Eğitsel Videolar ve Öğretim Tasarımı (2015 - 2024): Bir Bibliyometrik Analiz Çalışması

Yıl 2025, Sayı: 65, 3409 - 3442, 30.09.2025

Can Güler , Efgan Kaçar

https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1638304

Öz

Videolar, hemen hemen her alanda olduğu gibi eğitim ortamlarında da sıklıkla hem işitsel hem de görsel bir öğrenme içeriği olarak kullanılmaktadır. Özellikle açık ve uzaktan öğrenme ortamlarında video içeriklerinin, önemli bir öğrenme ihtiyacını karşıladığı söylenebilir. Bu araştırma bağlamı çerçevesinde, alanyazında yer alan çalışmaların incelenmesi ve bunların araştırma eğilimlerinin ortaya çıkarılması, eğitsel videoların geliştirilmesi ile ilgili araştırmalara yön verebilir. Bu bakımdan, çalışma eğitsel video alanındaki araştırma eğilimlerini ortaya koyarak alanyazındaki boşlukların belirlenmesine katkı sağlamaktadır. Çalışmada, “eğitsel videolar” ve “öğretim tasarımı” anahtar kelimelerinin kullanıldığı, 2015-2024 yılları arasında Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında yayımlanmış 534 makaleye ulaşılarak bunların bibliyometrik analizi yapılmıştır. Çalışma bağlamında elde edilen bulgulara göre; en az yayın 2015-2016 yıllarında, en çok yayın ise 2024 yılında üretilmiştir. Yayın sayısı ve yazarlar arası atıf sayısı en yüksek yazar, Z. Pi’dir. Çalışma kapsamındaki yayınlardan en fazla alıntılanan yazar ise R.E. Mayer’dir. En yüksek bağlantı gücüne sahip kurum, Shanxi Normal University’dir. En çok makale yayımlayan dergi, Education and Information Technologies’dir. Mikro çalışma alanlarından en yoğunu, öz-düzenlemeli öğrenmeye yönelik olmuştur. Makalelerde öne çıkan anahtar kelimeler; eğitim (education), yükseköğretim (higher education), ters yüz sınıf (flipped classroom) ve bilişsel yük (cognitive load) olmuştur.

Anahtar Kelimeler

eğitsel video , öğretim tasarımı , bibliyometrik analiz

Etik Beyan

Bu araştırma; anket, odak grup, gözlem, deney, görüşme teknikleri kullanılarak katılımcılardan veri toplanmasını gerektiren bir çalışma değildir. Çalışma, ilgili yayınların yalnızca bibliyometrik analizini kapsadığından etik kurul izni gerekli değildir.

Educational Videos and Instructional Design (2015 - 2024): A Bibliometric Analysis Study

Öz

Videos are frequently used as audio and visual learning content in educational environments as in almost every field. Video content meets a critical learning need, especially in open and distance learning environments. In the context of this research, examining the studies in the literature and revealing their research trends can guide research on the development of educational videos. In this regard, the study contributes to identifying gaps in the literature by revealing research trends in the field of educational videos. In this study, a bibliometric analysis of 534 articles published in the Web of Science (WoS) database between 2015 and 2024 using the keywords “educational videos” and “instructional design” was conducted. According to the findings, the fewest papers were published in 2015-2016, and the most were published in 2024. The author with the highest number of documents and inter-author citations is Z. Pi. The author with the highest number of citations in the publications within the scope of the study is R.E. Mayer. The institution with the highest link strength is Shanxi Normal University. The journal that publishes the most articles is Education and Information Technologies. Self-regulated learning from micro-study areas comes to the forefront. The prominent keywords in the articles are education, higher education, flipped classroom, and cognitive load.

