Etkinlik Tabanlı Kodlama Etkinliklerinin Okul Öncesi Çocuklarının Görsel-Uzamsal Becerilerine Etkisi

Öz

Araştırmanın amacı, etkinlik temelli kodlama uygulamalarının okul öncesi çocukların görsel-uzamsal becerileri üzerindeki etkisini incelemektir. Araştırma, ön test-son test kontrol gruplu yarı deneysel desen ile yürütülmüştür. Çalışma grubu, Ege Bölgesi’nde aynı ilkokul bünyesindeki 5 yaş grubu iki okul öncesi sınıfında öğrenim gören 17 deney ve 17 kontrol olmak üzere toplam 34 çocuktan oluşmaktadır. Verilerin toplanmasında, araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen ve beş alt boyut (şekil-zemin, mekân-konum algısı, mekânsal ilişkiler, simetri, zihinsel döndürme) içeren 12 maddelik “Görsel Uzamsal Yetenek Rubriği” kullanılmıştır. Deney grubuna altı hafta boyunca, haftada iki kez ve her oturumu yaklaşık 30–40 dakika süren, hikâye temelli ve somut materyallerle desteklenen etkinlik tabanlı kodlama programı uygulanmış; kontrol grubunda ise Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı [MEB] Okul Öncesi Eğitim Programı takip edilmiştir. Araştırmada bağımsız ve bağımlı örneklem t-testleri ile ANCOVA analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, her iki grupta da son test puanlarının yükseldiği; ancak ön test puanları kontrol edildiğinde, deney grubu lehine anlamlı bir fark bulunduğu görülmüştür. Elde edilen bulgular, etkinlik temelli kodlama uygulamalarının okul öncesi dönemde görsel-uzamsal beceriler üzerinde güçlü bir etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu sonuç, erken çocukluk eğitim programlarına kodlama temelli, somut ve deneyimsel etkinliklerin bütüncül biçimde entegrasyonunun çocukların görsel-uzamsal becerilerini anlamlı düzeyde desteklediğini ortaya koymaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Etkinlik tabanlı kodlama
• okul öncesi çocuklar
• görsel-uzamsal beceri.

The Effect of Activity-Based Coding Activities on Preschool Children’s Visual-Spatial Skills

Öz

The aim of the study is to examine the effect of activity-based coding practices on preschool children’s visual–spatial skills. The research was conducted using a quasi-experimental design with a pretest–posttest control group. The study group consisted of a total of 34 children, including 17 in the experimental group and 17 in the control group, attending two 5-year-old preschool classrooms within the same primary school in the Aegean Region. For data collection, a 12-item “Visual-Spatial Ability Rubric,” developed by the researchers and comprising five sub-dimensions (figure–ground perception, space–location perception, spatial relations, symmetry, and mental rotation), was used. The experimental group received an activity-based coding program supported by stories and concrete materials for six weeks, twice a week, with each session lasting approximately 30–40 minutes, while the control group followed the Ministry of National Education [MoNE] Preschool Education Program. Independent and dependent samples t-tests, as well as ANCOVA, were conducted for data analysis. The findings revealed an increase in posttest scores in both groups; however, when pretest scores were controlled, a significant difference was found in favor of the experimental group. These results indicate that activity-based coding practices have a strong effect on visual–spatial skills in early childhood. The findings further emphasize that the holistic integration of coding-based, concrete, and experiential activities into early childhood education programs significantly supports children’s visual–spatial development.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Unplugged coding
• preschool children
• visual-spatial skills.

Kaynakça

1. Arabacı, M., Göle, M. O., Uzun, A. M., Kaya, Ü. Ü., & Karaca, N. H. (2026). Outcomes associated with participation in a sustainability environmental education program: Preschool children’s life skills and computational thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 17, Article 1820824. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1820824
2. Aranda, G., & Ferguson, J. P. (2018). Unplugged programming: The future of teaching computational thinking?. Pedagogika, 68(3), 213-228. https://doi.org/10.14712/23362189.2018.859
3. Ari, F., Arslan‐Ari, I., & Vasconcelos, L. (2022). Early childhood preservice teachers’ perceptions of computer science, gender stereotypes, and coding in early childhood education. Techtrends, 66(3), 539-546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00725-w
4. Baiata, C., & Nivens, R. A. (2024). Unplugged computational thinking. In J. Morska & A. Rogerson (Eds.), New ways of teaching and learning: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium of the Mathematics Education for the Future Project (pp. 38–43). WTM-Verlag. https://doi.org/10.37626/GA9783959872881.0.09
5. Başaran, M., Metin, Ş., & Vural, Ö. F. (2024). Meta-thematic synthesis of research on early childhood coding education: A comprehensive review. Education and InformationTechnologies, 29(16), 20795-20822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12675-2
6. Battista, M. T. (2007). The development of geometric and spatial thinking. In F. K. Lester Jr. (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 843–908). Information Age Publishing.
7. Bers, M. U., González-González, C., & Armas-Torres, M. B. (2019). Coding as a playground: Promoting positive learning experiences in childhood classrooms. Computers & Education, 138, 130-145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.013
8. Bers, M.U. (2020). Coding as a playground: Programming and computational thinking in the early childhood classroom (2nd ed.) Routledge.

