Öz-yeterlik, İçe Yönelik Motivasyon, Kaygı ve Matematik Başarısı: Türkiye, Japonya ve Finlandiya'dan Bulgular

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 1, 277 - 291, 01.06.2011

Selda Yıldırım Selda Yıldırım

Öz

Bu araştırmada, öz-yeterlik, içe yönelik motivasyon ve kaygı arasındaki ilişkiler ve bu ilişkilerin matematik başarısı üzerindeki etkileri, Türkiye, Japonya ve Finlandiya’da, PISA 2003 uygulamasında öğrenci anketinden elde edilen veri kullanılarak araştırılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, her üç ülkede de öz-yeterlik inancının matematik başarısı üzerinde pozitif etkisinin olduğunu ve bu etkinin Finlandiya’da daha fazla olduğunu ve içe yönelik motivasyon ve kaygının öz-yeterlik ile matematik başarısı arasındaki aracı rolünün zayıf olduğunu göstermiştir. Farklı kültürlerde öz-yeterlik inancının kaynağının araştırılması öz-yeterlik ve başarı arasındaki ilişkilerdeki farklılıkların açıklanmasında etkili olabilir. Sonuçlar ayrıca motivasyonel inançlar ve başarı arasındaki ilişkilerin birlikte ele alınmasının önemli olduğunu desteklemektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

öz-yeterlik, içe yönelik motivasyon, kaygı, PISA 2003 matematik başarısı

Self-efficacy, Intrinsic Motivation, Anxiety and Mathematics Achievement: Findings from Turkey, Japan and Finland

Öz

In this study, relationships among self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation and anxiety were investigated across Turkey, Japan and Finland to predict the PISA 2003 mathematics performance. The data of student questionnaire was used in the study. In three of the countries, self-efficacy positively predicted mathematics achievement and this effect was relatively higher in Finland and mediating roles of intrinsic motivation and anxiety between self-efficacy and mathematics achievement were quite small. To investigate the possible sources of self-efficacy beliefs in different cultures may contribute to understand the differences on the relationship between self-efficacy and achievement. Also findings suggest that examining joint relationships when evaluating the strength of relationships among motivational beliefs and achievement are important. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

self-efficacy, intrinsic motivation, anxiety, PISA 2003 mathematics achievement

Kaynakça

• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: the exercise of control. New york: Freeman.
• Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
• Byrnes, J. P. (2003). Factors predictive of mathematics achievement in White, Black, and Hispanic 12th graders. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 316-326.
• Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L.G., & Ryan, R.M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325-346.
• EARGED, (2005). PISA 2003 projesi ulusal nihai rapor. Ankara.
• Goetz, T., Cronjaeger, H., Frenzel, A.C., Lüdtke, O. & Hall, N.C. (2010). Academic self concept and emotion relations: Domain spesificity and age effects. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 44-58.
• Hoffman, B. & Spatariu, A. (2008). The influence of self efficacy and metacognitive prompting on math problem solving efficiency. Comtemporary Educational Psychology, 33, 875-893.
• Krull, J.L. & Mackinnon, D.P. (2001). Multilevel modeling of individual and group level mediated effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 249-277.
• Metallidou, P. & Vlachou, A. (2007). Motivational beliefs, cognitive engagement, and achievement in language and mathematics in elementary school children. International Journal of Psychology, 42, 2-15.
• OECD (2005). PISA 2003 technical report. Paris.
• Üredi, I. & Üredi L. (2005). İlköğretim 8.sınıf öğrencilerinin öz-düzenleme stratejileri ve motivasyonel inançlarının matematik başarısını yordama gücü. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 250-260.
• Pajares, F. & Graham, L. (1999). Self-efficacy, motivation constructs, and mathematics performance of entering middle school students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 124-139.
• Pajares, F. & Miller, D. (1994). The role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86, 193-203.
• Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.). Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol.10 (pp. 1-49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
• Pietsch, J., Walker, R. & Chapman, E. (2003). The relationships among self-concept, self- efficacy and performance in mathematics during secondary school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 589-603.
• Randhawa, B.S. & Gupta, A. (2000). Cross-national gender differences in mathematics achievement, attitude, and self-efficacy within a common intrinsic structure. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 15, 51-66.
• Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y.F. & Congdon, R.T. (2004). HLM6: linear and nonlinear modeling. The U.SA, Scientific Software International, Inc.
• Snijder, T. A. B. & Bosker, R. J. (1999). An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: SAGE publications.
• Sobel, M. E. (1982). Asymptotic intervals for indirect effects in structural equations models. In S. Leinhart (Ed.), Sociological methodology 1982 (pp. 290–312). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Stevens, T., Olivárez, A., Jr., Lan,W. Y., & Tallent-Runnels, M. K. (2004). Role of mathematics self-efficacy and motivation in mathematics performance across ethnicity. Journal of Educational Research, 97, 208-221.
• Stevens, T., Wang, K., Olivarez, A., & Hamman, D. (2007). Use of self-perspectives and their sources to predict the mathematics enrolment intentions of girls and boys. Sex Roles, 56, 351-363.
• Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relations between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A systematic review. Educational Psychologist, 39, 111-133.
• Wolters, C.A., & Pintrich, P.R. (1998). Contexual differences in student motivation and self- regulated learning in mathematics, English, and social studies classrooms. Instructional Science, 26, 27-47.