FRENCH IMPERIALISM IN THE MIDDLE EAST: SYRIA IN THE PERIOD OF THE FRENCH MANDATE ADMINISTRATION (1920-1946)

Öz

This study examines the imperialist the policies of French mandate power covering the period from 1920 to 1946, with particular attention being given to the administrative, financial and cultural policies of France. The work also aims to display the relations of France with Arab nationalist leaders and the minorities, and even the political engagement of urban elites in Syria during the mandate era.

As one of the great powers, France’s interests in the Middle East focused on to preserve her centuries-old ties with the Catholics of Syria, to gain a strategic and financial base in the eastern Mediterranean, to ensure a cheap supply of cotton and silk, and prevent Arab nationalism from spreading her North African empire. Eventually, the Supreme Council of the League of Nations announced on April 24-26, 1920 that Syria was to be divided into the two French Mandates of Lebanon and Syria. Then French troops advanced towards Damascus and defeated irregular Arab forces under Youssef al-Azma at the Battle of Maysalun on July 24, 1920. A day later, French army captured Damascus, Faisal was expelled and Syria became the French mandate.

After the establishment of Greater Lebanon, French authorities tried to form suitable conditions in order to ensure its mandate regime by implementing the policy of ‘dive and rule’ in Syria. They firstly established two different states of Damascus and Aleppo in 1920. The Sanjak of Alexandretta, with its important Turkish population, was largely autonomous administration within the Aleppo state. Moreover, French announced in 1922 that Jabal Druze was a separate unit under French protection, its own governor and elected congress. In the same way, the mountain region in Latakia, with their large Alawite population, was declared an autonomous state. However, in 1922, French authorities decided to establish a Syrian Federation uniting the Damascus, Aleppo and Alawite states. The system of Syrian federation continued a short time and it was dissolved by the end of 1924. Instead, the State of Syria including Damascus and Aleppo and separate Sanjak of Alexandretta was created by France. It is certain that French mandate regime incited the ethnic and denominational separatism and conflict among the Syrian people by creating different regional states. Indeed, this division and conflict triggered by French authority have been affecting the situation in Syria even nowadays.

The French authority in Syria was considered as ‘illegitimate’ and ‘instable’ because Syrian people did not recognize French as a legitimate overlord, as the Sultan-Caliph of the Ottoman Empire had been. Thus, the rigid control of the French mandate administration over the political, judicial, economy and religious institutions caused to the outbreak of a combination of local revolts during 1920s. Especially, great revolt of Druze in 1925 took approximately twelve months to be suppressed. French forces could suppress the revolt in 1926 by bombarding Damascus and killing thousands of people. After the suppression, France had to recognize autonomy of Lebanon.

As for financial policies, France, which pursued a policy of protecting large landowners during the mandate administration, enabled French merchants to make more profits from the cereals production in Syria. In addition, France has managed the markets and paved the way for French tradesmen to gain more wealth imports-exports.

In addition, French Government placed their own ‘‘Frank’’ at the center of international trade in Syria, and left the management of the monetary mechanism in the hands of the French bankers, not the Syrians. In addition, the ports, customs, railways, tobacco regime and many other revenue-generating institutions of Syria and Lebanon were directly linked to the financial department of the French High Commissioner. In fact, the French administration in Syria focused on exploitation rather than its development.

During the mandate period, French also dominated the educational and cultural activities in Syria. Actually, most of the secondary and higher education institutions in Syria and Lebanon were in the hands of European and American missionaries. Particularly in Lebanon, most of the education system and almost all of the higher education was under the French control.

The lessons given in France were also taught in French schools in Syria, and French language became compulsory in schools. Furthermore, they rearranged the curriculum and put books related to French classics, French history and geography instead of Arab-Islamic culture. All these attempts indicate that French authorities aimed to exterminate the traces of Arabic consciousness and identity.

As a consequence, after the Second World War, France had to recognize independence of Syria and Lebanon, and French forces were withdrawn from both countries on April 15, 1946. The period of French mandate in Syria is very important period in which many crucial developments affecting the country in many dimensions emerged. Also, this period is significant in terms of laying the foundations of today's Syrian state structure and including the determination of its borders.

Among the institutions left behind by the French administration, the army has a special place in the forthcoming years with respect to its effectiveness in shaping the country's future. In fact, the Syrian army, built on the basis of minorities during the French mandate, played an active role in how the political life in the country would be shaped after the independence. In addition, the mosaic structure of the army has also affected the recent disintegration of the Syria as ‘opposition group’ and ‘pro-regime’ officers.

