Relational Aggression Among University Students: The Role of Dark Triad Traits

Yıl 2021, , 361 - 389, 30.07.2021

Nesrin Karaaslan Cem Ali Gizir

https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.683683

Cited By: 3

Öz

The aim of this research is to examine the extent to which the Dark Triad (Machiavellianism, narcissism and psychopathy) personality traits predicted the relational aggression levels of university students. The sample of the study comprised of 725 (457 female, 268 male) undergraduate students from diverse faculties of a state university in Turkey during the 2018-2019 academic year. “Personal Information Form”, “Relational Aggression Scale in Friendship Relations” and “Short Dark Triad Scale” were used in the study. Pearson correlation and multiple regression analysis were also used to analyze the data. The findings of the study indicated that Machiavellianism and psychopathy significantly predicted the relational aggression levels of university students. Similarly, it is observed that both Machiavellianism and psychopathy are significant predictors of the exclusion factor of relational aggression among university students. The results also revealed that only Machiavellianism predicted the manipulation factor of relational aggression while psychopathy predicted alone the gossip factor of relational aggression among university students. Nevertheless, narcissism did not seem to be a significant predictor of relational aggression levels of university students. The implications of this research were considered and some recommendations were made for practice.

Anahtar Kelimeler

relational aggression, dark triad, Machiavellianism, narcissism, psychopathy, university students

Üniversite Öğrencilerinde İlişkisel Saldırganlık: Karanlık Üçlü Kişilik Özelliklerinin Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Karanlık Üçlü (Makyavelizm, narsisizm ve psikopati) kişilik özelliklerinin üniversite öğrencilerinin ilişkisel saldırganlık (dışlama, manipülasyon, dedikodu) düzeylerini yordayıp yordamadıklarını incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini, 2018-2019 eğitim öğretim yılında, bir kamu üniversitesinde öğrenimlerine devam eden 725 (457 kadın, 268 erkek) lisans öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırma kapsamında “Kişisel Bilgi Formu”, “Arkadaşlık İlişkilerinde İlişkisel Saldırganlık Ölçeği” ve “Karanlık Üçlü Ölçeği” kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde çoklu regresyon analizinden yararlanılmıştır. Araştırma bulguları, Makyavelizm ve psikopati kişilik özelliklerinin üniversite öğrencilerinin ilişkisel saldırganlık düzeylerini anlamlı düzeyde yordadıklarını göstermiştir. Benzer şekilde, ilişkisel saldırganlığın alt-boyutları arasında yer alan dışlama eğilimi, Makyavelizm ve psikopati kişilik özellikleri tarafından yordanmaktadır. Diğer yandan, Makyevalizm tek başına üniversite öğrencilerinin arkadaşlık ilişkilerindeki manipülasyon eğilimlerini yordarken, psikopati ise tek başına dedikodu eğilimini yordamaktadır. Narsisizm kişilik özelliğinin ise ilişkisel saldırganlık ve alt-boyutlarının anlamlı bir yordayıcısı olmadığı belirlenmiştir. Araştırma bulguları alanyazın odağında tartışılmış, gelecekteki uygulama ve çalışmalara yönelik öneriler sunulmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

