The Role of Social-Emotional Learning Skills in Peer Bullying Experiences in Students with Learning Disabilities

Öz

The purpose of this study is to explore the social-emotional learning (SEL) abilities and experiences of peer bullying among students with learning disabilities (LD), considering various demographic factors, and to determine whether SEL levels can predict their exposure to peer bullying. In line with the relational survey method, the sample included 219 students with learning disabilities, aged 13-16, who were selected through a convenience sampling approach. Datas were collected eith Personal Information Form, the Adolescent Peer Relationships Assessment Scale Victim Form, and the SEL Skills Scale. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS 29, with descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, ANOVA for detecting differences, correlation analysis for identifying relationships between variables, and multiple linear regression tests to assess predictive power. The findings indicated that the SEL skill levels and experiences of peer bullying among students with disabilities significantly differed based on gender and the socio-economic status of the family. Furthermore, a significant relationship was found between students' SEL skills and their exposure to peer bullying. It was also determined that the subdimensions of SEL skills in LD students predicted their experiences of peer bullying.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• social-emotional learning
• peer-bullying
• specific learning disabilities

Özel Öğrenme Güçlüğünde Sosyal Duygusal Öğrenme Becerilerinin Akran Zorbalığına Maruz Kalmadaki Rolü

Öz

Bu araştırmada özel öğrenme güçlüğü (ÖÖG) tanılı öğrencilerin sosyal duygusal öğrenme becerileriyle akran zorbalığına maruz kalma durumlarını bazı demografik değişkenler açısından incelemek ve sosyal duygusal öğrenme düzeyinin akran zorbalığına maruz kalma durumunu yordayıp yordamadığını belirlemek amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma grubu, uygun örnekleme yöntemiyle belirlenen 13-16 yaş arasındaki özel öğrenme güçlüğü olan 219 öğrenci oluşturmuştur. İlişkisel tarama modelinde desenlenen bu araştırmanın veri toplama sürecinde Kişisel Bilgi Formu, Ergen Akran İlişkileri Belirleme Ölçeği Mağdur Formu ve Sosyal Duygusal Öğrenme Becerileri Ölçeği kullanılmış; veri analizi ise bağımsız örneklemler t-testi, ANOVA ve doğrusal regresyon yöntemleriyle gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın bulguları, ÖÖG olan öğrencilerin sosyal duygusal öğrenme beceri düzeylerinin ve akran zorbalığına maruz kalma durumlarının cinsiyete ve ailenin sosyoekonomik durumuna göre anlamlı düzeyde farklılaştığını, öğrencilerin sosyal duygusal öğrenme becerileriyle akran zorbalığına maruz kalmaları arasıdna anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu ve ÖÖG olan öğrencilerin sosyal duygusal öğrenme becerileri alt boyutlarının, akran zorbalığına maruz kalma durumlarını yordadığı belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• sosyal duygusal öğrenme becerileri
• akran zorbalığı
• özel öğrenme güçlüğü

Kaynakça

1. Aydar, G. (2019). Özel öğrenme güçlüğü tanısı almış öğrencilerin bulunduğu kaynaştırma sınıflarında akran zorbalığı [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi], Nişantaşı Üniversitesi.
2. Aydemir, T. (2024). Özgül öğrenme güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin sosyal becerilerinin ve problem davranışlarının akran zorbalığına maruz kalmalarında rolünün incelenmesi. Journal of International Management, Educational and Economics Perspectives 12(1), 77-90. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/3966650
3. Baumeister, A. L., Storch, E. A., & Geffken, G. R. (2007). Peer victimization in children with learning disabilities. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 25(1), 11-23. doi: 10.1007/s10560-007-0109-6
4. Başaran, C. (2008). Çeşitli tür liselerde öğrenim gören öğrencilerin saldırganlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi], Sakarya Üniversitesi.
