Artificial Intelligence Versus Pre-Service Teachers: A Social Story Comparison

Samet Aksoy; Halil Öztürk; Berfin Korkut; Işıl Önal Doğan; Suphi Ülkü Doğan

doi:10.53444/deubefd.1731722

EN TR

Öz

Artificial Intelligence Versus Pre-Service Teachers: A Social Story Comparison

Öz

This study compares social stories prepared by pre-service teachers and AI-generated social stories, focusing on the story preparation process, the appropriateness of social stories, and pre-service teachers’ views on technology and artificial intelligence. Designed as a case study, the research involved 11 pre-service teachers enrolled in a special education teacher education program. Social stories were created by the participants and generated using AI tools (ChatGPT for text generation and DALL·E for visual production). Data were collected through AI-generated social stories, semi-structured interviews, expert evaluations using the Social Story Evaluation Guide, and researcher diary entries. Social stories were evaluated across 12 criteria, including structural organization, language use, perspective, appropriateness of visuals, and alignment with social story principles. The findings indicated that social stories prepared by pre-service teachers outperformed AI-generated stories on nine criteria, whereas AI-generated stories showed stronger performance on one criterion, with equivalent results observed on two criteria. The findings highlight the potential of AI as a supportive tool in social story development while emphasizing the continued importance of pedagogical judgment and systematic training in AI use. The study offers implications for teacher education programs and the informed integration of AI into special education practices.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Artificial intelligence, social stories, pre-service teachers, educational technology, special education

Yapay Zeka Öğretmen Adaylarına Karşı: Bir Sosyal Öykü Karşılaştırması

Öz

Bu çalışma, öğretmen adayları tarafından hazırlanan sosyal öyküler ile yapay zekâ tarafından üretilen sosyal öyküleri; öykü hazırlama süreci, sosyal öykülerin uygunluğu ve öğretmen adaylarının teknoloji ile yapay zekâya yönelik görüşleri açısından karşılaştırmaktadır. Durum çalışması deseninde tasarlanan araştırma, özel eğitim öğretmenliği programına devam eden 11 öğretmen adayı ile yürütülmüştür. Sosyal öyküler, katılımcılar tarafından hazırlanmış ve yapay zekâ araçları (metin üretimi için ChatGPT, görsel üretimi için DALL·E) kullanılarak oluşturulmuştur. Veriler; yapay zekâ tarafından üretilen sosyal öyküler, yarı yapılandırılmış görüşmeler, Sosyal Öykü Değerlendirme Rehberi kullanılarak yapılan uzman değerlendirmeleri ve araştırmacı günlüğü aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Sosyal öyküler; yapısal düzen, dil kullanımı, bakış açısı, görsellerin uygunluğu ve sosyal öykü ilkeleriyle uyum gibi ölçütleri içeren toplam 12 kriter üzerinden değerlendirilmiştir. Bulgular, öğretmen adayları tarafından hazırlanan sosyal öykülerin dokuz kriterde yapay zekâ tarafından üretilen öykülerden daha yüksek puan aldığını; yapay zekâ tarafından üretilen öykülerin bir kriterde daha başarılı olduğunu ve iki kriterde ise eşdeğer sonuçlar elde edildiğini göstermiştir. Elde edilen bulgular, yapay zekânın sosyal öykü geliştirme sürecinde destekleyici bir araç olarak kullanılabileceğini ortaya koyarken, pedagojik yargının ve yapay zekâ kullanımına yönelik sistematik eğitimin önemini vurgulamaktadır. Çalışma, öğretmen eğitimi programları ve yapay zekânın özel eğitim uygulamalarına bilinçli bir şekilde entegre edilmesine yönelik önemli çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yapay zeka, sosyal öykü, öğretmen adayları, eğitim teknolojisi, özel eğitim

Destekleyen Kurum

TÜBİTAK- 2209-A - Üniversite Öğrencileri Araştırma Projeleri Destekleme Programı

Teşekkür

Bu çalışma TÜBİTAK 2209-A - Üniversite Öğrencileri Araştırma Projeleri Destekleme Programı kapsamında desteklenmiştir. Desteği için TÜBİTAK'a teşekkür ederiz.

