Küreselleşmenin Gerilemesi ve Ekonomik Ayrışma Çağında Stratejik Uyum: Dayanıklı Büyüme İçin Bir Çerçeve

Öz

: Bu kavramsal çalışma, küreselleşmenin gerilemesi ve ekonomik ayrışmanın derinleştiği bir dönemde firmaların karşılaştığı stratejik zorluklara yanıt vermek amacıyla, dayanıklılık merkezli bütüncül bir stratejik çerçeve önermektedir. Stratejik çeviklik ve yedeklilik sistemleri gibi yerleşik yapıların yanı sıra, bu çerçeve yeni bir meta-yetenek olarak tanıtılan “örgütsel dayanıklılık uyumu” kavramını da içermektedir. Dinamik yetenekler perspektifinden beslenen bu model, uluslararası işletmecilik, stratejik yönetim ve küresel siyasal ekonomi literatürlerinden elde edilen bulguları sentezlemekte ve bütünleşik bir kuramsal katkı sunmaktadır. Kavramsal düzeyde geliştirilmiş olmakla birlikte, model Apple ve Unilever gibi örnek olaylara dayandırılarak pratik bağlama oturtulmuştur. Bu yönüyle çalışma, firmaların parçalanmış küresel ortamlarda stratejik süreklilik, esneklik ve rekabet avantajı elde etmeleri için uygulanabilir bir yol haritası sunmaktadır. Kuramsal katkı olarak, örgütsel dayanıklılığı bütünsel bir meta-yetenek olarak yeniden tanımlarken; uygulamalı olarak, yöneticilere ve karar vericilere tedarik zinciri yeniden yapılanması, yönetişim uyumu ve jeopolitik risk yönetimi konularında yol gösterici stratejik içgörüler sağlamaktadır. Belirsizliklerle kuşatılmış günümüz iş dünyasında, bu çerçevenin sunduğu esneklik ve öngörü kapasitesi, uzun vadeli kurumsal direnç ve sürdürülebilirlik açısından kritik bir değer taşımaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Dayanıklılık
• Stratejik Çeviklik
• Küreselleşmenin Gerilemesi
• Ekonomik Ayrışma
• Tedarik Zinciri
• Stratejik Yönetim
• Çok Uluslu Şirketler

Strategic Adaptation in an Era of De-globalization and Economic Decoupling: A Framework for Resilient Growth

Abstract

This conceptual paper introduces a resilience-centered strategic framework designed to help firms navigate the increasing complexities of deglobalization and economic decoupling. The framework integrates established concepts such as strategic agility and redundancy systems with a newly proposed meta-capability—organizational resilience alignment. By doing so, it offers a holistic and actionable model to enhance organizational adaptability, continuity, and competitiveness in an era of systemic global volatility. Drawing on the dynamic capabilities perspective, the paper synthesizes insights from the strategic management, international business, and global political economy literatures. The model not only bridges theoretical gaps in the existing discourse on resilience and agility but also provides practical guidance for corporate leaders and policymakers seeking to redesign governance structures and supply chain strategies in response to geopolitical fragmentation. Key contributions include the theoretical refinement of resilience as an integrated meta-capability and the development of a strategic blueprint that addresses operational fragility, regulatory uncertainty, and market bifurcation. Although conceptual, the model is grounded in real-world examples, enhancing its applicability. This study aims to contribute to both academic scholarship and managerial practice by presenting a framework that prioritizes long-term sustainability, flexibility, and strategic foresight in an increasingly unpredictable global business environment.