5. Baydık, B. (2011). Okuma güçlüğü olan öğrencilerin üstbilişsel okuma stratejilerini kullanımı ve öğretmenlerinin okuduğunu anlama öğretim uygulamalarının incelenmesi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 36(162), 301-318. https://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/viewFile/1354/330
6. Berchiatti, M., Ferrer, A., Galiana, L., Badenes Ribera, L., & Longobardi, C. (2022). Bullying in students with special education needs and learning difculties: The role of the student–teacher relationship quality and students’ social status in the peer group. Child and Youth Care Forum, 51, 515–537. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-021-09640-2
7. Björkqvist, K., Lagerspetz, K. M. J., & Kaukiainen, A. O. (1992). Do girls manipulate and boys fight? Develpmental trends in regard to direct and indirect aggression. Aggressive Behavior, 18(2), 117-127. doi:10.1002/1098-2337(1992)18:2%3C117::AID-AB2480180205%3E3.0.CO;2-3
8. Boswort, K., Espelage, D. L., & Simon, T. R. (1999). Factors associated with bullying behavior in middle school students. Journal of Early Adolescence, 19(3), 341-362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431699019003003Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi kitabı (27. basım), Pegem Akademi.

9. Bourke, S., & Burgman, I. (2010) Coping with bullying in australian schools: How children with disabilities experience support from friends, parents and teachers. Disability and Society, 25(3), 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687591003701264
10. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). Contexts of child rearing: Problems and prospects. American Psychologist, 34(10), 844–850. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.34.10.844
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirci, F. (2008). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Pegem Akademi.
12. Can, H. H., Kılıçarslan, Ü., Ünlü, G., Polat, Ç., Kıvrak, G., & Kaan, Ş. (2023). İstanbul’un sosyo-ekonmik analizi. İstanbul Valiliği Açık Kapı Şube Müdürlüğü. http://www.istanbul.gov.tr/kurumlar/istanbul.gov.tr/PDF/acik_kapi_ek-_2_.pdf
13. CASEL (Cares Initiative. Collaborative for academic, social, and emotional learning), (2020). https://casel.org/covid-resources/
14. Cenkseven Önder, F., & Yalnızca Yıldırım, S. (2017). Ortaokul öğrencilerinde zorbalığı yordamada duygusal zekânın rolü. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 14(38), 131-146. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/329313
15. Cevahir, E. (2020).SPSS ile nicel veri analizi rehberi. Kibele Yayınları.
16. Champion, K., Vernberg, E., & Shipman, K. (2003). Nonbullying victims of bullies: Aggression, social skills, and friendship characteristics. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 24(5), 535–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2003.08.003
17. Churney, A. H. (2000). Promoting children’s social and emotional development: A follow-up evaluation of an elementary school-based program in social decision-making/social problem-solving. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section A. Humanities and Social Sciences, 62(01), 75. (UMI No. 3000887)
18. Cohen, S., & Wills, T. A. (1985). Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull, 98(2), 310-357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.98.2.310
19. Cross, D., Shaw, T., Hearn, L., Epstein, M., Monks, H., Lester, L., & Thomas, L. (2009). Australian covert bullying prevalence study (A.C.B.P.S.), Child Health Promotion Research Centre.
20. Çalışkan, Z., Evgin, D., Bayat, M., Caner, N., Kaplan, B., Öztürk, A., & Keklik, D. (2018). Peer bullying in the readolescent stage: Frequency and types of bullying and the affecting factors. The Journal of Pediatric Research, 6(3), 169-179. doi:10.4274/jpr.galenos.2018.26576
21. Çivilidağ, A., & Cooper, H. T. (2013). Ergenlerde siber zorba ve öfkenin incelenmesi üzerine bir araştırma: Niğde ili örneği. International Journal of Social Science, 6(1), 497-511. doi: 10.9761/JASSS_482
22. Dawkins, J. L. (1996). Bullying, physical disability, and the pediatric patient. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 38(7), 603-612. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8749.1996.tb12125.x
23. Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., & Tsukayama, E. (2012). What No Child Left Behind leaves behind: The roles of IQ and self-control in predicting standardized achievement test scores and report card grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 439–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026280
24. Duncan, D., Matson, J. L., Bamburg, J. W., Cherry, K. E., & Buckley, T. (1999). The relationship of self-injurious behavior and aggression to social skills in persons with severe and profound learning disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 20(6), 441-448. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0891-4222(99)00024-4
25. Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta‐analysis of school‐based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
26. Eccles, J. S. (2004). “Schools, academic motivation, and stage environment fit,” in Handbook of Adolescent Psychology, Chap. 5, eds R. M. Lerner and L. Steinberg (Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons), 125–153. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780471726746.ch5
27. Elias, M. J. (2004). The connection between social-emotional learning and learning disabilities: Implications for intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27, 53-63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1593632
28. Elcik, F., & Bayındır, N. (2015). Üstün yetenekli öğrencilerin bazı demografik özelliklerine göre sosyal-duygusal becerilerinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(5), 179-193. doi:10.16991/INESJOURNAL.146
29. Eldiorita, I., & Layyinah, L. (2016). Effect of social competence and school stress on bullying behaviour in adolescent. TAZKIYA Journal of Psychology 4(1), 48-58. doi:10.15408/tazkiya.v4i1.10824
30. Espelage, D. L. (2014). Ecological theory: Preventing youth bullying, agression and victimization; Theory into Practice 53(4), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2014.947216
31. Espelage, D., Rose, C. A., & Polanin, J. R. (2015). Social-emotional learning program to reduce bullying, figthing, and victimization among middle school students with disabilities. Remadial and Special Education, 36, 5, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932515627475