Kaynakça

Adams, L., Gouvousis, A., VanLue, M., & Waldron, C. (2004). Social story intervention: Improving communication skills in a child with an autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 19(2), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576040190020301
Adeshola, I., & Adepoju, A. P. (2024). The opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(10), 6159-6172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2253858
Agosta, E., Graetz, J. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (2004). Teacher–researcher partnerships to improve social behavior through social stories. Intervention in School and Clinic, 39(5), 276–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/10534512040390050401
Arslan, A., & Zengin, R. (2017). Investigation of science teacher student teachers’ perceptions about the concept of technology through metaphor analysis. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 55, 23-36. http://dx.doi.org/10.9761/JASSS6884
Baidoo-Anu, D., & Ansah, L. O. (2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52-62. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1337500
Baki, A., Yalçınkaya, H., Özpınar, İ., & Uzun, S. (2009). Comparison of primary school mathematics teachers’ and pre-service teachers’ perspectives on instructional technologies. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 1(1), 65-83.
Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. Open Educational Resources Collection. 6. Retrieved 22 May 2024 https://irl.umsl.edu/oer/6
Baz, E. H. (2016). Attitudes of Turkish EFL student teachers towards technology use. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(2), 1-10.
Bernad-Ripoll, S. (2007). Using a self-as-model video combined with Social Stories™ to help a child with Asperger syndrome understand emotions. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 22(2), 100-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576070220020101
Bıçakcı, M., & Gül, S. O. (2019). Effect of peer delivered social stories on the crossing skills of primary school students with developmental disabilities. Education and Science, 44(199), 257-278. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2019.8168