In fact, this study is crucial in the sense of shedding light on the recent developments in the Middle East with the civil war in Syria. There is no doubt that the French policies triggering the sectarian and ethnic separatism and their approach to the minorities affected the civil war in Syria. In other words, French sowed the seeds of ethnic and religious based conflict among the Syrian people and this fact prepared the ground for conflict in Syria even after a long period of time. Thus, the era of French administration in Syria has a good historical laboratory for the international community that wants to construct order and stability in Syria today.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• The Middle East,French Imperialism,French Mandate,Economy in Syria,Political Life,Arab Nationalism

ORTADOĞU’DA FRANSIZ EMPERYALİZMİ: FRANSIZ MANDA YÖNETİMİ DÖNEMİNDE SURİYE (1920-1946)

Öz

Bu çalışma, 1920-1946 yılları arasında Fransız mandası olarak yönetilen Suriye'de, Fransız idaresinin uyguladığı siyasi, ekonomi ve kültür politikalarını incelemektedir. Suriye'deki siyasi, sosyal ve iktisadi hayatın her alanına nüfuz eden Fransız politikalarının temel odak noktasını, etnik ve mezhepsel ayrılıklar ve bölgesel çatışmalar oluşturmuştur. Genel olarak 'böl ve yönet' anlayışıyla hareket eden Fransız yönetimi, Suriye'de farklı etnik ve mezhepsel temellere dayanan dört bölgesel devlet kurmuşlar ve böylece, Suriyelilerin siyasi birlik ve bütünlük içinde kendilerine karşı harekete geçmelerini engellemeyi hedeflemişlerdir. Fransız yönetimi, manda yönetimi boyunca Suriye’deki bütün ekonomik faaliyetlerin denetimini de kendi ellerinde tutmuş, kendi para birimi olan Frank'ı ticari faaliyetlerin merkezine koymuştur. Fransız manda yönetiminin yön verdiği ekonomik sistemde sadece büyük toprak sahipleri kâr edebilmiş, küçük toprak sahipleri ve köylüler ise çok kötü şartlarda yaşamak zorunda kalmışlardır. Ayrıca, yirmi beş yıldan fazla bir süre Suriye'de kalan Fransız idaresi, bölgede uyguladıkları eğitim ve kültür politikalarıyla halkı adeta kültürel asimilasyona maruz bırakmışlardır. Okullarda Suriye tarihi yerine, Fransız tarihinin okutulması ve Fransızcanın belli bir süre zorunlu dil haline getirilmesi, Fransız manda idaresinin Suriye'de beyin yıkama politikalarından sadece birkaçıdır.

Bu makalede, Fransız manda idaresinin 1920-1946 yılları arasında Suriye’de uyguladığı sömürge politikaları analitik bir bakış açısıyla ele alınmıştır. Ayrıca, üzerinden yaklaşık yüz yıl geçmiş olmasına rağmen, bu politikaların etkilerinin bölgede hala nasıl hissedildiği ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu noktadan hareketle söz konusu çalışma, yaklaşık on yıldır devam eden Suriye’deki iç savaşın temel sebeplerini ve bölgede meydana gelen diğer gelişmeleri, Fransız idaresinin sömürge politikaları ışığında, çok daha farklı bir bakış açısıyla değerlendirmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ortadoğu,Fransız Emperyalizmi,Fransız Mandası,Suriye’de Ekonomi,Siyasi Hayat,Arap Milliyetçiliği

Kaynakça

1. Acar, İrfan C., Lübnan Bunalımı ve Filistin Sorunu, TTK, Ankara 1989.
2. Bağlıoğlu, Ahmet, Orta Doğu Siyasi Tarihinde Dürziler, Fırat Üniversitesi Orta Doğu Araştırmaları Merkezi Yayınları, Elazığ 2006.
3. Barr, Jamess, Kırmızı Çizgi, Paylaşılamayan Toprakların Yakın Tarihi, (Çev.: Ekin Can Göksoy), Pegasus Yayınları, İstanbul 2016.
4. Bey, Salma Mardam, Syria’s Quest For Independence 1939-1945, Ithaca Press, Beyrut 1997.
5. Blake, Gerald H. ve Drysdale, Alasdair, The Middle East and North Africa: A Political Geography, Oxford University Press, New York 1985.
6. Burke, Edmund, III, ‘‘A Comparative View of French Native Policy in Morocco and Syria, 1912-1925’’, Middle Eastern Studies, C. 9, S. 2, ss. 175-186.
7. Cemal Paşa, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nda Ayrılıkçı Arap Örgütleri, Âliye-i Divan-ı Harb-i Örfı̂si, (Yay. Haz.: Ayşe H. Aydın), Arba Yayınları, İstanbul 1993.
8. Cleveland, William L. ve Bunton, Martin, A History of the Modern Middle East, Westview Press, Boulder 2009.

