Makarnalık Buğday Islah Materyalinin Miksograf Parametreleri ile Değerlendirilmesi

Öz

Bu çalışma 20 makarnalık buğday (Triticum durum L.) genotipi ile (16 hat, 4 çeşit) 2012-2013 yetiştirme döneminde kuru şartlarda Konya lokasyonunda yürütülmüştür. Deneme materyalinde fiziksel, kimyasal ve reolojik analizler yapılmıştır. TKW (Bin tane ağırlığı g), PRT (Protein miktarı %), SDS (Sodyum dodesil sülfat sedimantasyon ml), Renk (CLR, b sarı renk değeri), MMT (Miksograf gelişme süresi dk), MPH (Miksograf pik yüksekliği %), MRS (Miksograf sağ pik eğimi dk/%), MPW (Miksograf pik genişliği %), MBE (Miksograf bant alanı Nm), MTE (Miksograf toplam alan Nm) incelenmiştir. Bu çalışmada SDS sedimantasyon ve MMT (p < 0.01), MPH (p < 0.05), MPW (p < 0.05) MPE (p < 0.05) MTE (p < 0.05) değerleri arasında pozitif ve önemli korelasyon bulunmuştur. Analiz sonuçlarına göre 18 ve 1 numaralı hat ile Eminbey çesidinin yüksek kaliteye sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Makarnalık buğday ıslah programlarında son ürün kalitesinin tahmininde Miksograf analizi çok kullanışlı ve pratik bir testtir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Makarnalık buğday, kalite, miksograf, SDS sedimantasyon, protein

Assessment of Quality of Durum Wheat Breeding Material by Means of Mixograph Parameters

Öz

This study was conducted with twenty durum wheat (Triticum durum L.) genotypes (Lines 16, cultivars 4) under rainfed conditions in 2012-2013 growing season in Konya location. Physical, chemical and rheological analyzes of trial material were made. TKW (Thousand Kernel Weight g), PRT (Protein content %), SDS (Sodium dodecyl sulfate sedimentation ml), CLR (Yellowness (b value)), MMT (Mixograph mixing time min), MPH (Mixograph mixing peak height %); MRS (Mixograph right peak slope min/%), MPW (Mixograph mixing peak weight %), MBE (Mixograph bandwith energy Nm) and MTE (Mixograph total energy Nm) were investigated. In this study, it was obtained that the significant and positive relationships between SDS sedimentation and MMT (p < 0.01), MPH (p < 0.05), MPW (p < 0.05) MPE (p < 0.05) MTE (p < 0.05) were significant. According to the analyses results lines 18 and 1, Eminbey variety has high quality. The Mixograph analysis is most useful and pratical test to predict the end use quality of durum wheat in a breeding program

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Durum wheat, quality, mixograph, SDS sedimentation, protein

Kaynakça

1. Anonymous, (2002). AACC Approved Methods of the American Association of Cereal Chemist, USA
2. Anonymous, (2009). Approvedmethodologies. www.leco.com/resources/approved_methods
3. Bağcı, S. A. (1998). Multivariate analysis of computerized mixograph data for end-use quality improvement in winter wheat. M. Sc. thesis. South Dakota State University, SD, USA
4. Boggini, G., Tusa, P., Pogna, N. E. (1995). Bread-making quality of durum wheat genotypes with novel glutenin compositions. Journal of Cereal Science 22,105–113
5. Boyacioglu, M. H., Dappolonia, B. L. (1994). Durum wheat and bread products. Cereal Foods World 39, 168–174
6. Hoseney, R. C., Finney, P. L. (1974). Mixing a contrary view. Bakers Digest 48: 22-24
7. Joppa, L. R., Josephides, C. M., Youngs, V. L. (1983). Chromosomal location of genes affecting quality in durum wheat. Pages 297-301 in: Proc.6th Int. Wheat Genet. Symp. Kyoto, Japan
8. Josephides, C. M., Joppa, L. R., Youngs, V. L. (1987). Effect of chromosome 1B on gluten strengthand other characteristics of durum wheat. Crop Sci.27(2):212-216

9. Khatkar, B. S., Bell, A. E., SchoŞeld, J. D. (1996) A comparative study of the inter-relationships between mixograph parameters and bread making qualities of wheat flours and glutens. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 72 71–85
10. Kovacs, M. I. P., Noll, J. S., Dahlke, G., Leisle, D. (1995). Pasta viscoelasticity: its usefulness in the Canadian durum wheat breeding program. Journal of Cereal Science, 22, 115-121
11. Kovacs, M. I. P., Howes, N. K., Leisle, D., Skerritt, J. H. (1993). The effect of high Mr glutenin subunit composition on the results from tests used to predict durum wheat quality. Journal of Cereal Science 18 (1993) 43–51
12. Lukow, O. M., McVetty, P. B. E. (1991). Effect of cultivar and environment on quality characteristics of spring wheat. Cereal Chem. 68:597–601
13. MacRitchie, F. (1992). Physicochemical properties of wheat proteins in relation to functionality (1992). In ‘Advances in Food and Nutrition Research’, ( J. E. Kinsella, ed.), Academic Press, New York No. 36 pp 1–87
14. Matsuo, R. R., Dexter, J. E., Kosmolak, F. G., Leisle, D. (1982). Statistical Evaluation of tests for assessing spaghettti-making quality of durum wheat. Cereal Chemistry 59(3), 222-228
15. Pena, R. J. (2000). Durum wheat for pasta and breadmaking. Comparison of methods used in breeding to determine gluten quality related parameters. In : Royo C. (ed.), Nachit M. (ed.), Di Fonzo N. (ed.). Arau s J.L. (ed.). Durum wheat improvement in the Mediterranean region: New challenges. Zaragoza:CIHEAM, . p. 423-430
16. Peterson, C. J., Graybosch, R. A., Baenziger, P. S., Grombacher, A. W. (1992). Genotype and environment effects on quality characteristics of hard red winter wheat. Crop Sci. 32:98–103
17. Quick, J. S., Donnely, B. J. (1980). A rapid test for estimating durum wheat gluten quality. Crop Sci. 20:816- 818
18. Ram, S., Mishra, B. (2010). Cereals: Processing and Nutritional Quality. New India Publishing Agency. India
19. Şahin, M., Göçmen Akçacık, A., Aydoğan, S., Taner, S., Ayrancı, R. (2011). Ekmeklik buğdayda bazı kalite özellikleri ile miksograf parametreleri arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Tarla Bitkileri Merkez Araştırma Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20 (1): 6-11, Ankara