Keywords

• Resilience,
• Strategic Agility
• De-globalization
• Economic Decoupling
• Supply Chain
• Strategic Management
• Multinational Enterprises

Kaynakça

1. Aldrighetti, R., Battini, D., Ivanov, D., & Zennaro, I. (2021). Costs of resilience and disruptions in supply chain network design models: A review and future research directions. International Journal of Production Economics, 235, 108103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108103
2. Bandyopadhyay, S., Ferraro, D., & Bower, L. O. V. (2025). How do tariffs impact the US economy? Economics Letters, 254, Article 112406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2025.112406.
3. Bremen, P., Oehmen, J., Alard, R., & Schönsleben, P. (2010). Transaction costs in global supply chains of manufacturing companies. Journal of Systemics, Cybernetics & Informatics, 8(1), 19–24.
4. Brinley, S. (2023, July 12). The semiconductor shortage is – mostly – over for the auto industry. S&P Global Mobility. https://www.spglobal.com/mobility/en/research-analysis/the-semiconductor-shortage-is-mostly-over-for-the-auto-industry.html.
5. Cajal-Grossi, J., Del Prete, D., & Macchiavello, R. (2023). Supply chain disruptions and sourcing strategies. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 90, 103004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2023.103004
6. Cheng, Y. (2021). Analysis of the opportunities and challenges of Unilever’s differentiated competition by using SWOT and PEST. In 6th International Conference on Economics, Management, Law and Education (EMLE 2020) (pp. 280–284). Atlantis Press.
7. Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2004). Building the resilient supply chain. The International Journal of Logistics Management, 15(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1108/09574090410700275.
8. Contractor, F. J. (2025). Assessing the economic impact of tariffs: Adaptations by multinationals and traders to mitigate tariffs. Review of International Business and Strategy, 35(2/3), 190–213.

