Kültür Çevirisi Üzerine: Kuramsal Açılımlar, Disiplinlerarası Yönelimler ve Güncel Tartışmalar

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 39, 1 - 21, 31.12.2025

Ayşe Ayhan

https://doi.org/10.37599/ceviri.1795266

https://izlik.org/JA78JA94AW

Öz

Bu makale, kültür çevirisi kavramının günümüzdeki anlamını, işlevini ve sosyal bilimler alanında farklı disiplinlerdeki yerini tartışmayı amaçlamaktadır. Makale bunun yanı sıra, kavramın çeviribilim alanındaki gelişimini, kavramsallaştırılmasını ve konumunu da inceleyecektir. Roger Keesing’in 1985 yılında ilk kez ortaya attığı kültür çevirisi kavramı, disiplinlerarası araştırmalarda önemli yankı bulmuş; antropoloji, etnografya, kültürel çalışmalar, sömürgecilik sonrası çalışmalar ve çeviribilim gibi alanlarda farklı yönleriyle tartışılmıştır. Bu bağlamda kavram, kimi zaman kuramsal bir çerçeve, kimi zaman yöntemsel bir araç, kimi zaman da analitik bir mercek olarak kullanılmış; tanımlanmış, yorumlanmış ve eleştirilmiştir. Özellikle kültürel çalışmalar ve sömürgecilik sonrası yazında, kimlik müzakereleri, kültürlerarası etkileşim ve güç ilişkilerinin çözümlenmesinde işlevsel bir yaklaşım olarak öne çıkmıştır. Çeviribilim bağlamında yürütülen tartışmalarda ise kavramın sınırlarının tam olarak çizilememesi temel bir sorun olarak dikkat çekmektedir. Kültür çevirisinin neyi kapsadığı ve hangi bağlamlarda kullanılabileceği konusundaki belirsizlik, bir yandan kavramın kuramsal zenginliğini ve esnekliğini gösterirken, diğer yandan kavramsal muğlaklığına işaret etmektedir. Bu muğlaklık, araştırmacılar açısından hem yeni açılımlar sağlayan bir imkân, hem de netlik ihtiyacını gündeme getiren bir sorun olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Makale, öncelikle kavramın ortaya çıktığı dönemden günümüze kadar nasıl yorumlandığını ve farklı alanlarda nasıl yeniden tanımlandığını inceleyecek; ardından son yıllarda yapılmış akademik çalışmalardaki yerini ve hangi yaklaşımlarla kavramsallaştırıldığı güncel örnekler üzerinden tartışacaktır. Böylece, kültür çevirisinin hem kuramsal hem de yöntemsel açıdan sunduğu katkılar ortaya konulacaktır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

kültür çevirisi , çeviribilim , disiplinlerarasılık , çeviri kuramları , kültürel dönemeç

On Cultural Translation: Theoretical Perspectives, Interdisciplinary Approaches, and Current Debates

https://izlik.org/JA78JA94AW

Öz

This article examines the contemporary meaning, function, and disciplinary positioning of the concept of cultural translation, while also tracing its development and conceptualization within translation studies. First introduced by Roger Keesing in 1985, the term has generated considerable interdisciplinary interest, finding application in anthropology, ethnography, cultural studies, postcolonial studies, and translation studies. In these fields, cultural translation has been variously employed as a theoretical framework, a methodological tool, or an analytical lens, and has been defined, redefined, and critiqued in multiple ways. Particularly in cultural and postcolonial studies, it has served as a productive approach to exploring negotiations of identity, intercultural encounters, and the analysis of power relations. In translation studies, however, cultural translation has often raised the problem of indeterminate boundaries: what precisely the term encompasses and the contexts in which it can be applied remain open to debate. This ambiguity underscores the concept’s theoretical richness and adaptability, while simultaneously pointing to its vagueness. For researchers, this duality has been both a source of productive new insights and a challenge requiring greater definitional clarity. The article first considers how the concept has been understood and reinterpreted from its initial emergence to the present, mapping its reformulations across disciplinary contexts. It then focuses on recent debates within translation studies, analyzing how cultural translation has been conceptualized in current scholarship and through selected examples. In doing so, it highlights the theoretical and methodological contributions that the concept continues to offer to the study of translation and beyond.

Anahtar Kelimeler

cultural translation , translation studies , interdisciplinarity , theories of translation , cultural turn

