SAĞLIK KURUMLARINDA ÇALIŞAN ORTA YAŞ (45-65) PERSONELİNİN SAĞLIKLI YEME ALIŞKANLIKLARI VE DİYET KALİTESİNİN YAŞAM KALİTESİ VE İŞ PERFORMANSI ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Öz

Amaç: Sağlık çalışanlarında iş performansı, hasta güvenliği ve sağlık hizmetlerinin genel verimliliği açısından hayati öneme sahiptir. Sağlık çalışanlarında beslenme alışkanlıklarının ve yaşam kalitesinin iş performansı üzerindeki etkisini araştıran çalışmalar sınırlıdır. Bu çalışmada, orta yaşlı sağlık çalışanlarında sağlıklı beslenme alışkanlıklarının, diyetin ve yaşam kalitesi faktörlerinin iş performansı üzerindeki etkisi değerlendirilmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Çalışmaya toplam 333 sağlık çalışanı katılmıştır. Veriler, 24 saatlik besin tüketim kaydı, Sağlıklı Beslenme Göstergesi (HDI-2020), Sağlıklı Beslenme İlişkin Tutum Ölçeği (SBİTÖ), 36 maddelik Kısa Form Sağlık Anketi (SF-36) ve İş Performansı Ölçeği kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Tüm anketler yüz yüze görüşmelerle uygulanmıştır. Bulgular: Ortalama iş performansı puanı 4.27±0.72 bulunmuş, kadın ve erkek katılımcıların puanları arasında anlamlı bir fark gözlenmemiştir. Ancak, erkek sağlık çalışanlarının fiziksel sağlık puanı kadınlara göre daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Zihinsel sağlık puanlarında cinsiyetler arasında anlamlı fark saptanmamıştır. Kadınlarda iş performansı ile HDI-2020, ASHN, fiziksel sağlık ve zihinsel sağlık arasında pozitif korelasyon tespit edilmiştir. Lojistik regresyon analizine göre, iş performansını etkileyen faktörler arasında eğitim düzeyi, meslek, SBİTÖ ve lif tüketimi yer almaktadır. Sonuç: Bu çalışma, diyet lifi, sağlıklı beslenme kalitesi ve yeme alışkanlıklarının iş performansı üzerindeki olumlu etkisini ortaya koyan ilk çalışmadır. Bulgular, sağlık çalışanlarının iş performansını artırmak amacıyla yeterli lif içeren sağlıklı beslenme alışkanlıklarının teşvik edilmesinin önemini vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İş Performansı
• Diyet Lifi
• Sağlıklı Beslenme
• Sağlık Çalışanları
• Orta Yaş

EFFECTS OF HEALTHY EATING HABITS AND DIET QUALITY ON QUALITY OF LIFE AND JOB PERFORMANCE IN MIDDLE-AGED (45-65) HEALTHCARE WORKERS

Öz

Objective: Job performance (JP) among healthcare workers is vital for patient safety and the overall efficiency of healthcare services. Research exploring how dietary habits and quality of life influence JP in healthcare workers remains limited. This study aimed to assess the impact of healthy eating habits, diet, and quality of life factors on JP in middle-aged healthcare workers. Material and Methods: A total of 333 healthcare workers took part in the study. The study utilised 24-hour recall method (24hDR), the Healthy Diet Indicator (HDI-2020), the Attitude Scale for Healthy Nutrition (ASHN), the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), and the Job Performance Scale (JPS). All surveys were conducted through face-to-face interviews. Results: The average JP score was 4.27±0.72 and no significant difference was observed between the JP scores of men and female participants. However, male healthcare workers had higher mean physical health scores (SF-36-PCSc) than female participants. There was no significant difference in the mean mental health scores (SF-36-MCSc) between genders. In women, positive correlations were found between JP and HDI-2020, ASHN, and the physical (SF-36-PCSc) and MCSc from SF-36. Logistic regression analysis revealed that factors influencing JP included education level, occupation, ASHN, and fibre consumption. Conclusion: This study is the first to demonstrate the positive impact of dietary fibre, healthy diet quality, and eating habits on JP. These findings highlight the importance of promoting healthy eating habits that include a sufficient fibre diet to enhance JP in healthcare workers.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Job Performance
• Dietary Fiber
• Healthy Eating
• Healthcare Workers
• Middle Age

Etik Beyan

This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and ethical approval was obtained from Toros University Ethics Committee (Date: 24/01/2023, Decision No: 12). Informed consent forms were obtained from all participants who agreed to participate in the study.