Anahtar Kelimeler

educational video , instructional design , bibliometric analysis

Kaynakça

• Alfayez, Z. H. (2021). Designing educational videos for university websites based on students’ preferences. Online Learning, 25(2), 280-298. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v25i2.2232
• Allman, B., Kimmons, R., Wang, W., Bao, H., Rosenberg, J. M., & Koehler, M. J. (2024). Trends and topics in educational technology, 2024 edition. TechTrends, 68(3), 402-410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00950-5
• Alsharif, A. H., Salleh, N. Z. M., & Baharun, R. (2020). Research trends of neuromarketing: A bibliometric analysis. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 98(15), 2948-2962.
• An, Y. (2021). A history of instructional media, instructional design, and theories. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 4(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.35
• Anderson, T., & Rivera Vargas, P. (2020). A critical look at educational technology from a distance education perspective. Digital Education Review, 37, 208-229. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.204-225
• Anggraini, F., Wibowo, F. C., & Nasbey, H. (Aralık, 2023). A bibliometric analysis of microlearning video for physics online learning research (2013–2023). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Fisika.
• Anthonysamy, L., Koo, A. C., & Hew, S. H. (2020). Self-regulated learning strategies and non-academic outcomes in higher education blended learning environments: A one decade review. Education and information technologies, 25(5), 3677-3704.
• Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959-975. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007
• Ariffin, U. H., Mokmin, N. A. M., & Akmal, M. A. (2022). Augmented reality technology in physical education: A systematic review in instructional design, and AR implementation option over the last 5 years. Advanced Journal of Technical and Vocational Education, 6(1), 13-20.
• Aromataris, E., & Pearson, A. (2014). The systematic review: An overview: Synthesizing research evidence to inform nursing practice. AJN, 114(3), 53-58. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000444496.24228.2c
• Arruda, H., Silva, E. R., Lessa, M., Jr, D. P., & Bartholo, R. (2022). VOSviewer and Bibliometrix. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(3), 392-395. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1434
• Ata, A., & Arslan, M. (2000). 2000-2019 yılları arasında uzaktan eğitimde video kullanımı üzerine yapılan makalelerin incelenmesi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(40), 2480-2499. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.864252
• Atal, D., Admiraal, W., & Saab, N. (2023). 360° video in teacher education: A systematic review of why and how it is used in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 135, 104349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104349
• Balıkçı, H. C., & Karataş, S. (2024). Student-generated videos: A bibliometric analysis and systematic review. Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 13(1), 147-161. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.1139682
• Beege, M., Schroeder, N. L., Heidig, S., Rey, G. D., & Schneider, S. (2023). The instructor presence effect and its moderators in instructional video: A series of meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 100564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100564
• Bennett, K. D., Aljehany, M. S., & Altaf, E. M. (2017). Systematic review of video-based instruction component and parametric analyses. Journal of Special Education Technology, 32(2), 80-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643417690255
• Bera. (2024). British Journal of Educational Technology. https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14678535 adresinden 25.12.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Bolick, A. D., & Da Silva, R. L. (2024). Exploring artificial intelligence tools and their potential impact to instructional design workflows and organizational systems. TechTrends, 68(1), 91-100.v
• Branch, R. M., & Stefaniak, J. E. (2019). Instructional design theory. In Open and distance education theory revisited: implications for the digital era (pp. 85-94). Singapore: Springer Singapore.
• Candel, E. C., de-la-Peña, C., & Yuste, B. C. (2024). Pre-service teachers’ perception of active learning methodologies in history: Flipped classroom and gamification in an e-learning environment. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 3365-3387.
• Chen, C. M., & Wu, C. H. (2015). Effects of different video lecture types on sustained attention, emotion, cognitive load, and learning performance. Computers & Education, 80, 108-121. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.015
• Costley, J., Hughes, C., & Lange, C. (2017). The effects of instructional design on student engagement with video lectures at cyber universities. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 16, 189-207. https://doi.org/10.28945/3728
• Demir, Ö., & Birgili, B. (2024). The mediating role of instructional design and video length between grade level and pupil-content interaction in instructional mathematics videos on YouTube. Education and Information Technologies, 29(5), 5599-5629. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12004-z
• Deve, V., & Dubey, S. (2023). Impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Online Engineering Education, 14(1s), 10-13. https://doi.org/10.52783/joee.v14i1s.80
• Fang, X., & Chiu, T. K. (2024). Enhancing business education through video: A conceptual model and research directions based on a systematic review. The International Journal of Management Education, 22(2), 100959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2024.100959