9. Corley, K. G., & Gioia, D. A. (2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32.
10. Dai, X., & Zhao, Z. (2021). Can exporting resolve overcapacity? Evidence from Chinese steel companies. Economic Modelling, 102, 105578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105578
11. Doz, Y. L., & Kosonen, M. (2010). Embedding strategic agility: A leadership agenda for accelerating business model renewal. Long Range Planning, 43(2–3), 370–382. doi:10.1016/j.lrp.2009.07.006
12. Duchek, S. (2020). Organizational resilience: A capability-based conceptualization. Business Research, 13, 215–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40685-019-0085-7.
13. Duong, K. (2025). Economic Uncertainty In An Era Of Tariffs. MFI Essays In Economics And Policy: Spring 2025, 8. Enderwick, P. (2011). A ‘China-Plus-One’ strategy: The best of both worlds? Human Systems Management, 30(1–2), 85–96.
14. Froese, F. J., Sutherland, D., Lee, J. Y., Liu, Y., & Pan, Y. (2019). Challenges for foreign companies in China: Implications for research and practice. Asian Business & Management, 18(4), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-019-00084-0
15. González, F., Guttres, A., Lafontaine, O., Peres, S., & Schröder, G. (1998, June 17–18). Shaping globalisation [Conference presentation]. International Conference, Socialist International & Friedrich Ebert Stiftung, Bonn/Berlin. Graziano, A. G., & Tian, Y. (2023). Trade disruptions along the global supply chain (No. 2023-06). University of Nottingham, GEP.
16. Ivanov, D., & Dolgui, A. (2020). Viability of intertwined supply networks: Extending the supply chain resilience angles towards survivability. A position paper motivated by COVID-19 outbreak. International Journal of Production Research, 58(10), 2904–2915. 10.1080/00207543.2020.1750727
17. James, H. (2018). Deglobalization: The rise of disembedded unilateralism. Annual Review of Financial Economics, 10(1), 219–237.
18. Johnson, J. E., & Haug, P. (2021). Modifications to global supply chain management strategies resulting from recent trade disruptions: An exploratory study. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 14(4), 701–722. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-12-2020-0074
19. Kim, H. M., Li, P., & Lee, Y. R. (2020). Observations of deglobalization against globalization and impacts on global business. International Trade, Politics and Development, 4(2), 83-103. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITPD-05-2020-0067.
20. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., & Beck, T. E. (2005). Adaptive fit versus robust transformation: How organizations respond to environmental change. Journal of Management, 31(5), 738–757. 5 https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063052793
21. Lengnick-Hall, C. A., Beck, T. E., & Lengnick-Hall, M. L. (2011). Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Review, 21(3), 243–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.07.001.
22. Li, H., Li, L., Wu, B., & Xiong, Y. (2012). The end of cheap Chinese labor. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 26(4), 57–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/jep.26.4.57.
23. Lundberg, P. A., & Andersson, M. (2025). Trade wars and supply chain shifts: How do tariffs reshape global trade flows? (Unpublished manuscript / Student thesis). Lund University. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9181913.
24. MacInnis, D. J. (2011). A framework for conceptual contributions in marketing. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 136–154.
25. Mentzer, J. T., DeWitt, W., Keebler, J. S., Min, S., Nix, N. W., Smith, C. D., & Zacharia, Z. G. (2001). Defining supply chain management. Journal of Business Logistics, 22(2), 1–25.
26. Milovanović, G., Milovanović, S., & Radisavljević, G. (2017). Globalization–The key challenge of modern supply chains. Ekonomika, 63(1), 33–34.
27. OECD. (2021). Excess capacity in the global economy: Causes and consequences (OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 254). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/18166873.
28. O’Reilly III, C. A., & Tushman, M. L. (2008). Ambidexterity as a dynamic capability: Resolving the innovator's dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185–206.
29. Peters, M. A. (2021). The ancient Silk Road and the birth of merchant capitalism. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 53(10), 955–961. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1691481
30. Petras, J. (1999). Globalization: A critical analysis. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 29(1), 3–37.
31. Petricevic, O., & Teece, D. J. (2019). The structural reshaping of globalization: Implications for strategic sectors, profiting from innovation, and the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(9), 1487–1512. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00269-x
32. Pettit, T. J., Fiksel, J., & Croxton, K. L. (2010). Ensuring supply chain resilience: Development of a conceptual framework. Journal of Business Logistics, 31(1), 1–21.
33. Riccardo, A., Daria, B., & Dmitry, I. (2021). Increasing supply chain resilience through efficient redundancy allocation: A risk-averse mathematical model. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 54(1), 1011–1016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2021.08.752.
34. Roberts, A., & Bishop, J. (2020). Challenges and opportunities in the post-COVID-19 world – Geopolitics: Resilient and sustainable globalization [Report]. World Economic Forum. https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Challenges_and_Opportunities_Post_COVID_19.pdf.
35. Sheffi, Y. (2005). The Resilient Enterprise: Overcoming Vulnerability for Competitive Advantage. MIT Press.
36. Sutcliffe, K. M., & Vogus, T. J. (2003). Organizing for resilience. In K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton, & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive organizational scholarship: Foundations of a new discipline (pp. 94–110). Berrett-Koehler.
37. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640. The Economist. (2023, April 15). Why American companies are shying away from giving forecasts. https://www.economist.com/business/2023/04/15/why-american-companies-are-shying-away-from-giving- forecasts.
38. Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution?. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490-495.
39. Witt, M. A. (2019). De-globalization: Theories, predictions, and opportunities for international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 50(7), 1053–1077. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41267-019-00219-7
40. World Trade Organization. (2021). World trade primed for strong but uneven recovery after COVID-19 pandemic shock [Press release]. https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/pres21_e/pr876_e.htm.
41. Xu, T. (2025). Resilience and Sustainability in Global Supply Chains: Case Study of Apple’s Response to the COVID-19. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 158, 55-60. https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.19700.
42. Yücesan, E. (2025). Does deglobalization imply the end of global supply chains? International Business Review, 102398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2025.102398
43. Zhang, F., & Gallagher, K. P. (2016). China’s industrial policy and global overcapacity: The case of steel (GDAE Working Paper No. 16-01). Global Development and Environment Institute, Tufts University. https://sites.tufts.edu/gdae/files/2016/01/GDAE_WP_016_China-Industrial-Policy-Steel.pdf.
44. Zhao, S., Dilyard, J., & Jones, G. (2025). Rethinking global value chains through MNE sustainable innovation: an antidote to deglobalization?. Multinational Business Review, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBR-11-2024-0222.