Boşnak, Ö., & Turhan, C. (2020). Presentation of social stories with tablet computers in social skill instruction for students with autism spectrum disorder. Ilkogretim Online, 19(4). 2161-2170.
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i-vi.
Bucholz, J. L., Brady, M. P., Duffy, M. L., Scott, J., & Kontosh, L. G. (2008). Using literacy- based behavioral interventions and social stories to improve work behavior in employees with developmental disabilities. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 43(4), 486–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/215416470804300408
Butterworth, B., & Laurillard, D. (2010). Low numeracy and dyscalculia: Identification and intervention. ZDM Mathematics Education, 42(5), 527-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-010-0267-4
Camilleri, L. J., Maras, K., & Brosnan, M. (2023). A rule-based theoretical account of social stories to address the double empathy problem. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1085355. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1085355
Camilleri, L. J., Maras, K., & Brosnan, M. (2024). Effective digital support for autism: digital social stories. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 14, 1272157. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1272157
Carvalho, L., Martinez-Maldonado, R., Tsai, Y. S., Markauskaite, L., & De Laat, M. (2022). How can we design for learning in an AI world?. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100053
Charness, N., & Boot, W. R. (2009). Aging and information technology use: Potential and barriers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01647.x
Chen, Z. (2022). Measuring the level of homework answer copying during COVID-19 induced remote instruction. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(1), 010126. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.010126
Ciampa, K. (2017). Building bridges between technology and content literacy in special education: Lessons learned from special educators’ use of integrated technology and perceived benefits for students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 56(2), 85-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/19388071.2017.1280863
Çam, M. B., Çelik, N. C., Güntepe, E. T., & Durukan, Ü. G. (2021). Determining teacher candidates’ awareness of artificial Intelligence technologies. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 18(48), 263-285.
Çakmak, M. (2017). Opinions and suggestions of special education researchers using social story application [Master’s Thesis]. Anadolu University.
Çetin, M., & Aktaş, A. (2021). Artificial intelligence and future scenarios in education. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(Special Issue of Educational Sciences), 422428. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.911444
Danish, F., & AlShammari, N. (2024). The impact of AI-enhanced social stories on social skills development in autistic students. Kurdish Studies, 12(5), 1513–1521. https://doi.org/10.53555/ks.v12i5.3504
de Freitas, M. P., Piai, V. A., Farias, R. H., Fernandes, A. M., de Moraes Rossetto, A. G., & Leithardt, V. R. Q. (2022). Artificial intelligence of things applied to assistive technology: A systematic literature review. Sensors, 22(21), 8531. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22218531
Degirmenci, H. D., & Tekin-Iftar, E. (2023). Web-based professional development with and without coaching to train Turkish special education teachers. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 58(3), 299-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/215416472305800305
Değirmenci, H. D. (2018). A comparison of web-based professional development applications, both with and without coaching, in terms of how teachers working with autistic students acquire teaching skills and improve their students' safety skills. [Doctoral Thesis], Anadolu University.
Filiz, G., Kutluca, A. Y., & Üstün, E. Y. (2022). The preschool teacher candidates' technological pedagogical content knowledge levels and technology metaphors. Gazi Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(3), 490-522. https://doi.org/10.30855/gjes.2022.08.03.006 Gray, C. A., & Garand, J. D. (1993). Social stories: Improving responses of students with autism with accurate social information. Focus on Autistic Behavior, 8(1), 1-10.
Gray, C. (2010). The new social story book. Future Horizons.
Gray, C. (2015). The new social story book, revised and expanded 15th anniversary edition: Over 150 social stories that teach everyday social skills to children and adults with autism and their peers. Arlington, TX: Future Horizons INC.
Huang, J., Saleh, S., & Liu, Y. (2021). A review on artificial intelligence in education. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 10(3),206-217. https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2021-0077 Holstein, K., Wortman Vaughan, J., Daumé III, H., Dudik, M., & Wallach, H. (2019). Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need? In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1-16). https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300830
Howley, M., & Arnold, E. (2005). Revealing the hidden social code: Social stories for people with autistic spectrum disorders. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Jones, A., Issroff, K., Scanlon, E., Clough, G., McAndrew, P., & Blake, C. (2006). Using mobile devices for learning in informal settings: Is it motivating? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22(5), 347-359. İşler, B., & Kılıç, M. (2021). Use and development of artificial intelligence in education. e- Journal of New Media, 5(1), 1-11.
Isman, A., & Dabaj, F. (2003). Attitudes of students towards Internet. In E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 1618-1621). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
Istenic, A., Bratko, I., & Rosanda, V. (2021). Pre-service teachers’ concerns about social robots in the classroom: A development model. Educational Self-Development, 16(2), 60–87. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.16.2.05
Kaban, A. L., & Ergül, I. B. (2020). Teachers’ attitudes towards the use of tablets in six EFL classrooms. In P. Eva (Ed.), Examining the roles of teachers and students in mastering new technologies (pp. 284–298). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-21045.ch015
Kalyva, E., & Agaliotis, I. (2009). Can social stories enhance the interpersonal conflict resolution skills of children with LD? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(1), 192–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2008.02.005
Kaya, N. H., & Ünal, F. (2022). The effectiveness of social stories on online safety skills to individuals with intellectual disabilities. The Journal of Buca Faculty of Education, 53, 369–389. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1059725
Kennedy, M. J., Thomas, C. N., Meyer, J. P., Alves, K. D., & Lloyd, J. W. (2014). Using evidence- based multimedia to improve vocabulary performance of adolescents with LD: A UDL approach. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(2), 71-86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948713507262
