Centers Of Gravıty And Chaos Theory In Tradıtıonal-Modernıty Oscıllatıon Durıng Therapy Processes

Öz

In this study, by reviewing the literature, it is revealed how the paradigm shifts in science affect the natural and human sciences, sociologically explaining the traditional and modern society oscillations of the social change processes according to the chaos theory, the system theory of the three-pole oscillation with the chaotic attracting effect of the sobriety pole from the bipolar dialectical approach in the humanities. In this study, it is aimed to examine and reveal the explanation of these changes and the projections of these changes in the psychotherapy session. It is possible to classify societies as traditional and modern societies. Traditional societies are mostly agriculture-based and labor-intensive societies. Modern societies are societies based on industrialization and are societies based on mental power. In traditional societies, human relations are organized in the form of a hierarchical structure of patriarchal administration. Modern societies, on the other hand, are organized as equal individuals who are empowered by laws. While traditional social structure contain the security, comfort and warmth of being together, they also bring a contraction in which the boundaries of the individual are occupied. While modern societies give the individual his full freedom, they cannot give him the closeness, warmth and security he longs for as a human being. The history of humanity is oscillating from one end to the other in order to bring these two structures together. These drifts can reach unpredictable points in historical processes with the effect of attractor centers. This development is determined by the parameters of chaos theory, systems theory, field approach and fractal effects. While it is possible to follow these oscillations throughout human history, it is possible to follow similar oscillations, attractor effects and the unpredictable results of the butterfly effect in the history of psychotherapy by using the same approach. This change and transformation in psychotherapy systems is in question within the therapy processes of a therapist and an individual. In fact, it is always possible to monitor the same oscillations, attractor effect, chaotic structures, the effect of the field on the session and the unpredictable results due to fractal formations in a session. In accordance with the spirit of the time, therapy theories and therapists should update themselves in accordance with the development of the age.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• System theory
• Kaos theory
• Field theory
• Oscillation
• Two-Persons therapies

Terapi Süreçlerinde Geleneksel- Modernite Salınımında Çekim Merkezleri ve Kaos Kuramı

Öz

Bu çalışmada literatür gözden geçirilerek bilimdeki paradigma değişimlerinin doğa ve beşeri bilimleri nasıl etkilediğinin ortaya konması, sosyolojik olarak toplumsal değişim süreçlerinin cemaat ve cemiyet tipi toplum salınımlarının kaos teorisine göre izah edilmesi, beşeri bilimlerdeki iki uçlu diyalektik yaklaşımdan itidal kutbunun kaotik çeker etkisi ile üç kutuplu salınımın sistem teorisi açısından izahı ve bu değişimlerin psikoterapi seansındaki iz düşümlerini incelemek ve ortaya çıkarmak amaçlanmıştır. Toplumları geleneksel ve modern toplumlar olarak sınıflandırmak mümkündür. Geleneksek toplumlar daha çok tarıma dayalı ve işgücüne ağırlık veren toplumlardır. Modern toplumlar sanayileşmeye dayalı toplumlar olup daha çok zihin gücüne dayanan toplumlardır. Geleneksel toplumlarda insan ilişkileri pederşahi bir yönetimin hiyerarşik yapılanması şeklinde örgütlenmiştir. Modern toplumlar ise yasalardan gücünü alan eşit bireyler şeklinde organize olmuştur. Geleneksel yapılar içlerinde birlikte olmanın getirdiği güvenliği, konforu ve sıcaklığı barındırırken, bireyin sınırlarının işgal edildiği bir daralmayı da birlikte getirmektedir. Modern toplumlar bireyin özgürlüğünü ona tam verirken, insan olarak özlediği yakınlık, sıcaklık ve güvenliği verememektedir. İnsanlık tarihi bu iki yapıyı bir arada temin etmeye yönelik olarak bir uçtan öbür uca salınımlar halinde savrulmaktadır. Bu savrulmalar tarihsel süreçler içerisinde çekim merkezlerinin etkisi ile hiç öngörülemeyen noktalara ulaşabilmektedir. Bu gelişim kaos kuramının, sistem teorisinin, alan yaklaşımının ve fraktal etkilerin parametreleri tarafında belirlenmektedir. Bu salınımları insanlık tarihi boyunca takip etmek mümkün olabildiği gibi, aynı yasaları kullanarak psikoterapi tarihinde de benzer salınımları, çeker etkilerini ve sisteme girecek yeni bir girdi ile kelebek etkisinin öngörülemeyen sonuçlarını izlemek mümkündür. Psikoterapi sitemlerindeki bu değişim ve dönüşüm bir terapistin ve bireyin terapi süreçleri içinde de söz konusudur. Hatta bir seansın içinde mikro düzeyde aynı salınımları, çeker etkisini, kaotik yapılanmaları, alanın seansa etkisini ve fraktal oluşumlara bağlı öngörülemeyen sonuçlarını izlemek her zaman mümkündür. Zamanın ruhuna uygun bir şekilde terapi kuramları ve terapistler çağın gelişimine uygun olarak kendilerini güncellemelidirler.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Alan kuramı
• Kaos kuramı
• Sistem teorisi
• Salınım
• İki kişilik terapiler

Kaynakça

1. Akgül, M. (1998). Prof. Dr. Erol Güngör’ün anısına Armağan Türk Modernleşmesi ve Erol Güngör. Ahmet Sevgi (Ed). (s. 121-129) Konya: Selçuk Üniversitesi Türkiyat Araştırmaları Enstitüsü Yayınları.
