Primary Teachers' ICT Integration: The Effect of ICT Competence Beliefs, Attitudes Toward ICT Use and Teaching Self-Efficacy

Öz

This study, which aims to determine the predictive effects of primary teachers' basic ICT competence beliefs, attitudes towards ICT use and teaching self-efficacy on ICT integration, was designed in a predictive correlational model. The study was carried out with 116 primary teachers (74 female, 42 male) selected according to the convenience sampling. Data were collected through the scales of “Teachers’ ICT Integration Proficiency”, “Teachers’ Basic ICT Competence Beliefs”, “Teachers’ Attitudes Towards ICT Use”, and “Teaching Self-Efficacy”. The collected data were examined with descriptive statistics and multiple linear regression analysis. The findings revealed that teachers' teaching self-efficacy was very high level, while their basic ICT competence beliefs, attitudes towards ICT use, and ICT integration proficiency were high. It was found that the independent variables together, whose order of importance on ICT integration was basic ICT competence, teaching self-efficacy and attitude towards ICT use, together explained about 41% of the variation in ICT integration. According to the regression analysis results, basic ICT competence and teaching self-efficacy were found to be significant predictors of ICT integration, whereas attitudes towards ICT use were not identified as a significant predictor. In conclusion, to enhance primary school teachers’ ICT integration, priority should be given to strengthening their basic ICT competence beliefs and teaching self-efficacy.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• attitude towards ICT use in education
• basic ICT efficacy beliefs
• ICT integration
• primary teachers
• teacher self-efficacy

Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin BİT Entegrasyonu: BİT Yeterlik İnancı, BİT Kullanımına İlişkin Tutum ve Öz-Yeterliğin Etkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma, sınıf öğretmenlerinin temel BİT (Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri) yeterlik inançları, BİT kullanımına ilişkin tutumları ve öğretmen öz-yeterliklerinin, BİT entegrasyon yeterlikleri üzerindeki yordayıcı etkilerini belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Yordayıcı ilişkisel modelde tasarlanan çalışma, uygun örnekleme yöntemiyle seçilen 116 sınıf öğretmeni (74 kadın, 42 erkek) ile yürütülmüştür. Veriler, “Öğretmenlerin BİT Entegrasyonu Yeterlikleri”, “Temel BİT Yeterlik İnancı”, “BİT Kullanımına İlişkin Tutum” ve “Öğretmen Öz-Yeterliği” ölçekleri aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler betimsel istatistikler ve çoklu doğrusal regresyon analizi ile incelenmiştir. Bulgular, öğretmenlerin öğretim öz-yeterliklerinin çok yüksek; temel BİT yeterlik inançları, BİT kullanımına ilişkin tutumları ve BİT entegrasyon yeterliklerinin ise yüksek düzeyde olduğunu göstermiştir. Regresyon analizi sonuçlarına göre, BİT entegrasyonunu yordamada etkili olan değişkenler sırasıyla temel BİT yeterlik inancı, öğretmen öz-yeterliği ve BİT kullanımına ilişkin tutumdur. Ancak yalnızca ilk iki değişken anlamlı yordayıcılar olarak öne çıkmıştır. Sonuç olarak sınıf öğretmenlerinin BİT entegrasyonlarını geliştirmede temel BİT yeterlik inancı ve öğretmen öz-yeterliklerinin güçlendirilmesine öncelik verilmelidir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• BİT entegrasyonu
• eğitimde BİT kullanımına ilişkin tutum
• öğretim öz-yeterliği
• sınıf öğretmenleri
• temel BİT yeterlik inancı

Kaynakça

1. Ahiatrogah, P. D., & Barfi, K. A. (2016). The attitude and competence level of basic school teachers in the teaching of ICT in Cape Coast Metropolis. Proceedings of INCEDI 2016 Conference içinde (s. 446–454).Accra Ghana.
