Eu Citizenship As A Common Identity: Theoretical Underpinnings And Main Dimensions

Öz

This study deals with the emergence of the European Union citizenship as a kind of common political identity and attempts to make a theoretical analysis of this citizenship as well as a dimensional one Regarding the theoretical analysis of the issue there are two aspects to be explained First from a wider perspective a theoretical background is given to clarify the role and impact of identity in international realm Then from a more specified perspective theoretical underpinnings and rationale of the choice of citizenship as a common identity in the EU is unfolded Following these theoretical explanations the EU citizenship is scrutinised referring to its three main dimensions namely political dimension economic dimension and popular symbolic dimension Keywords: EU citizenship common political identity social constructivism ÖZET Bu çalışma Avrupa Birliği vatandaşlığının ortak siyasi bir kimlik olarak ortaya çıkmasını ele almakta ve bu vatandaşlığın hem teorik hem de temel dayanak noktalarına dayalı bir analizini yapmayı amaçlamaktadır Konunun teorik analizi bağlamında açıklanması gereken iki boyutu bulunmaktadır İlk olarak daha geniş bir perspektiften kimlik konusunun uluslararası alandaki rolü ve etkisini ortaya koymak için teorik bir arka plan verilmektedir Ardından daha özel bir perspektifle siyasi kimliğin AB’de ortak kimlik olarak seçilmesinin ardındaki teorik temeller ve gerekçeler ortaya konmaktadır Bu teorik açıklamaların ardından AB vatandaşlığı üç temel dayanağı konumundaki politik ekonomik ve popüler sembolik boyutları açısından incelenmektedir Anahtar sözcükler: AB vatandaşlığı ortak siyasi kimlik sosyal yapısalcılık

Anahtar Kelimeler

• -

Eu Citizenship As A Common Identity: Theoretical Underpinnings And Main Dimensions

Öz

Bu çalışma Avrupa Birliği vatandaşlığının ortak siyasi bir kimlik olarak ortaya çıkmasını ele almakta ve bu vatandaşlığın hem teorik hem de temel dayanak noktalarına dayalı bir analizini yapmayı amaçlamaktadır. Konunun teorik analizi bağlamında açıklanması gereken iki boyutu bulunmaktadır. İlk olarak, daha geniş bir perspektiften, kimlik konusunun uluslararası alandaki rolü ve etkisini ortaya koymak için teorik bir arka plan verilmektedir. Ardından, daha özel bir perspektifle, siyasi kimliğin, AB’de ortak kimlik olarak seçilmesinin ardındaki teorik temeller ve gerekçeler ortaya konmaktadır. Bu teorik açıklamaların ardından, AB vatandaşlığı, üç temel dayanağı konumundaki politik, ekonomik ve popüler-sembolik boyutları açısından incelenmektedir

Anahtar Kelimeler

• AB vatandaşlığı, ortak siyasi kimlik, sosyal yapısalcılık

Kaynakça

1. Adler, Emanuel. 1997. “Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics,” European Journal of International Relations 3 (3): 319-363.
2. Black Annabel and Cris Shore. 1996. “Citizen’s Europe and the Construction of European Identity,” in Victoria A Goddard et al, eds., the Anthropology of Europe, 2nd edition. pp. 275-298. Oxford: Berg.
3. Checkel, Jeffrey T. 1999a. “Social Construction and Integration,” in Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4): 545-560.
4. Christiansen, Thomas, Knud Erik Jorgensen and Antje Wiener. 1999. “The Social Construction of Europe,” Journal of European Public Policy 6 (4): 528-545.
5. Delanty, Gerard. 1995. Inventing Europe: Idea, Identity, Reality. London: Macmillan.
6. Emerson, Michael. 1998. Redrawing the Map of Europe. London: Macmillan.
7. Habermas, Jurgen. 1992. “Citizenship and National Identity: Some Reflections On the Future of Europe,” in Praxis International 12 (1): 1-19.
8. Habermas, Jurgen. 1994. “Citizenship and National Identity,” Bart van Steenbergen, ed., The Condition of Citizenship pp. 20-36. London: Sage.

9. Heater, Derek 1990. Citizenship: The Civic Ideal In World history, Politics and Education. London: Longman.
10. Heater, Derek. 1992. The Idea of European Unity. Leicester: Leicester University Press.
11. Hopf, Ted. 1998. “The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory,’ International Security,” reprinted in Andrew Linklater, ed., International Relations: Critical Concepts in Political Science. 4: 1756-1783.
12. Karlsson, Ingmar. 2000. “European Identity and the Enlargement of the European Union,” in Christopher Lord, ed., Central Europe: Core or Periphery? pp. 167- 181. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School.
13. Katzenstein, Peter J. 1996. “Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security,” in Peter Katzenstein, ed., The Culture of National Security. pp. 1-32. New York: Columbia University Press.
14. Keane, John. 1992. “Questions for Europe,” in Brian Nelson et al, eds., The Idea of Europe. pp. 55-61. Oxford: Berg.
15. Koslowski, Rey. 1999. “A Constructivist Approach to Understanding the European Union as a Federal Polity,” in Journal of European Public Policy 9 (4): 561- 578.
16. Koslowski, Rey and Friedrich V. Kratochwil. 1994. “Understanding Change in International Politics: The Soviet Empire’s Demise and the International System,” in International Organization 48 (2): 215-247.
17. Kostakopoulou, Theodora. 2001. Citizenship, Identity and Immigration in the European Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
18. Laffan, Brigit. 1996. “The Politics of Identity and Political Order in Europe,” in Journal of Common Market Studies 34 (1) 81-102.
19. Lapid, Yosef. 1997. “Culture’s Ship: Returns and Departures in International Relations Theory,” in Yosef lapid and Friedrich Kratochwil, eds., The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory pp.3-21. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
20. Meehan, Elizabeth. 1993. Citizenship and the European Union. London: Sage.
21. Papcke, Sven. 1992. “Who Needs European Identity and What Could It Be?,” in in Brian Nelson et al, eds., The Idea of Europe. pp. 61-75. Oxford: Berg.
22. Peterson, John and Elizabeth Bomberg. 1999. Decision Making in the European Union. London: Macmillan.
23. Radaelli, Claudio. 2001. “Conceptualising Europeanisation: Theories, Methods and the Challenge of Empirical Research”. http://www.york.ac.uk/depts/poli/juc/2001/papers
24. Rosamond, Ben. 2000. Theories of European Integration. London: Macmillan.
25. Shore, Cris. 2000. Building Europe. London: Rourledge.
26. Smith, Anthony. 1992. “National Identity and the Idea of European Unity,” International Affairs 68 (1): 55-76.
27. Tassin, Etienne. 1992. “Europe: A Political Community,” in Chantal Mouffe, ed., Dimensions of Radical Democracy pp. 169-193. London: Verso.
28. Waever, Ole. 1995. “Identity, Integration and Security,” in Journal of International Affairs 48 (2): 389-431.
29. Waever, Ole. 1996. “European Security Identities,” in Journal of Common Market Studies 34 (1): 103-130.
30. Weiler, Joseph H.H. 1997a. “The Reformation of European Constitutionalism,” Journal of Common Market Studies 35 (1): 97-131.
31. Weiler, Joseph H. H. 1997b. “To Be A European Citizen-Eros and Civilization,” in Journal of European Public Policy 4 (4): 495-519.
32. Wendt, Alexander. 1997. “Identity and Structural Change in International Politics,” in Yosef lapid and Friedrich Kratochwil, eds., The Return of Culture and Identity in IR Theory pp. 47-64. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
33. Wendt, Alexander. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.