2. APA (2014) DSM-5 Tanı Ölçütleri Başvuru El Kitabı (E. Köroğlu. Çev.) Ankara, Boylam yayınevi.
3. Aydın, G.N. (2020). Küreselleşen Modernleşme ve Kültür: Erol Güngör Örneğı̇. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Bursa.
4. Ballıkaya, C. (2015). POZİTİVİZM: Tarihsel Süreç İçerisindeki Gelişimi ve Sosyolojik Düşünceye Etkileri / POSITIVISM Its Development in History and Its Influence on Sociological Thought . Selçuk Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Dergisi , 0 (33) , 87-106 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sefad/issue/16468/171834.
5. Baranger, M. (2012). The intrapsychic and the intersubjective in contemporary psychoanalysis. Int. Forum Psychoanal, 21:130-135.
6. Baranger, M. & Baranger, W. (2008). The analytic situation as a dynamic field. Int. J. Psychoanal., 89:795-826.
7. Baranger, M. & Baranger, W. (2009) Dinamik Bir Alan Olarak Analitik Durum. Uluslararası Psikanaliz Yıllığı / The International Journal of Psychoanalysis Turkish Annual 1:151-187
8. Baranger, M., Baranger, W., & Eizirik, C.L. (2009). The Work of Confluence: Listening and Interpreting in the Psychoanalytic Field (L.G. Fiorini, Ed.) (1st ed.). Spiral process and the dynamic field. Process and non-process in analytic work. Chapter 2-3. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429483806

9. Bolay, S. H. (1999). Felsefi Doktrinler Ve Terimler Sözlüğü, Ankara: Akçağ Yay.
10. Civitarese ,G. (2013). The Violence of Emotions: Bion andPost-Bionian Psychoanaly¬sis. New York: Routledge.
11. Civitarese G. (2008). Immersion versus interactivity and analytic field. The International journal of psychoanalysis, 89(2), 279–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-8315.2008.00019.x
12. Civitarese, G. (2006). Dreams that mirror the session. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 87: 703-723.
13. Civitarese, G. (2010). The Intimate Room: Theory and Technique of the Analytic Field (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315787282.
14. Civitarese, G. (2014). The Necessary Dr.eam: New Theories and Techniques of Inter¬pretation in Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac, 2014.
15. Civitarese, G. (2019). An Apocryphal Dictionary of Psychoanalysis. New York USA. Routlage Press.
16. Civitarese, G. & Ferro, A. (2012). The secret of faces: commentary on paper by Rachael Peltz. Psychoanal. Dialogues, 22:296-304.
17. Civitarese, G. & Ferro, A. (2013) The Meaning and Use of Metaphor in Analytic Field Theory, Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 33:3, 190-209, DOI: 10.1080/07351690.2013.779887.
18. Cozolino, L. (2017) Psikoterapinin Nörobilimi Sosyal Beyni İyileştirmek (M. Benveniste, çev.). İstanbul: Psikoterapi enstitüsü yayınları.
