Theoretical Saturation in Grounded Theory Studies: An Evaluative Tool

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 23 Sayı: 1, 139 - 162, 28.03.2023

Züleyha Ünlü , Henna Qureshi

https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.1272631

Cited By: 3

Öz

The three Grounded Theory (GT hereafter) schools, Classic, Straussian, and Constructivist GT, differ from each other based on their paradigmatic perspectives. The major difference is in terms of the data analysis procedure. Common features exist among the three GT traditions such as constant comparison method, simultaneous data collection and analysis, memos, theoretical sensitivity, theoretical sampling, and theoretical saturation. Among these features, theoretical saturation acts as a key factor that initiates each coding stage of GT while ending the preceding one. This paper focuses on Theoretical Saturation in GT and evaluates how different GT paradigms approach the concept of Theoretical Saturation. Additionally, facilitating novice GT researchers, the paper suggests the Q-Ü Theoretical Saturation instrument to offer possible solutions to overcome the paradigm-related and practical challenges.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Theoretical Saturation, Grounded Theory, Paradigms, Evaluative Criteria, Instrument

Kaynakça

• Aldiabat, K. M., and Le Navenec, C. (2018). Data saturation: The mysterious step in Grounded Theory Method. The Qualitative Report, 23(1), 245-261. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol23/iss1/18
• Boddy, C. R. (2016). Sample size for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(4), 426–432. DOI: 10.1108/QMR-06-2016-0053
• Bloor, M., and Wood, F. (2006). Keywords in qualitative methods: A vocabulary of research concepts. London: Sage.
• Barbour, R. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? British Medical Journal, 322, 1115–1117. doi: 10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
• Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. London: Sage.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). London, UK: Sage.
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, UK: Sage.
• Caelli, K., Ray, L., and Mill, J. (2003). ‘Clear as mud’: Toward greater clarity in generic qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(2), 1–13. doi: 10.1177/160940690300200201
• Denny E. (2009). I never know from one day to another how I will feel: pain and uncertainty in women with endometriosis. Qualitative health research, 19(7), 985–995. doi: 10.1177/1049732309338725
• Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1994). Entering the field of qualitative research. In N.K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.) Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Fusch, P. I., and Ness, L. R. (2015). Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408-1416. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR20/9/fusch1.pdf
• Francis, J.J., Johnston, M., Robertson, C., Glidewell, L., Entwhistle, V., Eccles, M.P., and Grimshaw, J.M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalising data saturation for theory-driven interview studies. Psychologic Health 25(10), 1229–1245doi: 10.1080/08870440903194015
• France, N.E.M., Farrell, K., Kearney, B., and Myatt, S. (2008). Women living with fibromyalgia: ‘‘do no harm’’. International Journal of Human Caring, 12(4), 21–25. doi: 10.20467/1091-5710.12.4.21
• Fossey, E., Harvey, C., Mcdermott, F., and Davidson, L. (2002). Understanding and evaluating qualitative research. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 36(6), 717–732. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1614.2002.01100.x
• Guest, G., Bunce, A., and Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. DOI:10.1177/1525822X05279903
• Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging influences. In N. K. Denzin and Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.) The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 191–216). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Green J. and Thorogood, N. (2004). Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage.
• Gaskell, G. (2000). Individual and group interviewing. In Bauer M. and Gaskell G. (Eds.) Qualitative researching with text, image, and sound (pp. 38-56). London: Sage.
• Glaser, B.G. (1978) Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of Grounded Theory. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
• Glaser, B. G. and Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
• Hennink, M. M., Kaiser, B. N. and Marconi, V. C. (2017). Code saturation versus meaning saturation: How many interviews are enough? Qualitative Health Research, 27(4), 591–608. doi: 10.1177/1049732316665344
• Jassim, G. A. and Whitford, D. L. (2014). Understanding the experiences and quality of life issues of Bahraini women with breast cancer. Social science & medicine, 107, 189–195. doi: https://DOI.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2014.01.031
• Kazley, A. S., Johnson, E., Simpson, K., Chavin, K. and Baliga, P. (2015). African American patient knowledge of kidney disease: A qualitative study of those with advanced chronic kidney disease. Chronic Illness, 11(4), 245–255. doi: 10.1177/1742395314556658
• Kenny, M. and Fourie, R. (2014). Tracing the history of Grounded Theory Methodology: From formation to fragmentation. The Qualitative Report, 19(52), 1-9. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss52/1
• Keane, E. (2015). Considering the practical implementation of constructivist grounded theory in a study of widening participation in Irish higher education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 415-431. doi: 10.1080/13645579.2014.923622
• Kennedy, F., Harcourt, D. and Rumsey, N. (2012). The shifting nature of women’s experiences and perceptions of ductal carcinoma in situ. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 68(4), 856–867. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05788.x
• Kuzel, A. J. (1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. F. Crabtree and W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research: research methods for primary care (Vol. 3, pp. 31-44). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
