PSİKOLOJİK GÜVENLİK VE ÇALIŞAN PERFORMANSI İLİŞKİSİ: ALGILANAN ÖRGÜTSEL ENGELİN ARACI İŞ GÜVENCESİZLİĞİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ETKİSİ

Yıl 2020, Cilt 34, Sayı 1, 119 - 140, 25.01.2020

Daimi KOÇAK

https://doi.org/10.16951/atauniiibd.620054

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, psikolojik güvenliğin çalışan performansı üzerindeki etkisinde algılanan örgütsel engelin dolaylı çalışanların iş güvencesizliği algılarına göre değişip değişmediğinin incelenmesidir. Bu amacın gerçekleştirilmesine yönelik olarak hizmet sektöründe faaliyet gösteren özel bir işletmenin 223 çalışanından anket tekniği kullanılarak veri elde edilmiştir. Araştırma hipotezlerinin test edilmesinde SPSS Macro programı kullanılmıştır. Yapılan analizler sonucunda psikolojik güvenliğin çalışan performansı üzerindeki etkisinde algılanan örgütsel engelin tam aracı etkisinin olduğu, bu etkinin çalışanların iş güvencesizliği algıları yüksek olduğunda güçlü, düşük olduğunda ise zayıf olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma bulguları psikolojik güvenlik ile çalışan performansı arasındaki ilişkinin algılanan örgütsel engel ve iş güvencesizliği bağlamında ele alınması açısından daha iyi anlaşılmasına katkıda bulunacaktır. Araştırmanın teorik ve pratik etkileri tartışılarak gelecekte yapılacak çalışmalara ve sektör yöneticilerine önerilerde bulunulmuştur.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Psikolojik güvenlik, algılanan örgütsel engel, iş güvencesizliği, çalışan performansı