9. Çelenk, Selim, Hatay'ın Kurtuluş Mücadelesi Anıları, (Yay. Haz.: Günay Çelenk), Antakya Gazeteciler Cemiyeti, Antakya 1997.
10. Dam, Nikolaos van, The Struggle for Power in Syria : Politics and Society under Asad and the Ba'th Party, I.B. Tauris, London ; New York 2011.
11. Fieldhouse, David K., Ortadoğu’da Batı Emperyalizmi, 1914-1958, (Çev.: Merve Şahin), Tarih&Kuram Yayınları, İstanbul 2018.
12. Gürson, Poyraz, Suriye, Atılım Üniversitesi Yayınları, Ankara 2010.
13. Hopkins, E. W. vd., Tarihte ve Günümüzde Misyonerlik, (Çev.: Adnan Yazıcı, Nurer Uğurlu, Kemal Demir), Özgün Yayınevi, İstanbul 2006.
14. Hourani, Albert H., Arap Halkları Tarihi, (Çev.: Yavuz Alogan,) İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul 2000.
15. Hourani, Albert H., Syria and Lebanon: A Political Essay, Oxford University Press, London 1946.
16. Kasalak, Kadir, Milli Mücadelede Manda ve Himaye Meselesi, Genelkurmay Basımevi, Ankara 1993.
17. Kayalı, Hasan, Jön Türkler ve Araplar: Osmanlıcılık, Erken Arap Milliyetçiliği ve İslamcılık, 1908-1918, (Çev.: Türkan Yöney), Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul 2018.
18. Kedourie, Elie, In the Anglo-Arab Labyrinth: The McMahon-Husayn Correspondence and its Interpretations, 1914-1939, Frank Cass, London; Portland 2000.
19. Khoury, Philip S., Syria and The French Mandate 1920-1945, Princeton University Press, New Jersey 1987.
20. Longrigg, Stephen H., Syria and Lebanon Under French Mandate, Oxford University Press, Beyrut 1972.
21. Mansfield, Peter, A History of The Middle East, Penguin Books, London 2003.
22. Maoz, Moshe, Asad : The Sphinx of Damascus : A Political Biography, Grove Weidenfeld, New York 1989.
23. Meray, Seha L. ve Olcay, Osman, Osmanlı İmparatorluğunun Çöküş Belgeleri, (Mondros Bırakışması, Sevr Andlaşması, İlgili Belgeler), Ankara Üniversitesi Basımevi, Ankara 1977.
24. Neep, Daniel, Occupying Syria Under The French Mandate, Insurgency, Space and State Formation, Cambridge University Press, New York 2012.
25. Okur, Mehmet Akif, ‘‘Emperyalizmin Ortadoğu Tecrübesinden Bir Kesit: Suriye’de Fransız Mandası’’, bilig, S. 48, ss. 137-156.
26. Özçelik, İsmail, Milli Mücadele'de Güney cephesi (Urfa) (30 Ekim 1918-11 Temmuz 1920), Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi, Ankara 2003.
27. Provence, Michael, The Great Syrian Revolt and the Rise of Arab Nationalism, University of Texas Press, Austin 2005.
28. Salık, Nuri, Syrian Foreign Policy: From Independence to The Baathist Coup 1946-1963, Orion Kitabevi, Ankara 2014.
29. Shambrook, Peter A., French Imperialism in Syria, 1927-1936, Ithaca Press, Lebanon 1998.
30. Şahin, İsmail vd., ‘‘Ortadoğu’da Emperyalist Güçlerin Gizli Oyunu: Sykes-Picot Antlaşması’’, The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, S. 38, ss. 241-262.
31. Umar, Ömer Osman, Osmanlı Yönetimi ve Fransız Manda İdaresi Altında Suriye (1908- 1938), Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi, Ankara 2004.
32. Umar, Ömer Osman, ‘‘Suriye'de Fransız Emperyalizmi’’, Fırat Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, C. 12, S. 1, ss. 297-310.
33. Yamaç, Müzehher, “Fransız Diplomatik Belgelerinde Türkiye-Suriye Sınır Sorunu (1918 - 1940)”, Belleten, C. LXXXII, S. 295, ss. 1154- 1184.
34. Yavuz, Bige, “1921 Tarihli Türk-Fransız Anlaşması’nın Hazırlık Aşamaları”, Atatürk Araştırma Merkezi Dergisi, C. 8, S, 23, ss. 273-308.
35. Zeine, Zeine N., The Struggle for Arab Independence: Western Diplomacy & The Rise and Fall of Faisal's Kingdom in Syria, Khayat's, Beirut 1960.