BEDEN EĞİTİMİ VE SPOR ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN MESLEĞE YÖNELİK TUTUMU VE SERBEST ZAMAN DOYUM DÜZEYLERİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenlerinin mesleğe yönelik tutumu ve serbest zaman doyum düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin bazı değişkenlere göre incelenmesidir. Araştırma grubunu, Kastamonu ilindeki Milli Eğitim Bakanlığına bağlı devlet okullarında görev yapan 130 ve özel öğretim kurumlarında görev yapan 5 olmak üzere 135 Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmeni (101 erkek ve 34 kadın) oluşturmaktadır. Veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacılar tarafından hazırlanan Kişisel Bilgi Formu, “Serbest Zaman Doyum Ölçeği (SZDÖ)” ve “Beden Eğitimi Öğretmenliği Mesleğine Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği (BEÖYTÖ)” kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde frekans, yüzde, t-testi ve Pearson Korelasyon testleri kullanılmıştır. Araştırma bulgularına göre, cinsiyet değişkenine bağlı olarak katılımcıların BEÖYTÖ puan ortalamalarında erkeklerin lehine anlamlı farklılık tespit edilirken, SZDÖ alt boyutları ve toplam puan ortalamalarında ise anlamlı farklılık tespit edilmemiştir. Yaş değişkenine göre katılımcıların BEÖYTÖ ve SZDÖ puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı ilişki tespit edilmemiştir. Meslek yılı değişkenine göre katılımcıların BEÖYTÖ ve SZDÖ puan ortalamaları arasında anlamlı ilişki tespit edilmemiştir. Ayrıca BEÖYTÖ ve SZDÖ arasında yapılan korelasyon analizi sonucuna göre anlamlı ilişki tespit edilmemiştir. Sonuç olarak, Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenlerinin mesleğe yönelik tutumu serbest zaman doyum düzeyinden bağımsız olarak gelişebileceği ve serbest zamanlarını değerlendirme biçimlerinin mesleki tutumlarını doğrudan etkilemediği söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Öğretmenleri
• Mesleğe Yönelik Tutum
• Serbest Zaman Doyum

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PHYSICAL EDUCATION AND SPORTS TEACHERS’ ATTITUDES TOWARD THE PROFESSION AND THEIR LEISURE SATISFACTION LEVELS

Öz

The aim of this study is to examine the relationship between physical education and sports teachers’ attitudes toward the profession and their leisure satisfaction levels in relation to certain variables. The research group consists of 130 physical education and sports teachers (101 male and 34 female), including 135 employed in public schools affiliated with the Ministry of National Education and 5 working in private educational institutions in Kastamonu province. As data collection tools, the Personal Information Form prepared by the researchers, the “Leisure Satisfaction Scale (LSS)” and the “Attitude Scale for the Profession of Physical Education Teaching (ASPPET)” were used. In the analysis of the data, frequency, percentage, t-test, and Pearson correlation tests were used. According to the research findings, a significant difference was found in the ASPPET mean scores based on gender, favoring male participants, while no significant difference was observed in the subscale and total mean scores of LSS. No significant relationship was found between participants' age and their mean scores on the ASPPET and the LSS. No significant relationship was found between participants' years of professional experience and their mean scores on the ASPPET and the LSS. Additionally, the correlation analysis conducted between the ASPPET and LSS showed no significant relationship. In conclusion, it can be stated that physical education and sports teachers’ attitudes toward the profession may develop independently of their leisure satisfaction levels, and the way they utilize their leisure does not directly influence their professional attitudes.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Physical Education and Sports Teachers
• Attitude Toward the Profession
• Leisure Satisfaction

Kaynakça

1. 1. Chelladurai, P. (1990). Leadership in sports: A review. International Journal of Sport Psychology. 21(4), 328-354.
2. 2. Hünük D., Demirhan, G. (2003). İlköğretim sekizinci sınıf, lise birinci sınıf ve üniversite öğrencilerinin beden eğitimi ve spora ilişkin tutumlarının karşılaştırılması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 14(4), 175-184.
3. 3. Bailey R. (2006). Physical education and sport in schools: A review of benefits and outcomes. Journal of school health. 76(8), 397-401. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00132.x
4. 4. Kağıtçıbaşı Ç. (2005). Yeni İnsan ve İnsanlar. 10. Baskı. Evrim Yayınevi. İstanbul.