Kim, N. J., & Kim, M. K. (2022). Teacher’s perceptions of using an artificial intelligence based educational tool for scientific writing. Frontiers in Education, 7, 755914. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.755914
Kjeldgaard-Christiansen, J. (2024). What is creepiness, and what makes ChatGPT creepy? Leviathan: Interdisciplinary Journal in English, 10, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.7146/lev102024144284
Kokina, A., & Kern, L. (2010). Social Story™ interventions for students with autism spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40, 812- 826.
Kurt, O., & Kutlu, M. (2019). Effectiveness of social stories in teaching abduction-prevention skills to children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49, 3807– 3818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04096-9
Marino, M. T., Vasquez, E., Dieker, L., Basham, J., & Blackorby, J. (2023). The future of artificial intelligence in special education technology. Journal of Special Education Technology, 38(3), 404-416. https://doi.org/10.1177/01626434231165977
Menzi, N., Çalışkan, E., & Çetin, O. (2012). Investigation of pre-service teachers' technology competencies in terms of various variables. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 2(1), 1-18.
Mokmin, N. A. M., & Rassy, R. P. (2024). Review of the trends in the use of augmented reality technology for students with disabilities when learning physical education. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1251-1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11550-2
Moudry Quilty, K. (2007). Teaching paraprofessionals how to write and implement social stories for students with autism spectrum disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 28(3), 182-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325070280030701
National Autism Center. (2009). The National Autism Center’s national standards report. https://www.nationalautismcenter.org/reports/
National Professional Development Center on Autism. (2014). Evidence-based practices. https://autismpdc.fpg.unc.edu/wp-content/uploads/2014-EBP-Report.pdf
Obschonka, M., & Audretsch, D. B. (2020). Artificial intelligence and big data in entrepreneurship: A new era has begun. Small Business Economics, 55(3), 529-539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00202-4
Odom, S. L., Collet-Klingenberg, L., Rogers, S. J., & Hatton, D. D. (2010). Evidence-based practices in interventions for children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 54(4), 275– 282. https://doi.org/10.1080/10459881003785506
Olçay-Gül, S., & Tekin-Iftar, E. (2016). Family generated and delivered social story intervention: Acquisition, maintenance, and generalization of social skills in youths with ASD. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 51(1), 67-78. https://doi.org/10.1177/215416471605100107
Olçay, S., Kıyak, Ü. E., & Toper Korkmaz, Ö. (2022). Is social story™ an evidence-based practice? A meta-analysis and comprehensive descriptive analysis study. Ankara University Faculty of Educational Sciences Journal of Special Education, 23(2), 431– 458. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.766765
Prensky, M. (2008). Backup education?. Too many teachers see education as preparing kids for the past, not the future. Educational Technology, 48(1), 64-67.
Piper, A., Reeve, S. A., Deshais, M. A., Nirgudkar, A., Milata, E. M., Hickey, C. R., Thomas, R. R., & Stiuso, M. (2024). An evaluation of social stories™ to teach classroom social skills to children with an intellectual disability. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 59(3), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/215416472405900307
Reynhout, G., & Carter, M. (2006). Social Stories™ for children with disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 36, 445-469.
Sansosti, F. J., & Powell-Smith, K. A. (2008). Using computer-presented social stories and video models to increase the social communication skills of children with high-functioning autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 10(3), 162-178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098300708316259
Scattone, D., Tingstrom, D. H., & Wilczynski, S. M. (2006). Increasing appropriate social interactions of children with autism spectrum disorders using Social Stories™. Focus onAutism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 21(4), 211-222. https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576060210040201
Seo, S., & Kim, C. (2021). Analysis of understanding of prospective teachers’ computational thinking on artificial intelligence education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 25(1), 123-134. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2021.25.1.123
Steinbrenner, J. R., Hume, K., Odom, S. L., Morin, K. L., Nowell, S. W., Tomaszewski, B., Szendrey, S., McIntyre, N. S., Yucesoy-Ozkan, S., & Savage, M. N. (2020). Evidence- based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism. The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED609029
Szymkowiak, A., Melović, B., Dabić, M., Jeganathan, K., & Kundi, G. S. (2021). Information technology and Gen Z: The role of teachers, the internet, and technology in the Education of young people. Technology in Society, 65, 101565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101565
Talan, T., & Kalinkara, Y. (2023). The role of artificial intelligence in higher education: ChatGPT evaluation for an anatomy course. International Journal of Management Information Systems and Computer Science, 7(1), 33-40. https://doi.org/10.33461/uybisbbd.1244777
Tallvid, M. (2016). Understanding teachers’ reluctance to the pedagogical use of ICT in the 1:1 classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-014-9335-7
Timms, M. J. (2016). Letting artificial intelligence in education out of the box: Educational cobots and smart classrooms. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 26, 701-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-016-0095-y
Turan Güntepe, E., & Keleş, E. (2022). Evaluation of technology ıntegration process in the faculty of education by concentric circles model. Ahi Evran University Journal of Kırşehir Education Faculty, 23(2), 1639-1690.
Vandermeer, J., Beamish, W., Milford, T., & Lang, W. (2015). iPad-presented social stories for young children with autism. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 18(2), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2013.809811
Qi, C. H., Barton, E. E., Collier, M., Lin, Y. L., & Montoya, C. (2018). A systematic review of effects of social stories interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33(1), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357615613516
Yin, R. K. (2004). The case study anthology. Sage Publications.
Zaklas, N., & Gazit, T. (2025). The experience of using AI-generated social stories as a behavioral intervention tool for children. SSRN.
Zengin, E., & Uğraş, M. (2019). Determination of class teacher candidates methodoric perceptions of stem education. EKEV Academy Journal, 23(77), 57-76.
Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. SSRN. Access of date: 19.11.2022. Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=4312418

