Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik Temelinde Yüksek Performanslı Çalışma Sistemleri mi, İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi mi?: Bir Model Geliştirme Önerisi

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 9 Sayı: 1, 56 - 69, 30.06.2025

Selvi Vural , Nejla Aydınoğlu

Öz

Kurumsal sürdürülebilirliğin temelinde, işletmelerin insan kaynakları yönetimi (İKY) alanında uyguladığı çeşitli stratejiler ve politikalar yer almaktadır. Bu strateji ve uygulamalar, özellikle yüksek performanslı çalışma sistemleri (YPÇS) modeli altında bir araya getirilerek sistematik bir yapı kazanmakta ve işletmelerin uzun vadeli başarısına katkı sağlamaktadır. YPÇS kapsamında yer alan uygulamalar, sadece sürdürülebilir insan kaynakları yönetimi açısından değil aynı zamanda genel anlamda kurumsal sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanması bakımından da kritik bir role sahiptir. Ancak, bu alanda yapılan akademik çalışmaların henüz yeterli düzeyde olmayışı, konuya ilişkin daha derinlemesine araştırmalar yapılması gerektiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu bağlamda gerçekleştirilen mevcut araştırmanın temel amacı, yüksek performanslı çalışma sistemleri ile işletmelerin sürdürülebilir insan kaynakları yönetimi uygulamaları arasındaki ilişkiyi ortaya koymak ve bu ilişkiyi kurumsal sürdürülebilirlik perspektifinde değerlendirmektir. Özellikle YPÇS modeli içerisinde doğrudan yer almayan fakat insan kaynakları süreçlerinde önemli bir yeri olan kariyer yönetimi, performans yönetimi ile iş sağlığı ve güvenliği uygulamalarının da bu modele nasıl entegre edilebileceği araştırılmaktadır. Söz konusu uygulamaların modele katkısının belirlenmesi, teori ve uygulama arasında bir köprü kurulmasını sağlayarak işletmelerin insan kaynağını daha sürdürülebilir hale getirecektir. Araştırmanın, teorik olarak literatüre katkı sunması ve pratikte uygulayıcılar için rehber niteliğinde olması beklenmektedir. Bu doğrultuda, işletmelerin YPÇS aracılığıyla hem insan kaynağında sürdürülebilirliği sağlamaları hem de kurumsal performanslarını uzun vadede sürdürülebilir kılmaları amaçlanmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yüksek Performanslı Çalışma Sistemleri , Sürdürülebilir İnsan Kaynakları Yönetimi , Kurumsal Sürdürülebilirlik , Model Geliştirme

High Performance Work Systems or Human Resources Management Based on Corporate Sustainabilty? A Model Development Proposal

Öz

At the core of corporate sustainability lies a series of human resource management (HRM) practices, which are commonly structured under the model of high-performance work systems (HPWS). These practices are closely associated not only with sustainable human resource management (SHRM) but also with broader aspects of organizational sustainability. Despite their importance, the literature on this subject remains limited, highlighting the need for further in-depth research. The primary aim of the present study is to examine the relationship between high-performance work systems and sustainable HRM practices within organizations and to evaluate this relationship in the context of corporate sustainability. In addition to the components traditionally included in the HPWS model, this study also seeks to assess the contribution and potential integration of career management, performance management, and occupational health and safety practices—key elements actively utilized in HRM processes. Determining the role of these practices within the HPWS framework is expected to foster a theoretical and practical integration that will significantly enhance both organizational and human resource sustainability. In this regard, it is anticipated that organizations can achieve sustainable HRM and long-term corporate performance through the effective implementation of HPWS. The study is expected to contribute theoretically by providing new insights for researchers, while also offering practices implications that can increase the effectiveness and success of HRM applications in organizational settings.

