Development of Teacher Job Performance Scale and Determining Teachers' Job Performance Level

Yıl 2020, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 3, 564 - 590, 21.07.2020

İbrahim Limon , Şenay Sezgin Nartgün

Öz

This study aims to develop a valid and reliable scale to measure teachers’ self-reported job performance and use it for the first time on the target group. In line with this aim, the current study employed a single surveying model. The study sample consisted of three groups. There are 265 teachers in the first group; 509 teachers in the second and 1935 teachers in the last one. Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to determine the factor structure of the teachers’ job performance scale (TJPS). Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient and item statistics were also calculated. Results showed that the TJPS is a valid and reliable three-dimensional measure: task performance (16 items), contextual performance (9 items) and adaptive performance (12 items). On the other hand, teachers’ performance level is “always” for task, adaptive and the overall scale and sometimes for contextual performance. Based on the findings, some suggestions were made.

Anahtar Kelimeler

teacher, job performance, scale development

Öğretmen İş Performansı Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi ve Öğretmenlerin İş Performansı Düzeyinin Belirlenmesi

Öz

Bu araştırmanın amacı öğretmenlerin iş performansını öz-bildirim yöntemiyle ölçmede kullanılabilecek geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı geliştirmek ve geliştirilen ölçeğin ilk uygulamasını hedef grup üzerinde yürütmektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, araştırmada tekil tarama yöntemi esas alınmıştır. Araştırma üç farklı çalışma grubu üzerinde yürütülmüştür. Birinci çalışma grubunda 265 öğretmen; ikinci çalışma grubunda 509 öğretmen ve üçüncü çalışma grubunda 1935 öğretmen yer almaktadır. Öğretmen iş performansı ölçeğinin yapı geçerliğini test etmek amacıyla açımlayıcı faktör analizi ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi yürütülmüştür. Güvenirlik analizleri kapsamında ise Cronbach Alfa güvenirlik katsayısı ve madde istatistikleri hesaplanmıştır. Elde edilen bulgular ölçeğin geçerli ve güvenilir bir ölçme aracı olduğuna işaret etmektedir. Ölçek görev performansı (16 madde), bağlamsal performans (9 madde) ve uyumsal performans (12 madde) olmak üzere üç boyuttan oluşmaktadır. Ayrıca, elde edilen bulgular öğretmen iş performansının görev performansı, uyumsal performans ve ölçek genelinde “her zaman” bağlamsal performans boyutunda ise “ara sıra” düzeyinde olduğunu göstermektedir. Bulgular temelinde birtakım öneriler getirilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