Kaynakça

• Asad, T. (1986). The Concept of Cultural Translation in British Social Anthropology. J. Clifford & G. E. Marcus (Ed.), Writing culture: The poetics and politics of ethnography içinde (ss. 141-164). University of California Press.
• Baker, M. (2006). Translation and conflict: A narrative account. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203099919
• Bassnett, S., Trivedi, H. (Ed.). (1999). Postcolonial translation: Theory and practice. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203068878
• Benjamin, W. (1996). The task of the translator (H. Zohn, Trans.). M. Bullock & M. W. Jennings (Ed.), Selected writings: Vol. 1. 1913–1926 içinde (ss. 253–263). Belknap Press. (Özgün eser 1923 yılında yayımlandı).
• Bergantino, A. (2023). Translation and its fictions: pseudotranslation and partial cultural translation in focus. The Translator, 30(2), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.2023.2251892
• Bhabha, H. (1994). The location of culture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203820551
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (R. Nice, Çev.). Cambridge University Press.
• Calefato, P. (2010). Fashion as cultural translation: knowledge, constrictions and transgressions on/of the female body. Social Semiotics, 20(4), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2010.494388
• Chow, R. (1995). Primitive passions: Visuality, sexuality, ethnography, and contemporary Chinese cinema. Columbia University Press.
• Clifford, J. (1983). On ethnographic authority. Representations, 1(2), 118–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928386
• Conway, K. (2012). Cultural translation. Y. Gambier & L. v. Doorslaer (Ed.), Handbook of translation studies (Cilt. 3) içinde (ss. 21–25). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/hts.3
• Cronin, M. (2006). Translation and identity. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203015698
• Davis, B. P. (2019). The politics of Édouard Glissant’s right to opacity. The CLR James Journal, 25(1/2), 59–70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26946358
• Evans-Pritchard, E. E. (1971). The Azande: History and political institutions. Clarendon Press.
• Even-Zohar, I. (1978). The position of translated literature within the literary polysystem. J. S. Holmes, J. Lambert & R. v. d. Broeck (Ed.). Literature and translation: New perspectives in literary studies with a basic bibliography of books on translation studies içinde (ss. 117–127). Acco.
• Even-Zohar, I. (1979). Polysystem theory, Poetics Today, 1(1–2), 287–310. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772051
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic Books.
• Ginger, A. (2015). From cultural translation to translations inside photographs (1860–1930). Art in Translation, 7(1), 141–164. https://doi.org/10.2752/175613115X14235644692437
• Haberpeuntner, B. (2023). A theater of new, unforeseen constellations: Walter Benjamin’s “Arcade” in postcolonial theories of (cultural) translation”. Translation Studies, 16(1), 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/14781700.2022.2150679
• Hall, E. T. (1959/1990). The silent language. Doubleday.
• House, J. (2002). Universality versus culture specificity in translation”. A. Riccardi (Ed.), Translation studies: Perspectives on an emerging discipline içinde (ss. 92–110) Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.2989/16073610609486411
• Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1990). Discourse and the translator. Longman.
• Jenks, C. (1993). Culture. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203446317
• Katan, D. (2009). Culture. M. Baker & G. Saldanha (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies içinde (ss. 70-73). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203872062
• Keesing, R. M. (1985). Conventional metaphors and anthropological metaphysics: The problematic of cultural translation. Journal of Anthropological Research, 41(2), 201–217. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3630416
• Klaudy, K., Heltai, P. (2020). Re-Domestication, repatriation and additional domestication in cultural back-translation. Across Languages and Cultures, 21(1), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1556/084.2020.00003
• Kroeber, A. L., & Kluckhohn, C. (1952). Culture: A critical review of concepts and definitions. Harvard University, Peabody Museum of Archaeology and Ethnology.
• Lefevere, A. (1992). Translation, rewriting and the manipulation of literary fame. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315458496
• Lefevere, A., Bassnett, S. (1990). Introduction: Proust’s grandmother and the thousand and one nights: The “cultural turn” in translation studies. S. Bassnett & A. Lefevere (Ed.), Translation, history, and culture içinde (pp. 1-13). Pinter.
• Levi- Strauss, C. (1963). Structural anthropology (Çev: C. Jacobson & B. G. Schoepf). Basic Books Press.
• Longinović, T. Z. (2018). The migrant crypt: Cultural translation across the Balkans. Interventions, 20(6), 890–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369801X.2018.1492956
• Maitland, S. (2017). What is cultural translation? Bloomsbury.
• Malinowski, B. (1922). Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An account of native enterprise and adventure in the archipelagoes of melanesian New Guinea. Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
• Niranjana, T. (1992). Siting translation: History, post-structuralism and the post-colonial context. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.5973096
• Pym, Anthony (2014). Exploring translation theories. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203869291
• Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1952). Structure and function in primitive society. The free Press.
• Raubenheimer, L. (2023). Speaking back to the landscape canon: Cultural translation in Phumulani Ntuli’s Cloud Migration and the Liewe Land! Exhibition”. Critical Arts, 39(1–2), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560046.2023.2289582
• Ricoeur, P. (1981). Hermeneutics and the human sciences (J. B. Thompson, Çev. & Ed.). Cambridge University Press ve Éditions de la Maison des Sciences de l’Homme. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316534984
• Rushdie, S. (1992). Imaginary homelands: Essays and criticism 1981–1991. Penguin.
• Spivak Chakravorty, G. (1987). In other worlds: Essays in cultural politics. Methuen.
• Sturge, K. (2009). Cultural translation. M. Baker & G. Saldanha (Ed.), Routledge encyclopedia of translation studies içinde (ss. 67-70). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203872062
• Taft, R. (1981). The role and personality of the mediator. S. Bochner (Ed.), The mediating person: Bridges between cultures içinde (ss. 53–88). Schenkman.
• Trivedi, H. (2007). Translating culture vs. cultural translation. P. St-Pierre & P. C. Kar (Ed.), Translation – Reflections, refractions, transformations içinde (ss. 277 – 287). John Benjamins Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.71
• Toury, G. (1995). Descriptive translation studies and beyond. John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/btl.100
• Tylor, E. B. (1871). Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art, and custom. John Murray.
• Tymoczko, M. (2003). Ideology and the position of the translator: In what sense is a translator ‘in-between’?. M. C. Pérez (Ed.), Apropos of ideology. Translation studies on ideology – Ideologies in translation studies içinde (ss. 181–201). St Jerome. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759937
• Tymoczko, M. (2007). Enlarging Translation, Empowering Translators. St Jerome.
• Venuti, L. (1995). The translator’s invisibility. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203360064
• Venuti, L. (1998). The scandals of translation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203047873
• Vermeer, H. (1996). A skopos theory of translation. TEXTconTEXT.
• Wolf, M. (2002) Culture as translation – and beyond: Ethnographic models of representation in translation studies. T. Hermans (Ed.), Crosscultural transgressions: Research models in translation studies içinde (ss. 180–192). St Jerome. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315759944
• Young, R. (2003). Postcolonialism: A very short introduction. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198856832.001.0001