• Frenkel, J., Cajar, A., Engbert, R., & Lazarides, R. (2024). Exploring the impact of nonverbal social behavior on learning outcomes in instructional video design. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 12867. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63487-w
• Fyfield, M., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2019). 25 principles for effective instructional video design. [Sözlü bildiri]. ASCILITE.
• Fyfield, M., Henderson, M., & Phillips, M. (2022). Improving instructional video design: A systematic review. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 155-183. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.7296
• Gameil, A. A., & Al-Abdullatif, A. M. (2023). Using Digital Learning Platforms to Enhance the Instructional Design Competencies and Learning Engagement of Preservice Teachers. Education Sciences, 13(4), 334.
• Gegenfurtner, A., & Ebner, C. (2019). Webinars in higher education and professional training: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Educational Research Review, 28, 100293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100293
• Goksu, I., Kocak, O., Gunduz, A., & Goktas, Y. (2021). Instructional design studies between 1975 and 2019: A bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), 11(1), 73-92. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJOPCD.2021010105
• González, L. F. M., & Quiroz, V. G. (2019). Instructional Design in Online Education: a Systemic Approach. European Journal of Education, 2(3), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejed.v2i3.p64-73
• Google Akademik. (2024). https://scholar.google.com.hk/citations?user=ayW7cF8AAAAJ&hl=en adresinden 16.12.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Gutiérrez-Salcedo, M., Martínez, M. Á., Moral-Munoz, J. A., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Cobo, M. J. (2018). Some bibliometric procedures for analyzing and evaluating research fields. Applied Intelligence, 48, 1275-1287.
• Haupt, J. P., & Lee, J. J. (2023). US-China collaboration in science for the global common good. In Assessing the contributions of higher education (pp. 157-175). Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Henderson, M. L., & Schroeder, N. L. (2021). A systematic review of instructor presence in instructional videos: Effects on learning and affect. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100059. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100059
• Huang, J. H., Duan, X. Y., He, F. F., & Wang, G. J. (2021). A historical review and Bibliometric analysis of research on Weak measurement research over the past decades based on Biblioshiny. Preprints, 1(0), 1-19. http://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2108.11375
• Karthik, B. S. S., Chandrasekhar, B. B., David, R., & Kumar, A. K. (2019). Identification of instructional design strategies for an effective e-learning experience. The Qualitative Report, 24(7), 1537-1555.
• Khalil, M. K., & Elkhider, I. A. (2016). Applying learning theories and instructional design models for effective instruction. Advances in Physiology Education, 40, 147–156. https://doi.org/0.1152/advan.00138.2015
• Kılınç, H., Fırat, M., & Yüzer, T. V. (2017). Uzaktan eğitimde video kullanım eğilimleri: Bir araştırma sentezi. Pegem Eğitim ve Öğretim Dergisi, 7(1), 55-82. https://doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2017.003
• Lee, B., & Muldner, K. (2020, Nisan 23). Instructional video design: Investigating the impact of monologue-and dialogue-style presentations. [Sözlü bildiri]. 2020 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems.
• Lejia, L. I. U., Hew, K. F., & Du, J. (2024). Design principles for supporting self-regulated learning in flipped classrooms: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Research, 124, 102319.
• Li, J., Antonenko, P. D., & Wang, J. (2019). Trends and issues in multimedia learning research in 1996–2016: A bibliometric analysis. Educational Research Review, 28, 100282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100282
• Liao, C. W., Chen, C. H., & Shih, S. J. (2019). The interactivity of video and collaboration for learning achievement, intrinsic motivation, cognitive load, and behavior patterns in a digital game-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 133, 43-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.01.013
• Linnenluecke, M. K., Marrone, M., & Singh, A. K. (2019). Conducting systematic literature reviews and bibliometric analyses. Australian Journal of Management, 45(2), 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896219877678
• Liu, C., Zou, D., Chen, X., Xie, H., & Chan, W. H. (2021). A bibliometric review on latent topics and trends of the empirical MOOC literature (2008–2019). Asia Pacific Education Review, 22(3), 515-534. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09692-y
• Long, O. A. H. O., Halim, N. D. A., & Hanid, M. F. A. (2023). A review on the use of video in education: Advantages and disadvantages. Innovative Teaching and Learning Journal, 7(2), 25-40. https://doi.org/10.11113/itlj.v7.132
• Martins, J., Gonçalves, R., & Branco, F. (2022). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of elearning adoption using VOSviewer. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-022-00953-0
• Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511811678
• Mayer, R. E. (2014). The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (R. E. Mayer, Ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Mayer, R. E., Fiorella, L., & Stull, A. (2020). Five ways to increase the effectiveness of instructional video. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(3), 837-852.
