Yansıtıcı Düşünme Etkinliklerinin Öğrencilerin Sosyal Bilgiler Dersi Başarısı ile Öğrenme ve Yenilik Becerilerine Etkisi

Öz

Sosyal bilgiler dersi üç temel yaklaşım üzerine kurgulanmış bir derstir. Sosyal bilgiler dersi ile öğrencilerin etkin vatandaş olmaları, yansıtıcı düşünmeleri ve sosyal bilimci mantığı ile çalışmaları amaçlanmıştır. Sosyal bilgilerin temel yaklaşımlarından biri olan yansıtıcı düşünme bireylerin kendi öğrenmelerini kurgulamaları, öğrendiklerini değerlendirmeleri yeni öğrenmeler için alt yapı oluşturmalarını sağlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda araştırmada yansıtıcı düşünmeye dayalı etkinliklerin öğrencilerin sosyal bilgiler dersi akademik başarıları ile öğrenme ve yenilik becerilerine etkisin ortaya koymayı amaçlamıştır. Araştırma nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden yarı deneysel desen ile yürütülmüştür. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu 2023-2024 eğitim öğretim yılı bahar döneminde Aksaray il merkezinde bir devlet ortaokulunda öğrenim gören 67 beşinci sınıf öğrencisi oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın uygulama süreci on bir haftalık yansıtıcı düşünme etkinliklerinin deney grubuna uygulanması ile sonuçlanmıştır. Araştırma verilerin elde etmek için “Öğrenme ve Yenilik Becerileri Ölçeği” ÖYBÖ ve sosyal bilgiler başarı testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın uygulama süreci ile ilgili deney grubu öğrencilerinin görüşlerini almak için yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın nicel verileri nicel istatistiksel analiz programı kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Araştırmanın nitel verileri içerik analizi kullanılarak çözümlenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda yansıtıcı düşünmenin öğrencilerin sosyal bilgiler ders başarısını oldukça yüksek oranda artırdığını ve ayrıca yansıtıcı düşünme etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin öğrenme ve yenilik becerilerini anlamlı düzeyde artırdığı bulgusu elde edilmiştir. Bunun yanında uygulama öğretmeni ve deney grubu öğrencileri yansıtıcı düşünme etkinliklerinin öğrenmeyi kolaylaştırdığı ve bilgilerini pekiştirdikleri yönünde görüş bildirmişlerdir. Araştırmada deney ve kontrol grubu arasında hem akademik başarı hem de öğrenme ve yenilik becerileri açısından deney grubu lehine anlamlı farkın olduğu bulgularına ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Sosyal bilgiler
• yansıtıcı düşünme
• öğrenme ve yenilik becerisi
• 21. yüzyıl becerileri.

The Effect Of Reflectıve Thınkıng Actıvıtıes On Students' Achıevement In Socıal Scıences Course And Theır Learnıng And Innovatıon Skılls

Öz

The social studies course is built upon three fundamental approaches, aiming to help students become active citizens, think reflectively, and reason like social scientists. Reflective thinking, one of these key approaches, enables individuals to construct their own learning, critically evaluate existing knowledge, and lay a foundation for future learning. Within this context, the present study aimed to examine the impact of reflective thinking-based activities on students’ academic achievement in social studies and their learning and innovation skills. The research employed a quasi-experimental design within the quantitative research paradigm. The study group consisted of 67 fifth-grade students enrolled in a state secondary school in the central district of Aksaray during the spring term of the 2023–2024 academic year. The implementation lasted eleven weeks, during which reflective thinking activities were carried out with the experimental group. Data collection tools included the Learning and Innovation Skills Scale (LIS) and a social studies achievement test. Additionally, a semi-structured interview form was used to obtain student opinions on the process. Quantitative data were analysed through statistical software, while qualitative data were examined using content analysis. Findings showed that reflective thinking significantly improved students’ academic performance in social studies and enhanced their learning and innovation skills. Furthermore, both the implementing teacher and experimental group students stated that these activities supported learning and reinforced knowledge. A statistically significant difference was found between the experimental and control groups in favour of the experimental group regarding both academic achievement and learning and innovation skills.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Social studies
• reflective thinking
• learning and innovation skills
• 21st century skills.