5. 5. Richardson V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 102-119). Macmillan.
6. 6. Spittle M., Byrne K. (2009). The influence of sport education on student motivation in physical education. Physical education and sport pedagogy. 14(3), 253-266. https://doi.org/10.1080/17408980801995239
7. 7. Hoy WK., Miskel CG. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice. 9th edition. McGraw-Hill Education. New York.
8. 8. Quennerstedt M. (2019). Physical education and the art of teaching: transformative learning and teaching in physical education and sports pedagogy. Sport, Education and Society. 24(6), 611-623. https://doi.org/10.1080/13573322.2019.1574731

9. 9. Nacar FS., Tümkay S. (2011). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin iletişim ve kişilerarası problem çözme becerilerinin incelenmesi. İlköğretim Online. 10(2), 493-511. https://doi.org/66.2224/sbp.2008.36.7.8354
10. 10. Aloudat, A. S. (2017). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of a tour-guiding career. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 17(4), 333-344. https://doi.org/10.1080/15022250.2017.1330847
11. 11. Beard JG., Ragheb MG. (1980). Measuring leisure satisfaction. Journal of Leisure Research. 12, 20-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1980.11969416
12. 12. Johnson HA., Zabriskie RB., Hill B. (2006). The contribution of couple leisure involvement, leisure time, and leisure satisfaction to marital satisfaction. Marriage & Family review. 40(1), 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1300/J002v40n01_05
13. 13. Erdemli E., Yaşartürk F. (2020). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenliği bölümü öğrencilerinin serbest zaman doyum düzeyi ve problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi. 9(3), 1871-1882. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.605808
14. 14. Shin K., You S. (2013). Leisure type, leisure satisfaction and adolescents’ psychological wellbeing. Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology. 7(2), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2013.6
15. 15. Choi S., Yoo Y. (2017). Leisure attitude and satisfaction with leisure and life: proposing leisure prioritization and justification, World Leisure Journal. 59(2), 140-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/16078055.2016.1216886
16. 16. Iwasaki Y., Mannell RC. (2000). Hierarchical dimensions of leisure stress coping. Leisure Sciences. 22(3), 163-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400050149653
17. 17. Siegenthaler KL. (1997). Health benefits of leisure. research update. Parks and Recreation. 32(1), 24-31.
18. 18. Ayhan B., Özel B. (2020). Examining the relationship between leisure attitude and life satisfaction levels of university students. International Journal of Sport Culture and Science. 8(3), 154-166. https://doi.org/14486/IntJSCS.2020.605
19. 19. Wang EST., Chen LSL., Lin JYC., Wang MCH. (2008). The relationship between leisure satisfaction and life satisfaction of adolescents concerning online games. Adolescence. 43(169). 177-184.
20. 20. Özkan A., Yaşartürk F., Elçi G. (2021). The relationship between leisure satisfaction, physical activity level and healthy life-style behaviors of sport science students during the COVID-19 pandemic. Physical Education of Students. 25(5), 257-264. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2021.0501
21. 21. Siegenthaler KL., O’Dell I. (2000). Leisure attitude, leisure satisfaction, and perceived freedom in leisure within family dyads. Leisure Sciences. 22(4), 281-296. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409950202302
22. 22. Broughton K., Beggs, BA. (2007). Leisure satisfaction of older adults. Activities, Adaptation & Aging. 31(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1300/J016v31n01_01
23. 23. McDavid L., Cox AE., Amorose, AJ. (2012). The relative roles of physical education teachers and parents in adolescents’ leisure-time physical activity motivation and behavior. Psychology of Sport and Exercise. 13(2), 99-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2011.10.003
24. 24. McKenzie TL., LaMaster KJ., Sallis JF., Marshall SJ. (1999). Classroom teachers’ leisure physical activity and their conduct of physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 19(1), 126-132.
25. 25. Rose TE., McDonnell J., Ellis G. (2007). The impact of teacher beliefs on the provision of leisure and physical activity education curriculum decisions. Teacher Education and Special Education. 30(3), 183-198.
26. 26. Wallhead TL., Garn AC., Vidoni C. (2014). Effect of a sport education program on motivation for physical education and leisure-time physical activity. Research quarterly for exercise and sport. 85(4), 478-487. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2014.961051
27. 27. Büyüköztürk Ş., Çakmak EK., Akgün ÖE., Karadeniz Ş., Demirel F. (2021). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. 31. Baskı. Pegem Akademi Yayınları. Ankara.
