POST-NEOLİBERAL KALKINMA PARADİGMASINDA “KALKINMADA KADIN VE GÜÇLENME” ALGISI: DÜNYA BANKASI ÖRNEĞİ

Yıl 2014, Cilt: 16 Sayı: 2, 15 - 31, 01.12.2014

Hatice Karaçay Berna Şafak Zülfikar Derya Güler Aydın

https://izlik.org/JA76CK84MZ

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Dünya Bankası örneği altında post-neoliberal uluslararası kuruluşların kadının güçlenmesi konusuna bakış açısını eleştirel bir biçimde sunmak ve kadının güçlenmesi ve özgürleşmesi için benimsenmesi gereken çerçevenin ne olması gerektiğini ortaya koymaktır. Bu bağlamda çalışma üç bölümden oluşmaktadır. Birinci bölümde, kadının güçlenmesi söyleminin oluşumu/gelişimi ve ardından kavramın tanımı ve kapsamı incelenecektir. İkinci bölümde, kalkınmada kadının rolü tarihsel bir perspektif altında incelenecektir. Çalışmanın son bölümünde ise, Dünya Bankasının ve dolayısıyla yeni kalkınma paradigmasının temel aldığı güçlenme yakla-şımının zayıflıkları/zaafları ortaya konulacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Women Empowerment , New York Consensus , Women in Development , Comprehensive Development

Kaynakça

• ALKIRE, S. (2002), "Dimensions of Human Development", World Development, 30 (2),181-205.
• ARMSTRONG, P. - ARMSTRONG, H. (1994), Theorizing Women’s Work, Garamond Publications, Toronto.
• BERGERON, S.(2003), "The Post-Washington Consensus and Economic Representations of Women in Deve- lopment at the World Bank", International Feminist Journal of Politics, 5(3), 397-419.
• ELSON, D. - ÇAĞATAY, N.(2000), "TheSocial Content of Macroeconomic Policies",World Development, 28 (7), 1347-1364.
• FUKUDA-PARR, S. (2003) "The Human Development Paradigm: Operationalizing Sen’s Ideas on Capabili- ties", Feminist Economics, 9(2-3), 301-317.
• GÖKBERK, M. (1994), Felsefe Tarihi, Remzi Kitabevi, İstanbul.
• KANT, I.(1999), Pratik Aklın Eleştirisi, (Çev.Kuçuradi,Ioanna), Türkiye Felsefe Kurumu Yayınları, Ankara.
• KARAÇAY-ÇAKMAK H. (2006), "Kalkınma İktisadında Temel İhtiyaçlar Etiği Yaklaşımı", İstanbul Üni- versitesi SBF Dergisi, 34, 123-137.
• LEGOVINI, A. (2005), MeasuringWomen’sEnpowermentandImpact of Ethiopia’s, Alsop R., Bertelsen M. F., andHoland J. (der) Enpowerment in Practice: From Anlaysis to Implementation, World Bank Publica- tions, Washington DC, s. 125-152.
• LONG, C. (2003), The Advocate’s Guide to Promoting Gender Equality at the World Bank:Women’s
• Edge, WB/Oxford UP, Washington DC. NARAYAN, D. (2005), Measuring Empowerment: Cross-Disciplinary Perspectives, The World Bank
• Publications, Washington DC. NUSSBAUM, M. (2006), "Poverty and Human Functioning: Capabilities as Fundamental Entitlements",
• Grusky D. B. Ve KanburR. (der.)Poverty and Inequality, Standford University Press, New York, s. 47- OXALL, Z.- BADEN, S. (1997), Genderand Empowerment: Definitions, Approaches and Implications for Policy, Bridge Development-Gender Report no:40, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, Sussex.
• PARPART, J. -CONNELLY, P. - BARRITEAU, E. (2000), Theoretical Perspectives on Gender and De- velopment, International Development Research Center,Ottowa.
• RATHGEBER, E. (1990), "WID, WAD, GAD: Trends in Research and Practice", The Journal of Develo- ping Areas, 24 (2), 489-502.
• SOLAVA I. - ALKIRE, S.(2007), "Agency& Empowerment: A Proposal for Internationally Comparable Indica- tors" OPHI Working Papers ophiwp005, Queen Elizabeth House, University of Oxford, Oxford.
• SEN, G.- GROWN, C. (1987), "Development, Crises, and Alternative Visions: Third World Women’s Perspec- tives",Monthly Review Press, New York.
• SERAGELDIN, I.(1998), Culture and Development at the World Bank, Washington, DC: World Bank.
• STIGLITZ, J.(2002), Globalisation and Its Discontents, W.W.Norton&Company: New York.
• SCHECH, S.–VAS DEV, S.(2007) "Gender Justice: the World Bank’s New Approach to the Poor?", Develop- ment in Practice,17 (2), 114-26.
• TIANO, S. (1987) "Gender, Work, and World Capitalism: Third World Women’s Role in Development", Hess
• B.B. ve Ferree M.M. (der.)Analyzing Gender: A Handbook of Social Science Rese- arch,SagePublication,London, s.216-243. TOKSÖZ, G. (2012), Kalkınmada Kadın Emeği, Varlık Yayınları: İstanbul.
• WILLIAMSON, J. (2005), "The Washington Consensus as Policy Prescription for Development",Besley, T. ve -ZaghaR. (der.) Development Challenges in the 1990s, WB/Oxford UP, Washington DC, 31-57. WOLFENSOHN, http://www.worldbank.org/html/extdr/am97 (01.02.2013). J. (1999),
• "CoalitionsforChange" (annualmeetingspeech). World Bank (1995), Advancing Gender Inequality: From Concept to Action, WB/Oxford UP, Was- hington DC.
• World Bank (2000), Attacking Poverty: World Development Report 2000/01, WB/Oxford UP, Was- hington DC.
• World Bank, (2001), Engendering Development: A World Bank Research Report, WB/Oxford UP, Washington DC.
• World Bank, (2002a), IntegratingGenderintothe World Bank’sWork: A Strategyfor Action, WB/Oxford UP, Washington DC.
• World Bank, (2002b), Empowerment and Poverty Reduction:ASourcebook, WB/Oxford UP, Washing- ton DC.
• World Bank, (2006), Equityand Development: World Development Report, WB/Oxford UP, Washing- ton DC.
• World Bank, (2007), Global Monitoring Report: Confronting the Challenges of Gender Inequality and Fragile States, WB/Oxford UP, Washington DC.
• World Bank, (2010), An Evaluation of World bank Support 2002-2008: Gender and Development,
• WB/Oxford UP, Washington DC. World Bank, (2013), Empowerment, web.worldbank.org, TopicsPoverty, 01.02.2013
• YAZICI, A. (2008), "Kantçı ve Feminist Kuramlarda Bireysel Özerklik Tartışması", Uludağ Üniversitesi