öğretmen, iş performansı, ölçek geliştirme

Kaynakça

• Adejumobi, F. T., & Ojikutu, R. K. (2013). School climate and teacher job performance in Lagos state Nigeria. Discourse Journal of Educational Research, 1(2), 26-36.
• Adeyemi, T. (2008). Organisational climate and teachers’ job performance in primary schools in Ondo State, Nigeria: an analytical survey. Asian Journal of Information Technology, 7(4), 138-145.
• Akbulut, Y. (2015). Predictors of inconsistent responding in web surveys. Internet Research, 25(1).
• Akman, A. (2017). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin değişime direnç nedenlerinin incelenmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Kültür Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Akman, Y. (2018). Investigating the relationship between organizational justice, work motivation and teacher performance. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 47 (1), 164-187.
• Akyüz, A. N. (2013). Örgütsel adalet algısının örgütsel bağlılık ve iş performansı üzerindeki etkisi: öğretmenler üzerine ampirik bir çalışma. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kocaeli.
• Akyüz, B. (2012). Hizmetkar liderlik davranışlarının örgütsel adalet, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışları ve performans üzerine etkisi: eğitim sektörü üzerine bir araştırma. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kocaeli.
• Ali, A., & Haider, S. Z. (2017). Developing a validated instrument to measure teachers’ job performance: analyzing the role of background variables. Journal of Educational Research, 20(1), 21-35.
• Alkış, H., & Güngörmez, E. (2015). Örgütsel adalet algısı ile performans arasındaki ilişki: Adıyaman ili örneği. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 8(21), 937-967.
• Allworth, E., & Hesketh, B. (1999). Construct-oriented biodata: capturing change-related and contextually relevant future performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 7(2), 97-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2389.00110
• Altaş, S. S., & Çekmecelioğlu, H. G. (2015). Örgütsel adalet algısının iş tatmini, örgütsel bağlılık ve iş performansı üzerindeki etkileri: okul öncesi öğretmenleri üzerinde bir araştırma. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 29(3), 421-439.
• Amin, M., Shah, R., Ayaz, M., & Atta, M. A. (2013). Teachers' job performance at secondary level in Khyber Pakhyunkhwa, Pakistan. Gomal University Journal of Research, 29(2), 100-104.
• Argon, T., Sezgin-Nartgün, Ş., & Göksoy, S. (2013). Views of education inspectors regarding loneliness at work and employee performance. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 5(3), 575-584.
• Arthi, R., & Sumathi, G. (2016). Emotional intelligence and job performance among school teachers-an empirical approach. Sona Global Management Review, 10(3), 13-25. DOI: 10.5539/ass.v11n13p227.
• Avcıoğlu, G. Ş. (2014). Internet survey applications in social sciences: response rate, data quality, sample problems and solutions. International Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 89-113.
• Baard, S. K., Rench, T. A., & Kozlowski, S. W. (2013). Performance adaptation: a theoretical integration and review, Journal of Management, 40(1), 48-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206313488210.
• Bakker, A. B., & Bal, P. M. (2010). Weekly work engagement and performance: a study among starting teachers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 189-206. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X402596
• Balkar, B. (2015). The relationships between organizational climate, innovative behavior and job performance of teachers. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(2), 81-92. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15345/iojes.2015.02.007.
• Bashir, H., Alias, M., Saleh, K. M., & Halizah, A. (2017). Students’ perceptions of their teachers’ performance in teaching engineering drawing in Nigerian tertiary institutions. Path of Science, 3(10), 3001-3012. DOI: 10.22178/pos.27-4.
• Bhat, S. A., & Beri, A. (2016). Development and validation of teachers perceived job performance scale (TPJP) in higher education. Man in India, 96 (4), 935-944.
• Brief, A. P., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1986). Prosocial organizational behaviors. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 710-725. DOI: 10.2307/258391.
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Busso, L. (2003). The relationship between emotional intelligence and contextual performance as influenced by job satisfaction and locus of control orientation. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Alliant International University, San Diego.
• Büyükgöze, H., & Özdemir, M. (2017). Examining job satisfaction and teacher performance within affective events theory. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 18(1), 311-325. DOI: 10.17679/inuefd.307041.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Anket geliştirme. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 133-151.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı. Ankara: PegemA Akademi.
• Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications and Programming. New York: Routledge.
• Çakıroğlu, Ü. (2008). Eğitim araştırmaları için internet tabanlı veri toplama aracı tasarımı ve uygulaması. Sosyal Bilimler Arastırmaları Dergisi, 1, 56-68.