9. Berson, I. R., Berson, M. J., McKinnon, C., Aradhya, D., Alyaeesh, M., Luo, W., & Shapiro, B. R. (2023). An exploration of robot programming as a foundation for spatial reasoning and computational thinking in preschoolers’ guided play. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 65, 57-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2023.05.015
10. Borah, T., Baruah, J., & Bhattacharyya, N. (2021). Spatial ability—An approach in designing learning materials for children. In A. M. J. Gutierrez, R. S. Goonetilleke, & R. A. C. Robielos (Eds.), Convergence of ergonomics and design: Proceedings of ACED SEANES 2020 (pp. 149–158). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-63335-6_16
11. Burke, Q., O’Byrne, W. I., & Kafai, Y. B. (2016). Computational participation: Understanding coding as an extension of literacy instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(4), 371–375. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.496
12. Caci, B., Chiazzese, G., & D’Amico, A. (2013). Robotic and virtual world programming labs to stimulate reasoning and visual-spatial abilities. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 1493–1497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.070
13. Cameron, C., Kim, H., Duncan, R. J., Becker, D. R., & McClelland, M. M. (2019). Bidirectional and co-developing associations of cognitive, mathematics, and literacy skills during kindergarten. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 62, 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.02.004
14. Campbell, C., & Walsh, C. (2017). Introducing the “new” digital literacy of coding in the early years. Practical Literacy: The Early and Primary Years, 22(3), 10–12.
15. Canbeldek, M. (2020). Erken çocukluk eğitiminde üreten çocuklar kodlama ve robotik eğitim programının etkilerinin incelenmesi (Tez No. 628151), [Doktora tezi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi.
16. Carbajal, M. L., & Baranauskas, M. C. C. (2020). Multimodal analysis of preschool children’s embodied interaction with a tangible programming environment. In M. Kurosu (Ed.), Human-computer interaction: Multimodal and natural interaction (pp. 443–462). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49062-1_30
17. Clements, D. H. (1998). Geometric and spatial thinking in young children [Technical paper]. National Science Foundation.
18. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Davies, R. S., Williams, D. D., & Yanchar, S. C. (2008). The use of randomisation in educational research and evaluation: A critical analysis of underlying assumptions. Evaluation & Research in Education, 21(4), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500790802307837
20. Değirmenci, Ş. (2022). Kodlama eğitim programının 5 yaş grubu çocukların bilişsel esneklik ve bilgi-işlemsel düşünme becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi (Tez No. 732765), [Doktora tezi, Marmara Üniversitesi]. Marmara Üniversitesi.
21. Değirmenci, S., Okulu, H. Z., Cokcaliskan, H., & Yorulmaz, A. (2025). Fostering computational and systems thinking skills in preschoolers through unplugged coding and engineering design activities. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2025.2591195
22. Diago, P. D., González-Calero, J. A., & Yáñez, D. F. (2022). Exploring the development of mental rotation and computational skills in elementary students through educational robotics. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 32, 100388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100388
23. Fessakis, G., Gouli, E., & Mavroudi, E. (2013). Problem solving by 5–6 years old kindergarten children in a computer programming environment: A case study. Computers & Education, 63, 87-97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.11.016
24. Harper, F., Larsen, J., Quinn, M., Caudle, L., Parker, B., & Sadovnik, A. (2024). An unplugged remix of culturally responsive computing for early childhood education. Future in Educational Research, 2(4), 478-497. https://doi.org/10.1002/fer3.41
25. Hegarty, M., & Waller, D. (2005). Individual differences in spatial abilities. In P. Shah & A. Miyake (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of visuospatial thinking (pp. 121–169). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610448.005
26. Hommel, B., Gehrke, J., & Knuf, L. (2000). Hierarchical coding in the perception and memory of spatial layouts. Psychological Research, 64(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s004260000032
27. İvrendi, A., Erol, A., & Atan, A. (2018). 5–6 yaş çocuklarına yönelik geometri ve uzaysal algı testinin geliştirilmesi. Kastamonu Education Journal, 26(6), 1823–1833. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2097
28. Kafai, Y. B., & Burke, Q. (2014). Connected code: Why children need to learn programming. MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9992.001.0001
29. Kalelioğlu, F. (2015). A new way of teaching programming skills to K–12 students: Code.org. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 200–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.05.047
30. Kalkan, A., & Arslan, M. (2015). Okul öncesi dönemine yönelik Görsel Algilama Ölçeği’nin (GAÖ) Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 11(4), 1369-1391.
31. Kalyenci, D., Metin, Ş., & Başaran, M. (2022). Test for assessing coding skills in early childhood. Education and Information Technologies, 27(4), 4685–4708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10803-w
32. Kangas, M. (2010). Creative and playful learning: Learning through game co-creation and games in a playful learning environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2009.11.001
33. Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. (23. basım) Nobel Yayıncılık.
34. Květon, P., Jelínek, M., & Vobořil, D. (2014). Testing of spatial ability: Construction and evaluation of a new instrument. Studia Psychologica, 56(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.21909/SP.2014.03.663