Kaynakça

1. Adelman, C. ve Walker, R. (1975). A guide to classroom observation.(1th. ed.). Methuen ve Co Ltd.
2. Alım, M. ve Ünal, K. (2024). Yansıtıcı düşünmeyi geliştirici öğrenme günlüklerinin 10. sınıf coğrafya dersi çevre ve toplum ünitesindeki akademik başarıya etkisi. Gazi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 10(1), 121-167. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.30855/gjes.2024.10.01.005
3. Baßeng, G. ve Budke, A. (2024). Game on, feflection on: Reflection diaries as a tool for promoting reflection skills in geography lessons. Education Sciences, 14(3), 1-19. 316. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030316
4. Barbagallo, M. S. (2021). Nursing students’ perceptions and experiences of reflective practice: A qualitative meta- synthesis. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(1), 24-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.07.006
5. Barkley, E. F., Major, C .H. ve Cross, K.P. (2014). Collaborative learning techniques: A Handbook for college faculty (2th. ed.). Jossey-Bass.
6. Baron Levi, J. (2020). The Hairy bikie and other metacognitive strategies: Implementing a frontal lobe prosthesis for those whose learning ıs compromised (eBook). Springer published
7. Barondess, J. A. (1997). On mentoring. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 90(6), 347-349.
8. Bolton, G. (2010). Reflectıve Practıce; Wrıtıng And Professıonal Development. (4. Baskı.).SAGE Publications Ltd.

