During COVID-19 Pandemic ICT Integration Proficiency as a Predictor of Web 2.0 Self Efficacy Beliefs of Teachers

Öz

This study was designed to examine the relationship between teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs in using Web 2.0 technologies and their level of proficiency in using Information and Communication Technologies (ICT). The study group comprised of 336 teachers employed in different branches in state schools. Within this scope, “ICT Integration Proficiency for Teachers (TIPS)” and the “Web 2.0 Practical Content Development Self-Efficacy Belief (W2SEBS)” scales were used. The validity of the scales used in the research was tested with confirmatory factor analysis and the scales were seen to be valid. The multiple regression model created for the prediction of Web 2.0 self-efficacy beliefs by information and communication technology integration proficiency was found to be significant. Accordingly, ICT proficiency of teachers is thought to assist in the development of self-efficacy beliefs about the use of Web 2.0 tools.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Teacher
• ICT proficiency
• Web 2.0 self-efficacy beliefs
• Covid 19.

Pandemi Sürecinde Öğretmenlerin Web 2.0 Öz-yeterlik İnanışların bir Yordayıcısı olarak BİT Entegrasyonu Yeterlikleri

Öz

Bu araştırmada, öğretmenlerin Web 2.0 hızlı içerik geliştirme teknolojilerini kullanabilme öz-yeterlik inanışları ile bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerini (BİT) kullanma yetkinlik düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Çalışma grubu, devlet okullarında farklı branşlarda görev yapmakta olan 336 öğretmenden oluşmaktadır. Bu kapsamda katılımcılara “Öğretmenler için Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Entegrasyonu Yeterlikleri Ölçeği” ile “Web 2.0 Hızlı İçerik Geliştirme Öz-Yeterlik İnancı Ölçeği” uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışmada kullanılan ölçeklerin geçerlikleri doğrulayıcı faktör analizi ile sınanmış ve ölçeklerin geçerli oldukları bulunmuştur. Web 2.0 öz-yeterliğinin bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri entegrasyonu yeterlikleri tarafından yordanmasına yönelik kurulan çoklu regresyon modelinin anlamlı olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Buna göre öğretmenlerin BİT yeterlikleri, onları Web 2.0 araçlarını kullanmadaki öz-yeterlik inanışlarının gelişmesine yardımcı olduğu düşünülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Öğretmen
• BİT yeterlik
• Web 2.0öz-yeterlik inanışlar
• Covid 19.

Kaynakça

1. Abbitt, J. T. (2011). An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 27(4), 134-143.https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670
2. Anderson, P. (2007, February 2). What is web 2.0? Ideas, technologies and implications for education. JISC TechWatch report. http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/techwatch/tsw0701b.pdf
3. Bandura, A. (1997). Self efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behaioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
4. Birişçi, S., & Kul, Ü. (2019). Predictors of technology integration self-efficacy beliefs of preservice teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1),75-93, https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.512537
5. Birişçi, S., Kul, Ü., Aksu, Z., Akaslan, D., & Çelik, S. (2018). Web 2.0 rapid content development self-efficacy perception scale. Educational Technology Theory and Practice, 8(1), 187-208. https://doi.org/10.17943/etku.335164
6. Blume, C. (2020). German teachers’ digital habitus and their pandemic pedagogy. Postdigital Science and Education 2, 879-905. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00174-9
7. Bozkurt, A. (2020). Koronavirüs (Covid-19) pandemi süreci ve pandemi sonrası dünyada eğitime yönelik değerlendirmeler: Yeni normal ve yeni eğitim paradigması. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmları Dergisi, 6(3), 112-142.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/1215818
8. Butler, J. (2012). Grappling with change: Web 2.0 and teacher education. In D. Polly, C. Mims, & K.A. Persichitte (Eds.), Developing technology-rich teacher education programs: Key issues (pp. 135-150). IGI Global.