19. Cozolino, L. (2017) Terapist Olmak (E. Kurtuluş, çev.). İstanbul: Psikoterapi enstitüsü yayınları.
20. Cozolino, L. (2018) Terapi Neden İşe Yarar? Zihnimizi Kullanarak Beynimizi Değiştirmek (E. Kurtuluş, çev.). 2. Baskı İstanbul: Psikoterapi enstitüsü yayınları.
21. Cozolino, L. (2020) İnsan İlişkilerinin Nörobilimi (M. Benveniste, çev.). 2. Baskı İstanbul: Psikoterapi enstitüsü yayınları.
22. Dalbay, R. S. (2018). “Kimlik” ve “Toplumsal Kimlik” Kavramı . Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Derneği ,(31),161-176 . 04.08.2022 tarihinde https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/sbe/issue/38551/365264 alınmıştır.
23. Erdem, S. (2005). Türkçede Mecelle Literatürü. Türkiye Araştırmaları Literatür Dergisi, (5) , 673-722 . Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/talid/issue/43403/529045.
24. Erikson E.H. (1993) Kimlik Bocalaması (F. Deresoy, Çev.) Malatya. Özmert Ofset.
25. Erikson E.H. (2014) İnsanın 8 Evresi (G. Akkaya, Çev.) İstanbul. Okuyanus Yayınevi.
26. Erikson, E. H. (1945) Childhood and Tradition in Two American Indian Tribes - A Comparative Abstract, with Conclusions. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 1:319-350.
27. Erikson, E. H. (1946) Ego Development and Historical Change - Clinical Notes. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 2:359-396.
28. Erikson, E. H. (1954) The Dream Specimen of Psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 2:5-56.
29. Erikson, E. H. (1955) Freud's 'The Origins of Psycho-Analysis'. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 36:1-15.
30. Erikson, E. H. (1956) The Problem of Ego Identity. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 4:56-121.
31. Erikson, E. H. (1962) Reality and Actuality - An Address. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 10:451-474. Erikson, E. H. (1970) Reflections on the Dissent of Contemporary Youth. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 51:11-22 Erikson, E. H. (1976) Psychoanalysis and Ethics - Avowed and Unavowed. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 3:409-414. Erikson, E. H. (1980) On the Generational Cycle an Address. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 61:213-223.
32. Erikson, E. H. (1984) Reflections on the Last Stage - And the First. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 39:155-165.
33. Essman, E. (2014). Between “other” and “other”: Merleau-Ponty as a precursor of the analytic field. Fort Da, 20:9-29.
34. Fairbairn, W. D. (1946) Object-Relationships and Dynamic Structure. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 27:30-37. Fairbairn, W. D. (1952) Chapter I. Schizoid Factors in the Personality (1940). Psychoanalytic Studies of the Personality, 7:1-27. Fairbairn, W. D. (1963) Synopsis of an Object-Relations Theory of the Personality. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 44:224-225. Fairbairn, W.D. (1944) Endopsychic Structure Considered in Terms of Object-Relationships. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 25:70-92.
35. Fairbairn, W.R. (1941). A Revised Psychopathology of the Psychoses and Psychoneuroses. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 50-80.
36. Fenichel O, (1974). Nevrozların Psikanalitik Teorisi. İzmir: Ege Üniversitesi Yayınları.
37. Ferro, A. (2015). The Analytic Field and Its Transformations. London: Karnac.
38. Ferro, A. & Basile, R. (2009). The Analytic Field: A Clinical Concept.
39. Ferro, A. & Foresti, G. (2008). “Objects” and characters” in psychoanalytical texts/dialogues. Int. Forum Psychoanal, 17:71-81.
40. Ferro, A., & Basile, R. (Eds.). (2009). The Analytic Field: A Clinical Concept (1st ed.). Routledge.
41. Fosshage, J. (1997). The organizing functions of dream mentation. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, Vol. 33, No. 3: 429-458.
42. Fosshage, J. (2007) The organizing functions of dreaming: Pivotal issues in understanding and working with dreams. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 16: 213-221.
43. Fosshage, J. (2010) Implicit and explicit dimensions of oedipal phenomenology: A reassessment. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 30, 6: 520-534.
44. Fosshage, J. (2011) Development of individuality within a systems world. In Persons in Context: The Challenge of Individuality in Theory and Practice, eds. William Coburn and Roger Frie. New York: Routledge. Chapter 6, pp. 89-105. Fosshage, J. L. (1989) Chapter 1 The Developmental Function of Dreaming Mentation: Clinical Implications. Progress in Self-Psychology 5:3-11.