9. Boud, D., Keogh, R. ve Walker, D. (2005). Promoting reflection in learning: a Model. D. Boud, R. Keogh ve D. Walker (Eds.). Reflectıon: Turnıng experıence ınto learnıng içinde (ss.18-40). Routledge Falmer.
10. Bozan, S. (2021), Yansıtıcı düşünme ve öğretim uygulamaları: Biyoloji konularının öğretiminde yansıtıcı düşünme stratejileri [Yayımlanmamış doktora tezi]. Atatürk Üniversitesi.
11. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. (11. Baskı.). Pegem Akademi.
12. Chamdani, M., Yusuf, F. A., Salimi, M. ve Fajari, L. E. W. (2022). Meta-Analysis Study: The Relationship between Reflective Thinking and Learning Achievement. Journal of Efficiency and Responsibility in Education and Science, 15(3), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.7160/eriesj.2022.150305
13. Chaudhry, N. G. ve Rasool, G. (2012). A case study on improving problem solving skills of undergraduate computer science students. World Applied Sciences Journal, 20 (1), 34-39.
14. Cohen, L., Manion, L. ve Morrison, K. (2018). Research Methods in Education. (11. Baskı). Routledge
15. Cooper, J. M. ve Allen, D. W. (1970). Microteaching: History and Present Status. ERIC Clearinghouse on Teacher Education. (1), 1-38. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED036471
16. Cottrell, S. (2023). Critical thinking skills: Effective analysis, argument and reflection.(4. Baskı.). Bloomsbury Publishing. Creswell, J. W. ve Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (5. Baskı.). Sage Publications.
17. Creswell, J. W. ve Guetterman, T. C. (2019). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (6th.ed). Pearson.
18. Cullıngford, C. (2006). Mentoring as myth and reality: Evidence and ambiguity. C. Cullingford (Eds.). Mentoring in Education; An International Perspective. içinde (ss.1-10) Ashgate Publishing.
19. Deng, P. (2021). A Project-based focused freewriting approach to teach writing. Learning and Education, 10(2), 54-55. https://doi.org/10.18282/l-e.v10i2.2266 (Erişim Tarihi: 25.11.2024).
20. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A Restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Heath and Co Publishers.
21. Dumlao, J. P. (2024). developmental process of conceptual understanding through reflective journal writing (RJW) among HUMSS (humanities and social sciences) students. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research (AJHSSR)8 (4), 49-55 https://www.ajhssr.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/E248044955.pdf
22. Dursun, F. ve Özen, R. (2018). Yansıtıcı düşünmeye göre hazırlanan genel konfeksiyon teknolojisi dersi programının akademik başarı ve tutuma etkisi. Cumhuriyet International Journal of Education, 7(4), 385–407.http://dx.doi.org/10.30703/cije.434556
23. Farrell, T. S. C. (2004). Reflective practice in action: 80 reflection breaks for busyteachers. Corwin Press.
24. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education. (7. Baskı.). McGraw-Hill.
25. Fraenkel, J., Wallen, N., ve Hyun, H. (2022). How to design and evaluate research in education. (11.Baskı.). McGraw-Hill.
26. Geisinger, K. F. (2016). 21st century skills: What are they and how do we assess them?. Applied measurement in education, 29(4), 245-249. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2016.1209207
27. Grant, A., McKimm, J. ve Murphy, F. (2017). Developing reflective practice: a guide for medical students, doctors and teachers. (1. Bölüm. ). John Wiley and Sons.
28. Gribas, J. ve Underwood, A. (2024). Exploring character through structural metaphor: A Guide for actors and directors. (1. Baskı.). Routledge
29. Gunning, T. G. (2014). Creating literacy instruction for all students.(8. Baskı.). Pearson Education Limited.
30. Gül, M. ve Yücel Toy, B. (2021). Yansıtıcı düşünmeye dayalı öğretimin sosyal bilgiler dersinde uygulanması. Millî Eğitim Dergisi 50 (231), (283-304). https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.721801
31. Gürbüztürk, O. ve Ünal, H. (2022). The effect of reflective thinking activities on academic achievement, attitude and permanence: Meta-analysis study, Inonu University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 23(1), 671-702. https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1081203 Haigh, N. (2000). Teaching teachers about reflection and ways of reflecting. Waikato Journal of Education, 6, 87–98. https://doi.org/10.15663/wje.v6i1.457
32. Hillier, Y. (2005). Reflective teaching in further and adult education (1. Baskı.). Continuum.
33. Hubbs, D. ve Brand, C. F. (2010). Learning from the inside out: A method for analyzing reflective journals in the college classroom. Journal of Experiential Education, 33(1), 56-71.
34. Hughes, H. W., Kooy, M. ve Kanevsky, L. (1997). Dialogic Reflection and Journaling. The Clearing House, 70 (4), 187–190. https://www.jstor.org/stable/30189281
35. Howell, R. A. (2021). Engaging students in education for sustainable development: The benefits of active learning, reflective practices and flipped classroom pedagogies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 325,1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129318
36. Jackson, A., Barrella, E. ve Bodnar, C (2024). Application of concept maps as an assessment tool in engineering education: Systematic literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 113(4), 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20548 (Erişim Tarihi: 30.11.2024).
37. Janssen, L., Schick, K., Neurohr, T., Pittroff, S. I. D., Reiser, S., Bauer, J. ve Gartmeier, M. (2024). Reflect to İnteract fostering medical students’ communication through reflection-focused e-learning. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 541. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05368-4
38. Jorgensen, C.G. (2014). Social Studies Curriculum Migration Confronting Challenges in the 21st Century. E.W. Ross (Ed), The Social Studies Curriculum : Purposes, Problems, and Possibilities, Fourth Edition (4. Baskı. ss. 3-89) içinde, Suny Press.
39. Khoshgoftar, Z. ve Barkhordari-Sharifabad, M. (2023). Medical students’ reflective capacity and its role in their critical thinking disposition. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 198. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04163-x
