Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi

Vural Çelik; Hakan Kitapçı; Burçin Çetin Karabat

doi:10.33721/by.1062770

TR EN

Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi

Öz

Bu çalışma bilgi teknolojileri (BT) sektöründe faaliyet gösteren işletmelerin örgütsel öğrenme kapasitelerinin, gelecek dönemlerde işletmede yapılacak yenilikleri ve çevresel dinamizmi nasıl etkileyeceğini tespit etmeyi amaçlamaktadır. Araştırmada çift yetenekliliğin örgütsel öğrenme kapasitesi üzerindeki etkisinin yanı sıra çevresel dinamizmin işletmelerin yenilik yapma performansını nasıl etkilediği incelenmektedir. Bu doğrultuda geliştirilen araştırma modelindeki ilişkileri ölçmek amacı ile BT sektöründe çalışan 311 orta ve üst düzey yöneticiden elde edilen veriler Smart PLS 2.0 ve SPSS programları aracılığı ile analiz edilmiştir. Verilerin analizinde faktör analizi ve korelasyon analizi kullanılmıştır. Yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılarak test edilen araştırma hipotezlerinin tamamı kabul edilmiştir. Farklı sektörlerdeki işletmelerin katılımı ile elde edilecek genişletilmiş veri setine rekabet ortamı, pazar dalgalanmaları gibi faktörlerin dahil edilmesi ile araştırma sonuçlarının genellenebilirliği artıracaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Keşifsel Yenilik, Düzeltici Yenilik

Kaynakça

Abdallah, A. B., Dahiyat, S. E. ve Matsui, Y. (2019). Lean Management and Innovation Performance: Evidence from International Manufacturing Companies. Management Research Review, 42 (2), 239-262.
Ahmad, F. ve Karim, M. (2019). Impacts of Knowledge Sharing: A Review and Directions for Future Research. Journal of Workplace Learning, 31, 207–230.
Alsabbagh, M. ve Khalil, A. H. A. (2016). The Impact of Leadership Styles on Organizational Learning: An Empirical Study on the Education Sector in Damascus City. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6 (5), 197-216.
Argote, L. (1999). Organizational Learning: Creating, Retaining, and Transferring Knowledge. Kluwer Academic.
Argote, L. ve Ophir, R. (2002). Intraorganizational Learning. In J. A. C. Baum (Eds.), Companion to Organizations, (193–234). Blackwell
Argyris, C. ve Schon, D. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading. Addison Wesley Publishing Co.
Auh. S. ve Menguc, B. (2004). Balancing Exploration and Exploitation: the Moderating Role of Competitive Intensity. Journal of Business Research. 58 (12), 1652-1661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2004.11.007
Barney, J. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17 (1), 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Berberoglu, A. (2018). Impact of Organizational Climate on Organizational Commitment and Perceived Organizational Performance: Empirical Evidence from Public Hospitals. BMC Health Services Reseach, 18 (1), 399-408.
Bocanet, A. ve Ponsiglione, C. (2012). Balancing Exploration and Exploitation Complex Environments. The Journal of Information Knowledge Management Systems, 42 (1), 15-35. https://doi.org/10.1108/03055721211207743

Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E. ve Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking Organizational Ambidexterity: Dimensions, Contingencies, and Synergistic Effects. Organization Science, 20 (4), 781–796.
Chege, S. M., Wang, D. ve Suntu, S. L. (2020) Impact of Information Technology Innovation on Firm Performance in Kenya, Information Technology for Development, 26 (2), 316-345. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2019.1573717
Cheryl, A. V. D. (1997). Organizational Learning in Acquisitions Wtihin The Hospitality Industry: Developing The Constructs of Exploration and Exploitation. University of South Carolina.
Collins, C. J., ve Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge Exchange and Combination: The Role of Human Resource Practices in the Performance of High-technology Firms, Academy of Management Journal,. 49 (3), 544-560.
Costello, A. B. ve Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from your Analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10 (7), 1-9.
Crossan, M. M. ve Bedrow, I. (2003). Organizational Learning and Strategic Renewal, Strategic Management Journal, 24 (11), 1087-1105.
Crossan, M., Lane, H. W. ve White, R. E. (1999). An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution. The Academy of Management Review, 24 (3), 522–537.
Davis, J. P., Eisenhardt, K. M. ve Bingham, C. B. (2009). Optimal Structure, Market Dynamism, and the Strategy of Simple Rules, Administrative Science Quarterly, 54 (3), 413-452. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2009.54.3.413
Dekoulou, P. ve Trivellas, P. (2014). Learning Organization in Greek Advertising and Media Industry: A Way to Face Crisis and Gain Sustainable Competitive Advantage. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 148, 338–347
Dess G. G. ve Beard D. W. (1984). Dimensions of Organizational Task Environment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29 (1), 52-73. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393080
Djamaludin, A.; Madhakomala, R. ve Tunas, B. (2022). Generating Employee Competitive Advantage in the Port and Maritime Industry: Knowledge Management and Learning Organization Role. International Journal of Social Science Reseach and Review, 5, 188–199
Duncan R.B. (1972). Characteristics of Organizational Environments and Perceived Environmental Uncertainty, Administrative Science Quarterly. 17 (3), 313-327. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392145
Duncan, B. L. (1976). Differential Social Perception and Attribution of Intergroup Violence: Testing the Lower Limits of Stereotyping of Blacks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34 (4), 590-598
Fang C., Chang S. ve Chen G. (2010). Organizational Learning Capability and Organizational Innovation: The Moderating Role of Knowledge Inertia. African Journal of Business Management, 5 (5), 1864-1870. Farzaneh, M., Ghasemzadeh, P., Nazari, J. A. ve Mehralian, G. (2021). Contributory Role of Dynamic Capabilities in the Relationship Between Organizational Learning and Innovation Performance. European Journal of Innovation Management. 24 (3), 655-676
Garvin, D. A. (1993). Building A Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review, 71 (4), 78-91.
Gibson, C.B., ve J. Birkinshaw. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal. 47 (2), 209-226. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159573
Goh, S. ve Richards, G. (1997). Benchmarking the Learning Capability of Organizations. European Management Journal, 15 (5), 575-583. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(97)00036-4
Guinot, J., Chiva, R. ve Mallén, F. (2013). Organizational Trust and Performance: Is Organizational Learning Capability a Missing Link? Journal of Management and Organization, 19 (5), 559–582. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2014.3
Jansen J. J. P., Bosch V. D., Frans, A. J. ve Volberda H. W. (2006). Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performnace: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science. 52 (11), 1661-1674
He, Z. L. ve P. K. Wong (2004), Exploration vs. Exploitation: an Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis, Organization Science, 15 (4), 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Henrich, R. G. (2007). Exploration and Exploitation in Product Innovation. Advance Access Published, 6 (5), 945-975. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm013
Holmqvist, M. (2004), Experimental Learning Processes of Exploitation and Exploration: An Empirical Study of Product Development. Organization Science, 15 (1), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1030.0056
Hsu, M. L. A. ve Chen, F. H. (2017). The Cross-level Mediating Effect of Psychological Capital on the Organizational Innovation Climate - Employee Innovative Behavior Relationship. Journal of Creative Behavior, 51 (2),128-139.
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures. Organization Science, 2 (1), 88-115. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.88
Hult, G., Tomas M. ve Ferrel, O. C. (1997). Global Organizational Learning Capacity in Purchasing: Construct and Measurement. Journal of Business Research. 40 (2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(96)00232-9
Jansen, J. J. P., Van Den B., Frans A. J. ve Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory Innovation, Exploitative Innovation, and Performance: Effects of Organizational Antecedents and Environmental Moderators. Management Science, 52 (11), 1661-1674. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1060.0576
Kim, E. J. ve Park, S. (2020). Transformational Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Climate and Learning: An Empirical Study. Leadership & Organization Development Journal. 41 (6), 761-775.
Lawrence, P. ve Lorch, J. W. (1967). Organization and Environment: Managing Differentiation and Integration. Harvard Business School.
