Problemli İnternet Kullanımı Üzerine Gerçeklik Terapisi Temelinde Bir Olgu Sunumu

Öz

Yoğun ve kontrolsüz internet kullanımının, ileri boyutlarda klinik vakalara dolayısıyla davranışsal bağımlılığa evrildiği durumlara rastlanmaktadır. Böyle durumlara müdahale ederken, ruh sağlığı uzmanları farklı kuramlardan faydalanmaktadır. Bunlardan biri de Türk kültürüne uygunluğu irdelenen gerçeklik terapisidir. Bu çalışmada da, problemli internet kullanım belirtilerini, davranışsal bağımlılık boyutta sergilediği düşünülen 25 yaşındaki bir genç yetişkin ile gerçeklik terapisi temelinde gerçekleştirilen danışma süreci, temel kavramlar ve İstek-Yapma-Değerlendirme-Plan yapma (IYDP) sistemi bağlamında vaka analiz edilmiştir. Bu amaçla ilk olarak problemli internet kullanımına ve gerçeklik terapisinin temel kavramları ile IYDP sistemine dair kısa bilgi verilmiştir. Ardından danışma süreci gerçeklik terapisi ışığında sunulmuştur. Danışanın yaşantısında var olan sorunlardan kaçış yolu olarak yoğun düzeyde internet kullandığı, sorumluluk almak yerine özellikle eğlence ve güç ihtiyacını internetten karşılamaya çalıştığı görülmüştür. Danışma sürecinde, danışan kendi ihtiyaçlarını keşfederek hayatı üzerinde sorumluluk almayı başarmış, hayatında yeni planlar yaparak, internet kullanımı üzerindeki kontrolünü arttırmış ve oyun oynama davranışı ile karşıladığı ihtiyaçlarına sosyal hayatta alternatifler oluşturmuştur. Bu sonuçlar ışığında, gerçeklik terapisi temelinde gerçekleştirilen danışma sürecinin, problemli internet kullanımı ve davranışsal bağımlılık belirtilerinin var olduğu vakalar için işlevsel olacağı düşünülmektedir. Bu bağlamda problemli internet kullanıcısı olan veya davranışsal bağımlılık belirtileri gösteren danışanlar ile çalışan ruh sağlığı uzmanlarına, müdahale süreçlerinde gerçeklik terapisinin temel kavramlarından ve IYDP sürecinden faydalanmaları önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Gerçeklik Terapisi
• Problemli Internet Kullanımı
• Davranışsal Bağımlılık
• olgu sunumu

A Case Report Based on Reality Therapy on Problematic Internet Use

Öz

Intense and uncontrolled internet use can lead to behavioral addiction, resulting in clinical-level symptoms. Mental health professionals use different theoretical perspectives while intervening in such situations. One of these approaches is reality therapy, which was examined for its suitability to Turkish culture. In this study, the counseling process based on reality therapy with a 25-year-old young adult showing symptoms of problematic internet use was analyzed. For this purpose, brief information was provided about problematic internet use, the basic concepts of reality therapy, and the wants, direction, evaluation, and planning WDEP system. Then, the counseling process was presented in the light of reality therapy. It has been observed that the client intensively uses the Internet as a way to escape from the current problems in his life, tries to meet his needs for entertainment and power through the Internet, and avoids taking responsibility. During the counseling process, the client discovered his own needs and managed to take responsibility for his life, made new plans, increased his control over internet use, and created alternatives to meet his needs in social life and playing games. In light of these results, it was inferred that the counseling process based on reality therapy would be functional for cases with problematic internet use and behavioral addiction symptoms. In this context, it is recommended that mental health professionals who work with clients who are problematic internet users or show signs of behavioral addiction should benefit from the basic concepts of reality therapy and the WDEP process in their intervention processes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Reality Therapy
• Problematic Internet Use
• Behavioral Addiction
• case presentation