ilişkisel saldırganlık, karanlık üçlü, Makyavelizm, narsisizm, psikopati

Kaynakça

• Abaydın, Y. (2013). Sosyal etki kuramı bağlamında psikolojik dışlanma (Doktora tezi). Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara.
• Abell, L., & Brewer, G. (2014). Machiavellianism, self-monitoring, self-promotion and relational aggression on Facebook. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 258-262.
• Abell, L., Brewer, G., Qualter, P., & Austin, E. (2016). Machiavellianism, emotional manipulation, and friendship functions in women’s friendships. Personality and Individual Differences, 88, 108-113.
• Abrams, D., Hogg, M. A., & Marques, J. M. (2004). Social psychology of inclusion and exclusion. New York: Psychology Press. Ali, F., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2010). The dark side of love and life satisfaction: Associations with intimate relationships, psychopathy and Machiavellianism. Personality and Individual Differences, 48, 228-233.
• Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291-322.
• Archer, J., & Coyne, S. M. (2005). An integrated review of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(3), 212-230.
• Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the major dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327-353.
• Ashton, M. C., Book A., Hodson, G., Lee K., Visser, B. A., & Volk, A. A. (2018). Is the dark triad common factor distinct from low honesty-humility? Journal of Research in Personality, 73, 123-129.
• Austin, E. J., Farrelly, D., Black, C. ve Moore, H. (2007). Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side? Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 179-189.
• Barnett, M. A., & Thompson, S. (1985). The role of perspective taking and empathy in children's Machiavellianism, prosocial behavior, and motive for helping. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 146, 295-305.
• Banks, G. C., Forsyth, D., O’Boyle, E. H., & Story, P. A. (2013). A meta-analytic review of the Dark Triad–intelligence connection. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 789-794.
• Baumeister, R. F., Kathleen, L., & Vohs, D. (2004). Gossip as cultural learning. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 111-121.
• Beersma, B., & Van Kleef, G. A. (2012). Why people gossip: An empirical analysis of social motives, antecedents, and consequences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(11), 2640-2670.
• Buss, D. M., Gomes, M., Higgins, D. S., & Lauterbach, K. (1987). Tactics of manipulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1219-1229.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (13. Baskı). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Campbell, W. K., & Campbell, S. M. (2009). On the self-regulatory dynamics created by the peculiar benefits and costs of narcissism: A contextual reinforcement model and examination of leadership. Self and Identity, 8(2-3), 214-232.
• Christie, R., & Geis, F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press.
• Coyne, S. M., Archer, J., & Eslea, M. (2006). ‘‘We’re not friends anymore! Unlessy’’: The frequency and harmfulness of indirect, relational, and social aggression. Aggression Behavior, 32, 294-307.
• Coyne, S. M., & Thomas, T. J. (2008). Psychopathy, aggression, and cheating behavior: A test of the Cheater-Hawk hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 44(5), 1105-1115.
• Crick, R. N., & Grotpeter, J. K. (1995). Relational aggression, gender and social-psychological adjustment. Child Development, 66, 710-722.
• Czar, K. A., Dahlen, E. R., Bullock, E. E., & Nicholson, B. C. (2010). Psychopathic personality traits in relational aggression among young adults. Aggressive Behavior, 37(2), 207-214.
• Çankaya, G. ve Ergin, H. (2015). Çocukların oynadıkları oyunlara göre empati ve saldırganlık düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Hacettepe University Faculty Of Health Sciences Journal, 1(2), 283-297.
• Dahling, J. J., Whitaker, B. G., & Levy, P. E. (2008). The development and validation of a new Machiavellianism scale. Journal of Management, 35(2), 219-257.
• Demir, N. Ö., Görgün-Baran, A. ve Ulusoy, D. (2005). Türkiye’de ergenlerin arkadaş-akran grupları ile ilişkileri ve sapmış davranışlar: Ankara örneklemi. Ahmet Yesevi Üniversitesi Bilig Dergisi, 32, 83-108.
• Dunbar, R. I. M. (2004). Gossip in evolutionary perspective. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 100-110.
• Dündar, S. (2009). Üniversite öğrencilerinin kişilik özellikleri ile problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(2), 139-150.
• Ellwardt, L., Labianca, G. (Joe), & Wittek, R. (2012). Who are the objects of positive and negative gossip at work? Social Networks, 34(2), 193-205.