• Campbell, C. H., Ford, P., Rumsey, M. G., Pulakos, E. D., Borman, W. C., Falker, D. B., et al. (1990). Development of multiple job performance measures in a representative sample of jobs. Personnel Psychology, 43, 277-300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01559.x
• Campbell, J. B., Mchenry, J. J., & Wise, L. L. (1990). Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology, 43, 313-333. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1990.tb01561.x.
• Campbell, J. P. (2012). Behavior, Performance, and Effectiveness – In the 21st Century. In S. W. Kozlowski (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Psychology Volume 1 (s. 159-198). New York: Oxford University Press.
• Carlos, V. S., & Rodrigues, R. G. (2016). Development and validation of a self-reported measure of job performance. Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 126(1), 279-307.
• Castilho, A. F. (2015). The relationship of learning culture with contextual performance and negative emotions at work: the mediator role of job satisfaction and P-O fit. (Unpublished master thesis). University of Coimbra, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Coimbra.
• Cerit, Y. (2012). Lider üye etkileşimi ile öğretmenlerin performansları arasındaki ilişki. Balıkesir Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15(28), 33-46.
• Cerit, Y. (2015). Mekanik okul yapısı ile öğretmenlerin performansları arasındaki ilişki: rol belirsizliğinin arabulucu etkisi. International Periodical for The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 10(3), 237-250.
• Chamundeswari, S. (2013). Job satisfaction and performance of school teachers. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 3(5), 420-428.
• Charbonnier-Voirin, A., & Roussel, P. (2012). Adaptive performance: a new scale to measure ındividual performance in organizations. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 29, 280-293. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.232.
• Charbonnier-Voirin, A., Akremi, A. E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2010). A multilevel model of transformational leadership and adaptive performance and the moderating role of climate for innovation. Group & Organization Management, 35(6), 699-726. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601110390833.
• Chughtai, A. A. (2008). Impact of job involvement on in-role job performance and organizational citizenship behaviour. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 9(2), 169-183.
• Cohen, A., & Liu, Y. (2011). Relationships between in-role performance and individual values, commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior among Israeli teachers. International Journal of Psychology, 46(4), 271-287. DOI: 10.1080/00207594.2010.539613.
• Çokluk, Ö., Şekercioğlu, G., & Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2018). Sosyal bilimler için çok degiskenli istatistik SPSS ve Lisrel uygulamaları. Ankara: Pegem A Akademi.
• Çöl, G. (2008). Algılanan güçlendirmenin işgören performansı üzerine etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), 35-46.
• Coleman, V. I., & Borman, W. C. (2000). Investigating the underlying structure of the citizenship performance domain. Human Resource Management Review, 10(1), 25-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(99)00037-6.
• Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Teachers' sense of adaptability: examining links with perceived autonomy support, teachers' psychological functioning, and students' numeracy achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 55(2017), 29-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.003.
• Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A First Course in Factor Analysis. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Delgado-Rodríguez, N., Hernández-Fernaud, E., Rosales, C., Díaz-Vilela, L., Isla-Díaz, R., & Díaz-Cabrera, D. (2018). Contextual performance in academic settings: the role of personality, self-efficacy, and impression management. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 34(2), 63-68. DOI: 10.5093/jwop2018a8.
• Demir, A. (2008). Ortaöğretim okullarında okul iklimi ile öğretmen performansı arasındaki ilişki. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Yeditepe Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale Development Theory and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Dilekçi, Ü. (2018). Öğretmenlerin öğretim duygu durumları ve algıladıkları uyumsal performansları. (Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi). Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.
• Doğan, S. & Kılıç, S. (2014). Üretkenlik karşıtı iş davranışlarının türleri, boyutları ve benzer kavramlarla ilişkilerine yönelik bir yazın incelemesi. H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 32 (2), 103-132. DOI: 10.17065/huiibf.92053.
• Duyar, I., Ras, N., & Pearson, C. L. (2015). Analysis of teachers’ task and extra-role performance under different autonomy regimes. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 64(4), 499-522. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-06-2013-0103.
• Ekinci, S. (2018). Profesyonel öğrenme topluluğu, psikolojik sahiplenme ve bağlamsal performans arasındaki ilişki. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bolu.