• McBurney, M. K., & Novak, P. L. (2002, September). What is bibliometrics and why should you care?. In Proceedings. IEEE international professional communication conference (pp. 108-114). IEEE.
• Miao, F., Mishra, S., Orr, D., & Janssen, B. (2019). Guidelines on the development of open educational resources policies. UNESCO Publishing.
• Mou, J., Cui, Y., & Kurcz, K. (2019). Bibliometric and visualized analysis of research on major e-commerce journals using Citespace. Journal of electronic commerce research, 20(4), 219-237.
• National Science Board. (2022). The state of U.S. science and engineering 2022. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20221 adresinden 19.12.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• National Science Board. (2023). Publications output: U.S. trends and international comparisons. https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb202333 adresinden 19.12.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Nicolaou, C., Matsiola, M., & Kalliris, G. (2019). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching methodologies through audiovisual media. Education Sciences, 9(3), 196. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9030196
• Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Sanders, T., Parker, P., Del Pozo Cruz, B., & Lonsdale, C. (2021). Video improves learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Educational Research, 91(2), 204-236. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654321990713
• Noetel, M., Griffith, S., Delaney, O., Harris, N. R., Sanders, T., Parker, P., Cruz B. D. P., & Lonsdale, C. (2022). Multimedia design for learning: An overview of reviews with meta-meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 92(3), 413-454. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211052329
• Oliveira, L. R., Fontes, R., Collus, J., & Cerisier, J. F. (2019). Video and online learning in higher education: a bibliometric analysis of the open access scientific production, through web of science. In INTED2019 Proceedings (pp. 8562-8567). IATED.
• Orak, C., & Turan, Z. (2024). Using artificial intelligence in digital video production: A systematic review study. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 7(3), 286-307. http://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.1459434
• Orcid. (2024). https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7153-0955 adresinden 16.12.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Otto, E., Culakova, E., Meng, S., Zhang, Z., Xu, H., Mohile, S., & Flannery, M. A. (2022). Overview of Sankey flow diagrams: Focusing on symptom trajectories in older adults with advanced cancer. Journal of geriatric oncology, 13(5), 742-746.
• Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2020). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. bmj, 372.
• Pappas, C., & Williams, I. (2011). Grey literature: Its emerging importance. Journal of Hospital Librarianship, 11(3), 228-234. http://doi.org/10.1080/15323269.2011.587100
• Pasqualotto, A., Parong, J., Green, C. S., & Bavelier, D. (2022). Video Game Design for Learning to Learn. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 39(11), 2211–2228. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2110684
• Pearson, A., Robertson-Malt, S., & Rittenmeyer, L. (2011). Synthesizing qualitative evidence. Anne Dabrow Woods.
• Polat, H. (2023). Instructors’ presence in instructional videos: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(7), 8537-8569. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11532-4
• Poquet, O., Lim, L., Mirriahi, N., & Dawson, S. (2018). Video and learning: A systematic review (2007--2017). Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK), Sidney, Avustralya. https://summeracademy.academic.wlu.edu/files/2020/07/Poquet-et-al-2018-video-learning-review.pdf adresinden 12.12.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Rahman, K. A., Sapiai, N. S., Arifin, N. A. M., Mokhtar, S. A., & Aziz, T. M. F. T. A. (2024). The importance of educational video in learning during pre and post COVID-19 pandemic: Bibliometric analysis. International Journal of Professional Business Review, 9(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.26668/businessreview/2023.v9i1.4317
• Raja, R., & Nagasubramani, P. C. (2018). Impact of modern technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3iS1.165
• Reigeluth, C. M. (Ed.). (2009). Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory. New York: Routledge.
• Reiser, R. A., & Dempsey, J. V. (2012). Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (p. 408). Boston: Pearson.
• Rençber, İ., Baş, D. P., & Kurt, Y. (2023). Öznel kariyer başarısı yazınının bibliyometrik bir analizi. Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 20(1) 212–231. https://doi.org/10.33437/ksusbd.1135901
• Richey, R. C., Klein, J. D., & Tracey, M. W. (2011). The instructional design knowledge base: Theory, research, and practice. Routledge.
• Rickard, M., Sams, D. E., Mullis, S., & Sadasivan, A. (2023). SoTL Best Practices: 21st Century College Students’ Perceptions of Learning Styles and Instructional Design Materials’ Influence on the Successful Completion of Assignments. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 17(1), 10.
• Rojas-Salazar, A., & Haahr, M. (2023, October). The CLG Framework: A Methodical Approach to Designing Educational Video Games. In Latin American Conference on Learning Technologies (pp. 254-270). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.