45. Fosshage, J. L. (2000). The Meanings of Touch in Psychoanalysis: A Time for Reassessment. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 20:21-43.
46. Fosshage, J. L. (2002). A relational self psychological perspective. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 47:67-82.
47. Fosshage, J. L. (2003a) Fundamental Pathways to Change: Illuminating Old and Creating New Relational Experience1. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 12:244-251.
48. Fosshage, J. L. (2003b) Some Reflections on “What is a Psychoanalytic Relationship?” and “How Does it Effectuate Change?”. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 1:45-53.
49. Fosshage, J. L. (2003c) Contextualizing Self Psychology and Relational Psychoanalysis: Bi-Directional Influence and Proposed Syntheses. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 39:411-448.
50. Fosshage, J. L. (2004a).The explicit and implicit dance in psychoanalytic change. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 49:49-65.
51. Fosshage, J. L. (2004b). The Role of Empathy and Interpretation in the Therapeutic Process: Commentary on Discussions of Salee Jenkins's Clinical Case. Progress in Self-Psychology, 20:325-334.
52. Fosshage, J. L. (2005a), Moments of Therapeutic Impasse: Commentary on Jody Messler Davies's “Whose Bad Objects Are We Anyway? Repetition and Our Elusive Love Affair with Evil”. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15:759-769.
53. Fosshage, J. L. (2005b). Commentary on Paper by Steven H. Knoblauch. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 15:875-881.
54. Fosshage, J. L. (2005c). A Self-Psychological/Relational View of Robert Grossmark's “The Case of Peter”. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 41:105-116.
55. Fosshage, J. L. (2006) Affective Experiences and Honesty in the Interaction: Discussion of Holly Levenkron's Paper. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 26:202-219.
56. Fosshage, J. L. (2007) Searching for Love and Expecting Rejection: Implicit and Explicit Dimensions in Cocreating Analytic Change. Psychoanalytic Inquiry 27:326-347.
57. Fosshage, J. L. (2010) The Psychoanalytic World: Notes From My Personal Odyssey - Kohut Memorial Lecture: October 24, 2008. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 5:184-197.
58. Fosshage, J. L. (2011a) The Use and Impact of the Analyst's Subjectivity with Empathic and other Listening/Experiencing Perspectives. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 80:139-160.
59. Fosshage, J. L. (2011b). How Do We “Know” What We “Know?” And Change What We “Know?”. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 21:55-74.
60. Fosshage, J. L. (2013). Forming and Transforming Self-Experience. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self Psychology, 8:437-451.
61. Fosshage, J. L. (2014c) Issues on Therapeutic Action and Self Psychology: A Commentary. Psychoanalytic Perspectives, 11:1-6.
62. Fosshage, J. L. (2018). Discussion of “Three Dimensional Field Theory”. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 28:397-402.
63. Fosshage, J. L. & Hershberg, S. G. (2014a). Prologue: Specialness, Grandiosity, Omnipotence, Entitlement, and Indulgence: Changing Theories of Narcissism, Attitudes, and Culture. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 34:381-382.
64. Fosshage, J. L. & Hershberg, S. G. (2014b). Epilogue: Specialness, Grandiosity, Omnipotence, Entitlement, and Indulgence: Changing Theories of Narcissism, Attitudes, and Culture. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 34:513-522.
65. Fosshage, J. L. & Munschauer, C. A. (2004c). Facilitative Analytic Interaction in a Case of Extreme Nihilism and Aversiveness. Progress in Self-Psychology, 20:21-47.
66. Fosshage, J. L. & Munschauer, C. A. (2004d). Facilitative Interaction, Rules, Enactments, and “A Spirit of Inquiry”: Reply to the Discussions. Progress in Self-Psychology, 20:79-92.
67. Freud, S. (1905). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 7:123-246.
68. Freud, S. (1908). On the Sexual Theories of Children. The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud 9:205-226.
69. Güngör, E. (1995). Tarihte Türkler (6. Baskı) İstanbul: Ötüken Yayınevi.
70. Güngör, E. (1997). Ahlak Psikolojisi ve Sosyal Ahlak (2. Baskı) İstanbul: Ötüken Yayınevi.
71. Güngör, E. (1998). Değerler Psikolojisi Üzerinde Araştırmalar Ahlâk Psikolojisi, Ahlâkî Değerler ve Ahlâkî Gelişme ­ Profesörlük Tezi (2. Baskı) İstanbul: Ötüken Yayınevi.