• Erdoğan, B. (2018). Karanlık üçlü kişilik özelliklerine sahip üniversite öğrencileriyle kendine zarar verme davranışı gösterenlerin saldırganlık ve risk alma davranışlarının karşılaştırılması (Yüksek lisans tezi). İstanbul Üniversitesi, Adli Tıp Enstitüsü, Sosyal Bilimler Anabilim Dalı, İstanbul.
• Eryılmaz, A. ve Ercan, L. (2011). Öznel iyi oluşun cinsiyet, yaş grupları ve kişilik özellikleri açısından incelenmesi. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 4(36), 139-151.
• Foster, E. K. (2004). Research on gossip: Taxonomy, methods, and future directions. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 78-99.
• García, G. M. (2009). Narcissism, self-esteem, and self-worth as predictors of aggression (Master’s thesis). The University of Tennessee, Chattanooga.
• Gravetter, F. J., & Wallnau, L. B. (2007). Statistics for the behavioral sciences (7. Ed.). Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
• Grieve, R., & Mahar, D. (2010). The emotional manipulation–psychopathy nexus: Relationships with emotional intelligence, alexithymia and ethical position. Personality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 945-950.
• Goldberg, L. R. (1990). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
• Hawley, P. H., Little, T. D., & Pasupathi, M. (2002). Winning friends and influencing peers: Strategies of peer influence in late childhood. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 26, 466-474.
• Hartung, F.-M., Krohn, C., & Pirschtat, M. (2019). Better than its reputation? Gossip and the reasons why we and individuals with “dark” personalities talk about others. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-16.
• Ináncsi, T., Láng, A., & Bereczkeia, T. (2015). Machiavellianism and adult attachment in general interpersonal relationships and close relationships. Europe’s Journal of Psychology (EJOP), 11(1), 139-154.
• Jonason, P. K. Richardson, E. N., & Potter, L. (2015). Self-reported creative ability and the dark triad traits: An exploratory study. American Psychological Association, 9(4), 488-494.
• Jones, D. N., & Neria, A. L. (2015). The dark triad and dispositional aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 360-364.
• Jones, D. N., & Paulhus, D. L. (2014). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21, 28-41.
• Kerig, P. K., & Stellwagen, K. K. (2010). Roles of callous-unemotional traits, narcissism, and machiavellianism in childhood aggression. Journal of Psychopathological Behavior Assessment, 32, 343-352.
• Knight, N. M., Dahlen, E. R., Bullock-Yowell, E., Michael, B., & Madson, M. B. (2018). The HEXACO model of personality and dark triad in relational aggression. Personality and Individual Differences, 122, 109-114.
• Kurtyılmaz, Y. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin ilişkisel saldırganlık ile benlik saygısı, sosyal bağlılık ve sosyal kaygı düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiler (Doktora Tezi). Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Eskişehir.
• Kurtyılmaz, Y., Can, G. ve Ceyhan, A. A. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerinin ilişkisel saldırganlık ile benlik saygısı, sosyal bağlılık ve sosyal kaygı düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiler. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, 7(47), 33-52.
• Kurtyılmaz, Y., Can, G. ve Ceyhan, A. A. (2011). Üniversite öğrencilerinin arkadaşlık ilişkilerinde ilişkisel saldırganlığın değerlendirilmesine ilişkin bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. XI. Ulusal Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Kongresi, İzmir.
• LaFontana, K. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2002). Children’s perceptions of popular and unpopular peers: A multimethod assessment. Developmental Psychology, 38, 635-647.
• Leary, M. R., Twenge, J. M., & Quinlivan, E. (2006). Interpersonal rejection as a determinant of anger and aggression. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10, 111-132.
• Lehmann, A., & Ittel, A. (2012). Aggressive behavior and measurement of psychopathy in female inmates of German prisons: A preliminary study. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 35(3), 190-197.
• Linder, J. R., Crick, N. R., & Collins, W. A. (2002). Relational aggression and victimization in young adults’ romantic relationships: Associations with perceptions of parent, peer, and romantic relationship quality. Social Development, 11(1), 69–86.
• Loudin, J. L., Loukas, A., & Robinson, S. (2003). Relational aggression in college students: Examining the roles of social anxiety and empathy. Aggressive Behavior, 29(5), 430-439.
• Loukas, A., Paulos, S. K., & Robinson, S. (2005). Early adolescent social and overt aggression: Examining the roles of social anxiety and maternal psychological control. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 34, 335-345.
