Investigating The Effect of Technology Use in Education on Classroom Management within The Scope of The FATİH Project

Öz

This study aims to investigate the effect of technology use in education on classroom management within the scope of the FATİH project, which is a technology integration project. The present study utilizes the descriptive mixed method which involves both qualitative and quantitative methods. “The personal information survey”, “The Effects of Technology Use on Classroom Management Scale” and “the semi-structured interview form” were developed by the researchers for data collection. The scale development study and preliminary applications were carried out before the actual application. The application was conducted in schools which actually used interactive board, tablet computer and software technologies within the framework of the FATİH Project. The study group was made up of 52 teachers serving in various provinces on the secondary education level. The content analysis method was used for analysis of the data obtained using the semi-structured interview form. Quantitative data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, Mann Whitney U and Kruskal Wallis H techniques on SPSS 18.0. According to the results obtained in the study, the average scores of intra-classroom relationship and behavior management sub-scale proportional to item count were higher compared to other sub-scales. Average scores obtained from the management of the classroom order and teaching sub-dimension were the lowest. The effect level of technology use by teachers in the classroom on classroom management was moderate. No statistically significant difference was found in terms of effect levels of technology use by teachers in the classroom on classroom management, except for the variable of daily internet use. Considering the results obtained from qualitative data, the perception that interactive board use in the classroom had positive effects on classroom management stood out. It can be said that this perception resulted from use of interactive board as a presentation tool during classes. In contrast, the teachers stated that tablet computer use in the classroom led to time management issues, negative student behaviors and certain interruptions during the class due to access problems.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• FATİH Project,classroom management,technology use in education,teachers.

Kaynakça

1. Albayrak, E., (2014). Evaluation of the usage of information technologies in the schools included to Fatih Project by means of classroom management [in Turkish]. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Akdeniz University Institute of Educational Sciences, Antalya.
2. Başar, H. (2003). Classroom Management [in Turkish]. Ankara: Anı Publishing.
3. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2009). Data analysis handbook [in Turkish]. Ankara: Pegem Academy Publishing.
4. Brophy, F. (1988). Educating Teachers About Managing Classroom and Students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(1), 1-18.
5. Chen, C. H. (2008). Why do teachers not practice what they believe regarding technology integration?. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 65-75.
6. Clark, R. E. (1994). Media will never influence learning. Educational Technology Research & Development 42(2), 21-29
7. Dursun, Ö. Ö., Kuzu, A., Kurt, A. A., Güllüpınar, F., & Gültekin, M. (2013). Views of School Administrators’ on FATIH Projects Pilot Implementation Process [in Turkish]. Trakya University Faculty of Education Journal, 3(1), 100-113.
8. Erdoğan, İ. (2001). Classroom Management - How to succeed in lessons, conferences, panels and seminars [in Turkish]. Sistem Publishing, İstanbul.

9. Gorder, L. M. (2008). A study of teacher perceptions of instructional technology integration in the classroom. The Journal of Research in Business Education, 50(2), 63-76.
10. Hayduk, L., A. (1987). Structural equation modelling with LISREL: Essentials and advances. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
11. Jedeskog, G., & Nissen, J. (2004). ICT in the classroom: is doing more important than knowing?. Education and Information Technologies, 9(1), 37-45.
12. Kim, W. (2007). Towards a definition and methodology for blended learning. Retrieved from http://www.researchgate.net/publication/36379239_The_marriage_of_Rousseau_and_blended_learning_an_investigation_of_three_higher_educational_institutions'_praxis/file/9fcfd51447b4a53b77.pdf#page=9.
13. Küçükahmet, L. (2004). Classroom Management [in Turkish]. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
14. Lemlech, J. K. (1988). Classroom Management. (2nd Ed.). Longman Inc., New York.
15. MNE (2012), Fatih Project Scope [in Turkish]. Retrieved from http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/proje-hakkinda.
16. MNE (2013). FATIH Project Teacher Training-Seminar of conscious, safe use information technology and internet of FATIH project [in Turkish]. Retrieved from http://fatihprojesi.meb.gov.tr/tr/icerikincele.php?id=5.
17. MNE (2015). New EBA and Interactive Classroom Management in Education [in Turkish]. Retrieved from http://www.meb.gov.tr/egitimde-yeni-eba-ve-etkilesimli-sinif-yonetimi/haber/9567/tr#.
18. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2015). Qualitative Data Analysis. (Ed. S. Akbaba Altun ve A. Ersoy, Çev) Pegem Academy, Ankara.
19. Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. M., &Kemp, J. E. (2013). Learning theory and teaching theory (Trans. İ. Şahin). Effective Instructional Design. İstanbul: Bahçeşehir University Publishing.
20. Muir-Herzig, R. G. (2004). Technology and its impact in the classroom. Computers & Education, 42(2), 111-131.
21. Nam, C. S., & Smith-Jackson, T. L. (2007). Web-based learning environment: A theory-based design process for development and evaluation. Journal of Information Technology Education, 6(1), 23-43.
22. Sarıtaş, M. (2003). Development and Application of Classroom Management and Discipline Related Rules [in Turkish]. New Approaches in Classroom Management, (Ed. Leyla Küçükahmet) Nobel Publishing, Ankara.
23. Uçar, A., Sarıtepeci, M. & Çakır H. (2017- in process). Examination of teachers' classroom management perceptions in terms of various variables in technology supported courses [in Turkish]. IV rd International Eurasian Educational Research Congress, Pamukkale.
24. Usluel, Y. K., Mumcu, F. K., & Demiraslan, Y. (2007). ICT in The Learning-Teaching Process: Teachers’ Views on The Integration and Obstacles [in Turkish]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 32(32), 164-178.
25. Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2006). Qualitative Research Methods in the Social Sciences [in Turkish]. Seçkin Publishing, Ankara.
26. Yıldız, H., Sarıtepeci, M., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2013). A study on the contributions of the in-service training activities within the scope of FATIH project to teachers’ professional growth in reference to ISTE teachers’ standards [in Turkish]. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, Special issue (1), 375-392.
27. Yılmaz, V. (2004). Structural equation models with LISREL: implementation to consumer complaints [in Turkish].. Journal of Social Sciences, 1, 77-90.
28. Zhao, Y. (2007). Social studies teachers' perspectives of technology integration. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 15(3), 311-333.