9. Caladine, R. (2008). Enhancing e-learning with media-rich content and interactions. Information Science.
10. Chai, C. S., & Lim, C. P. (2011). The Internet and teacher education: Traversing between the digitized world and schools. The Internet and Higher Education, 14(1), 3-9.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.04.003
11. Chang, G.,& Yano, S. (2020). How are countries addressing the Covid-19 challenges in education? A snapshot of policy measures.https://world-education-blog.org/2020/03/24/how-are-countries-addressing-the-covid-19-challenges-in-education-a-snapshot-of-policy-measures/
12. Crompton, H. (2017). ISTE standards for educators. International Society for Technology in Education.
13. Çoklar, A. N., & Yurdakul, I. K. (2017). Technology integration experiences of teachers. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 8(1), 19-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/dcse-2017-0002
14. Conole, G. (2012). Designing for learning in an open world. Springer.
15. Crawford, J., Butler-Henderson, K., Rudolph, J., Malkawi, B., Glowatz, M., Burton, R., Magni, P. A., & Lam, S. (2020). COVID-19: 20 countries’ higher education intra-period digital pedagogy responses. Journal of Applied Learning & Teaching, 3(1), 9-28. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1680/geot.2008.T.003
16. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.
17. D’souza, Q. (2006, October 10). Web 2.0 ideas for educators: A guide to RSS and more. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.176.97&rep=rep1&type=pdf
18. Ertmer, P. A. (1999). Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(4), 47-61.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02299597
19. Haşlaman, T., Kuşkaya-Mumcu, F., & Usluel, Y. K. (2007). The integration of Information and Communication Technologies in learning and teaching process: A lesson plan example. Education and Science, 32(146), 54-63.http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/733
20. Hsu, S. (2010). Developing a scale for teacher integration of information and communication technology in grades 1–9. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 175-189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2729.2010.00348.x
21. Inan, F. A., & Lowther, D. L. (2010). Factors affecting technology integration in K-12 classrooms: A path model. Educational Technology Research & Development, 58(2), 137-154.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9132-y
22. Jandrić, P. (2020). Postdigital research in the time of Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 233-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00113-8.
23. Jandrić, P., Hayes, D., Truelove, I., Levinson, P., Mayo, P., Ryberg, T….(2020). Teaching in the age of Covid-19. Postdigital Science Education, 2, 1069-1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00169-6
24. Kabakci-Yurdakul, I. (2011). Examining technopedagogical knowledge competencies of preservice teachers based on ICT usage. Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Education, 40,397- 408.https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/87379
25. Karademir, A., Yaman, F., & Saatçioğlu, Ö. (2020). Challenges of higher education institutions against COVID-19: The case of Turkey. Journal of Pedagogical Research.https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2020063574
26. Karahan, E.,& Bozan, M. A. & Akçay, A. O. (2020). Sınıf öğretmenliği lisans öğrencilerinin pandemi sürecindeki çevrim içi öğrenme deneyimlerinin incelenmesi.Turkish Studies, 15(4), 201-214. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44348
27. König, J., Biela, D. J.J.,& Glutsch, N. (2020) Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4). 608-622 https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
28. Kul, U. (2018). Influences of technology integrated professional development course on mathematics teachers. European Journal of Educational Research, 7(2), 233-243. http://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.7.2.233
29. Kul, Ü., & Birişçi, S. (2017). Describing pre-service teachers’ reasoning within drawing geometrical shapes in logo programming. Mehmet Akif Ersoy University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 44, 37-65. http://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.331250
30. Kul, Ü., Birişçi, S., & Kutay, V. (2019). Adaptation of teachers’ ICT integration proficiency scale into Turkish. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 8(2), 437-456. http://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.442836
31. Lawrence, J. E., & Tar, U. A. (2018). Factors that influence teachers’ adoption and integration of ICT in teaching/learning process. Educational Media International, 55(1), 79-105, http://doi.org/10.1080/09523987.2018.1439712
32. Lederman, F. (2020, March 3). Will shift to remote teaching be boon or bane for inline learning? Inside Higher Education. Inside Higher Ed https://www.insidehighered.com/digital-learning/article/2020/03/18/most-teaching-going-remote-will-help-or-hurt-online-learning
33. Lee, M.,& Tsai, C. (2010). Exploring teachers’ perceived self-efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 38(1), 1-21.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4