72. Güngör, E. (2003). Kültür Değişmesi ve Milliyetçilik İstanbul: Hisar Kültür Gönüllüleri Yayınları.
73. Hançerlioğlu, O. (1978). Felsefe Ansiklopedisi, İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
74. İbn-i Haldun (2020). Mukaddime, 2. Baskı İstanbul: İlgi Kültür Sanat Yayıncılık.
75. İlhan, C. (2014). Günümüz Türkçesiyle mecelle (mecelle-i ahkâm-ı adliye) 2. Baskı İstanbul: Yetkin yayınları.
76. Kandel E. R ( 2011) Belleğin Peşinde. İstanbul Boğaziçi Üniversitesi Yayınevi.
77. Kandel, E. (1999) Biology and the Future of Psychoanalysis: A New Intellectual Framework for Psychiatry Revisited. Am J Psychiatry, 156:505–524.
78. Katz, S. M. (2001). The implications of revising Freud’s empiricism for Drive theory. Psychoanal. Contemp. Thought, 24:253-272.
79. Katz, S. M. (2017) Contemporary Psychoanalytic Field Theory Stories, dreams, and metaphor. New York USA. Routlage Press.
80. Katz, S. M., Cassorla, R. & Civitarese, G. (2017). Advances in Contemporary Psychoanalytic Field Theory Concept and future development. New York USA. Routlage Press.
81. Katz, S.M. (2010). A Holistic Framework for Psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Review 97:107-135.
82. Katz, S.M. (2011). Unconscious Metaphoric Processes as a Basis for an Inclusive Model of Psychoanalytic Perspectives, Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 31:2, 134-146.
83. Katz, S.M. (2012). Field theory. International Journal Psychoanalysis, 93:743-744. Katz, S.M. (2013 a). General psychoanalytic field theory: its structure and applica¬tions to psychoanalytic perspectives. Psychoanal. Inquiry, 33:277-292.
84. Katz, S.M. ed. (2013b). Metaphor and Fields: Common Ground, Common Lan¬guage, and the Future of Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.
85. Kernberg, O. (2008). Ağır Kişilik bozukluklarında Psikoterapötik Stratejiler (A.A. Köşkdere. Çev.) İzmir, Odağ Vakfı yayınları.
86. Klein, M. (1935). A Contribution to the Psychogenesis of Manic-Depressive States. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 16: 145-174.
87. Klein, M. (1940). Mourning and its Relation to Manic-Depressive States. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 21:125-153.
88. Klein, M. (1945). The Oedipus Complex in the Light of Early Anxieties. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 26:11-33.
89. Klein, M. (1946). Notes on Some Schizoid Mechanisms. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 27:99-110. Klein, M. (1932). The Psycho-Analysis of Children, Hogarth Press. Kohut, H. (1984). How Does Analysis Cure?, eds. A. Goldberg & P. Stepansky. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Kohut, H. (1971). The Analysis of the Self. New York: International Uni¬versities Press. Türkçesi: Kendiliğin Çözümlenmesi, çev. Cem Atbaşoğlu, Banu Büyükkal, Cüneyt İşcan, Metis, 1998.
90. Kohut, H. (1977). The Restoration of the Self. New York: International Uni¬versities Press. Türkçesi: Kendiliğin Yeniden Yapılanması, Çev. Oğuz Cebeci, Metis.
91. Kohut, H. (1978a). "Psychoanalysis and the Interpretation of Literature: A Correspondence with Erich Heller." Critical Inquiry 4, 3:433 - 51.
92. Kohut, H. (1979). The Two Analyses of Mr. Z. International Journal of Psychoanalysis 60:3 - 27.
93. Kohut, H. (1980). "Reflections." In Advances in Self Psychology. A. Goldberg, ed. New York: International Universities Press.
94. Kohut, H., and Wolf, E. (1978). The Disorders of the Self and Their Treatment: An Outline. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 59:413-25.
95. Lewin K. (1938). The Conceptual Representation and Measurement of Psychologi¬cal Forces Contr. Psychology Theor., 1(4) serial 4.
96. Lewin K. (1943). Defining the “field at a given time.” Psychology Rev., 50:292-310.
97. Lewin K. (1948). Resolving Social Conflicts: Selected Papers on Group Dynamics, ed. G. W. Lewin. New York: Harper & Row.
