Denklem ve Eşitsizlik Kavramları Bağlamında Rutinleştirme:Bir Durum Çalışması

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ampirik örnekler sunarak, rutinleştirme bağlamında öğrenme süreçlerinin yapısını açığa çıkarmaktır. Bu doğrultuda bir lise öğrencisinin denklem ve eşitsizlik sistemlerini içeren görev durumlarında söyleme katılım biçimlerini nesneleştirme, esneklik, bağlılık, gerekçelendirme, katılımcının yetkinliği ve uygulanabilirlik özellikleri bağlamında incelenmiştir. Bu nedenle çalışma, nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden biri olan durum çalışması olarak tasarlanmıştır. Çalışmanın katılımcısı Elif, bir devlet lisesinde sayısal ağırlıklı derslerle eğitim gören bir 11. sınıf öğrencisidir. Araştırmanın bulguları yarı-yapılandırılmış bireysel ve odak grup görüşmeleri aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Çalışmanın bulguları Elif’in bireysel görüşmede söyleme başkalarını taklit etme yoluyla ritüel bir katılım sergilerken, odak grup görüşmelerinde katılımcının kavramların yapısına yönelik farkındalığının oluşmasıyla daha keşifsel bir katılım sergilediğini göstermiştir. Çalışmanın bulgularına göre, öğrencilerin kendilerinden daha tecrübeli olarak gördüğü katılımcıların rutinleri üzerine düşünerek kendi rutinini uyguladığında söyleme daha keşifsel bir şekilde katılabildiği görülmüştür. Ayrıca rutinleştirme bağlamında öğrenmenin gerçekleşebilmesi için bireyin bir yandan söyleme katılması, bir yandan da rutinlerinin süreç odaklı olmaktan sonuç odaklı olmaya doğru gelişmesi için çaba göstermesi gerektiği tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Matematiksel söylem
• rutin
• ritüel katılım
• keşifsel katılım
• denklem ve eşitsizlikler
• lise öğrencileri

Routinization in the Context of Equation and Inequality Concepts: A Case Study

Öz

This study aims to reveal the structure of learning as routinization by providing empirical examples. The participation of a high school student in discourse in task situations involving systems of equations and inequalities was examined in terms of objectification of the discourse, flexibility, bondedness, substantiability, performer’s agentivity, and applicability. The study was designed as a case study, one of the qualitative research methods. Elif, the study participant, is an 11th-grade student studying courses focused on mathematics and science-oriented fields in a public high school. The data were collected through semi-structured individual and focus group interviews. Findings showed that Elif exhibited ritualistic participation by imitating others in the individual interview. In contrast, she exhibited more explorative participation in the focus group interviews as the participants became aware of the structure of the concepts. It was found that students’ participation in discourses was more explorative when they reflected on the routines of those they considered more experienced. It was also determined that for learning to occur as routinization, individuals should participate in discourse and make an effort to develop their routines from process-oriented to result-oriented.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Mathematical discourse
• routine
• ritualistic participation
• explorative participation
• equations and inequalities
• high school students

Kaynakça

1. Adler P. A. & Adler P. (1998). Observational techniques. In N. K. Denzin, Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 79–109). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Akçakoca, T., Sağ, G. Y., & Argün, Z. (2023). Rituals and explorations in students’ mathematical discourses: The case of polynomial inequalities. Participatory Educational Research, 11(1), 178-197.
3. Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2021). To tell a story, you need a protagonist: how dynamic interactive mediators can fulfill this role and foster explorative participation to mathematical discourse. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 106(2), 291-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-10009-w
4. Ben-Zvi, D. & Sfard, A. (2007). Ariadne’s thread, daedalus’ wings and the learners autonomy. Education et Didactique, 1(3), 117-134. https://doi.org/10.4000/educationdidactique.241
5. Biza, I., & Nardi, E. (2023). Online search routines in undergraduate students’ agentive participation in mathematical discourse. Paper presented at Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Budapest, Hungary.
6. Christiansen, I. M., Corriveau, C. & Pettersson, K. (2023). Hybrids between rituals and explorative routines: opportunities to learn through guided and recreated exploration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112(1), 49-72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10167-z
7. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. United State of America: Sage.
8. Emre-Akdoğan, E., & Gürbüz, F. N. (2023). Explorative participation in the context of a classroom discourse. Paper presented at Twelfth ERME Topic Conference Language in the Mathematics Classroom. Oxford, UK

