Matematik Ders Kitaplarında Tam Sayılarla Çarpma ve Bölme İşlemleri Nasıl Öğretiliyor: Türkiye, ABD ve Kanada Karşılaştırması

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 13 Sayı: 2, 806 - 825, 28.12.2022

Emine Özgür Şen

https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1078787

Öz

Bu araştırmada matematik ders kitaplarında tam sayılarla çarpma ve bölme işlemlerinin nasıl öğretildiği incelenmiştir. Bu bağlamda, Türkiye, ABD ve Kanada matematik ders kitaplarında tam sayılarla çarpma ve bölme işlemlerinin nasıl sunulduğu incelenmiş ayrıca konu içeriğinde verilen örnek ve problemlerin analizi değerlendirilmiştir. Nitel olarak tasarlanan çalışmanın yöntemi doküman incelemesidir. Veri toplama aracı olarak Türkiye, ABD ve Kanada’nın matematik ders kitapları kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizi içerik analiz yöntemi kullanılarak çözümlenmiştir. Araştırmada, ders kitaplarında tam sayılarla çarpma ve bölme işlemi öğretiminde sunulan problemlerin büyük çoğunluğunun hesaplama, temel bilgi ve becerileri doğrudan uygulama, kapalı uçlu cevap ve matematiksel olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Kanada matematik ders kitabında tartışma, yorumlama, bağlantı oluşturma, yansıtıcı düşünme, açık uçlu cevap, gerçek ve otantik bağlam problemleri diğer ders kitaplarına oranla daha fazla olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Türkiye matematik ders kitabındaki problemler ise hesaplama, temel bilgi ve becerileri doğrudan uygulama, kapalı cevap ve matematikseldir. Ayrıca, tam sayılarla çarpma ve bölme işlemi öğretimde tüm ders kitapları sayma pulları ve sayı doğrusu modelini kullanmıştır. Ancak sadece Kanada matematik ders kitabı tam sayılarla çarpma ve bölme işlemini öğretiminde model kullanımını ayrıntılı olarak ele almıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