• Rosendahl, P., & Wagner, I. (2024). 360 videos in education–A systematic literature review on application areas and future potentials. Education and Information Technologies, 29(2), 1319-1355. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11549-9
• Ruiz-Rojas, L. I., Acosta-Vargas, P., De-Moreta-Llovet, J., & Gonzalez-Rodriguez, M. (2023). Empowering education with generative artificial intelligence tools: Approach with an instructional design matrix. Sustainability, 15(15), 11524.
• Rupp, M. A., Odette, K. L., Kozachuk, J., Michaelis, J. R., Smither, J. A., & McConnell, D. S. (2019). Investigating learning outcomes and subjective experiences in 360-degree videos. Computers & Education, 128, 256-268.
• Sablić, M., Mirosavljević, A., & Škugor, A. (2021). Video-based learning (VBL)—Past, present and future: An overview of the research published from 2008 to 2019. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 26(4), 1061-1077. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-020-09455-5
• Santagata, R., König, J., Scheiner, T., Nguyen, H., Adleff, A. K., Yang, X., & Kaiser, G. (2021). Mathematics teacher learning to notice: A systematic review of studies of video-based programs. ZDM – Mathematics Education, 53(1), 119-134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01216-z
• Science Direct. (2024). Computers & Education. https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/computers-and-education adresinden 25.12.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Senadheera, V. V., Ediriweera, D. S., & Rupasinghe, T. P. (2024). Instructional design models for digital learning in higher education - A scoping review. Journal of Learning for Development, 11(1), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v11i1.973
• Springer Nature Link. (2024). Education and Information Technologies. https://link.springer.com/journal/10639/aims-and-scope adresinden 24.12.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Suartama, I. K., Setyosari, P., & Ulfa, S. (2019). Development of an instructional design model for mobile blended learning in higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 14(16).
• Ten Hove, P., & Van der Meij, H. (2015). Like it or not. What characterizes YouTube's more popular instructional videos?. Technical Communication, 62(1), 48-62. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/stc/tc/2015/00000062/00000001/art00005 adresinden 24.12.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Thompson, P., Xiu, Y., Tsotsoros, J. D., & Robertson, M. A. (2021). The effect of designing and segmenting instructional video. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 20, 173-200. https://doi.org/10.28945/4756
• Ulukök Yıldırım, Ş. & Sönmez, D. (2024). A bibliometric look at eye tracking research in videobased learning. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education, 21(2), 378-400. https://doi.org/10.33711/yyuefd.1378898
• Ugur, S., & Kuş, G. (2025). Design and implementation of interactive virtual reality supported first aid training. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(1), 408-419.
• Van der Linden, S., Van der Meij, J., & McKenney, S. (2022). Teacher video coaching, from design features to student impacts: A systematic literature review. Review of Educational Research, 92(1), 114-165. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211046984
• Van Eck, N., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523-538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
• Veloutsou, C., & Liao, J. (2023). Mapping brand community research from 2001 to 2021: Assessing the field's stage of development and a research agenda. Psychology & Marketing, 40(3), 431-454. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21782
• Verma, N., Getenet, S., Dann, C., & Shaik, T. (2023). Characteristics of engaging teaching videos in higher education: A systematic literature review of teachers’ behaviours and movements in video conferencing. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 18(40), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.58459/rptel.2023.18040
• Wahid, R., Ahmi, A., & Alam, A. F. (2020). Growth and collaboration in massive open online courses: A bibliometric analysis. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(4), 292-322. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i4.4693
• Wang, T., Du, Z., & Liu, J. (2024). The effects of video lecture design on learners in online learning: A systematic review. Journal of Information & Knowledge Management, 23(01), 2350052. http://doi.org/10.1142/S0219649223500521
• Web of Science. (2025). http://webofscience.com/wos/woscc/analyze-results adresinden 17.01.2025 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Weng, X., Ng, O. L., & Chiu, T. K. (2023). Competency development of pre-service teachers during video-based learning: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 199, 104790. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104790
• WHO. (2020). WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on Covid 19. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020 adresinden 24.12.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
• Yıldırım, Y., Kaçar, E., & Altınpulluk, H. (2023). 2012-2022 yılları arasında Scopus veri tabanında çevrimiçi öğrenme videoları üzerine yayınlanmış makalelerin bibliyometrik analizi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (58), 2409-2429. https://doi.org/10.53444/deubefd.1268857
• Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., & Schroeder, U. (2014). The state of video-based learning: A review and future perspectives. International Journal on Advances in Life Sciences, 6(3), 122-135. http://www.iariajournals.org/life_sciences/ adresinden 02.12.2024 tarihinde erişilmiştir.