• Erdem, H., Gökmen, Y., & Türen, U. (2016). Psikolojik güçlendirme boyutlarının iş performansı üzerine etkisinde örgütsel bağlılığın aracılık rolü: görgül bir araştırma. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 17(2), 161-176.
• Fadeyi, V. T., Sofoluwe, A. O., & Gbadeyan, R. A. (2015). Influence of teachers’ welfare scheme on job performance in selected Kwara State Secondary Schools. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, Arts and Sciences, 2(4), 89-93.
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS. Sage Publications: Los Angeles.
• Findley, H. M., Giles, W. F., & Mossholder, K. W. (2000). Performance appraisal process and system facets: relationships with contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 634-640. DOI:10.1037/0021-9010.85.4.634.
• Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Neale, M. (2000). The contribution of task performance and contextual performance to effectiveness: investigating the role of constraints. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(3), 517-533. https://doi.org/10.1111/1464-0597.00029.
• Griffin, M. A., Neal, A., & Parker, S. K. (2007). A new model of work role performance: positive behavior in uncertain and interdependent contexts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(2), 327-347. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24634438.
• Guan, X., Sun, T., Hou, Y., Zhao, L., Luan, Y.-Z., & Fan, L.-H. (2014). The relationship between job performance and perceived organizational support in faculty members at Chinese universities: a questionnaire survey. BMC Med Education, 14(50), 1-10. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-14-50.
• Hamidizadeh, M. R., Baramond, S., & Latifi, M. M. (2012). Empowerment and contextual performance with job utility's model. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 1199-1218.
• Hanif, R. (2004). Teacher stress, job performance and self efficiacy of women school teachers. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad.
• Hanif, R., & Pervez, S. (2004). Development and validation of teachers' job performance scale. Pakistan Journal of Psychological Research, 19(3-4), 89-104.
• Hanif, R., Tariq, S., & Nadeem, M. (2011). Personal and job related predictors of teacher stress and job performance among school teachers. Pak. J. Commer. Soc. Sci., 5(2), 319-329.
• Hatipoğlu, A., & Kavas, E. (2016). Veli yaklaşımlarının öğretmen performansına etkisi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(4), 1012-1034.
• Huck, S. W. (2012). Reading Statistics and Research. Boston: Pearson Education.
• Jamal, M. (2007). Job stress and job performance controversy revisited: An empirical examination in two countries. International Journal of Stress Management, 14(2), 175-187. DOI: 10.1037/1072-5245.14.2.175.
• Jex, S. M., & Britt, T. W. (2008). Organizational Psychology: A Scientist-Practitioner Approach. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.
• Johari, J., & Yahya, K. K. (2009). Linking organizational structure, job characteristics, and job performance constructs: a proposed framework. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 145-152. DOI: 10.5539/ijbm.v4n3p145.
• Jundt, D. K., Shoss, M. K., & Huang, J. L. (2015). Individual adaptive performance in organizations: a review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 53-71. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1955.
• Kalay, F. (2016). The impact of organizational justice on employee performance: a survey in Turkey and Turkish context. International Journal of Human Resource Studies, 6(1), 1-20. DOI: 10.5296/ijhrs.v6i1.8854.
• Karakulakoğlu, S. E. (2014). İnternet araştırmalarında yöntem sorunu. Erciyes İletişim Dergisi, 3(4), 122-134. https://doi.org/10.17680/akademia.v3i4.5000013908.
• Khan, A., Shah, I. M., Khan, S., & Gul, S. (2012). Teachers’ stress, performance & resources the moderating effects of resources on stress & performance. International Review of Social Sciences and Humanities, 12(2), 21-29.
• Kılınç, H., & Fırat, M. (2017). Opinions of expert academicians on online data collection and voluntary participation in social sciences research. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 17(5), 1461-1486. DOI: 10.12738/estp.2017.5.0261.
• Kline, R. B. (2009). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Kluge, A., Sauer, J., Burkolter, D., & Ritzmann, S. (2010). Designing training for temporal and adaptive transfer: a comparative evaluation of three training methods for process control tasks. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 43(3), 327-353. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.43.3.d.
• Koç, H., Yazıcıoğlu, İ., & Hatipoğlu, H. (2009). Öğretmenlerin iş doyum algıları ile performansları arasındaki ilişkinin belirlenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28, 13-22.
• Koopmans, L., Bernaards, C. M., Hildebrandt, V. H., Vet, H. C., & Beek, A. J. (2013). Measuring individual work performance - identifying and selecting indicators. A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation, 45(3), 61-81. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-131659.
• Korkmaz, M. (2005). Duyguların ve liderlik stillerinin öğretmenlerin performansı üzerinde etkisi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 43, 401-422.
• Lauermann, F. V. (2013). Teacher responsibility. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Michigan, Michigan.