9. Essack, R. M. (2015). Exploring grade 11 learner routines on function from a commognitive perspective. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
10. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. & Graven, M. (2019). Rituals and explorations in mathematical teaching and learning: introduction to the special issue. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(2), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09890-x
11. Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Tabach, M. & Nachlieli, T. (2016). Opportunities for learning given to prospective mathematics teachers: Between ritual and explorative instruction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 19, 547-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-015-9311-1
12. Glesne C. & Peskin A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman. Jayakody, G. (2015). Commognitive conflicts in the discourse of continuous functions. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 611–619.
13. Karavi, T. Mali, A. & Avraamidou, L. (2022). Commognition as an approach to studying proof teaching in university mathematics lectures. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(7), em2132. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/12173
14. Kieran, C., Forman, E. & Sfard, A. (2001). Guest editorial learning discourse: sociocultural approaches to research in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 1–12.
15. Lavie, I. & Sfard, A. (2019). How children individualize numerical routines: Elements of a discursive theory in making. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4-5), 419-461. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2019.1646650
16. Lerman, S. (2006). Socio-cultural research in PME. In A. Gutièrez & P. Boero (Eds.), Handbook of research on the psychology of mathematics education: Past, present and, future (pp. 347–366). Rotterdam: Sense. Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Lisarelli, G., Macchioni, E. & Miragliotta, E. (2022). A developing discourse on transitions between different realizations of the same function. Proceedings of the 45th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 147-154.
18. Lipper, D. & Karavi, T. (2023). Teaching characteristics in the introduction of proof for supporting de-ritualization. Paper presented at Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Budapest, Hungary.
19. Liu, J. & Weingarden, M. (2022). Beyond correctness: Understanding preservice teachers’ fraction discourse. Paper presented at American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. San Diego, California.
20. Macchioni, E., Lisarelli, G., Miragliotta, E. & Baccaglini-Frank, A. (2023). Sense-making in algebraic mathematizing discourse: The profiles of Bea and Nico. Paper presented at Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Budapest, Hungary.
21. Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı (2018). Ortaöğretim matematik dersi (9, 10, 11 ve 12. sınıflar) öğretim programı. https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr/ProgramDetay.aspx?PID=343 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
22. Moschkovich, J. N. (Ed.). (2010). Language and mathematics education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
23. Nachlieli, T. & Katz, Y. (2017). Ritual towards explorative classroom participation of pre-service elementary school mathematics teachers. Paper presented at Tenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Dublin, Ireland.
24. Nachlieli, T. & Tabach, M. (2019). Ritual-enabling opportunities-to-learn in mathematics classrooms. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(2), 253-271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9848-x
25. Nachlieli, T. & Tabach, M. (2022). Classroom learning as a deritualization process: The case of prospective teachers learning to solve arithmetic questions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 65, 100930. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2021.100930
26. Nisa, Z. & Lukito, A. & Masriyah, M. (2021). Students mathematical discourse analysis by commognition theory in solving absolute value equation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1808(1), 1–10.
27. Roberts, A. & le Roux, K. L. (2019). A commognitive perspective on Grade 8 and Grade 9 learner thinking about linear equations. Pythagoras, 40(1), 1–15.
28. Sfard, A. (2007). When the rules of discourse change, but nobody tells you: Making sense of mathematics learning from a commognitive standpoint. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 16(4), 565-613. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400701525253
29. Sfard, A. (2008). Thinking as communicating: Human development, the growth of discourses, and mathematizing. New York: Cambridge University.
30. Sfard, A. (2012). Introduction: Developing mathematical discourse—Some insights from communicational research. International Journal of Educational Research, 51, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2011.12.013
31. Sfard, A. (2018). On the need for theory of mathematics learning and the promise of ‘commognition’. The Philosophy of Mathematics Education Today, 219-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77760-3_13
32. Sfard, A. (2020). Commognition. Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education, 95-101.
33. Sfard, A. & Lavie, I. (2005). Why cannot children see as the same what grown-ups cannot see as different?—Early numerical thinking revisited. Cognition and Instruction, 23(2), 237-309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci2302_3
34. Tabach, M. (2006). Research and teaching—Can one person do both? A case study. Proceedings of the 30th conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 5, 233–240.
35. Viirman, O. & Jacobsson, M. (2023). Adapting standard mathematics exercises to promote de-ritualization. Paper presented at Thirteenth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Budapest, Hungary.
36. Viirman, O. & Nardi, E. (2019). Negotiating different disciplinary discourses: biology students’ ritualized and exploratory participation in mathematical modeling activities. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101(2), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9861-0
37. Weingarden, M., Heyd-Metzuyanim, E. & Nachlieli, T. (2019). The realization tree assessment tool–examining explorative participation in mathematics lessons. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 56, 100717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2019.100717
38. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning as a social system. Systems Thinker, 9(5), 2-3. Yin, R.K. (2018). Case study research and applications. London UK: Sage.