2. Aivazidi, M., & Michalakelis, C. (2023). Information and communication technologies in primary education: Teachers’ perceptions in Greece. Informatics, 10(57), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10030057
3. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice Hall.
4. Akpan, C. P. (2014). ICT competence and lecturers’ job efficacy in universities in Cross River State, Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(10), 259–266.
5. Akram, H., Abdelrady, A. H., Al-Adwan, A., & Ramzan, M. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of technology integration in teaching-learning practices: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.920317
6. Aktaş, İ., & Karamustafaoğlu, O. (2024). The effect of guided inquiry-based virtual and physical laboratories on science learning outcomes. Research in Science & Technological Education, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2024.2423071
7. Aktaş, İ., & Özmen, H. (2022). Assessing the performance of Turkish science pre-service teachers in a TPACK practical course. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 3495–3528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10757-z
8. Al-Alwan, A. F., & Mahasneh, A. M. (2014). Teachers’ self-efficacy as determinant of students’ attitudes toward school: A study at the school level. Review of European Studies, 6(1), 171–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/res.v6n1p171

9. Alhassan, R. (2017). Exploring the relationship between web 2.0 tools self-efficacy and teachers' use of these tools in their teaching. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(4), 217–228. http://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v6n4p217
10. Arkorful, V., Barfi, K. A., & Aboagye, I. K. (2021). Integration of information and communication technology in teaching: Inital perpectives of senior high school teachers in Ghana. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 3771–3787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10426-7
11. Aslan, A., & Zhu, C. (2017). Investigating variables predicting Turkish pre-service teachers’ integration of ICT into teaching practices. British Journal of Educational Technology, 48(2), 552–570. https://doi:10.1111/bjet.12437
12. Aydın, M. K., & Semerci, A. (2017). Öğretmenlerin BİT tutumları ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 46(213), 155–176.
13. Bariu, T. N., & Chun, X. (2022). Influence of teachers attitude on ICT implementation in Kenyan universities. Cogent Education, 9(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2107294
14. Basargekar, P., & Singhavi, C. (2017). Factors affecting teachers' perceived proficiency in using ICT in the classroom. IAFOR Journal of Education, 5(2), 67–84.
15. Birgin, O., Uzun, K., & Akar, S. G. M. (2020). Investigation of Turkish mathematics teachers’ proficiency perceptions in using information and communication technologies in teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 25, 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09977-1
16. Bond, M., Marín, V. I., Dolch, C., Bedenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1–24.
17. Chang, M., Evans, M. A., Kim, S., Norton, A., Deater-Deckard, K., & Samur, Y. (2016). The effects of an educational video game on mathematical engagement. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1283–1297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-015-9382-8
18. Cüre, F., & Özdener, N. (2008). Öğretmenlerin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri (BİT) uygulama başarıları ve BİT’e yönelik tutumları. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 34, 41–53.
19. Eickelmann, B., & Vennemann, M. (2017). Teachers ‘attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 733–761. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474904117725899
20. FATİH Projesi Eğitimleri, Sayı 43501582-774.01.01-E.932493 (2018). https://soma.meb.gov.tr/Fatih_Projesi_Bakanlik_yazisi.pdf
21. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in science education (8. baskı). McGraw–Hill Companies.
22. Gedi̇k, O., Turna, C., Turhan, E. M., & Gençer, Y. (2023). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının farklılaştırılmış öğretime yönelik öz yeterlik algıları. Temel Eğitim, 19, 35–41.
23. González, M. G., & Alonso, J. M. R. (2021). ICT in primary education. Review of its importance and a proposal. South Florida Journal of Development, 2(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.46932/sfjdv2n1-012
24. Günbatar, M. S. (2014). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerine yönelik bir tutum ölçeği geliştirme çalışması. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 121–135.
25. Gyamfi, S. A. (2017). Pre-service teacher’s attitude towards information and communication technology usage: A Ghanaian survey. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 13(1), 52–69.
