Araştırma Makalesi

Nesnelerin interneti hizmetlerini kullanım niyeti üzerine nicel bir araştırma

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 1 25 Mart 2023
PDF İndir
EN TR

A quantitative study on the intention to use internet of things services

Abstract

The Internet of Things (IoT) has become an integral part of our lives. It provides great convenience to consumers in their work and home lives and in the services they receive, such as health and tourism. However, as with other technological innovations, consumers have privacy and security concerns about IoT services. This study investigated how perceived usefulness and privacy risk affected consumers’ attitudes toward IoT services. The study also examined how their attitudes toward IoT services affected their intention to use them. The research hypotheses were tested with the structural equation model. The results showed that perceived usefulness positively affected consumers’ attitudes, affecting their intention to use IoT services. On the other hand, perceived privacy risk did not significantly affect their attitudes toward IoT services.

Keywords

internet of things , perceived usefulness , intention to use

Kaynakça

  1. AlHogail, A. (2018). Improving IoT technology adoption through ımproving consumer trust. Technologies, 6(64), 1-17. doi: 10.3390/technologies6030064.
  2. Al-rawashdeh, M., Keikhosrokiani, P., Belaton, B., Alawida, M., & Zwiri, A. (2022). IoT adoption and application for smart healthcare: A systematic review. Sensors, 22(14), 5377. doi: 10.3390/s22145377
  3. Alraja, M. N., Farooque, M. M. J., & Khashab, B. (2019). The effect of security, privacy, familiarity, and trust on users’ attitudes toward the use of the IoT-based healthcare: the mediation role of risk perception. IEEE Access, 7, 111341-111354.
  4. Arfi, W. B., Nasr, I. B., Khvatova, T., & Zaied, Y. B. (2021). Understanding acceptance of e healthcare by IoT natives and IoT immigrants: An integrated model of UTAUT, perceived risk, and financial cost. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 163, 120437.
  5. Atzori, L., Iera, A., & Morabito, G. (2010). The internet of things: A survey. Computer Networks, 54(15), 2787-2805.
  6. Bertin, E., Crespi, N., & Magedanz, T. (Eds.). (2013). Evolution of telecommunication services: the convergence of telecom and internet: technologies and ecosystems (Vol. 7768). Springer.
  7. Boateng, G. O, Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018) Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. front. Public Health, 6, 149.
  8. Brous, P., Janssen, M., & Herder, P. (2020). The dual effects of the Internet of Things (IoT): A systematic review of the benefits and risks of IoT adoption by organizations. International Journal of Information Management, 51, 101952.
  9. Chang, C. C., Yan, C. F., & Tseng, J. S. (2012). Perceived convenience in an extended technology acceptance model: Mobile technology and English learning for college students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 809-826.
  10. Chuang, J. H., Wang, J. H., & Liang, C. (2020). Implementation of Internet of Things depends on intention: Young farmers’ willingness to accept innovative technology. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 23(1030-2020-1046), 253-265.

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yıldız, B., & Kütahyalı, D. N. (2023). A quantitative study on the intention to use internet of things services. Business Economics and Management Research Journal, 6(1), 28-43. https://doi.org/10.58308/bemarej.1221072