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Otizm ve Spekrum Bozukluğu Eğitimi, Özel Eğitim ve Engelli Eğitimi (Diğer)

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Samet Aksoy
0009-0005-9935-1103
Türkiye

Halil Öztürk ^*
0000-0001-5646-2130
Türkiye

Berfin Korkut
0000-0000-0000-0000
Türkiye

Işıl Önal Doğan
0000-0000-0000-0001
Türkiye

Suphi Ülkü Doğan
0000-0000-0000-0002
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Mart 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

1 Temmuz 2025

Kabul Tarihi

25 Şubat 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Sayı: 67

DOI

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1731722

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA25KP34GK

APA

Aksoy, S., Öztürk, H., Korkut, B., Önal Doğan, I., & Doğan, S. Ü. (2026). Artificial Intelligence Versus Pre-Service Teachers: A Social Story Comparison. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 67, 250-273. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1731722

AMA

1.Aksoy S, Öztürk H, Korkut B, Önal Doğan I, Doğan SÜ. Artificial Intelligence Versus Pre-Service Teachers: A Social Story Comparison. DEU BEF Dergi. 2026;(67):250-273. doi:10.53444/deubefd.1731722

Chicago

Aksoy, Samet, Halil Öztürk, Berfin Korkut, Işıl Önal Doğan, ve Suphi Ülkü Doğan. 2026. “Artificial Intelligence Versus Pre-Service Teachers: A Social Story Comparison”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, sy 67: 250-73. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1731722.

EndNote

Aksoy S, Öztürk H, Korkut B, Önal Doğan I, Doğan SÜ (01 Mart 2026) Artificial Intelligence Versus Pre-Service Teachers: A Social Story Comparison. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi 67 250–273.

IEEE

[1]S. Aksoy, H. Öztürk, B. Korkut, I. Önal Doğan, ve S. Ü. Doğan, “Artificial Intelligence Versus Pre-Service Teachers: A Social Story Comparison”, DEU BEF Dergi, sy 67, ss. 250–273, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.53444/deubefd.1731722.

ISNAD

Aksoy, Samet - Öztürk, Halil - Korkut, Berfin - Önal Doğan, Işıl - Doğan, Suphi Ülkü. “Artificial Intelligence Versus Pre-Service Teachers: A Social Story Comparison”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 67 (01 Mart 2026): 250-273. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1731722.

JAMA

1.Aksoy S, Öztürk H, Korkut B, Önal Doğan I, Doğan SÜ. Artificial Intelligence Versus Pre-Service Teachers: A Social Story Comparison. DEU BEF Dergi. 2026;:250–273.

MLA

Aksoy, Samet, vd. “Artificial Intelligence Versus Pre-Service Teachers: A Social Story Comparison”. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, sy 67, Mart 2026, ss. 250-73, doi:10.53444/deubefd.1731722.

Vancouver

1.Samet Aksoy, Halil Öztürk, Berfin Korkut, Işıl Önal Doğan, Suphi Ülkü Doğan. Artificial Intelligence Versus Pre-Service Teachers: A Social Story Comparison. DEU BEF Dergi. 01 Mart 2026;(67):250-73. doi:10.53444/deubefd.1731722

Öz

Öz

Artificial Intelligence Versus Pre-Service Teachers: A Social Story Comparison

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yapay Zeka Öğretmen Adaylarına Karşı: Bir Sosyal Öykü Karşılaştırması

Öz

Anahtar Kelimeler

Destekleyen Kurum

Teşekkür

Kaynakça

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

Konular

Bölüm

Yazarlar

Yayımlanma Tarihi

Gönderilme Tarihi

Kabul Tarihi

Yayımlandığı Sayı

DOI

IZ

Kaynak Göster