• Levers, M. J. D. (2013). Philosophical paradigms, Grounded Theory, and perspectives on emergence. SAGE Open. doi: 10.1177/2158244013517243 Long-Sutehall, T., Willis, H., Palmer, R., Ugboma, D., Addington-Hall, J. and Coombs, M. (2011). Negotiated dying: a grounded theory of how nurses shape withdrawal of treatment in hospital critical care units. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 48(12), 1466–1474. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.06.003
• Leininger, M. (1994). Evaluation criteria and critique of qualitative research studies. In J. M. Morse (Ed.) Critical issues in qualitative research methods, (pp. 95–115). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Lincoln, Y. and Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage.
• Lomborg, K. and Kirkevold, M. (2003). Truth and validity in grounded theory–a reconsidered realist interpretation of the criteria: fit, work, relevance, and modifiability. Nursing Philosophy, 4(3), 189-200. doi: 10.1046/j.1466-769X.2003.00139.x
• Morse, J. M. (2015). “Data were saturated...”. Qualitative Health Research, 25(5), 587-588. doi: 10.1177/1049732315576699
• McNulty, C., Ricketts, E.J., Rugman, C., Hogan, A., Charlett, A. and Campbell, R. (2015). On behalf of the CIRT study group: a qualitative study exploring the acceptability of the McNulty–Zelen design for randomized controlled trials evaluating educational interventions. BMC Fam Pract. 16, 169. doi: 10.1186/s12875-015-0356-0
• Marshall, B., Cardon, P., Poddar, A. and Fontenot, R. (2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research? A review of qualitative interviews in research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(1), 11-22. doi: 10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667
• Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in Ph.D. studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(3), Art. 8. Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs100387.
• Morse, J. M., Barnett, N., Mayan, M., Olson, K. and Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2). Retrieved from https://journals.library.ualberta.ca/ijqm/index.php/IJQM/article/view/4603
• Morse, J. M. (2000). Determining sample size. Qualitative Health Research, 10(1), 3–5. doi: 10.1177/104973200129118183
• Mays, N. and Pope, C. (2000). Quality in qualitative health research. In Pope C. and Mays N. (Eds.) Qualitative research in health care (pp. 89-102). London: BMJ Books.
• Morse J. M. (1995). The significance of saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147–149. doi: 10.1177/104973239500500201
• Niccolai, L. M., Hansen, C. E., Credle, M. and Shapiro, E. D. (2016). Parents’ recall and reflections on experiences related to HPV vaccination for their children. Qualitative Health Research, 26(6), 842–850. doi: 10.1177/1049732315575712
• O'Reilly, M. and Parker, N. (2012). “Unsatisfactory saturation”: A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190-197. doi: 10.1177/1468794112446106
• Otmar, R., Kotowicz, M. A., Nicholson, G. C. and Pasco, J. A. (2011). Methodological reflections on using pilot data from fracture patients to develop a qualitative study. BMC research notes, 4, 508. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-508
• Onwuegbuzie, A. and Leech, N. (2007). A call for qualitative power analyses. Quality & Quantity, 41(1), 105-121. doi:10.1007/s11135-005-1098-1
• Patton, M. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. London: Sage.
• Qureshi, H. A. (2018). Theoretical sampling in qualitative research: A multi-layered nested sampling scheme. International Journal of Contemporary Research and Review, 9(8), 20218-20222. doi: 10.15520/ijcrr/2018/9/08/576
• Qureshi, H. A. (2019). Factors affecting participation in mentoring research in academia. International Journal of Contemporary Research and Review, 10(5), 20407-20413. doi: 10.15520/ijcrr.v10i05.702
• Qureshi, H. A. and Ünlü, Z. (2020). Beyond the paradigm conflicts: A four-step coding instrument for Grounded Theory. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1-10 doi:  10.1177/1609406920928188
• Richardson, L. and St. Pierre, E. A. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 959–978). Thousands Oak, CA: Sage Publications Ltd.
• Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., … Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant, 52, 1893-1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8
• Sparkes, E., Duarte, R. V., Raphael, J. H., Denny, E. and Ashford, R. L. (2012). A qualitative exploration of psychological factors associated with spinal cord stimulation outcome. Chronic Illness, 8(4), 239-251. doi: 10.1177/1742395311433132
• Starks, H. and Brown Trinidad, S. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and Grounded Theory. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1372–1380. doi: 10.1177/1049732307307031
• Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded Theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
• Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179-183. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770180211. Thomson, S. B. (2011). Sample Size and Grounded Theory. JOAAG, 5(1),45-52. Retrieved from: https://roam.macewan.ca:8443/server/api/core/bitstreams/56dde525-da50-4ea2-97b1-c3db2bcc076e/ content
• Tuckett A. G. (2004). Qualitative research sampling: the very real complexities. Nurse researcher, 12(1), 47–61. doi:10.7748/nr2004.07.12.1.47.c5930
• van Rijnsoever, F.J. (2017). (I Can’t Get No) Saturation: A simulation and guidelines for sample sizes in qualitative research. PLoS ONE, 12(7). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0181689
• Wray, N., Markovic, M. and Manderson, L. (2007). ‘Researcher saturation’: the impact of data triangulation and intensive-research practices on the researcher and qualitative research process. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1392-1402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307308308
• Zhao, X. and Davey, G. (2015). Contesting modernity: tobacco use and romanticism among older Dai farmers in Xishuangbanna, China. Sociology of Health and Illness. 37(8), 1173–1190. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.12305.