98. Lewin K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers, ed. D. Cartwright. New York: Harper & Row.
99. Lewin, K. (1935). A Dynamic Theory of Personality. New York: McGraw-Hill.
100. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. (F. Heider & G. M. Heider, Trans.). McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1037/10019-000.
101. Lewin, K. (1976). Field theory in social science selected theoretical papers, (5th ed.). Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
102. Lorenz, E. (1995). The Essence of Chaos, United Kingdom: UCL Press, s. 32-37.
103. Magnavita, J.J (2002) Theories of Personality Contemporary Approaches to the Science of Personality Chapter 8 Sullivan: interpersonal theory New York. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
104. Mandelbrot, B. B. (1982). The fractal geometry of nature. Newyork. W. H. Freeman and Company.
105. Masterson J.F. (2014). Gerçek Kendilik (P. Üzeltüzenci, Çev.) İstanbul: Psikoterapi Enstitüsü Yayınları.
106. Masterson, J. (1967). The Psychiatric Dilemma of Adolescence. Boston: Little Brown. Türkçesi; Ergenliğe Yaklaşımda Psikiyatrinin İkilemi, (çev. Pınar Üzeltüzenci), Psikoterapi Enstitüsü Eğitim Yayınları, 2013.
107. Masterson, J. (1972). Treatment of the Borderline Adolescent: A Developmental Approach. New York: Wiley. Türkçesi; Borderline Ergenin Tedavisi; Gelişimsel Bir Yaklaşım, (çev. Pınar Üzeltüzenci), Psikoterapi Enstitüsü Eğitim Yayınları, 2012.
108. Masterson, J. (1976). Psychotherapy of the Borderline Adult: A Developmental Approach. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Türkçesi; Borderline Yetişkinlerde Psikoterapi; Gelişimsel Bir Yaklaşım, çev. Muhittin Macit, Hülya Macit, Psikoterapi Enstitüsü Eğitim Yayınları, 2014.
109. Masterson, J. (1980). From Borderline Adolescent to Functioning Adult: The Test of Time. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Türkçesi; Borderline Ergenden İşlevsel Yetişkine; Zaman Testi, (çev. Pınar Üzeltüzenci), Psikoterapi Enstitüsü Eğitim Yayınları, 2013.
110. Masterson, J. (1985). The Real Self -A Developmental, Self, and Object Relations Approach. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Türkçesi; Gerçek Kendilik; Gelişimsel, Kendilik ve Nesne İlişkileri Yaklaşımı, çev. Pınar Üzeltüzenci, Psikoterapi Enstitüsü Eğitim Yayınları, 2014.
111. Masterson, J. (1993). The Emerging Self-A Developmental, Self, and Object Relations Approach to the Treatment of the Closet Narcissistic Disorder of the Self. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Türkçesi; Kendiliğin Doğuşu, Gizli Narsisitik Kendilik Bozukluğunun Tedavisinde Gelişimsel, Kendilik ve Nesne İlişkileri Yaklaşımı, çev. Meltem Kamer Helvacıoğlu, Gülünay Akçalı, Psikoterapi Enstitüsü Eğitim Yayınları, 2012.
112. Masterson, J. (2008). Kişilik Bozuklukları; (çev. Mirel Benveniste, Pınar Özdemir) İstanbul. Litera Yayınları.
113. Masterson, J., &. Klein, R. (Eds.) (1988). Psychotherapy of the Disorders of the Self: The Masterson Approach.
114. New York: Brunner/Mazel. Türkçesi; Kendilik Bozukluklarının Psikoterapisi; Masterson Yaklaşımı, çev. Mirel Benveniste, Pınar Özdemir, Psikoterapi Enstitüsü Eğitim Yayınları, 2014.
115. May R. (2013). Varoluşçuluk. İstanbul: Okuyan Us Yayınları
116. McWilliams, N. Lingiardi, V. (2020). Psikodinamik Tanı Kılavuzu PDM-2 (M. Benveniste, M. Arık. Çev.) (T. Özakkaş, Ed.) İstanbul: Psikoterapi Enstitüsü Yayınları.
117. Mecelle-yi ahkâm-i adliye (2022).04.08.2022 tarihinde https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mecelle adresinden alınmıştır.