• Lev, S., & Koslowsky, M. (2012). On-the-job embeddedness as a mediator between conscientiousness and school teachers’ contextual performance. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(1), 57-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2010.535656.
• Loomis, D. K., & Paterson, S. (2018). A comparison of data collection methods: mail versus online surveys. Journal of Leisure Research, 49(2), 133-149. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2018.1494418.
• McCloy, R. A., Campbell, J. P., & Cudeck, R. (1994). A confirmatory test of a model of performance determinants. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(4), 493-505. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.79.4.493.
• Mehmood, T., Qasim, S., & Azam, R. (2013). Impact of emotional intelligence on the performance of university teachers. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(18), 300-307.
• Motowidlo, S. J., Borman, W. C., & Schmit, M. J. (1997). A theory of individual differences in task and contextual performance. Human Performance, 10(2), 71-83. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327043hup1002_1.
• Motowidlo, S.J. (2003). Job performance. In W.C. Borman, Daniel R. Ilgen & R.J. Klimoski, Handbook of Psychology (s.39-53). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. OECD. (2005). Teachers matter: attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Organ, D. W. (1990). The motivational basis of organizational citizenship behavior. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 43-72.
• Özdemir, M., & Gören, S. Ç. (2017). Psikolojik güçlendirme, liderlik uyumu ve öğretmen performansı ilişkisinde örgütsel bağlılığın aracı rolü. İlköğretim Online, 16(1), 342-353. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17051/io.2017.47449.
• Özdemir, M., & Yirmibeş, A. (2016). Okullarda liderlik ekibi uyumu ve öğretmen performansı ilişkisinde iş doyumunun aracı etkisi. GEFAD, 36(2), 323-348.
• Pallant, J. (2007). SPSS Survival Manual A Step by Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows. Berkshire: McGraw Hill.
• Payne, J., & Barnfather, N. (2012). Online data collection in developing nations: an investigation into sample bias in a sample of South African University Students. Social Science Computer Review, 30(3), 389-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439311407419.
• Ployhart, R. E., & Bliese, P. D. (2006). Individual Adaptability (I-Adapt) Theory: Conceptualizing the Antecedents, Consequences, and Measurement of Individual Differences in Adaptability. In C. S. Burke, L. G. Pierce, & E. Salas (Eds.), Understanding Adaptability: A Prerequisite for Effective Performance Within Complex Environments (s. 3-39). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Pradhan, R. K., & Jena, L. K. (2017). Employee performance at workplace: conceptual model and empirical validation. Business Perspectives and Research, 5(1), 69-85. DOI: 10.1177/2278533716671630.
• Pulakos, E. D., Arad, S., Donovan, M. A., & Plamondon, K. E. (2000). Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 612-624. DOI: 10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.612.
• Pulakos, E. D., Dorsey, D. W., & White, S. S. (2006). Adaptability in the Workplace: Selecting an Adaptive Workforce. In C. S. Burke, L. G. Pierce, & E. Salas (Eds.), Understanding Adaptability: A Prerequisite for Effective Performance Within Complex Environments (s. 41-71). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
• Pulakos, E. D., Schmitt, N., Dorsey, D. W., Arad, S., Borman, W. C., & Hedge, J. W. (2002). Predicting adaptive performance: further tests of a model of adaptability. Human Performance, 15(4), 299-323. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327043HUP1504_01.
• Ramawickrama, J., Opatha, H. H., & Pushpakumari, D. (2017). A synthesis towards the construct of job performance. International Business Research, 10(10), 66-81. DOI: 10.5539/ibr.v10n10p66.
• Raza, S. A. (2010). Relationship between organizational climate and performance of teachers in public and private colleges of Punjab. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi.
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2012). Organizational Behavior. Essex: Pearson.
• Russo, R. (2003). Statistics for the behavioral sciences: an introduction. Essex, UK:
• Scotter, J. R., & Motowidlo, S. J. (1996). Interpersonal facilitation and job dedication as separate facets of contextual performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(5), 525-531. DOI: 10.1037/0021-9010.81.5.525.
• Scotter, J. R., Motowildo, S. J., & Cross, T. C. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systematic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(4), 526-535. DOI: 10.1037//0021-9010.85.4.526.
• Şehitoğlu, Y. (2010). Örgütsel sessizlik, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve algılanan çalışan performansı ilişkisi. (Yayımlanmamiş doktora tezi). Gebze Yüksek Teknoloji Enstitüsü, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Kocaeli.
• Shaffril, H. A., & Uli, J. (2010). The influence of sociodemographic factors on work performance among employees of employees of government agriculture agencies in Malaysia. The Journal of International Social Research, 3(10), 459-469.
