Relationships of Pain Intensity, Kinesiophobia and Quality of Life in Chronic Subacromial Pain Syndrome
Öz
Objectives: Shoulder pain is an important and frequently
reported biopsychosocial problem. In addition to physical problems,
understanding of psychological problems that contribute to shoulder pain is
important for the treatment process. Therefore, the purpose was to investigate
the relationship between kinesiophobia, demographic characteristics, pain
intensity and quality of life in patients seeking conservative treatment for
chronic subacromial pain syndrome
Materials and Methods: Patients with chronic shoulder pain who applied to
İzmir Atatürk Training and Research Hospital were included in the study.
Demographic data of the patients were recorded. The pain severity with Visual
Analogue Scale, kinesiophobia with the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK), and
quality of life with SF-36 quality of life index were assessed. In statistical
analysis, Spearman and Kendall Correlation Analysis were used. Statistical
significance level was set at p <0.05.
Results: Ninety-five patients, 32 male and 63 female, were included in the
study. The median age was 51 (40-61) years, TSK score was 43(38-47), pain at
rest was 3(0-5), pain during activity was 7 (5-8), SF-36 physical component
(PC) and mental component (MC) scores were 36.50(29.3-42.1) and 42(34.9-49.6),
respectively. While there was no difference between the pain (rest pain
female/male= 3/2, p=0.054; activity pain female/male= 7/6, p=0.187) and
kinesophobia scores (female/male=43/41, p=0,185) between genders, physical
(female/male= 34.40 /41.40, p=0.001) and mental components
(female/male=37.70/48.45, p=0.000) of quality of life was lower in women.
Kinesiophobia score showed correlations with educational level, physical and
mental components of quality of life (r= -0.163, p= 0.039; r= -0.499, p= 0.000;
r= -0.279, p= 0.006).
Conclusion: Patients with subacromial pain syndrome had high
kinesiophobia scores. Female and male participants showed similar pain and
kinesiophobia, however, quality of life scores were better in male
participants. Kinesiophobia showed negative correlations with the level of
education, SF-36 scores. It is important to consider kinesiophobia, education
level and quality of life integrations in chronic shoulder rehabilitation.
Anahtar Kelimeler
Kaynakça
- George SZ, Staud R, Borsa PA, et al. Biopsychosocial influence on shoulder pain: Rationale and protocol for a pre-clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2017;56:9-17.
- Diercks RL. Practice guideline 'Diagnosis and treatment of the subacromial pain syndrome. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2014;158:A6985.
- Luime JJ, Koes BW, Hendriksen IJ, et al. Prevalence and incidence of shoulder pain in the general population; a systematic review. Scand J Rheumatol 2004;33(2):73-81.
- Pribicevic M. The epidemiology of shoulder pain: A narrative review of the literature. In Pain in perspective. InTech. 2012.
- Steuri R, Sattelmayer M, Elsig S, et al. Effectiveness of conservative interventions including exercise, manual therapy and medical management in adults with shoulder impingement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. Br J Sports Med 2017 Jun 19. pii: bjsports-2016-096515. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096515. [Epub ahead of print] Review.
- Lentz TA, Barabas JA, Day T, Bishop MD, George SZ. The relationship of pain intensity, physical impairment, and pain-related fear to function in patients with shoulder pathology. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(4):270-7
- Kibler WB, Ludewig PM, McClure PW, Michener LA, Bak K, Sciascia AD. Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: the 2013 consensus statement from the ‘Scapular Summit’. Br J Sports Med 2013; 47(14):877-885.
- Burwinkle T, Robinson JP, Turk DC. Fear of movement: factor structure of the tampa scale of kinesiophobia in patients with fibromyalgia syndrome. J Pain 2005;6(6):384- 391.
Ayrıntılar
Birincil Dil
İngilizce
Konular
Sağlık Kurumları Yönetimi
Bölüm
Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar
Yayımlanma Tarihi
28 Haziran 2019
Gönderilme Tarihi
17 Ocak 2019
Kabul Tarihi
-
Yayımlandığı Sayı
Yıl 2019 Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2