26. Hains, V. V., Sedlar, A., & Cerepinko, K. (2019). Competences and methods of using information and communication technology amongst pre-school and primary school teachers. V. Beker, A. Lackovic & G. Pavelin (Haz..), Economic and Social Development 40th International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development - Book of Proceedings içinde (s. 152–158).
27. International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE). (2008). ISTE National Educational Technology Standards (NETS) and Performance Indicators for Teachers. http://www.iste.org
28. Jenßen, L., Eilerts, K., & Grave-Gierginler, F. (2023). Comparison of pre- and in-service primary teachers’ dispositions towards the use of ICT. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 14857–14876. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11793-7
29. Jogezai, N. A., Baloch, F. A., Jaffar, M., Shah, T., Khilji, G. K., & Bashir, S. (2021). Teachers’ attitudes towards social media (SM) use in online learning amid the COVID-19 pandemic: The effects of SM use by teachers and religious scholars during physical distancing. Heliyon, 7, 1–9 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06781
30. Karaman, M. K., & Kurfallı, H. (2008). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerini öğretim amaçlı kullanım düzeyleri. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 1(2), 43–56.
31. Kocaman Karoğlu, A., Kübra, B., & Çimşir, E. (2020). Toplum 5.0 sürecinde Türkiye’de eğitimde dijital dönüşüm. Üniversite Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(3), 147–158. https://doi.org/10.32329/uad.815428
32. Korkmaz, F., & Unsal, S. (2016). Developing the scale of teacher self-efficacy in teaching process. European Journal of Educational Research, 5(2), 73–83. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.5.2.73
33. Korukluoğlu, P., Alcı, B., & Rubach, C. (2023). Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the teachers’ basic ICT competence beliefs scale. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 10(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.995005
34. Kretschmann, R. (2015). Effect of physical education teachers’ computer literacy on technology use in physical education. Teacher Education, 72, 261–277.
35. Kul, Ü., Birişçi, S., & Kutay, V. (2019). Use of case adaptation of teachers’ ICT integration proficiency scale into Turkish. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 8(2), 437–456. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.442836
36. Leòn-Valdez, R. B., Garcia-Lopez, R. I., & Cuevas-Salazar, O. (2021). Nível de domínio de tecnologias de informação e comunicação em professores do ensino fundamental privado. Revista Ibero-Americana de Estudos em Educação, 16(1), 820–834. https://doi.org/10.21723/riaee.v16iEsp.1.14917
37. Lin, Y. S., Chen, S. Y., Su, Y. S., & Lai, C. F. (2017). Analysis of students’ learning satisfaction in a social community supported computer principles and practice course. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology, 14(3), 849–858. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/81058
38. Liu, Z., Kong, X., Liu, S., Yang, Z., & Zhang, C. (2022). Looking at MOOC discussion data to uncover the relationship between discussion pacings, learners’ cognitive presence and learning achievements. Education and Information Technologies, 27, 8265–8288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10943-7 MEB (2022, 3 Aralık). 2022 yili sonuna kadar dersliklerin yüzde 90'i etkileşimli tahtayla buluşacak. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. https://www.meb.gov.tr/2022-yili-sonuna-kadar-dersliklerin-yuzde-90i-etkilesimli-tahtayla-bulusacak/haber/28388/tr
39. Mlambo, S., Rambe, P., & Schlebusch, L. (2020). Effects of Gauteng province’s educators’ ICT self-efficacy on their pedagogical use of ICTS in classrooms. Heliyon, 6(4), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03730
40. Morgan, G.A., Leech, N.L., Gloeckner, G.W., & Barret, K.C. (2005). SPSS for introductory statistics: Use and interpretation (2. baskı). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Olivarría, C. G. A., Nistal, M. T. F., García, J. J. V., & Escobedo, P. A. S. (2022). Factores asociados a las prácticas de enseñanza docentes con apoyo de las tecnologías de la información y comunicación. Educar, 58(1), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.1349
42. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD education working papers. https://www.voced.edu.au/content/ngv:79286
43. Öngören, S. (2022). Teachers’ use of ICT in the preschool period: A mixed research method. Education and Information Technologies, 27(8), 11115–11136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11066-9