118. Meriç C. (2021). Bu Ülke. (69. Baskı) İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları.
119. Meriç, C. (2021). İlk Sosyolog İlk Sosyalist Saint Simon, (22.Baskı) İstanbul: İletişim Yay.
120. Mutlu, Ş. (2018). Erol Güngör’de Modernleşme ve Sekülerleşme İlişkisi. Taha Eğri ve Burak Yuvalı (Ed). 7. Türkiye Lisansüstü Çalışmaları Kongresi - Bildiriler Kitabı IV, (s. 221-238) Burdur: Mehmet Akif Üniversitesi Yayınları.
121. Ornstein, P. (1978). The Search for the Self. Vols. 1, 2, 3 and 4 New York: International Universities Press.
122. Öner, U. ve Eren Gümüş, A. (2000). Kurt Lewin ve Alan Kuramı Lewin'in Çocuk Psikolojisi . Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES) , 33 (1) , 9-27 . DOI: 10.1501/Egifak_0000000030
123. Özakkaş, T. (2008). Bütüncül psikoterapi. İstanbul: Litera Yayınevi.
124. Özakkaş, T. (2016). A Unifying Model of Relative Psychotherapy. Journal of Unified Psychotherapy and Clinical Science, 4, 1, 65-84.
125. Porges, S. W. (2021). Polyvagal Theory: A biobehavioral journey to sociality. Comprehensive Psychoneuroendocrinology, 100069.
126. Porges, S.W. (2022) Polyvagal Theory: A Science of Safety. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience. 16, 1-15. DOI=10.3389/fnint.2022.871227
127. Schore, A.N. (2001). Regulation of the right brain: A fundamental mechanism of attachment trauma, dissociation, and psychotherapy. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 17(3).
128. Schore, A.N. (2003) Affect dysregulation and disorders of the self. New York: Norton.
129. Schore, A.N. (2004). The effects of a secure attachment relationship on right brain development, affect regulation, and infant mental health. Infant Mental Health Journal, 22, 201-269.
130. Schore, A.N. (2012). The science and art of psychotherapy. New York: Norton.
131. Schore, A.N. (2020). The development of the unconscious mind. New York: Norton.
132. Schore, A.N. (2022). Duygulanımın Düzenlenmesi ve Kendiliğin Kökeni (2. Baskı), (Çev: Mirel Benveniste) İstanbul. Psikoterapi Enstitüsü Yayınevi.
133. Siegel, D.J. (2010). The Mindful Therapist. A Clinician’s Guide to Mindsight and Neural Integration. New York, Norton Press.
134. Siegel, D.J. (2018). Zihnin Gelişimi: İlişkiler ve Beyin Arasındaki Etkileşim Bizi Nasıl Biz Yapar? İstanbul: Psikoterapi enstitüsü yayınları.
135. Siegel, D.J. (2021). Beynin Bilinçli Farkındalığı (Çev: Psikotereapi Enstitüsü Çeviri Ekibi). İstanbul: Psikoterapi enstitüsü yayınları.
136. Spitz, R. A. (1950). Relevancy of Direct Infant Observation. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 5:66-73.
137. Spitz, R. A. (1951). The Psychogenic Diseases in Infancy-An Attempt at their Etiologic Classification. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 6:255-275.
138. Spitz, R.A. & Wolf, K.M. (1946). Anaclitic Depression-An Inquiry Into the Genesis of Psychiatric Conditions in Early Childhood, Ii. Psychoanalytic Study of the Child, 2:313-342.
139. Stern, D.N. (1985). The interpersonal world of the infant. New York, NY: Basic Books.
140. Stern, D.N. (2004). The Present Moment in Psychotherapy and Everyday Life, New York, W. W. Norton & Company.
141. Stolorow, R.D. (2007). Trauma and human existence: Autobiographical, psychoanalytic, and philosophical reflections. New York: Routledge.
142. Stolorow, R.D. (2011). World, affectivity, trauma: Heidegger and post-Cartesian Psychoanalysis, New York: Routledge.
143. Stolorow, R.D. & Atwood, G.E. (1979). Faces in a cloud: Subjectivity in Personality Theory. Northvale, N.J.: Aronson.
144. Stolorow, R.D. & Atwood, G.E. (2012). Deconstructing “the self” of self psychology. International Journal Psychoanalitic Self Psychology, 7: 573-576.