Kaynakça

• Alvi, A. K., Haider, R., ve Raffaqat Ali, R. (2013). “Effect of Job Autonomy, Job Security and Employee Tranning on Perceived Organization Support. Asian Journal of Empirical Research, 3(5), ss.576-585.
• Armeli, S., Eisenberger, R., Fasolo, P., ve Lynch, P. (1998). “Perceived Organizational Support and Police Performance: The Moderating Influence of Socioemotional Needs”. Journal of applied psychology, 83(2), 288-297.
• Awan, W. A., ve Salam, A. (2014). “Identifying the Relationship between Job Insecurity and Employee Performance–An Evidence from Private Colleges in Larkana, Pakistan”. Beykent University Journal of Social Sciences, 7(1), ss. 23-31.
• Baer, M., ve Frese, M. (2003). “Innovation Is Not Enough: Climates For Initiative and Psychological Safety, Process Innovations, and Firm Performance”. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 24(1), ss.45-68.
• Baron, R. M., ve Kenny, D. A. (1986). “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), ss.1173-1182
• Bilstad, J. B. (2016). The Relationship between Team Psychological Safety and Team Effectiveness in Management Teams: The Mediating Effect of Dialogue, (Unpublished Master's thesis), Department of Psychology, University of Oslo.
• Blau, P. (1964). Power and Exchange in Social Life, New York: J Wiley and Sons.
• Bosman, J., Buitendach, J. H., ve Laba, K. (2005). “Job Insecurity, Burnout and Organizational Commitment among Employees of a Financial Institution in Gauteng”. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 31(4), ss.32-40.
• Byrne, Z. S., ve Hochwarter, W. A. (2008). “Perceived Organizational Support and Performance: Relationships Across Levels of Organizational Cynicism”. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(1), ss.54-72.
• Cheng, J., Chang, S. C., Kuo, J. H., ve Lu, K. M. (2014). Social Relations and Voice Behavior: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety”. Wseas Transactions on Business And Economics, 11, ss.130-140.
• Chirumbolo, A. ve Areni, A. (2005). “The Influence of Job Insecurity on Job Performance and Absenteeism: The Moderating Effects of Work Attitudes. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology”, 31(4), ss.65-71.
• Çöl, G. (2011). “Algılanan Güçlendirmenin İşgören Performansı Üzerine Etkileri”. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), ss.35-46.
• De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H., Vander Elst, T., ve Handaja, Y. (2010). “Objective Threat of Unemployment and Situational Uncertainty during a Restructuring: Associations with Perceived Job Insecurity and Strain”. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(1), ss.75-85.
• De Witte, H., Vander Elst, T., ve De Cuyper, N. (2015). “Job Insecurity, Health and Well-Being”. In Sustainable Working Lives Springer, Dordrecht, 109-128
• Dereli, B., ve Cengiz, D. (2011). “İnsan Kaynakları Yönetiminde Grup, Grup Dinamiği Kavramları ve Grup Dinamiğinin Ölçülmesi Üzerine Uygulama Örneği”. Öneri Dergisi, 9(35), ss.35-43.
• Dwivedi, S. (2017). “Overcome the Stress Using Psychological Safety in Organization”, Palma Journal, 16(3), ss.90-93.
• Edmondson, A. (1999). “Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), ss.350-383.
• Edmondson, A. C. (2002). Managing the Risk of Learning: Psychological Safety in Work Teams (pp. 255-275). Cambridge, MA: Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
• Edmondson, A. C., ve Lei, Z. (2014). “Psychological Safety: The History, Renaissance, and Future of an Interpersonal Construct. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., 1(1), ss.23-43.
• Gibney, R., Zagenczyk, T. J., Fuller, J. B., Hester, K. I. M. ve Caner, T. (2011). “Exploring Organizational Obstruction and the Expanded Model of Organizational Identification”, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 41(5), ss.1083-1109.
• Gibney, R., Zagenczyk, T. J. ve Masters, M. F. (2009). “The Negative Aspects of Social Exchange: An Introduction to Perceived Organizational Obstruction”, Group and Organization Management, 34(6), ss.665–697.
• Heaney, C., Israel, B. ve House, J. (1994). “Chronic Job Insecurity among Automobile Workers: Effects on Job Satisfaction and Health”. Social Science and Medicine, 38(10), ss.1431-1437.
• Hedlund, E., ve Österberg, J. (2013). “Team Training, Team Learning, Leadership and Psychology Safety: A Study of Team Training and Team Learning Behavior during a Swedish Military Staff Exercise”. Sociology Mind, 3(1), ss.89-98.
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., ve Mullen, M. (2008). “Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Articles”, 2. Dublin Institute of Technology Articles, ss.53-60
• Jha, S. (2018). “Team Psychological Safety and Team Performance: A Moderated Mediation Analysis of Psychological Empowerment”. International Journal of Organizational Analysis. 27(4), ss. 903-924.
• Jimenez, H., ve Didona, T. (2017). “Perceived Job Security and its Effects on Job Performance: Unionized VS. NonUnionized Organizations”. The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 4(8), ss.3761-3767.
• Johnson, D. W., ve Johnson, F. P. (1982). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group Skills (2nd ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Kahn, W. A. (1990). “Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work”. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), ss.692-724.