Levinthal, D. A. ve March, J. G. (1993). The Myopia of Learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (52), 95-112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250141009
Liu, Y. ve Zhong, R. (2011). Research on Transactive Memory System, Knowledge Reuse and Team Efficacy in Professional Service Teams. International Conference on Management and Service Science, 1-4.
March, J. G. (1991). Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organization Science, 2 (1), 71-87. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2.1.71
Marquardt, M. J. (1996). Building the Learning Organization: A Systems Approach to Quantum Improvement and Global Success. McGraw-Hill.
Masa’deh, R.E., Obeidat, B.Y. ve Tarhini, A. (2016). A Jordanian Empirical Study of the Associations Among Transformational Leadership, Transactional Leadership, Knowledge Sharing, Job Performance, and Firm Performance: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. Journal of Management Development, 35 (5), 681-705.
Mohammad, H. I. (2019). Mediating Effect of Organizational Learning and Moderating Role of Environmental Dynamism on the Relationship Between Strategic Change and Firm Performance. Journal of Strategy and Management,12 (2), 275-297.
Mullins L. (2010). Management and Organizational Behavior. 9th Edition. Pearson Education
Nevis, E.C., DiBella, A.J. ve Gould, J.M. (1995). Understanding Organizations as Learning Systems. Sloan Management Review. 36 (2), 73-80
Nonaka, I. ve Takeuchi, H. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create The Dynamics of Innovation? University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign's Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
Nonaka, I.ve Takeuchi, H. (1995a). The Knowledge Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press
Nunally, J. C. (1967). Psychometic Theory. McGraw Hill.
Ojha, D., Struckell, E., Acharya, C. ve Patel, P. C. (2018). Supply Chain Organizational Learning, Exploration, Exploitation, and Firm Performance: A Creation-dispersion Perspective. International Journal of Production Economics, 204, 70-82
O’Reilly, C. A. ve Tushman, M. (2008) Ambidexterity as a Dynamic Capability: Resolving the Innovator’s Dilemma. Research in Organizational Behavior, 28, 185-206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2008.06.002
Pan, X., Song, M. L., Zhang, J.ve Zhou, G. (2019). Innovation Network, Technological Learning and Innovation Performance of High-Tech Cluster Enterprises. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23 (9), 1729-1746.
Peralta, C. F. ve Saldanha, M. F. (2014). Knowledge-centered Culture and Knowledge Sharing: the Moderator Role of Trust Propensity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 18 (3), 538-550.
Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy. Free Press.
Porter, M. E. (1996). What is a Strategy?. Harvard Business Review, 74 (6): 61-78
Rahmi, D.Y. ve Indarti, N. (2019). Examining the Relationships Among Cognitive Diversity, Knowledge Sharing and Team Climate in Team Innovation, Team Performance Management: An International Journal, 25 (5/6), 299-317. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-11-2018-0070
Rao, Y., Yang, M. ve Yang, Y. (2018). Knowledge Sharing, Organizational Learning and Service Innovation in Tourism, Journal of Service Science and Management, 11 (5), 510-526
Reagans, R. ve McEvily, B. (2003). Network Structure and Knowledge Transfer: The Effects of Cohesion and Range. Administrative Sciences, 48, 240-267
Roberts, N. ve Stockport, G. J. (2009). Defining Strategic Flexibility. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 10 (1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03396553
Robbins, S. P. ve Judge, T.A. (2016). Organizational Behavior. 17th Edition, Pearson Education Limited.
Sanz-Valle, R., Naranjo-Valencia, J. ve Jiménez-Jiménez, D. P. C. L. (2011). Linking Organizational Learning with Technical Innovation and Organizational Culture. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15 (6), 997-1015. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271111179334
Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational Culture and Leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday.
Shaher, A.ve Ali, K., (2020). The Effect of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Knowledge Management on Innovation Performance: The Mediation Role of Market Orientation. Management Science Letters. 10 (15), 3723–3734.
Sheng, M. L. (2017). A Dynamic Capabilities-based Framework of Organizational Sensemaking through Combinative Capabilities Towards Exploratory and Exploitative Product Innovation in Turbulent Environments. Industrial Marketing Management, 65 (2), 28-38.
Sinkula, J. M. (1994). Market Information Processing and Organizational Learning. Journal of Marketing, 58 (1), 35-45. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299405800103
Teo, H. H. ve Wang X. (2006). Organizational Learning Capacity and Attitude toward Complex Technological Innovations: An Empirical Study. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 57 (2), 264-279. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20275
Tushman, M. L. ve O’Reilly, C.A. (1996). The Ambidextrous Organization: Managing Evolutionary and Revolutionary Change. California Management Review, 38 (4), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165852
Van Deusen. C. A. (1997). Organizational Learning in Acquisitions within The Hospitality Industry: Developing The Constructs of Exploration and Exploitation. (Master of Science Appalachian State University).
Zhang, W., Sun, S. L., Jiang, Y. ve Zhang, W. (2019). Openness to Experience and Team Creativity: Effects of Knowledge Sharing and Transformational Leadership, Creativity Research Journal, 31:1, 62-73. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2019.1577649
Zhu, Y.Q. (2016). Why and How Knowledge Sharing Matters for R&D Engineers. R&D Management, 47 (2), 212-222