32. Ersoy, Ö., & Avcı, N. (2001) Özel gereksinimli olan çocuklar ve eğitimleri. Yapa Yayınları.
33. European Community Wales: The European Social Fund (National Assembly for Wales) Regulations (2001). https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2001/872/pdfs/uksi_20010872_en.pdf
34. Field, A. (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd edition), Sage Publications.
35. Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2009). Background knowledge: The missing piece of the comprehension puzzle. Heinemann, Portsmouth.
36. Fox, C. L., & Boulton, M. J. (2005). The social skills problems of victims of bullying: Self, peer, and teacher perceptions. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 313-328. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905X25517
37. Garrett, J. (2023). Addressing bullying against students with disabilities with social emotional learning. Integrated Studies, 551. https://digitalcommons.murraystate.edu/bis437/551
38. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS Statistics 26 Step by Step: A Simple Guide and Reference. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429056765
39. Graczyk, P., Matjasko, J., Weissberg, R., Greenberg, M., Elias, M., & Zins, J. (2000) The role of the collaborative to advance social and emotional learning (CASEL) in supporting the implementation of quality school-basedprevention programs. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation (11),1, 3-6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532768Xjepc1101_02
40. Güven, F. (2015). Ortaokul 8. sınıf öğrencilerinin zorbalık yapmaları ile zorbalığa maruz kalmalarının cinsiyet, anne-baba eğitimi, sosyoekonomik düzey ve empati eğilimi açısından incelenmesi [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi], Toros Üniversitesi.
41. Hattie, J. (1992). Towards a model of schooling: A synthesis of metaanalyses. Australian Journal of Education, 36(1), 5-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494419203600102
42. Heiman, T. (2004). Teachers coping with changes: Including students with disabilities in mainstream classes: An international view. International Journal of Special Education, 19(2), 91-103. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ852062.pdf
43. Heiman, T., & Olenik-Shemesh, D. (2020). Social-emotional profile of children with and without learning disabilities: The relationships with perceived loneliness, self-efficacy and well-being. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(20), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17207358
44. Humphrey, J. L., Storch, E. A., & Geffken, G. R. (2007). Peer victimization in children with attentiondeficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal Of Child Health Care, 11(3), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367493507079571
45. Irshad, E., & Atta, M. (2013). Social Competence as Predictor of Bullying among Children and Adolescents. Journal of the Indian Academy of Applied Psychology, 35-42. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2013-00983-005
46. Jankauskiene, R., Kardelis, K., Sukys, S., & Kardeliene, L. (2008). Associations between school bullying and psychosocial factors. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 36(2), 145–162. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.2008.36.2.145
47. Jones, S. M., & Kahn, J. (2017). The evidence base for how we learn: Supporting students’ social, emotional, and academic development – Consensus statements of evidence from the Council of Distinguished Scientists. National Commission Social, Emotional, and Academic, The Aspen Institute.
48. Kabakçı, Ö. F., & Owen, F. K. (2010). Sosyal duygusal öğrenme becerileri ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 35(157), 152-166. https://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/293/162
49. Kalafatoğlu, M. R. (2022). Özel öğrenme güçlüğü tanılı ilköğretim öğrencilerinde sosyal-duygusal öğrenme becerileri, yaşam doyumu ve umut: Nitel bir araştırma [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi], Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi.