35. Kwon, K., Jeon, M., Zhou, C., Kim, K., & Brush, T. A. (2024). Embodied learning for computational thinking in early primary education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 56(4), 410-430. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2022.2158146
36. La Paglia, F., Francomano, M. M., Riva, G., & La Barbera, D. (2018). Educational robotics to develop executive functions visual spatial abilities, planning and problem solving. Annual Review of CyberTherapy and Telemedicine, 16, 80–86.
37. McNamara, T. P. (1986). Mental representations of spatial relations. Cognitive Psychology, 18(1), 87-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(86)90016-2
38. Mercan, Z., & Kandır, A. (2021). 5–8 yaş çocuklar için görsel uzamsal akıl yürütme becerileri testinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. e-Kafkas Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8, 45-66. https://doi.org/10.30900/kafkasegt.800816
39. Metin, S. (2022). Activity-based unplugged coding during the preschool period. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 32(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09616-8
40. Misirli, A., Komis, V., & Ravanis, K. (2019). The construction of spatial awareness in early childhood: The effect of an educational scenario-based programming environment. Review of Science, Mathematics and ICT Education, 13(1), 111–124. https://doi.org/10.26220/REV.3122
41. Montuori, C., Pozzan, G., Padova, C., Ronconi, L., Vardanega, T., & Arfé, B. (2023). Combined unplugged and educational robotics training to promote computational thinking and cognitive abilities in preschoolers. Education Sciences, 13(9), 858. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090858
42. Moon, J. A. (2004). A handbook of reflective and experiential learning: Theory and practice. RoutledgeFalmer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203416150
43. Munasinghe, B., Bell, T., & Robins, A. (2023). Unplugged activities as a catalyst when teaching introductory programming. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 7(2), 56-71. https://doi.org/10.33902/jpr.202318546
44. Mutoharoh, Hufad, A., Faturrohman, M., & Rusdiyani, I. (2021). Unplugged coding activities for early childhood problem-solving skills. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini, 15(1), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.21009/JPUD.151.07
45. Newcombe, N. S., & Shipley, T. F. (2015). Thinking about spatial thinking: New typology, new assessments. In J. S. Gero (Ed.), Studying visual and spatial reasoning for design creativity (pp. 179–192). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9297-4_10
46. Papalia, D. E., & Feldman, R. D. (2011). Experience human development (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
47. Pelizzari, F., Marangi, M., Rivoltella, P. C., Peretti, G., Massaro, D., & Villani, D. (2023). Coding and childhood between play and learning: Research on the impact of coding in the learning of 4-year-olds. Research on Education and Media, 15(1), 9–19. https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2023-0003
48. Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. International Universities Press.
49. Relkin, E., & Strawhacker, A. (2021). Unplugged learning: Recognizing computational thinking in everyday life. In M. U. Bers (Ed.), Teaching computational thinking and coding to young children (pp. 41–62). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7308-2.ch003
50. Sabena, C. (2017). Early child spatial development: A teaching experiment with programmable robots. In G. Aldon, F. Hitt, L. Bazzini, & U. Gellert (Eds.), Mathematics and Technology: A CIEAEM Sourcebook (pp. 13–30). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51380-5_2
51. Somuncu, B., & Aslan, D. (2022). Effect of coding activities on preschool children’s mathematical reasoning skills. Education and Information Technologies, 27(1), 877-890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10618-9
52. Sutton, K., & Williams, A. (2007). Spatial cognition and its implications for design. In Proceedings of the International Association of Societies of Design Research 2007 (IASDR 2007). International Association of Societies of Design Research.
53. Terroba, M., Ribera, J. M., Lapresa, D., & Anguera, M. T. (2022). Observational analysis of the development of computational thinking in early childhood education (5 years old) through an intervention proposal with a ground robot of programmed directionality. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 30(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2022.2055102
54. Tversky, B. (2003). Navigating by mind and by body. In C. Freksa, W. Brauer, C. Habel, & K. F. Wender (Eds.), Spatial cognition III: Routes and navigation, human memory and learning, spatial representation and spatial learning (pp. 1–10). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45004-1_1
55. Üstün, A. G., & Ogelman, H. G. (2025). A systematic review on preschool coding education and computational thinking. The Journal of Limitless Education and Research, 10(2), 389–475.
56. Wang, F., Huang, J., Zheng, X. L., Wu, J. Q., & Zhao, A. P. (2025). STEM activities for boosting pupils’ computational thinking and reducing their cognitive load: Roles of argumentation scaffolding and mental rotation. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 57(6), 1370-1389. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2024.2398504
57. Wang, L., Huang, M., & Ismail@Kamal, J. B. (2024). The application of an unplugged and low-cost children’s coding education tool in a gamification context. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 32(2), 387–406. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.32.2.03
58. Zhang, Y., Liang, Y., Tian, X., & Yu, X. (2024). The effects of unplugged programming activities on K-9 students’ computational thinking: Meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 72(3), 1331–1356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10339-5