Teşekkür

The authors would like to acknowledge the healthcare workers (doctors, dentists, pharmacists, nurses, and other healthcare workers) who completed the survey.

Kaynakça

1. 1. Durand-Sanchez E, Ruiz-Alvarado C, Contreras-Valderrama R, Morales-García WC, Mamani-Benito O, Huancahuire-Vega S, et al. Sociodemographic aspects and healthy behaviors associated with perceived life satisfaction in health professionals. J Prim Care Community Health. 2023; 14: 21501319221148332.
2. 2. Sasaki N, Kuroda R, Tsuno K, Kawakami N. Workplace responses to COVID-19 associated with mental health and work performance of employees in Japan. J Occup Health. 2020; 62(1): e12134.
3. 3. Zhang M, Kim R. Scope of public health workforce: an exploratory analysis on World Health Organization policy and the literature. Glob Heal J. 2024;8(4): 153-61.
4. 4. Walton-Roberts M, Bourgeault IL. Health workforce data needed to minimize inequities associated with health-worker migration. Bull World Health Organ. 2023; 102(2): 117-22.
5. 5. Kazar G, Rahmanzadeh P. The impact of mental health disorders and job demands on the individual job performance of construction workers. J Occup Health. 2024; 66(1): uiae060.
6. 6. Campbell JP. Modeling the performance prediction problem in industrial and organizational psychology. In Dunnette MD, Hough LM, eds. Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. USA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1990. p. 687–732.
7. 7. Rao TV. Performance management: towards organizational excellence. Vol. 2. USA: Sage Publications Pvt. Ltd., 2016. p. 331.
8. 8. Latham GP, Pinder CC. Work motivation theory and research at the dawn of the twenty-first century. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005; 56: 485–516.