50. Karaca, O., Tirit Karaca, D., Çalış, S., & Yiğit, G. (2018). Disleksi: Özgül öğrenme güçlüğü. Psikonet Yayınları.
51. Karasar, N. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Nobel Yayıncılık.
52. Kaukiainen, A., Salmivalli, C., Lagerspetz, K., Tamminen, M., Vauras, M., Mäki, H., & et al. (2002). Learning difficulties, social intelligence, and self-concept: Connections to bully-victim problems. Scandinavian Journal Of Psychology, 43, 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9450.00295
53. Kavale, K. A., & Forness, S. R. (1996). Social skill deficits and learning disabilities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 29(3), 226–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221949602900301
54. Kepenekci-Karaman, Y., & Çinkir, S. (2001). Bullying among students in Turkish high schools. Child Abuse and Neglect, 30(2), 193-204.
55. Kılıçaslan, F., Beyazgül, B., Kuzan, R., Karadağ, D., Koruk, F., & Koruk, İ. (2023) The prevalence of peer bullying and psychiatric symptoms among high school students in southeast Turkey, Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 77(1), 83-90. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2022.2134450
56. Korkmazlar, Ü. (2003). Öğrenme bozuklukları ve özel eğitim. Kulaksızoğlu, A. (Edt.), Farklı gelişen çocuklar ( s. 147-171) içinde. Epsilon Yayıncılık.
57. Lindsay, S., & Mcpherson, A.C. ( 2012). Experiences of social exclusion and bullying at school among children and youth with cerebral palsy. Disability and Rehabilitation; 34(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638288.2011.587086
58. Luciano, S., & Savage, R. S. (2007). Bullying risk in children with learning difficulties in inclusive educational settings. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 22(1), 14-31. doi:10.1177/0829573507301039
59. Marini, M., Di Filippo, G., Bonuomo, M., Torregiani, G., & Livi, S. (2023). Perceiving Ooeself to be integrated into the peer group: A protective factor against victimization in children with learning disabilities. Brain Sciences, 13(2), 1-13. https:// doi.org/10.3390/brainsci13020263
60. Martinez, R. S. (2002). A comparison of learning disability subtypes in middle school: Self concept, perceived social support, and emotional functioning [Unpublished doctoral dissertation], The University of Texas at Austin.
61. Meadan, H., & Halle, J. W. (2004). Social Pperceptions of students with learning disabilitieswWho differ in social status. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 19(2), 71–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5826.2004.00091.x
62. Mishna, F. (2003). Learning disabilities and bullying double jeopardy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(4), 336-47. doi: 10.1177/00222194030360040501
63. Morgan, C. T. (1989), (Derleyen: S. Karakaş). Psikolojiye giriş. Hacettepe Üniversitesi.Psikoloji Bölümü Yayınları.
64. Morocco, C. C., Hindin, A., Mata-Aguilar, C., & Clarck-Chiarelli, N. (2001). Building a deep understanding of literature with middle-grade students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 24(1), 47-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/1511295
65. Nabuzoka, D. (2003). Teacher ratings and peer nominations of bullying and other behaviour of children with and without learning difficulties. Educational Psychology, 23, 307–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000060147
66. Nair, B. (2014). Ergenlerin saldırganlık davranışlarının bazı değişkenler açısından incelenmesi [Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi], Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi.
67. Narváez Olmedo, G., Sala Roca, J., & Urrea Monclús, A. (2021). Relation between Learning disabilities and socioemotional skills in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 9(4), 819-830. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2021.090415
68. Nelson, J. R., Benner, G., & Rogers-Adkinson, D. (2003). An investigation of the characteristics of K-12 students with comorbid emotional disturbance and significant language deficits served in public school settings. Behavioral Disorders, 29(1), 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290302900105
69. Nickelson, A. B., Fredrick, S. S., Allen, K. P., & Jenkins, L. N. (2019). Social emotional learning (SEL) practices in schools: Effects on perceptions of bullying victimization. Journal of School Psychology, 73(4), 74-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.03.002
70. OECD Sosyal ve Duygusal Beceriler Araştırması Türkiye Ön Raporu (Eylül 2021). Eğitim Analiz ve Değerlendirme Raporları Serisi, No:19, T.C. Mili Eğitim Bakanlığı. 07170836_No19_-_OECD_Sosyal_ve_Duygusal_Beceriler_Arastirmasi.pdf
71. Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at School: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell.
72. O'Moore, A. M., & Hillery, B. (1989). Bullying in Dublin schools. The Irish Journal of Psychology, 10(3), 426-441. doi:10.1080/03033910.1989.10557759.