40. Kotnal, J. R. (2017). Strategic Planning and SWOT Analysis. International Journal of Advanced Research and Development, 2(6), 60-62. https://www.multidisciplinaryjournal.net/assets/archives/2017/vol2issue6/2-5-301-844.pdf
41. Lewis, T. (2021). Operationalizing reflective practice in an elementary math classroom. [unpublished doctoral thesis]. Unıversıty Of Calıfornıa.UCLA. ProQuest ID: Lewis_ucla_0031D_20107. Merritt ID: ark:/13030/m56x5qws. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/2kk109j9
42. Loughran, J. J. (1996). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modelling. (1. Baskı.). Falmer Press.
43. McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochemia medica, 22(3), 276-282. https://hrcak.srce.hr/89395
44. McMullen, K.M. (2020). An Action research study into the teaching practices that support the development of reflective thinking and self-regulated learning in secondary mathematics (unpublished doctoral dissertation,) Monash University. Merriam, S. B. ve Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. (4th. ed.). John Wiley and Sons.
45. National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Curriculum standards for social studies. National Council or Social Studies
46. Nhat, T. N. M. ve Van Le, T. (2023). Effects of Reflective Thinking On Deep Learning in Theoretical Linguistics Classes. International Journal of Instruction, 16(4), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2023.1647a
47. Obafemi, K. E. (2024). Enhancing pupils’ academic performance in mathematics using brainstorming instructional strategy. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 4(2), 99-106. https://doi.org/10.17509/ajsee.v4i2.60053 (Erişim Tarihi: 11.12.2024).
48. Rotherham, A. J. ve Willingham, D. (2009). To work, the 21st century skills movement will require keen attention to curriculum, teacher quality, and assessment. Educational leadership, 9 (1), 15-20. http://cesa7ita2009.pbworks.com/f/21st+Century+Skills+Curriculum+Teachers+Assessment.pdf
49. Rushton, I. ve Suter, M. (2012). Reflective practice for teaching ın lifelong learning: (1th.ed.). McGraw-Hill Education Open University Press.
50. Rusov, V. (2023). Reflective dialogue-a condition for the implementation of studentcentered learning. Buletinul Ştiinţific al Universităţii de Stat “Bogdan Petriceicu Hasdeu” din Cahul, Seria “Stiinte Umanistice”, 17(1), 69-81. https://ibn.idsi.md/vizualizare_articol/196985 (Erişim Tarihi: 08.12.2024.).
51. Russell, W. B., Waters, S. ve Turner, T. N. (2014). Essentials of middle and secondary social studies. (1th.ed.). Routledge Taylor and Francis Group.
52. Palmes, H. (2024). Reflective portfolio: An Educational tool in senior high school biology ınstruction. Available at SSRN 21(10): 1065-1071 https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4895075 (Erişim Tarihi: 27.11.2024).
53. Parker, W. C. (2014). Social studies in elementary education. (14. Baskı.). Pearson Education Limited.
54. Pascal, R. (2015). Design and truth in autobiography. (1. Baskı). Routledge.
55. Pathak, R.P. (2012). Teaching of social studies. (1. Baskı.). Pearson Education.
56. Powell, D. (2010). Join, or die! a pragmatic case for reflective self-study in social studies. A. R. Crowe (Ed.), Advancing social studies education through self-study methodology: The power, promise, and use of self-study in social studies education (Vol. 10).içinde (pp. 21-36) Springer Science and Business Media.
57. Schön, D. A. (1983). The Reflective practitioner: How professıonals thınk ın actıon. Basic Books.
58. Smith, A. (2024). What Did I Learn at School Yesterday? Student Reflective Journaling as an Educational Practice. Masters of Education in Teaching and Learning. 73. https://digitalcommons.acu.edu/metl/73?utm_source=digitalcommons.acu.edu%2Fmetl%2F73&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages Tanskanen, I. ( 2023). Professional autobiographical process including identity work in creative writing practices. M. Cerquetti ve C. Ferrara (Eds.). DICO Toolkit for digital career stories İçinde (s. 33-48). Il capitale culturale Studies on the Value of Cultural Heritage Supplementi.
59. Teare, B. (2006). Problem-solving and thinking skills resources for able and talented children (1. Baskı.). Network Continuum Education.
60. Thelma, C. C. ve Siyunda, A. C. (2023). Reflective teaching methods on learners academic performance in social studies: A Case of selected junior secondary schools in lusaka district, Zambia. International Journal of Novel Research in Humanity and Social Sciences. 10 (5). 78-88. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8416905
61. Thompson, C. (2021). Reflective practice for professional development: A guide for teachers. (1th. ed.). Routledge.
62. Thompson, C. (2022). Reflective practice for professional development: A guide forteachers. (1. Baskı). Routledge.
63. Thyer, B.A. (2023). Experımental research desıgns ın socıal work: Theory and applications. Columbia University Press.
64. Titus, A. ve Muttungal, P. V. (2024). Reflective thinking in school: A Systematic review. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) 13 (2). 742~751. http://dx.doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.26573
65. Trilling, B. ve Fadel, C. (2009). 21st century skills: Learning for life in our times. (1. Baskı). Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.
66. Vogel, T. (2014). Breakthrough thinking: A guide to creative thinking and idea generation.How Books.
67. Widiana, I. W., Triyono, S., Sudirtha, I. G., Adijaya, M. A. ve Wulandari, I. G. A. A. M. (2023). Bloom’s revised taxonomy-oriented learning activity to improve reading interest and creative thinking skills. Cogent Education, 10(2), 1-15. 2221482. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2221482
68. Wilson, J. ve Jan, L. W. (2009). Smart thinking: A programme for developing thinking skills in 7 to 12 year olds. (2. Baskı.). Routledge.
69. Yıldırım A. ve Şimşek H. (2016). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık
70. Yurdal, M. O. ve Kıncal, R. Y. (2023). Tıp fakültesi öğrencilerinin eleştirel düşünme eğilimleri, yansıtıcı öğrenme anlayışları ve akademik başarıları arasındaki ilişkisi. Tıp eğitimi dünyası, 22(68), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.25282/ted.1322193