Kaynakça

1. Agbaria, Q. (2023). Cognitive behavioral intervention in dealing with internet addiction among Arab teenagers in Israel. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 21, 2493–2507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469- 021-00733-6
2. Bağatarhan, T., & Siyez, D. M. (2022). The effectiveness of a cognitive-behavioral prevention program for internet addiction. Journal of Rational-Emotive & Cognitive-Behavior Therapy, 40(4), 767-792. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10942-021-00439-7
3. Baltacı, Ö., Akbulut, Ö. F., & Zafer, R. (2020). Problematic internet use during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A qualitative research. Kırşehir Ahi Evran University Journal of Health Sciences, 1(3), 126-140.
4. Berber Çelik, Ç. (2016). An educational intervention to reduce internet addiction tendency. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 3(3), 365-386. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2016.3.0021
5. Can, S., & Zeren, Ş. G. (2019). The role of internet addiction and basic psychological needs in explaining the academic procrastination behavior of adolescents. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 48(2). 1012-1040. https://doi.org/10.14812/cufej.544325
6. Corey G. (2012) Reality Therapy. In G. Corey (Ed.), Theory and Practice of Counseling and Psychotherapy (pp. 333-359). Cengage Learning.
7. Duba, D. J. D., Graham, M. A., Britzman, M., & Minatrea, N. (2009). Introducing the “Basic Needs Genogram” in Reality Therapy-based marriage and family counseling. International Journal of Reality Therapy, 28(2), 15. https://digitalc ommons.wku.edu/csa_fac_pub/28
8. Dursun A. (2022). Adolescents' views on problematic internet use and psychological needs. International Kalem Educational Human Sciences Journal, 12, 521-546. https://doi.org/10.23863/kalem.2021.214