28. 28. Karasar N. (2022). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler. Nobel Yayıncılık. Ankara. 29. Ünlü H. (2011). Beden eğitimi öğretmenliği mesleğine yönelik tutum ölçeği (BEÖYTÖ) geliştirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri. 1(4), 2005-2020.
29. 30. Gökçe H., Orhan K. (2011). Serbest zaman doyum ölçeğinin geçerlilik güvenirlik çalışması. Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 22(4), 139-145.
30. 31. Pehlivan KB. (2004). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumları ve okul tutumları arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi. 14(4), 211-218.
31. 32. Curtner-Smith MD. (2001). The occupational socialization of a first-year physical education teacher with a teaching orientation. Sport, Education and Society. 6(1), 81-105. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696040
32. 33. Lawson HA. (1983). Toward a model of teacher socialization in physical education: The subjective warrant, recruitment, and teacher education (part 1). Journal of Teaching in Physical Education. 2(3), 3-16. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2.3.3
33. 34. Mirze F., Yılmaz A. (2022). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenlerinin öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 22(2), 723-737. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2022..-894415
34. 35. Ayenalem KA., Abate SG., Mengistie TA., Lakew KA., Ayana AM., Yohannes ME. (2022). The attitude of ethiopian secondary school teachers towards the teaching profession. Teaching and Teacher Education. 117, 103785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103785
35. 36. Stepanchenko NI., Briskin YA. (2019). Dispositional factors of personality professional development of the future teachers of physical education and sport. Physical education of students. 23(4), 202-208. https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2019.0407
36. 37. Ardahan F, Yerlisu-Lapa T. (2010). Examination of university students’ leisure satisfaction levels by gender and income. Journal of Sports Sciences. 1(4), 129-136.
37. 38. Della Giusta M., Jewell SL., Kambhampati US. (2011). Gender and life satisfaction in the UK. Feminist Economics. 17(3), 1-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2011.582028
38. 39. Yerlisu-Lapa T. (2013). Life satisfaction, leisure satisfaction and perceived freedom of park recreation participants. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 93, 1985-1993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.153
39. 40. Serdar E., Demirel M., Demirel Harmandar D., Donuk B. (2018). Üniversite öğrencilerinin serbest zaman doyum düzeyleri ile mutluluk düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki. The Journal of Social Sciences. 18, 430-438. https://doi.org/10.16990/SOBIDER.4412
40. 41. Vong-Tze N. (2005). Leisure satisfaction and quality of life in Macao, China. Leisure Studies. 24(2), 195-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614360412331313502
41. 42. Deci EL., Ryan RM. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. 5. Edition. Plenum Press. New York.
42. 43. Coleman D, Iso-Ahola SE. (1993). Leisure and health: the role of social support and self-determination. Journal of Leisure Research. 25(2), 111-128. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1993.11969913
43. 44. Akbal, M. (2016). Beden eğitimi öğretmenlerinin öğretmenlik mesleğine ilişkin tutumları ile öz yeterlilikleri arasındaki ilişki. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Bartın.
44. 45. Burgul NS., Tınazcı C., Erdağ D. (2017). Attitudes of candidates of physical education pedagogy towards physical education teaching. International Journal of Economic Perspectives. 11(1), 633-638.
45. 46. Şen N., Koçak ÇV. (2022). Beden eğitimi ve spor öğretmenlerinde mesleki tutum, iş doyumu ve mesleki tükenmişlik ilişkisi. Aksaray University Journal of Sport and Health Researches. 3(2), 221-238.
46. 47. Day C., Stobart G., Sammons P., Kington A., Gu Q., Smees R., Mujtaba, T. (2006). Variations in teachers’ work, lives and effectiveness. Final report for the VITAE Project, DfES.
47. 48. Klassen RM., Chiu, MM. (2010). Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of educational Psychology. 102(3), 741-756.
48. 49. Ayyıldız T. (2015). Rekreatif dans faaliyetlerine katılan bireylerin serbest zaman tatmin düzeylerinin incelenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü. Ankara.
