. Paschall, M. J. & Fishbein, D. H. (2002). Executive cognitive functioning and aggression: A public health perspective. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 7(3), 215-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-1789(00)00044-6.
53. Poland, S. E., Monks, C. P. & Tsermentseli, S. (2016). Cool and hot executive function as predictors of aggression in early childhood: Differentiating between the function and form of aggression. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 34(2), 181-197. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjdp.12122.
54. Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2004). Spss and sas procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, 36(4), 717-731. https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/BF03206553.pdf.
55. Preacher, K. J. & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.
56. Raine, A., Dodge, K., Loeber, R., Gatzke-Kopp, L., Lynam, D., Reynolds, C., Stouthamer-Loeber, M.& Liu,J. (2006). The Reactive–Proactive aggression questionnaire: Differential correlates of reactive and proactive aggression in adolescent boys. Aggressive Behaviour, 32(2), 159–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.20115.
57. Ramirez, J. M., & Andreu, J. M. (2006). Aggression, and some related psychological constructs (anger, hostility, and impulsivity): Some comments from a research project. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 276– 291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.015.
58. Rios, O. L. H. D. L., Solis, K. O. & Aragon C. J. D. R. (2013). Cognitive flexibility and inhiiıtory control: A clinical approach to understanding bullying for abuse of power. Revista Argentina de Clinica Psicologica 22(3), 219-227.
59. Salmivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.90004 .
60. Spielberger, C. D., Jacobs, G., Russell, S. & Crane, R. S. (1983). Assessment of Anger: The State-Trait Anger Scale. In J. N. Butcher & C. D. Spielberger (Eds.), Advances in personality assessment (Vol. 2) (pp. 161-190). Erlbaum.
61. Spielberger, C. D., Reheiser, E. C., & Sydeman, S. J. (1995). Measuring the experience, expression, and control of anger. Issues in Comprehensive Pediatric Nursing, 18(3), 207-232. https://doi.org/10.3109/01460869509087271.
62. Stevens, A. D. (2009). Social problem-solving and cognitive flexibility: Relations to social skills and problem behavior of at-risk young children. (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Available from Pro Ouest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3359050).
63. Tabachnick, B. G & Fidel, L. S. (2007). Using Mulivariate Statistics. MA: Allyn&Bacon, Inc.
64. Tafrate, R.C., Kassinove, H. & Dundin, L. (2002). Anger episodes in high-and low-trait-anger community adults. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 58(12), 1573-1590. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.10076.
65. Thomson, N. D. & Centifanti, L. C. M. (2018). Proactive and reactive aggression subgroups in typically developing children: The role of executive functioning, psychophysiology, and psychopathy. Child Psychiatry and Human Development, 49(2):197-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10578-017-0741-0.
66. TÜİK, (2018). Güvenlik Birimine Gelen veya Getirilen Çocuklar, Haber bülteni. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/PreHaberBultenleri.do;jsessionid=21plcLLV21TL6SF46QjM22wtRd9vpl9V2HbBLth4b2dTjbzbTcG7!568563640?id=27609.
67. Türk, F. ve Hamamcı, Z. (2016). Bilişsel-Davranışçı Yaklaşım’a dayalı olarak uygulanan öfke kontrolü programlarının etkililiğinin değerlendirilmesi: Bir meta-analiz çalışması. Uluslararası Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 9(43), 1522-1528. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Fulya-Tuerk/publication/301579453.
68. Uz Baş,A., Selda-Öz, F. ve Topçu-Kabasakal, Z. (2012). İlköğretim ve ortaöğretim okullarında reaktif ve proaktif saldırganlık: Okul psikolojik danışmanlarının görüş ve yaklaşımları. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(23), 354 – 370. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/181382.
69. Uz Baş, A. ve Topçu Kabasakal, Z. (2010). İlköğretim okullarında saldırganlık ve şiddet davranışlarının yaygınlığı. İlköğretim Online, 9(1), 93-105. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2010.06.001.
70. Uz Baş, A., ve Yurdabakan, I. (2012). Factor structure of the reactive-proactive aggression questionnaire in turkish children and gender, grade-level, and socioeconomic status differences in reactive and proactive aggression. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30(3), 284–297. https://doi.org/10.1007. -0741-0.
71. Verlinden, S., Hersen, M. & Thomas, J. (2000). Risk Factors in school shootings. Clinical Psychology Review, 20(1), 3-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00055-0.
72. Wang, Y., Cao, S., Zhang, Q., & Xia, L.-X. (2020). The longitudinal relationship between angry rumination and reactive-proactive aggression and the moderation effect of consideration of future consequences-immediate. Aggressive Behavior, 46(6), 476–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21913.
73. White, B. A. & Turner, K. A. (2014). Anger rumination and effortful control: Mediation effects on reactive but not proactive aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 56, 186–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.08.012.
74. Woods, V. (2012). Helping Couples Deal With Anger and Conflict. In Cognitive and Rational-Emotive Behavior Therapy With Couples (pp. 65-80). Springer, NY. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-1-4614-5137-2_5.
75. Xu, Y., Farver, J.A.M. & Zhang, Z. (2009). Temperament, harsh and indulgent parenting, and Chinese children’s proactive and reactive aggression. Child Development, 80(1), 244-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01257.x .
76. Yalçin, R. Ü., ve Gençdoğan, B. (2019). Mutluluk Saldırganlığın Yordayıcısı mıdır? Üniversite Öğrencileri İle Bir Yapısal Eşitlik Modeli Çalışması. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 8(3), 593-608. http://dx.doi.org/10.30703/cije.510491.