Anahtar Kelimeler

High Performance Work Systems , Sustainable Human Resource Management , Corporate Sustainability , Model Development

Kaynakça

• Allen, N. J. & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 63 (1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
• Alqudah, I. H., Carballo-Penela, A. & Ruzo-Sanmartín, E. (2022). High-performance human resource management practices and readiness for change: An integrative model including affective commitment, employees’ performance, and the moderating role of hierarchy culture. European Research on Management and Business Economics, 28 (1), 100177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iedeen.2021.100177
• Amrutha, V. N. & Geetha, S. N. (2020). A systematic review on green human resource management: Implications for social sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 247, 119131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119131
• Appelbaum, E., Bailey, T., Berg, P. & Kalleberg, A. L. (2000). Manufacturing advantage: Why high-performance work systems pay off. Cornell University Press.
• Arocas, R. & Camps, J. (2008). A model of high performance work practices and turnover intentions. Personnel Review, 37 (1), 26-46. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480810839950
• Arthur, J. B. (1994). Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal, 37 (3), 670-687. https://doi.org/10.5465/256705
• Banmairuroy, W., Kritjaroen, T. & Homsombat, W. (2022). The effect of knowledge-oriented leadership and human resource development on sustainable competitive advantage through organizational innovation's component factors. Asia Pacific Management Review, 27 (3), 200-209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2021.11.003
• Boxall, P. & Macky, K. (2009). Research and theory on high-performance work systems: Progressing the high-involvement stream. Human Resource Management Journal, 19 (1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2008.00082.x
• Bratton, J., Gold, J., Bratton, A. & Steele, L. (2021). Human resource management (6th ed.). Bloomsbury Publishing.
• Brundtland Commission. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
• Campos‐García, I., Alonso‐Muñoz, S., González‐Sánchez, R. & Medina‐Salgado, M. S. (2024). Human resource management and sustainability: Bridging the 2030 agenda. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31 (3), 2033-2053. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.2700
• Cao, M., Zhao, S., Chen, J. & Lv, H. (2024). Employees' HR attributions count: The effects of high-performance work systems on employees' thriving at work and emotional exhaustion. Personnel Review, 53 (4), 835-856. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-11-2022-0754
• Chan, W., Pervaiz, A. & Ahmed, K. (2014). Sustainable people management through work-life balance: A study of the Malaysian Chinese context. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 6 (3), 262-280. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-03-2014-0037
• Cherif, F. (2020). The role of human resource management practices and employee job satisfaction in predicting organizational commitment in Saudi Arabian banking sector. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40 (7/8), 529-541. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-10-2019-0216
• Chowdhury, S., Dey, P., Joel-Edgar, S., Bhattacharya, S., Rodriguez-Espindola, O., Abadie, A. & Truong, L. (2023). Unlocking the value of artificial intelligence in human resource management through AI capability framework. Human Resource Management Review, 33 (1), 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2022.100899
• Davidescu, A. A., Apostu, S. A., Paul, A. & Casuneanu, I. (2020). Work flexibility, job satisfaction, and job performance among Romanian employees—Implications for sustainable human resource management. Sustainability, 12 (15), 6086. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156086
• Delery, J. E. & Doty, D. H. (1996). Modes of theorizing in strategic human resource management: Tests of universalistic, contingency, and configurational performance predictions. Academy of Management Journal, 39 (4), 802–835. https://doi.org/10.5465/256713
• Dhamija, P. (2013). Human resource management: An effective mechanism for long term sustainability. The Clarion International Multidisciplinary Journal, 2 (1), 74-80.
• Dyllick, T. & Hockerts, K. (2002). Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11 (2), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323
• Ehnert, I. (2006). Sustainability issues in human resource management: Linkages, theoretical approaches and outlines for an emerging field. In 21st EIASM SHRM Workshop (pp. 28-29). Aston, Birmingham.