9. Dursun, A., & Ceyhan, A. A. (2023). The effectiveness of reality therapy-based psycho-education program regarding decreasing the level of problematic internet usage of adolescents. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 13(69), 146-159. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1319657asa
10. Dursun, A., & Gamsız Tunç, Ö. (2021). Reality therapy-based group interventions for adolescents and young adults: systematic review. İnönü University Faculty of Education Journal, 22(3), 2323-2346. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.951530
11. Erden, S., & Hatun, O. (2015). Using the cognitive behavioral approach in coping with internet addiction: A case report. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 2(1), 53-83. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2015.2.1.015
12. Eroğlu, Y., Sağar, M. E., & Kaya, F. (2003). Self-control predicts problematic internet use in university students. EKEV Academy Magazine, 94, 345-359. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1246985
13. Fernandes, B., Maia, B. R., & Pontes, H. M. (2019). Internet addiction or problematic internet use? Which term should be used? Psicologia Usp, 30(e190020). 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-6564e190020
14. Gentile, D. (2009). Pathological video-game use among youth ages 8 to 18: a national study. Psychological Science, 20, 594–602. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02340.x
15. Glasser, W. (1999). The psychology of personal freedom: Choice theory (M. İzmirli, Trans.). Istanbul: Hayat Publishing. (Original work published 1998).
16. Glasser, W. (2000). Counseling with Choice Theory: The New Reality Therapy. New York: HarperCollins. Gökmen, A. & Batmaz, S. (2024). A study on the relationship between internet addiction, life satisfaction and cognitive behavioral therapy. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 34(1), 335-349.
17. Han, D., & Bayram, S. (2022). Examination of the movie "Nilüfer's Decision" in terms of the basic concepts of reality therapy. Turkish Journal of Educational Evaluations, 2(2), 45-64.
18. Kaner, S. (1993). Control theory and reality therapy. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal, 26(2), 569-585. https://doi.org/10.1501/Egifak_0000000486
19. Kim, J. U. (2007). A reality therapy group counseling program as an Internet addiction recovery method for college students in Korea. International Journal of Reality Therapy, 26(2). 3-6.
20. Király, O., Potenza, M. N., Stein, D. J., King, D. L., Hodgins, D. C., Saunders, J. B., & Abbott, M. W. (2020). Preventing problematic internet use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Consensus guidance. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 100, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2020.152180
21. Köroğlu, G., Öztürk, Ö., Tellioğlu, N., Genç, Y., Mirsal, H., & Beyazyürek, M. (2006). Discussion of psychiatric comorbidity in a bipolar patient presenting with problematic internet use: case report. Journal of Addiction, 7, 150-154.
22. Litwack, L. (2007). Research review dissertations on reality therapy and choice theory 1970-2007. International Journal of Reality Therapy 27(1), 14-16.
23. Liu, T., & Potenza, M. N. (2007). Problematic internet use: clinical implications. CNS Spectra, 12(6), 453-466. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1092852900015339
24. Malak, M. Z. (2018). Internet addiction and cognitive behavioral therapy. In Ö. Şenormancı & G. Şenormancı (Eds.), Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Clinical Applications (pp. 183-199). IntechOpen.
25. Murdock, T. B. (2009). Achievement motivation in race and ethnic context. In K. R. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 433-462). Taylor and Francis.
26. Özdemir, M. B. (2022). Analysis of the movie Future Days in terms of Reality Therapy. Journal of Life Skills Psychology, 6(12), 93-110.
27. Prenzlau, S. (2006). Using reality therapy to reduce PTSD-related symptoms. International Journal of Reality Therapy, 25(2), 23-29.
28. Roberts, A., Sharman, S., & Bowden-Jones, H. (2022). Clinical services for problematic internet usage. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 46, 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2022.101180
29. Safari, S., Soleimanian, A. A., & Jajarmi, M. (2021). The effectiveness of "reality therapy" training on internet addiction and perceptions of social support-family in teenage girls. Journal of Health Promotion Management, 10(5), 107-120.
30. Salubi, O. G., & Muchaonyerwa, N. (2023). Postgraduate students' internet use and prevalence of internet addiction: what roles can librarians play post COVID-19? Digital Library Perspectives, 39(4), 517-537. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLP-12-2022-0100
31. Sari, E. (2014). Psychological counseling and psychotherapy. Vize Publishing.
32. Seligman, L. (2001). Systems, strategies and skills of counseling and psychotherapy. Merrill Prentice Hall.
33. Skeen, J. W. (2002). Choice theory, value ethics, and the sixth need. International Journal of Reality Therapy, 22, 14-19.
34. Spada, M. M. (2014). An overview of problematic Internet use. Addictive behaviors, 3(9), 3-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.007
35. Statista Internet Statistics, (2023, October 24). Worldwide internet and social media usage. Retrieved October 25, 2023, from https://www.statista.com/markets/424/internet/
36. Tunç, E. & Voltan Acar, N. (2022). Examination of the movie “A Separation” in terms of reality therapy elements. Social Sciences Studies Journal (Sssjournal), 3(10), 1257-1264.
37. Türkdoğan, T. (2015). The effectiveness of reality therapy-based interventions in schools: a review of primary and secondary school students. Aegean Education Journal, 16(1), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.12984/eed.45828
38. Ülker Tümlü, G., & Voltan Acar, N. (2014). Analysis of the movie “Desolate Man” based on Reality Therapy. Man and Man, 1(2), 62-73. https://doi.org/10.29224/insanveinsan.279983
39. Wood, R. T. (2008). Problems with the concept of video game “addiction”: Some case study examples. International journal of mental health and addiction, 6, 169-178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-007-9118-0
40. Wu, Q., Chen, T., Zhong, N., Bao, J., Zhao, Y., Du, J., & Zhao, M. (2023). Changes of internet behavior of adolescents across the period of COVID-19 pandemic in China. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 28(1), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2021.2019809
41. Wubbolding, R. E. & Brickell, J. (2007). Frequently asked questions and brief answers: Part I. International Journal of Reality Therapy, 27(1), 29-30
42. Wubbolding, R. E. (2013). Reality therapy for the 21st century. Routledge.
43. Wubbolding, R. E. (2015). The voice of William Glasser: accessing the continuing evolution of reality therapy. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 37, 189- 205. https://doi.org/10.17744/mehc.37.3.01
44. Wubbolding, R. E., & Robey, P. A. (2012). Introduction to choice theory and reality therapy. In P. A. Robey, R. E. Wubbolding & J. Carlson (Eds.), Contemporary Issues in Couples Counseling (pp. 3-19). Routledge.
45. Yalçın, N. (2006). Are we using the internet correctly? Are we addicted to the internet? Are our children and youth at risk? Information Technologies Congress Academic Informatics Proceedings Book, (pp. 585- 588) Denizli: Pamukkale University, 2006.
46. Yang, X., Li, Q., Chan, K. K. Y., Wu, A. M., Ramos, M., Wang, X., & Zhang, G. (2023). The COVID-19 pandemic, problematic internet use, post-traumatic stress and mental health. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14. 1-2. https://doi.org/10.3389 /fpsyt.2023.1273778
47. Yorgun, A., & Voltan Acar, N. (2014). The practicality of reality therapy in Turkish culture: an analytical overview. Education and Science, 39(175): 216-226. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2014.460
48. Zalewska, A., Gałczyk, M., Sobolewski, M., & Fernandes, H. (2023). Internet addiction and physical activity among Polish and Portuguese students in the final year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(16), 5204. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12165204