44. Pallant, J. (2020) SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS. McGraw-Hill, Open University Press.
45. Pendergast, D., Garvis, S., & Keogh, J. (2011). Pre-service student-teacher self-efficacy beliefs: An insight into the making of teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 36(12), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n12.6
46. Peng, R., Razak, R. A., & Halili, S. H. (2023). Investigating the factors affecting ICT integration of in-service teachers in Henan Province, China: Structural equation modeling. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01871-z
47. Petko, D., Prasse, D., & Cantieni, A. (2018). The interplay of school readiness and teacher readiness for educational technology integration: A structural equation model. Computers in the Schools, 35(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2018.1428007
48. Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). European Framework for the Digital Competence of Educators: DigCompEdu (EUR 28775 EN). European Commission.
49. Rubach, C., & Lazarides, R. (2021). Addressing 21st-century digital skills in schools–Development and validation of an instrument to measure teachers' basic ICT competence beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 118, 106636. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106636
50. Ruiz-Aquino, M., Borneo Cantalicio, E., Alania-Contreras, R. D., Garcia Ponce, E. S., & Zevallos Acosta, U. (2022). Actitudes hacia las TIC y uso de los entornos virtuales en docentes universitarios en tiempos de pandemia de la COVID-19. PUBLICACIONES, 52(3), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v52i3.22270
51. Senemoğlu, N. (2001). Gelişim ve öğrenme: Kuramdan uygulamaya. Gazi Yayınları.
52. Sun, L. P., Siklander, P., & Ruokamo, H. (2018). How to trigger students’ interest in digital learning environments: A systematic literature review. Seminar.net-International journal of media, technology and lifelong learning, 14(1), 62–84.
53. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2018). Using multivariate statistics (7th Edition). Boston: Pearson
54. Tati, A. G., & Moreno, M. S. (2023). Cómo el profesorado de Lengua Española y Ciencias Naturales integra las TIC: Un estudio cuantitativo. Revista Fuentes, 25(2), 194–205. https://doi.org/10.12795/revistafuentes.2023.22261
55. Toy, S. N., & Duru, S. (2016). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin öğretmen öz yeterlikleri ile kaynaştırma eğitimine ilişkin yeterlik inançlarının karşılaştırılması. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 17(1), 146–173. https://doi.org/10.12984/eed.00332
56. Turan, B., & Haşit, G. (2014). Teknoloji kabul modeli ve sınıf öğretmenleri üzerinde bir uygulama. Uluslararası Alanya İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(1), 109–119.
57. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) (2008). Competency Standards Modules: ICT Competency Standards for Teachers. UNESCO: Paris, Fance.
58. Ünsal, S., Korkmaz, F., & Perçin, S. (2016). Analysis of mathematics teachers' self-efficacy levels concerning the teaching process. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(24), 99–107.
59. Wang, H. Y., Sigerson, L., & Cheng, C. (2019). Digital nativity and information technology addiction: Age cohort versus individual difference approaches. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.08.031
60. Yıldız, Y., & Topal, F. A. (2022). Müzik öğretmeni adaylarının bilgi iletişim teknolojilerine (BİT) ve uzaktan eğitime yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi. EKEV Akademi Dergisi, 92, 46–67. https://doi.org/10.17753/sosekev.1185601
61. YÖK (2019). Sınıf öğretmenliği lisans programı. https://www.yok.gov.tr/Documents/Kurumsal/egitim_ogretim_dairesi/Yeni-Ogretmen-Yetistirme-Lisans-Programlari/Sinif_Ogretmenligi_Lisans_Programi09042019.pdf