• Ehnert, I. (2009). Sustainability and human resource management: Reasoning and applications on corporate websites. European Journal of International Management, 3 (4), 419-438.
• Ehnert, I. & Harry, W. (2012). Recent developments and future prospects on sustainable human resource management: Introduction to the special issue. Management Revue, 23 (3), 221-238.
• Fu, N., Flood, P. C., Bosak, J., Morris, T. & O'Regan, P. (2015). How do high performance work systems influence organizational innovation in professional service firms? Employee Relations, 37 (2), 209-231.
• Gollan, P. J. (2006). High involvement management and human resource line sustainability. Handbook of Business Strategy, 7 (1), 279-286.
• Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (3), 635-672. https://doi.org/10.5465/256741
• Jabbour, C. J. C. & Santos, F. C. A. (2008). The central role of human resource management in the search for sustainable organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19 (12), 2133-2154.
• Kim, K. Y., Clark, K. D. & Messersmith, J. G. (2023). High performance work systems and perceived organizational support: The contribution of human resource department’s organizational embodiment. Human Resource Management, 62 (2), 181-196.
• Kramar, R. (2014). Beyond strategic human resource management: Is sustainable human resource management the next approach? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25 (8), 1069-1089.
• Loi, R., Hang-Yue, N., & Foley, S. (2006). Linking employees' justice perceptions to organizational commitment and intention to leave: The mediating role of perceived organizational support. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79 (1), 101-120.
• Lozano, R., & Barreiro‐Gen, M. (2023). Organisations' contributions to sustainability: An analysis of impacts on the sustainable development goals. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32 (6), 3371-3382.
• Lu, Y., Zhang, M. M., Yang, M. M. & Wang, Y. (2023). Sustainable human resource management practices, employee resilience, and employee outcomes: Toward common good values. Human Resource Management, 62 (3), 331-353.
• Maraippanadar, S. & Kramar, R. (2014). Sustainable HRM: The synthesis effect of high performance work systems on organizational performance and employee harm. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 6 (3), 206-224.
• Mowbray, P. K., Wilkinson, A. & Tse, H. H. (2021). High-performance work systems and employee voice behaviour: An integrated model and research agenda. Personnel Review, 50 (6), 1530-1543.
• Newman, D. T., Fast, N. J. & Harmon, D. J. (2020). When eliminating bias isn’t fair: Algorithmic reductionism and procedural justice in human resource decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160, 149-167.
• Pfeffer, J. (1998). The human equation: Building profits by putting people first. Harvard Business School Press.
• Pfeffer, J. (2010). Building sustainable organizations: The human factor. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 24 (1), 34-45.
• Pichler, S., Varma, A., Yu, A., Beenen, G. & Davoudpour, S. (2014). High performance work systems, cultures and gender demography. Employee Relations, 36 (6), 693-707.
• Ramsay, H., Scholarios, D. & Harley, B. (2000). Employees and high‐performance work systems: Testing inside the black box. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 38 (4), 501-531.
• Savaneviciene, A. & Stankeviciute, Z. (2013). Sustainability as a concept for human resource management. Economics and Management, 18 (4), 837-846.
• Shih, H. A., Chiang, Y. H. & Hsu, C. C. (2006). Can high performance work systems really lead to better performance? International Journal of Manpower, 27 (8), 741-763.
• Tanke, M. L. (1990). Human resource management for the hospitality industry (2nd ed.). Delmar Publishers Inc.
• Taylor, S., Osland, J. & Egri, C. P. (2012). Introduction to HRM’s role in sustainability: Systems, strategies, and practices. Human Resource Management, 51 (6), 789-798.
• Truss, C. (2001). Complexities and controversies in linking HRM with organisational outcomes. Journal of Management Studies, 38, 1121–1149.
• Wright, P. M., Gardner, T. M. & Moynihan, L. M. (2003). The impact of HR practices on the performance of business units. Human Resource Management Journal, 13 (3), 21-36.
• Yoon, S. W., Han, S. H. & Chae, C. (2024). People analytics and human resource development–research landscape and future needs based on bibliometrics and scoping review. Human Resource Development Review, 23 (1), 30-57.
• Zihan, W., Makhbul, Z. K. M. & Alam, S. S. (2024). Green human resource management in practice: Assessing the impact of readiness and corporate social responsibility on organizational change. Sustainability, 16 (3), 1153.