matematik ders kitabı, tam sayılar, çarpma ve bölme işlemleri

Kaynakça

• Alajmi, A. H. (2012). How do elementary textbooks address fractions? A review of mathematics textbooks in the USA, Japan, and Kuwait. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 239-261.
• Altiparmak, K., & Özdoğan, E. (2010). A study on the teaching of the concept of negative numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 41(1), 31-47.
• Almeida, R., & Bruno, A. (2014). Strategies of pre-service primary school teachers for solving addition problems with negative numbers. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45(5), 719-737.
• Aydın-Ünal, Z., & İpek, A. S. (2010). Gerçekçi matematik eğitiminin ilköğretim 7. sınıf öğrencilerinin tam sayılarla çarpma konusundaki başarılarına etkisi. Eğitim ve Bilim, 34(152).
• Badarudin, B. R. H., & Khalid, M. (2008). Using the jar model to improve students’ understanding of operations on integers. Proceedings Of Icme-11–Topic Study Group 10 Research and Development In The Teaching And Learning Of Number Systems And Arithmetic, 85.
• Beswick, K. (2011). Positive experiences with negative numbers. Australian Association of Math Teachers, 67(2), 31–41.
• Bishop, J. P., Lamb, L. L., Philipp, R. A., Whitacre, I., Schappelle, B. P., & Lewis, M. L. (2014). Obstacles and affordances for integer reasoning: An analysis of children's thinking and the history of mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 19-61.
• Boonlerts, S., & Inprasitha, M. (2013). The textbook analysis on multiplication: The case of Japan, Singapore and Thailand. Creative Education, 4(4), 259-262.
• Bouck, E. C., & Park, J. (2020). App-based manipulatives and the system of least prompts to support acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of adding integers. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 55(2), 158-172.
• Bryant, D. P., Bryant, B. R., Dougherty, B., Roberts, G., Pfannenstiel, K. H., & Lee, J. (2020). Mathematics performance on integers of students with mathematics difficulties. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 58, 100776.
• Carpenter, C. H., & Wessman-Enzinger, N. M. (2018). Grade 5 students’ negative integer multiplication strategies. In T. E. Hodges, G. J. Roy, & A. M. Tyminski, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 139–146). Greenville, SC: University of South Carolina & Clemson University.
• Cai, J., & Jiang, C. (2017). An analysis of problem-posing tasks in Chinese and US elementary mathematics textbooks. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(8), 1521-1540.
• Fan, L., Cheng, J., Xie, S., Luo, J., Wang, Y., & Sun, Y. (2021). Are textbooks facilitators or barriers for teachers’ teaching and instructional change? An investigation of secondary mathematics teachers in Shanghai, China. ZDM–Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1313-1330.
• Fan, L. (2013). Textbook research as scientific research: towards a common ground on issues and methods of research on mathematics textbooks. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 765-777.
• Fan, L., & Zhu, Y. (2000). Problem solving in Singaporean secondary mathematics textbooks. The Mathematics Educator, 5(1),117-141.
• Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: development status and directions. ZDM, 45(5), 633-646.
• Fuadiah, N. F., Suryadi, D., & Turmudi (2019). Teaching and learning activities in classroom and their impact on student misunderstanding: a case study on negative integers. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 407-424.
• Gracin, D. G. (2018). Requirements in mathematics textbooks: a five-dimensional analysis of textbook exercises and examples. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(7), 1003-1024.
• Güler, A., Halıcıoğlu, M.B. & Taşğın, S. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma. Ankara: Seçkin.
• Hwang, S., Yeo, S., & Son, T. (2021). A comparative analysis of fraction addition and subtraction contents in the mathematics textbooks in the US and South Korea. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(4), 511-521.
• Kajander, A., & Lovric, M. (2009). Mathematics textbooks and their potential role in supporting misconceptions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 40(2), 173-181.
• Kar, T., & Işık, C. (2015). Türk ve Amerikan yedinci sınıf matematik ders kitaplarının tamsayılarla toplama ve çıkarma işlemleri üzerinden karşılaştırılması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 40(177), 75-92.
• Khalid, M., & Embong, Z. (2020). Emphasizing concrete representation to enhance students’ conceptual understanding of operations on integers. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 11(3), 762-773.
• Kul, Ü., Sevimli, E., & Aksu, Z. (2018). A comparison of mathematics questions in Turkish and Canadian school textbooks in terms of synthesized taxonomy. Turkish Journal of Education, 7(3), 136-155.
• Lepik, M. (2015). Analyzing the use of textbook in mathematics education: the case of Estonia. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia, (35), 90-102.
• Lepik, M., Grevholm, B., & Viholainen, A. (2015). Using textbooks in the mathematics classroom–the teachers’ view. Nordic Studies in Mathematics Education, 20(3-4), 129-156.
• Makonye, J. P., & Fakude, J. (2016). A study of errors and misconceptions in the learning of addition and subtraction of directed numbers in grade 8. SAGE Open, 6(4), 1-10.
• Mayer, R. E., Sims, V., & Tajika, H. (1995). A Comparison of how textbooks teach mathematical problem solving in Japan and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 443-460.
• Mersin, N. & Kılıç, Ç. (2021). Ortaokul matematik ders kitaplarında bulunan problem kurma etkinliklerinin uluslararası düzeyde karşılaştırılması. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(4), 1259-1279.
• Nur, A. S., Kartono, K., Zaenuri, Z., & Rochmad, R. (2022). The learning trajectory construction of elementary school students in solving integer word problems. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 404-424.
• Özer, E., & Sezer, R. (2014). A Comparative analysis of questions in American, Singaporean, and Turkish mathematics textbooks based on the topics covered in 8th grade in turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 14(1), 411-421.
• Porter, A. C. (2002). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3-14. Peled, I., & Carraher, D. W. (2006). Signed numbers and algebraic thinking. In J. J. Kaput, D. W. Carraher, & M. L. Blanton (Eds.), Algebra in the early grades (pp. 303–328). New York: Routledge.
• Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: A way to understand teaching and learning cultures. Zentralblatt for the Didactics of Mathematics, 33(5), 158–175.
• Permata, D., & Wijayanti, P. & Masriyah (2019, March). Students’ misconceptions on the algebraic prerequisites concept: operation of integer numbers and fractions. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1188, No. 1, p. 012059). IOP Publishing.
• Peterson, J. C. (1972). Fourteen different strategies for multiplication of integers or why (− 1)(− 1)=+ 1. The Arithmetic Teacher, 19(5), 396-403.
• Powell, S. R., Mason, E. N., Bos, S. E., Hirt, S., Ketterlin‐Geller, L. R., & Lembke, E. S. (2021). A systematic review of mathematics ınterventions for middle‐school students experiencing mathematics difficulty. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(4), 295-329.
• Reeder, S., & Bateiha, S. (2016). Prospective elementary teachers' conceptual understanding of ıntegers. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 8(3), 16-29.
• Son, J. W., & Senk, S. L. (2010). How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(2), 117-142.
• Stacey, K., & Vincent, J. (2009). Modes of reasoning in explanations in Australian eighth-grade mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 72(3), 271-288.
• Stephan, M., & Akyuz, D. (2012). A proposed instructional theory for integer addition and subtraction. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(4), 428-464.
• TIMSS (2019) https://odsgm.meb.gov.tr/meb_iys_dosyalar/2020_12/10175514_TIMSS_2019_Turkiye_ On_ Raporu_.pdf
• Thomson, S., & Fleming, N. (2004). Summing it up: Mathematics achievement in Australian schools in TIMSS 2002. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
• Ulusoy, F., & İncikabı, L. (2020). Middle school teachers' use of compulsory textbooks in instruction of mathematics. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 21(1), 1-18.
• Van den Ham, A. K., & Heinze, A. (2018). Does the textbook matter? Longitudinal effects of textbook choice on primary school students’ achievement in mathematics. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 59, 133-140.
• Wessman-Enzinger, N. M., & Tobias, J. M. (2022). The dimensions of prospective elementary and middle school teachers’ problem posing for integer addition and subtraction. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 1-33.
• Xin, Y. P. (2007). Word problem solving tasks in textbooks and their relation to student performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 100(6), 347-360.
• Van De Walle, J.A., Karp, K.S. & Bay-Williams, J.M. (2016). İlkokul ve ortaokul matematiği: Gelişimsel yaklaşımla öğretim (Çeviri Editörü S. Durmuş). Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Yıldırım, A & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Şeçkin.
• Zhu, Y., & Fan, L. (2006). Focus on the representation of problem types in intended curriculum: A comparison of selected mathematics textbooks from Mainland China and the United States. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(4), 609-626.