9. 9. Çalışkan A, Köroğlu Ö. Job performance, task performance, contextual performance: development and validation of a new scale. Int J Econ Admin Sci. 2022; 8(2): 180-201.
10. 10. Mukaka MM. Statistics corner: a guide to appropriate use of correlation coefficient in medical research. Malawi Med J. 2012; 24(3): 69–71.
11. 11. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med. 2020; 54(24), 1451-62.
12. 12. Roe AJ, Sankavaram K, Baker S, Franck K, Puglisi M, Earnesty D, et al. 24-hour dietary recall in the Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Program: perspective of the program coordinator. Nutrients. 2023; 15(19): 4147.
13. 13. De Keyzer W, Bracke T, McNaughton SA, Parnell W, Moshfegh AJ, Pereira RA, et al. Cross-continental comparison of national food consumption survey methods—a narrative review. Nutrients. 2015; 7(5): 3587–620.
14. 14. Kanauchi M, Kanauchi K. The World Health Organization's healthy diet indicator and its associated factors: a cross-sectional study in central Kinki, Japan. Prev Med Rep. 2018; 12: 198–202.
15. 15. Herforth AW, Wiesmann D, Martínez-Steele E, Andrade G, Monteiro CA. Introducing a suite of low-burden diet quality indicators that reflect healthy diet patterns at population level. Curr Dev Nutr .2020; 4(12): nzaa168.
16. 16. Ozenoglu A, Erkul C. The effect of job stress on diet quality and emotional eating among hospital employees. Int J Gastron Res. 2024; 3(2), 44-53.
17. 17. Ware JE. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a user's manual. Vol. 5. Boston: The Health Institute, Health Assessment Lab, New Engl Med Cent. 1994. p. 41–6.
18. 18. Demiral Y, Ergor G, Unal B, Semin S, Akvardar Y, Kivircik B, et al. Normative data and discriminative properties of short form 36 (SF36) in Turkish urban population. BMC Public Health. 2006; 6: 247.
19. 19. Alessandri G, Consiglio C, Luthans F, Borgogni L. Testing a dynamic model of the impact of psychological capital on work engagement and job performance. Career Dev Int. 2018; 23(1): 33–47.
20. 20. Stajkovic AD, Luthans F. Self-efficacy and work-related performance: a meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 1998; 124(2): 240–61.
21. 21. Şahin ET, Kanbur A. Presenteeism in healthcare professionals and its effect on job performance (contextual performance / task performance). J Nursol. 2022; 25(1): 7–13.
22. 22. Castanheira F, Sguera F, Story J. Organizational politics and its impact on performance and deviance through authenticity and emotional exhaustion. Br J Management. 2022; 33(4), 1887-904.
23. 23. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica. 1979; 47(2): 263–91.
24. 24. Vroom VH. Work and motivation. Vol. 9. New York: Wiley; 1964. p. 328.
25. 25. Bracken DW, Timmreck CW, Church AH. The handbook of multisource feedback: the comprehensive resource for designing and ımplementing msf processes. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass: Wiley; 2001. p. 1-10.
26. 26. Borman WC, Motowidlo SJ. Task performance and contextual performance: the meaning for personnel selection research. Hum Perform. 1977; 10: 99–109.
27. 27. Avey JB, Avolio BJ, Luthans F. Experimentally analyzing the impact of leader positivity on follower positivity and performance. Leadersh Q. 2011; 22(2): 282–94.
28. 28. Wang G, Netemeyer RG. The effects of job autonomy, customer demandingness, and trait competitiveness on salesperson learning, self-efficacy, and performance. J Acad Mark Sci. 2002; 30(3): 217–28.
29. 29. Guo Y, Ling B. Effects of leader motivating language on employee task and contextual performance: the mediating role of feedback quality. Psychol Rep. 2020; 123(6): 2501–18.
30. 30. Williams R, Kemp V. Caring for healthcare practitioners. BJPsych advances. 2020; 26(2): 116-28.
31. 31. Faragher EB, Cass M, Cooper CL. The relationship between job satisfaction and health: a meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2005; 62(2): 105–12.
32. 32. Dewa CS, Loong D, Bonato S, Trojanowski L. The relationship between physician burnout and quality of healthcare in terms of safety and acceptability: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2017; 7(6): e015141.
33. 33. Schultz IZ, Crook J, Berkowitz J, Milner R, Meloche GR, Lewis ML. A prospective study of the effectiveness of early intervention with high-risk back-injured workers—a pilot study. J Occup Rehabil. 2008; 18(2): 140–51.
34. 34. Panchbhaya A, Baldwin C, Gibson R. Improving the dietary intake of health care workers through workplace dietary interventions: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Adv Nutr. 2022; 13(2): 595– 620.
35. 35. Grimani A, Aboagye E, Kwak L. The effectiveness of workplace nutrition and physical activity interventions in improving productivity, work performance and workability: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2019; 19: 1676.
36. 36. Jacka FN, O'Neil A, Opie R, Itsiopoulos C, Cotton S, Mohebbi M, et al. A randomised controlled trial of dietary improvement for adults with major depression (the ‘SMILES’ trial). BMC Med. 2017; 15(1): 23.
37. 37. Raji CA, Erickson KI, Lopez OL, Kuller LH, Gach HM, Thompson PM, et al. Regular fish consumption and age-related brain gray matter loss. Am J Prev Med. 2014; 47(4): 444–51.
38. 38. Gubler T, Larkin I, Pierce L. Doing well by making well: the impact of corporate wellness programs on employee productivity. Manag Sci. 2018; 64(11): 4967–87.
39. 39. Nechuta SJ, Shu XO, Li HL, Yang G, Xiang YB, Cai H, et al. Combined impact of lifestyle-related factors on total and causespecific mortality among Chinese women: prospective cohort study. PLoS Med. 2010; 7(9): e1000339.
40. 40. Lattimer JM, Haub MD. Effects of dietary fiber and its components on metabolic health. Nutrients. 2010; 2(12): 1266–89.