145. Stolorow, R.D. & Atwood, G.E. & Orange, D.M. (2002). Worlds of experience: Interweaving philosophical and clinical dimensions in psychoanalysis. New York: Basic Books.
146. Stolorow, R.D. Atwood, G.E. (1992). Contexts of being: The intersubjective foundations of psychological life, Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press
147. Stolorow, R.D. Atwood, G.E. Ross, J.M. (1978). The representational world in psychoanalytic therapy International Review of Psycho-Analysis, 5: 247-256.
148. Stolorow, R.D. Brandchaft, B. Atwood, G.E. (1987). Psychoanalytic treatment: An intersubjective approach, Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
149. Strozier, C.B. (2022). Heinz Kohut Psikanalist Olma Yolunda. İstanbul. Psikoterapi Enstitüsü Yayınevi.
150. Wachtel, P.L. (1973). Psychodynamics, behavior therapy, and the implacable experimenter: An inquiry into the consistency of personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 82, 324-334.
151. Wachtel, P.L. (1977a). Interaction cycles, unconscious processes, and the person situation issue. In D. Magnusson & N. Endler (Eds.), Personality at the crossroads: Issues in İnteractional Psychology (pp. 317-331). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
152. Wachtel, P.L. (1977b). Psychoanalysis and Behavior Therapy: Toward an Integration. New York: Basic Books. Wachtel, P.L. (1981). Transference, schema, and assimilation: The relevance of Piaget to the psychoanalytic theory of transference. Annual of Psychoanalysis, 8, 59-76.
153. Wachtel, P.L. (1982). Vicious circles: The self and the rhetoric of emerging and unfolding. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 18, 273-295.
154. Wachtel, P.L. (1987). Action and Insight. New York: Guilford Press.
155. Wachtel, P.L. (1994). Cyclical processes in psychopathology. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103, 51-54.
156. Wachtel, P.L. (1997). Psychoanalysis, behavior therapy, and the relational world. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
157. Wachtel, P.L. (1999). Race in the mind of America: Breaking the vicious circle between blacks and whites. New York: Routledge.
158. Wachtel, P.L. (2003). The surface and the depths: The metaphor of depth in psychoanalysis and the ways in which it can mislead. Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 39, 5-26.
159. Wachtel, P.L. (2008a). Mahoney’s constructivism, psychoanalytic constructivism, and the creation of isolated discourse worlds. Constructivism in the Human Sciences, 12, 34-37.
160. Wachtel, P.L. (2008b). Relational theory and the practice of psychotherapy. New York: Guilford Press; Türkçesi: İlişkisel Kuram ve Psikoterapi Uygulaması, (çev. Betül Taylan Bozkurt), Litera.
161. Wachtel, P.L. (2010). One-person and two-person conceptions of attachment and their implications for psychoanalytic thought. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 91, 561-581.
162. Wachtel, P.L. (2011). Therapeutic Communication: Knowing What to Say When, 2nd ed. New York: Guilford.
163. Wachtel, P.L. (2011). Inside the session: What really happens in psychotherapy? Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
164. Wachtel, P.L. (2012). Bütüncül İlişkisel Psikoterapi. s:40-41 İstanbul. Psikoterapi Enstitüsü Yayınevi.
165. Wachtel, P.L. (2014). Cyclical Psychodynamics and the Contextual Self: The Inner World, the Intimate World, and the World of Culture and Society. New York: Routledge.
166. Wachtel, P.L. (2017). Attachment Theory and Clinical Practice: A Cyclical Psychodynamic Vantage Point. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 37:332-342.
167. Wachtel, P.L., & DeMichele, A. (1998). Unconscious plans, or unconscious conflicts? Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 8, 429-442.
168. Wachtel, P.L., Kruk, J., & McKinney, M. (2005). Cyclical psychodynamics and integrative relational psychotherapy. In J. Norcross & M. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of Psychotherapy Integration (2nd ed., pp. 172-195). New York: Oxford University Press.
169. WHO (2007). ICD-11 International Classification of Diseases. 11th Revision The global standard for diagnostic health information, New York, WHO Press.
170. Winnicott D.W. (1953). Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena - A Study of the First Not-Me Possession. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 34:89-97.
171. Winnicott D.W. (1992) .Through Paediatrics to Psycho-Analysis : Collected Papers. 3-19, 1949. London Brunner & Mazel.