• Lyons, M. T., & Hughes, S. (2015). Malicious mouths? The dark triad and motivations for gossip. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 1-4.
• Martin, R. A., Lastuk, J. M., Jeffery, J., Vernon, P. A., & Veselka, L. (2012). Relationship between the Dark Triad and humor styles: A replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 178-182.
• Masui, K., Fujiwara, H., & Ura, M. (2013). Social exclusion mediates the relationship between psychopathy and aggressive humor style in noninstitutionalized young adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(2), 180-184.
• Masui, K., Iriguchi, S., Terada, M., Nomura, M. ve Ura, M. (2012). Lack of family support and psychopathy facilitates antisocial punishment behavior in college students. Psychology, 3, 284-288.
• Marsee, M. A., Silverthorn, P., & Frick, P. J. (2005). The association of psychopathic traits with aggression and delinquency in non-referred boys and girls. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 23(6), 803-817.
• McAndrew, F. T., & Milenkovic, M. A. (2002). Of Tabloids and family secrets: The evolutionary psychology of gossip. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(5), 1064-1082.
• Mills, C. (2010). Experiencing gossip: The foundations for a theory of embedded organizational gossip. Group & Organization Management, 35(2), 213-240.
• Newman, J. P., MacCoon, D. G., Vaughn, L. J., & Sadeh, N. (2005). Validating a distinction between primary and secondary psychopathy with measures of Gray’s BIS and BAS constructs. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 114, 319–323.
• Özsoy, E. ve Ardıç, K. (2017). Karanlık Üçlü’nün (narsisizm, Makyavelizm ve psikopati) iş tatminine etkisinin incelenmesi. Yönetim ve Ekonomi, 24(2), 391-406.
• Özsoy, E., Rauthmann, J. F., Jonason, P. K., & Ardıç, K. (2011). Reliability and validity of the Turkish versions of dark triad dirty dozen (DTDD-T), short dark triad (SD3-T), and single item narcissism scale (SINS-T). Personality and Individual Differences, 117, 11-14.
• Paal, T., & Bereczkei, T. (2007). Adult theory of mind, cooperation, Machiavellianism: The effect of mindreading on social relations. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(3), 541-551.
• Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36, 556-563.
• Peeters, M., Cillessen, A. H. N., & Scholte, R. H. J. (2010). Clueless or powerful? Identifying subtypes of bullies in adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescents, 39, 1041-1052.
• Polatcı, S., Irk E., Gültekin, Z. ve Sobacı, F. (2017). Psikolojik dayanıklılık ve kişilik özellikleri tatmin düzeyini etkiler mi? Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 29, 553-578.
• Pursoo, T. (2013). Predicting reactive and proactive relational aggression in early adolescence as a function of ındividual differences in Machiavellianism, empathy, and emotion regulation (Doctoral dissertation). University of Ottawa, Canada.
• Schmeelk, K. M., Sylvers, P., & Lilienfeld, S. O. (2008). Trait correlates of relational aggression in a nonclinical sample: DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 22(3), 269-283.
• Solmaz, B. (2006). Söylenti ve dedikodu yönetimi. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 16, 563-574.
• Sumner, F. C. (1942). H. Cleckley: The mask of sanity. The Journal of General Psychology, 27(2), 367-368.
• Sutton, J., & Keogh, E. (2000). Social competition in school: Relationships with bullying, Machiavellianism and personality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 443-456.
• Toplu-Yaşlıoğlu, D. ve Atılgan, Ö. (2018). Karanlık üçlü ölçeği: Türkçeye uyarlama, güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik çalışması. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(3), 725-739.
• Warburton, W. A., Williams, K. D., & Cairns, D. R. (2006). When ostracism leads to aggression: The moderating effects of control deprivation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(2), 213-220.
• Warren, G. C., & Clarbour, J. (2009). Relationship between psychopathy and indirect aggression use in a noncriminal population. Aggressive Behavior, 35(5), 408-421.
• Wastell, C., & Booth, A. (2003). Machiavellianism: An alexithymic perspective. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 22(6), 730-744.
• Wert, S. R., & Salovey, P. (2004). A social comparison account of gossip. Review of General Psychology, 8(2), 122-137.
• Williams, K. D. (2009). Ostracism: A temporal need‐threat model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 41, 275-314.
• Wu, X., Kwan, H. K., Wu, L. Z., & Ma, J. (2018). The effect of workplace negative gossip on employee proactive behavior in China: The moderating role of traditionality. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 801-815.
• Young, S., & Pinsky, D. (2006). Narcissism and celebrity. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(5), 463-471.