• Kirkman, B. L., ve Rosen, B. (1999). “Beyond Self-Management: Antecedents and Consequences of Team Empowerment”. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), ss.58-74.
• Koçak D. (2019), “Algılanan Örgütsel Engel Ölçeğinin Türkçe Uyarlaması ve İşte Kalma Niyeti Üzerindeki Etkisi”, BMIJ, 7(1), ss.58-77
• Lee, E. R. (2016). “The Research about Mediating Effect of Perceived Organizational Obstruction in the Relationship with Job Insecurity and EVLN”. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(2), ss.99-114.
• Liu, Y., Loi, R., ve Lam, L. W. (2011). “Linking Organizational Identification and Employee Performance in Teams: The Moderating Role of Team-Member Exchange”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(15), ss.3187-3201.
• Mackey, J. D., Mcallister, C. P., Brees, J. R., Huang, L. ve Carson, J. E. (2018). “Perceived Organizational Obstruction: A Mediator That Addresses Source–Target Misalignment between Abusive Supervision and OCBs”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39, ss.1283–1295.
• MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., ve Williams, J. (2004). “Confidence Limits for the Indirect Effect: Distribution of the Product and Resampling Methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39(1), ss.99-128.
• May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., ve Harter, L. M. (2004). “The Psychological Conditions of Meaningfulness, Safety and Availability and the Engagement of the Human Spirit at Work”. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 77(1), ss.11-37.
• Muller, D., Judd, C. M., ve Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). “When Moderation Is Mediated and Mediation Is Moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, 89(6), ss.852-863.
• Piccoli, B., Callea, A., Urbini, F., Chirumbolo, A., Ingusci, E., ve De Witte, H. (2017). “Job Insecurity and Performance: The Mediating Role of Organizational Identification”. Personnel Review, 46(8), ss.1508-1522.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). “Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), ss.879–903.
• Preacher K. J., Rucker D. D., ve Hayes A. F. (2007). “Addressing Moderated Mediation Hypotheses: Theory, Methods, and Prescriptions”, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), ss.185-227.
• Preacher, K. J., ve Hayes, A. F. (2004). “SPSS and SAS Procedures for Estimating Indirect Effects in Simple Mediation Models”. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), ss.717-731.
• Reisel, W. D., Probst, T. M., Chia, S. L., Maloles, C. M., ve König, C. J. (2010). “The Effects of Job Insecurity on Job Satisfaction, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, Deviant Behavior, and Negative Emotions of Employees”. International Studies of Management & Organization, 40(1), ss.74-91.
• Rhoades, L., ve Eisenberger, R. (2002). “Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), ss.698-714.
• Rich, B. L. (2006). Job Engagement: Construct Validation and Relationships with Job Satisfaction, Job Involvement, and Intrinsic Motivation. (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis), University of Florida.
• Schepers, J., de Jong, A., Wetzels, M., ve De Ruyter, K. (2008). “Psychological Safety and Social Support in Groupware Adoption: A Multi-Level Assessment in Education. Computers & Education, 51(2), ss.757-775.
• Seçer, B. (2011). “İş Güvencesizliğinin İçsel İşten Ayrılma ve Yaşam Doyumuna Etkisi”. The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 13(4), ss.43-60.
• Sigler, T.H., ve Pearson, C. M. (2000). “Creating an Empowering Culture: Examining the Relationship between Organizational Culture and Perceptions of Empowerment”. Journal of Quality Management, 5, ss.27-52.
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). “Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models”. Sociological Methodology, 13, ss.290-312.
• Sverke, M., Hellgren, J., ve Näswall, K. (2002). “No Security: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Job Insecurity and Its Consequences”. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 7(3), ss.242-264.
• Tavakol, M., ve Dennick, R. (2011). “Making Sense of Cronbach's Alpha”. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, ss.53-55.
• Tiwari, B., ve Lenka, U. (2016). “Building Psychological Safety for Employee Engagement in Post-Recession”. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal, 30(1), ss.19-22.
• Tuna, R., Bacaksız, F. E., ve Seren, A. K. H. (2018). “The Effects of Organizational Identification and Organizational Cynicism on Employee Performance among Nurses”. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 11(3), ss.1707-1714.
• Uğurlu, Ö. Y., ve Sibel, A. (2016). “The Relationship between Psychological Safety and Employee Voice: The Mediation Role of Affective Commitment and Intrinsic Motivation”. Journal of Business Research-Türk, 8(1), ss.223-239.
• Vévoda, J., Ivanová, K., Nakládalová, M., ve Marečková, J. (2010). “Pracovní Spokojenost Všeobecných Sester. PROFESE, 3(3), ss.207–220
• Wang, H. J., Lu, C. Q., ve Siu, O. L. (2015). “Job Insecurity and Job Performance: The Moderating Role of Organizational Justice and the Mediating Role of Work Engagement”. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(4), ss.1249-1259.
• Yener, S. (2015). “Psikolojik Rahatlık Ölçeğinin Türkçe Formunun Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması”. ODÜ Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi (ODÜSOBİAD), 5(13), ss.280-305.