34. Martinovic, D., & Zhang, Z. (2012). Situating ICT in the teacher education program: Overcoming challenges, fulfilling expectations. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(3), 461-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.12.001
35. Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2011). ICT integration into learning-teaching process: Models and indicators. Education Technology Theory and Practice. 1(1), 62-79.
36. Mishra, L., Grupta, T., & Shree, A. (2020). Online teaching-learning in higher education during lockdown period of COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Research Open, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100012
37. Mısırlı, Z. A. (2016). Integrating technology into teaching and learning using variety of models. Ihlara Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 37-48.
38. Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2020, 15 Nisan). Bakan Selçuk, koronavirüs’e karşı eğitim alanında alınan tedbirleri açıkladı. http://www.meb.gov.tr/bakan-selcuk-koronaviruse-karsi-egitim-alaninda-alinan-tedbirleri-acikladi/haber/20497/tr
39. National Council of of Teachers of Mathematics NCTM. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Author.
40. Niederhauser, D. S., & Perkmen, S. (2008) Validation of the intrapersonal technology integration scale: Assessing the influence of intrapersonal factors that influence technology integration. Computers in the Schools, 25(1-2), 98-111, http://doi.org/10.1080/07380560802157956
41. O’Reilly T. (2007, August 27). What is web 2.0: design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. MPRA. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/4578/1/mpra_paper_4578.pdf
42. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development [OECD] (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on education - Insights from Education at a Glance 2020. https://www.oecd.org/education/the-impact-of-covid-19-on-education-insights-education-at-a-glance-2020.pdf
43. Özer, M. (2020). Educational Policy Actions by the Ministry of National Education in the times of COVID-19. Kastamonu Education Journal, 28(3), 1124-1129. http://dx.doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.722280
44. Remuzzi, A., & Remuzzi G. (2020). COVID-19 and Italy: what next? The Lancet, 395(10231), 1225-1228. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30627-9
45. Ritzhaupt, A. D., Dawson, K., & Cavanaugh, C. (2012). An investigation of factors influencing student use of technology in K-12 classrooms using path analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 46(3), 229-254. https://doi.org/10.2190/EC.46.3.b
46. Rogers-Estable, M. (2014). Web 2.0 use in higher education. European Journal of Open, Distance and eLearning,17(2), 129-141.https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014-0024
47. So, H. J., & Kim, B. (2009). Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 25(1), 101-116. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.1183
48. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics(4th ed.). Allyn and Bacon.
49. Teo, T. (2009). Modeling technology acceptance in education: A study of pre-service teachers. Computers & Education, 52(1), 302- 312.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.006
50. Thompson, J. (2007). Is Education 1.0 ready for Web 2.0 students?. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 3(4), 1-6. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1095&context=innovate
51. Tsai, H. C. (2015). A senior teacher’s implementation of technology integration. International Education Studies, 8(6), 151-161.https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n6p151
52. UNESCO (2020). Education: from Disruption to Recovery. Paris: UNESCO.
53. Van Allen, J., & Katz, S. (2020). Teaching with OER during pandemics and beyond. Journal for Multicultural Education, 14(3-4), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.1108/JME-04-2020-0027
54. Wang, Cuiyan, Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., & Ho, R. C. (2020). Immediate psychological responses and associated factors during the initial stage of the 2019 coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic among the general population in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17051729
55. Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, C. (2020). Suspending classes without stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the COVID-19 outbreak. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(3), 55-61. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13030055
56. Zhou, L., Zi, F., Wu, S. ve Zhou, M. (2020). “School’s Out, But Class’s On”, The largest online education in the world today: Taking China’s practical exploration during the COVID-19 epidemic prevention and control as an example. Best Evidence of Chinese Education, 4(2), 501-519. http://dx.doi.org/10.15354/bece.20.ar023
57. Zhu, X., & Liu, J. (2020). Education in and after Covid-19: Immediate responses and long-term visions. Postdigital Science and Education. 2, 695-699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00126-3