73. Osher, D., Kidron, Y., Brackett, M., Dymnicki, A. B., Jones, S., & Weisberg, R. (2016). Advancing the science and practice of social and emotional learning, Review of Research in Education, 40(1), 644-681. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16673595
74. Östberg, V., Låftman, S. B., Modin, B., & Lindfors, P. (2018). Bullying as a stressor in mid-adolescent girls and boys–associations with perceived stress, recurrent pain, and salivary cortisol. International Journal of Enviromental Research and Public Health Sciences, 15(2), 1-11. doi:10.3390/ijerph15020364
75. Özkan, İ., Nuri, C., & Bağlama, B. (2023). Özel eğitim gerektiren bireylerde akran zorbalığının öğretmen görüşlerine göre belirlenmesi (KKTC) örneği. Uluslararası Anadolu Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(4), 1064-1086. https://doi.org/10.47525/ulasbid.1395194
76. Özkan, Y., & Çifci, E. G. (2010). Düşük sosyo-ekonomik düzeydeki ilköğretim okullarında akran zorbalığı. İlköğretim Online, 9(2), 576-586. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/90762
77. Parada, R. (2000). Adolescent peer relations instrument: A theoretical and empirical basis for the measurement of participant roles in bullying and victimization of adolescence: An interim test manual and a research monograph: A test manual. Publication Unit, Self-concept Enhancement and Learning Facilitation (SELF) Research Centre.
78. Pallant, J. (2017). SPSS kullanma kılavuzu: SPSS ile adım adım veri analizi (S. Balcı & B. Ahi, Çev.; 2. baskı). Anı Yayıncılık.
79. Pişkin, M. (2002). Okul zorbalığı: Tanımı, türleri, ilişkili olduğu faktörler ve alınabilecek önlemler. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 2(2), 531-562. https://search.trdizin.gov.tr/tr/yayin/detay/2142/okul-zorbaligi-tanimi-turleri-iliskili-oldugu-faktorler-ve-alinabilecek-onlemler
80. Polat, F., & Sohbet, R. (2020). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinden akran çatışmasına bakış. KSÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(2), 41-51. https://doi.org/10.17517/ksutfd.608921
81. Reiter, S., & Lapidot-Lefler, N. (2007). Bullying among special education students with intellectual disabilities: Differences in social adjustment and social skills. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 3, 174–181. https://doi.org/10.1352/1934-9556
82. Rigby, K. (2008). School perspectives on bullying and preventative strategies: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Education0(0) 1–16, https://10.1177/0004944116685622journals.sagepub.com/home/aed
83. Rigby, K., & Slee, P. T. (1991). Bullying among Australian school children: Reported behavior and attitudes toward victims. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(5), 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1991.9924646
84. Rinaldi, C. (2003). Language competence and social behavior of students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Behavior Disorders, 29(1), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.1177/019874290302900106
85. Rivers, I., & Smith, P. K. (1994). Types of bullying behaviour and their correlates. Aggressive Behavior, 20(5), 359–368. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2337(1994)20:5<359::AID-AB2480200503>3.0.CO;2-J
86. Rose, C. A., Espelage, D. L., Monda-Amaya, L. E., Shogren, K. A., & Aragon, S. R. (2013). Bullying and middle school students with and without specific learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(3), 239–254. doi:10.1177/0022219413496279
87. Rose, C. A., Monda-Amaya, L. E., & Espelage, D. L. (2011). Bullying perpetration and victimization in special education: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 32(2), 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510361247
88. Roseberry, L. (1997). An applied Expeeimental evaluation of conflict cesolution curriculum and social skills development [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis], Loyola University.
89. Rossman, B. R., & Rosenberg, M. S. (1992). Family stress and functioning in children: The moderating effects of children's beliefs about their control over parental conflict. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 33(4), 699-715. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1992.tb00906.x
90. Sanada, T. (2025). Contextualizing ijime: The relationship between school bullying, socioeconomic status, and academic achievement with a focus on school position. Contemporary Japan, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/18692729.2024.2425550
91. Sarı, H., & Pürsün, T. (2019). Kaynaştırma sınıflarında akran zorbalığının öğretmen ve öğrenci görüşleri açısından incelenmesi. Sosyal Politika Çalışmaları Dergisi, 19(44), 731-768. https://doi.org/10.21560/spcd.v19i49119.500742
92. Saylor, C. F., & Leach, J. B. (2009). Perceived bullying and social support ın students accessing special ınclusion programming. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 21, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10882-008-9126-4
93. Shabeeda, P. (2023). Exploring the relationship between parental socio-econımic status and learning disabilities in children. International Journal of Novel Research and Development (IJNRD), 8(7), 381-394. https://ijnrd.org/papers/IJNRD2307142.pdf
94. Shanker, S. (2014). Broader measures of success: Socio/emotional learning (SEL). People for education. https://peopleforeducation.ca/wpcontent/uploads/2017/06/M Social-Emotional-Le arning.pd
95. Seçer, İ. (2014). Akran zorbalığına uğrayan ergenlerin mağduriyet algılamaları ve kullandıklari başa çıkma stratejilerine grupla psikolojik danışmanın etkisinin incelenmesi [Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi], Atatürk Üniversitesi.