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Türkçe

Konular

-

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Vural Çelik Bu kişi benim
0000-0003-3319-8829
Türkiye

Hakan Kitapçı
0000-0001-6378-7240
Türkiye

Burçin Çetin Karabat ^*
0000-0002-7787-1221
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

30 Aralık 2022

Gönderilme Tarihi

25 Ocak 2022

Kabul Tarihi

24 Ekim 2022

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2022 Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.33721/by.1062770

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA97KM26DN

APA

Çelik, V., Kitapçı, H., & Çetin Karabat, B. (2022). Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi. Bilgi Yönetimi, 5(2), 239-255. https://doi.org/10.33721/by.1062770

AMA

1.Çelik V, Kitapçı H, Çetin Karabat B. Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi. BY. 2022;5(2):239-255. doi:10.33721/by.1062770

Chicago

Çelik, Vural, Hakan Kitapçı, ve Burçin Çetin Karabat. 2022. “Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi”. Bilgi Yönetimi 5 (2): 239-55. https://doi.org/10.33721/by.1062770.

EndNote

Çelik V, Kitapçı H, Çetin Karabat B (01 Aralık 2022) Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi. Bilgi Yönetimi 5 2 239–255.

IEEE

[1]V. Çelik, H. Kitapçı, ve B. Çetin Karabat, “Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi”, BY, c. 5, sy 2, ss. 239–255, Ara. 2022, doi: 10.33721/by.1062770.

ISNAD

Çelik, Vural - Kitapçı, Hakan - Çetin Karabat, Burçin. “Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi”. Bilgi Yönetimi 5/2 (01 Aralık 2022): 239-255. https://doi.org/10.33721/by.1062770.

JAMA

1.Çelik V, Kitapçı H, Çetin Karabat B. Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi. BY. 2022;5:239–255.

MLA

Çelik, Vural, vd. “Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi”. Bilgi Yönetimi, c. 5, sy 2, Aralık 2022, ss. 239-55, doi:10.33721/by.1062770.

Vancouver

1.Vural Çelik, Hakan Kitapçı, Burçin Çetin Karabat. Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi. BY. 01 Aralık 2022;5(2):239-55. doi:10.33721/by.1062770

Cited By

DİNAMİK ÇEVRELERDE ÖRGÜTSEL MİYOPİDEN KURTULMAK: ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME AÇISINDAN İNCELEME

Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi

https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.1571534

Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi

Örgütsel Öğrenme Kapasitesi, Çift Yeteneklilik, Çevre Dinamizmi ve Yenilik Performansı İlişkisi

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

The Relationship between Organizational Learning Capacity, Ambidexterity, Environmental Dynamism and Innovation Performance

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster

Cited By

DİNAMİK ÇEVRELERDE ÖRGÜTSEL MİYOPİDEN KURTULMAK: ÖRGÜTSEL ÖĞRENME AÇISINDAN İNCELEME