• Shaikh, F. (2015). Effect of primary school teachers perceived motivation on their performance in Sindh. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iqra University, Faculty of Education and Learning Sciences, Sindh.
• Shaikh, F., Saad, M. I., & Bhutto, M. I. (2012). Level of primary school teachers’ ıntrinsic and extrinsic motivation and their performance in sindh. Pakistan Journal of Education, XXIX(I-II), 1-13.
• Shalmani, R. S., & Praveena, K. (2013). Influence of gender and type of school on job performance among school teachers. Indian Streams Research Journal, 3(8). DOI : 10.9780/22307850.
• Shen, J., Benson, J., & Huang, B. (2014). High performance work systems and teachers' work performance: the mediating role of quality of working life. Human Resource Management, 53(5), 817-833. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21614.
• Shoss, M. K., Witt, L., & Vera, D. (2011). When does adaptive performance lead to higher task performance? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(7), 910-924. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.780.
• Şimşek, A. (2012). Bilimsel Gelişme ve Paradigma Değişimi. Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri içinde (Ed.Ali Şimşek). Eskişehir: AÖF Yayınları.
• Singh, K. (2007). Quantitative Social Research Methods. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• Somech, A., & Drach-Zahavy, A. (2000). Understanding extra-role behavior in schools: the relationships between job satisfaction, sense of efficacy, and teachers' extra-role behavior. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(2000), 649-659. DOI:10.1016/s0742-051x(00)00012-3.
• Stanton, J. M. (1998). An empirical assessment of data collection using the internet. Personnel Psychology(51), 709-725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1998.tb00259.x.
• Stanton, J. M., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2001). Using internet/intranet web pages to collect organizational research data. Organizational Research Methods, 4(3), 200-217. DOI: 10.1177/109442810143002.
• Stout, R. J., Salas, E., & Carson, R. (1994). Individual task proficiency and team process behavior: what's important for team functioning? Military Psychology, 6(3), 177-192. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp0603_3.
• Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statiscs. New Jersey: Pearson Education.
• Töre, E. (2018). An examination of the mediating role of organizational citizenship behaviour on the effect of intrinsic motivation on job performance of teachers. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Science Studies, 4(2), 4-12.
• Torun, Y., & Okumuş, D. (2016). Akademisyenlerin algıladıkları kurumsal imaj ile iş performansı arasındaki ilişkide örgütsel sinizmin düzenleyici rolü. Ö. Demirel, & S. Biçer içinde, Eğitim bilimlerinde yenilikler ve nitelik arayışı (s. 873-892). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Ullman, J. B. (2013). Structural Equation Modeling. In B. G. Tabachnick, & L. S. Fidell, Using Multivariate Statistics (s. 681-785). Boston: Pearson.
• Usop, A. M., Askandar, K., Langguyuan-Kadtong, M., & Usop, D. A. (2013). Work performance and job satisfaction among teachers. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3 (5), 245-252.
• Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216-226. DOI: 10.1111/1468-2389.00151.
• Wade, M., & Parent, M. (2002). Relationships between job skills and performance: a study of webmasters. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18(3), 71-96. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.2002.11045694.
• Welbourne, T. M., Johnson, D. E., & Erez, A. (1998). The role-based performance scale: validity analysis of a theory-based measure. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 540-555. DOI: 10.2307/256941.
• Wetzel, A. P., Arment, S. T., & Reed, E. (2015). Building teacher candidates’ adaptive expertise: engaging experienced teachers in prompting reflection. Reflective Practice, 16 (4), 546-558. DOI: 10.1080/14623943.2015.1064380.
• Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601-617. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700305.
• Witt, L., Kacmar, K. M., Carlson, D. S., & Zivnuska, S. (2002). Interactive effects of personality and organizational politics on contextual performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 911-926. DOI: 10.1002/job.172
• Worthington, R. L., & Whittaker, T. A. (2006). Scale development research a content analysis and recommendations for best practices. The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806-838. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000006288127.
• Yazıcıoğlu, İ. (2010). Örgütlerde iş tatmini ve işgören performansı ilişkisi: Türkiye ve Kazakistan karşılaştırması. Bilig, Güz(55), 243-264.
• Yusoff, R. B., Ali, A. M., & Khan, A. (2014). Assessing reliability and validity of job performance scale among university teachers. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 4(1), 35-41.
• Zhu, Y. (2013). Individual behavior: in-role and extra-role. International Journal of Business Administration, 4(1), 23-27. DOI: 10.5430/ijba.v4n1p23.
• Zlatković, B., Stojiljković, S., Djigić, G., & Todorović, J. (2012). Self-concept and teachers’ professional roles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69 (December), 377-384. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.423.