96. Sharp, S., & Smith, P. (2002). School bullying: Insights and perspectives. Routledge.
97. Silva, J. L., Oliveira, W.A., Carlos, D.M., Lizzi, E.A.S., Rosário, R., & Silva, M.A.I. (2018). Intervention in social skills and bullying. Rev Bras Enferm, 71(3), 1085-91. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0151
98. Sivrikaya, T., & Eldeniz Çetin, M. (2023). Kaynaştırma öğrencilerinin zorbalığa maruz kalma durumlarının ve zorbalıkla başa çıkma stratejilerinin belirlenmesi. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 37(1), 232–252. https://doi.org/10.33308/26674874.2023371532
99. Soleimani, E., & Moharam Zade, H. (2018). The effectiveness of social problem solving training on adjustment and self-efficacy in bullying students. Educational Psychology, 14(47), 49-73. doi: 10.22054/jep.2018.17688.1615
100. Springs, B. H. (2002). The effectiveness of lifeskills training in promoting positive social behavior [Unpublished Doctoral Thesis], University of South Carolina.
101. Süzük, E., & Akıncı, T. (2022). Lise öğrencilerinin akran zorbalığına maruz kalma düzeylerini yordayan değişkenlerin incelenmesi. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (BAİBÜEFD) , 22(1), 62-79. https://dx.doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2022..-819947
102. Şirin, A., Özgen, F., Akca-Erol , G., & Akça-Koca, D. (2018). İlkokul 4. sınıf öğrencilerinin aile ilişkilerinin empatik eğilimlerine etkisi. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 48(48), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.15285/maruaebd.363290
103. Terzioğlu, N. K. (2022). Özel eğitimde akran zorbalığı: Öğretmen görüşlerine dayalı nitel bir çalışma. Turkish Journal of Special Education Research and Practice, 4(1), 64–90. https://doi.org/10.37233/TRSPED.2022.0123
104. Toblin, R. L., Schwartz, D., Gorman, A. H., & Abou-ezzeddine, T. (2005). Social-cognitive and behavioral attributes of aggressive victims of bullying. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 26(3), 329–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2005.02.004
105. Urfalı Dadandı, P., Dadandı, İ., Avcı, S., & Şahin, M. (2016). School counselors’ thoughts about psychosocial problems and guidance needs of students with learning disabilities. Journal of Human Sciences, 13, 6038. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v13i3.4277
106. Wang, Y., Yang, Z., Zhang, Y., Wang, F., Liu, T., & Xin, T. (2019). The effect of social-emotional competency on child development in Western China. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01282.
107. Weinreich, L., Haberstroh, S., Schulte-Körne, G., & Moll, K. (2023). The relationship between bullying, learning disorders and psychiatric comorbidity. BMC Psychiatriy, 23(116), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04603-4
108. Weissberg, R.P., & Cascarino, J. (2013). Academic learning + social-emotional learning = nationalpriority. Phi Delta Kappan, 95(2), 8-13. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171309500203
109. Weissberg, R. P., & O’Brien, M. U. (2004). What works in school-based social and emotional learning programs for positive youth development. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591(1), 86-97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716203260093
110. Yıldız, A. (2004). Öğrenme güçlüğü olan çocukların psikososyal özellikleri, sorunları ve eğitimi. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 2, 169-180. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/93000
111. Yurtal, F., & Cenkseven, F. (2016). İlköğretim okullarında zorbalığın yaygınlığı ve doğası. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 3(28), 1-13. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/200126
112. Ziegler, S., & Rosenstein-Manner, M. (1991). Bullying at school: Toronto in an Iinernational context. Research Services, No. 196. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED328848
113. Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R.P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (2004) Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? Teachers College Press.