49. 50. Çakır VO. (2017). Üniversite öğrencilerin serbest zaman doyum düzeyleri ile serbest zaman yönetimleri arasındaki ilişki. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Spor Bilimleri Dergisi. 2(3), 17-27.
50. 51. Mannell R., Kleiber D. (1997). A social psychology of leisure. State College, PA: Venture.
51. 52. Caldwell LL., Smith EA., Weissinger E. (1992). Development of a leisure experience battery for adolescents: Parsimony, stability, and validity. Journal of leisure research. 24(4), 361-376.
52. 53. Baldwin CK., Norris PA. (1999). Exploring the dimensions of serious leisure: “Love me-love my dog!”. Journal of Leisure Research. 31(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1999.11949848
53. 54. Richter E., Lucksnat C., Redding C., Richter D. (2022). Retention intention and job satisfaction of alternatively certified teachers in their first year of teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education. 114, 103704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2022.103704
54. 55. Jentsch A., Hoferichter F., Blömeke S., König J., Kaiser G. (2023). Investigating teachers' job satisfaction, stress and working environment: The roles of self‐efficacy and school leadership. Psychology in the Schools. 60(3), 679-690. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22788
55. 56. Akman Y. (2021). The relationships among teacher leadership, teacher self-efficacy and teacher performance. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science. 14(4), 720-744. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.930802
56. 57. Skaalvik EM., Skaalvik S. (2023). Shared goals and values in the teaching profession, job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: The mediating role of psychological need satisfaction. Social Psychology of Education. 26(5), 1227-1244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-023-09787-x
57. 58. Shu K. (2022). Teachers’ commitment and self-efficacy as predictors of work engagement and well-being. Frontiers in Psychology. 13, 850204. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.850204
58. 59. Yoon I., Goddard RD. (2023). Professional development quality and instructional effectiveness: Testing the mediating role of teacher self-efficacy beliefs. Professional Development in Education. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2023.2264309
59. 60. Tokay Argan M., Mersin S. (2021). Life satisfaction, life quality, and leisure satisfaction in health professionals. Perspectives in psychiatric care. 57(2), 660-666. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppc.12592
60. 61. Marič M., Todorović I., Žnidaršič J. (2021). Relations between work-life conflict, job satisfaction and life satisfaction among higher education lecturers. Management: Journal of Sustainable Business & Management Solutions in Emerging Economies. 26(1), 63-72.
61. 62. Gregersen T., Mercer S., MacIntyre PD. (2021). Language teacher perspectives on stress and coping. Foreign Language Annals. 54(4), 1145-1163. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12544
62. 63. Zimmermann J., Tilga H., Bachner J., Demetriou Y. (2021). The effect of teacher autonomy support on leisure-time physical activity via cognitive appraisals and achievement emotions: A mediation analysis based on the control-value theory. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(8), 3987. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18083987
63. 64. Jukić R., Ham E. (2023). Teacher Stress and Free Time as a Space for Dealing with Stress. Acta Paedagogica Vilnensia. 51, 132-145.
64. 65. Wang CC., Kao YL., Huan TC., Wu CH. (2011). Free time management contributes to better quality of life: A study of undergraduate students in Taiwan. Journal of Leisure Research. 43(4), 553-579. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.2011.11950283
65. 66. Wang J., Zhang L., Sun Y., Lu G., Chen Y., Zhang S. (2022). Exploring the impacts of urban community leisure on subjective well-being during COVID-19: A mixed methods case study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 19(14), 8514. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148514
66. 67. Iso-Ahola SE., Baumeister RF. (2023). Leisure and meaning in life. Frontiers in Psychology. 14, 1074649.
67. 68. De Pedro Jiménez D., Meneses-Monroy A., de Diego-Cordero R., Hernández-Martín MM., Moreno-Pimentel AG., Romero-Saldaña M. (2021). Occupational and leisure-time physical activity related to job stress and job satisfaction: correspondence analysis on a population-based study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 18(21), 11220. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111220
68. 69. Kim M., Jasper AD., Lee J., Won H. (2022). Work, leisure, and life satisfaction for employees with physical disabilities in South Korea. Applied Research in Quality of Life. 17, 469-487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09893-4
69. 70. Dallmeyer S., Wicker P., Breuer C. (2023). The relationship between leisure-time physical activity and job satisfaction: A dynamic panel data approach. Journal of Occupational Health. 65(1), e12382. https://doi.org/10.1002/1348-9585.12382