The Mediating Role of Positive Psychological Capital on the Effect of Perceived Organizational Politics On Organizational Silence

Öz

In this study, the mediating role of positive psychological capital and its sub-dimensions on the effect of perceived organizational politics on organizational silence were researched. Regarding this, using convenience sampling method, a questionnaire was carried out in Afyonkarahisar by 660 state and private sector workers. Using structural equality modeling in the research, positive psychological capital and its sub-dimensions’ mediating model was tested with AMOS 25 and SPSS 25. As the findings of the research, partial mediating role of positive psychological capital on the effect of perceived organizational politics on organizational silence was detected. Regarding the mediating role of the sub-dimensions of positive psychological capital in reducing the negative effects of perceived organizational politics, partial mediating role of optimism and resilience sub-dimensions on organizational silence was detected. Thus, it is induced that the positive psychological capital that the workers have will partially reduce the negative effects of perceived organizational politics on organizational silence.    

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Perceived Organizational Politics,Organizational Silence,Positive Psychological Capital

Algılanan Örgütsel Politikanın Örgütsel Sessizlik Üzerindeki Etkisinde Pozitif Psikolojik Sermayenin Aracı Rolü

Öz

Bu çalışmada, algılanan örgütsel politikanın örgütsel sessizlik üzerindeki etkisinde pozitif psikolojik sermayenin ve alt boyutlarının aracı rolü araştırılmıştır. Bu kapsamda Afyonkarahisar’da kolayda örnekleme yöntemi ile 660 kamu ve özel sektör çalışanına anket uygulanmıştır. Çalışmada yapısal eşitlik modeli kullanılarak AMOS 25 ve SPSS 25 programları ile pozitif psikolojik sermaye ve alt boyutlarının aracılık modeli test edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda algılanan örgütsel politikanın örgütsel sessizlik üzerindeki etkisinde pozitif psikolojik sermayenin kısmi aracılık rolü tespit edilmiştir. Pozitif psikolojik sermayenin alt boyutlarının algılanan örgütsel politikanın olumsuz etkilerini azaltmaya yönelik aracı etkileri kapsamında iyimserlik ve dayanıklılık alt boyutlarının örgütsel sessizlik üzerinde kısmi aracı rolü tespit edilmiştir. Böylelikle çalışanların sahip oldukları pozitif psikolojik sermayenin, örgüte olumsuz etkileri olan algılanan örgütsel politikanın örgütsel sessizlik üzerindeki olumsuz etkilerini kısmen azalttığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Algılanan Örgütsel Politika,Örgütsel Sessizlik,Pozitif Psikolojik Sermaye

Kaynakça

1. Acaray, A. (2014). Örgüt kültürü, örgütsel sessizlik ve işten ayrılma niyeti arasındaki ilişkilerin incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Kocaeli: Kocaeli Üniversitesi SBE.
2. Adams, G. L., Ammeter, A. P., Treadway, D. C., Ferris, G. R., Hochwarter, W. A., & Kolodinsky, R. W. (2002). Perceptions of organizational politics: additional thoughts, reactions and multi-level issues. F.J. Yammarino ve F. Dansereau (Ed.). The Many Faces of Multi-level Issues içinde. İngiltere: Emerald Group Publishing, 2002, 287-294.
3. Aqmal, I. U., & Soewarno, N. (2018). The mediating impact of psychological capital and job relevant information on the influence of budget participation against job performance. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research. 11(6), 1-14.
4. Ay, D.A. (2014). Ulusal kültür, örgüt kültürü, örgütsel politika algısı ve sendika üyesi olma eğilimi ilişkisi. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Balıkesir: Balıkesir Üniversitesi SBE.
5. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 51(6), 1173-1182.
6. Bentley, J. R., Breland, J. W., Xu, N., Campion, E. D., & Treadway, D. C. (2015). The political skill and will of expatriates in acculturating to the politics of an organization in a new culture. International Journal of Intercultural Relations. (49), 343-353.
7. Bursalı, Y.M. (2008). Örgütsel politikanın işleyişi: örgütsel politika algısı ve politik davranış arasındaki ilişkiler. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi. İzmir: Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi SBE.
8. Çetin, F., & Basım, H.N. (2012), Örgütsel psikolojik sermaye: bir ölçek uyarlama çalışması. Amme İdare Dergisi. 45(1), 121-137.

9. Dağtekin, G. (2017). The Relationship between psychological capital and organizational silence: a research on telecommunications sector. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi SBE.
10. Donaldson, S.I., Dollwet, M., & Rao, M.A. (2015). Happiness, excellence and optimal human functioning revisited: examining the peer-reviewed literature linked to positive psychology. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 10(3), 185–195.
11. Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies. 40(6), 1359-1392.
12. Erkutlu, H., & Chafra, J. (2015). Empowering leadership and organizational job embeddedness: the moderating roles of task interdependence and organizational politics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. (210), 3-10.
13. Ferris, G.R., & Kacmar, K.M. (1992). Perception of organizational politics. Journal of Management. 18(1), 93-116.
14. Fuller, C. M., Simmering, M. J., Atinc, G., Atinc, Y., & Babin, B. J. (2016). Common methods variance detection in business research. Journal of Business Research. 69(8), 3192-3198.
15. Gull, S., & Zaidi, A. A. (2012). Impact of organizational politics on employees’ job satisfaction in the health sector of lahore Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business. 4(2). 156-170.
16. Gupta, V., & Singh, S. (2014). Psychological capital as a mediator of the relationship between leadership and creative performance behaviors: empirical evidence from the Indian R&D sector. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 25(10), 1373-1394.
17. Gürbüz, S., & Şahin, F. (2015). Sosyal Bilimlerde Araştırma Yöntemleri Felsefe-Yöntem-Analiz. 2. Baskı. Ankara: Seçkin Yayınevi.
18. Kacmar, K. M., & Ferris, G. R. (1991). Perceptions of organizational politics scale (POPS): development and construct validation. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 51, 193–205.
19. Kacmar, K.M., & Carlson, D.S. (1997). Further validation of the perceptions of politics scale (POPS): a multiple sample investigation. Journal of Management. 23(5), 627-658.
20. Karacaoğlu, K., & Cingöz, A. (2009). İşgören sessizliğinin kaynağı olarak liderlik davranışı ve örgütsel adalet algısı. 17. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı. Eskişehir: Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi, 700-707.
21. Khalid, J., & Ahmed, J. (2016). Perceived organizational politics and employee silence: supervisor trust as a moderator. Journal of The Asia Pacific Economy. 21(2), 174-195.
22. Khan, A., & Hussain, N. (2016). The analysis of the perception of organizational politics among university faculty. Pakistan Business Review. 18(2), 451-467.
23. Koçel, T. (2010). İşletme Yöneticiliği. 12.Baskı. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
24. Larson, M., & Luthans, F. (2006). Potential added value of psychological capital in predicting work attitudes. Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies. 13(1), 45-62.
25. Li, X., Kan, D., Liu, L., Shi, M., Wang, Y., Yang, X., vd. (2015). The mediating role of psychological capital on the association between occupational stress and job burnout among bank employees in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(3), 2984-3001.
26. Liang, T., & Wang, Y. (2016). Organizational silence in state-owned enterprises: intermediary role of the perceptions of organizational politics. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management. 6(05), 640-648.
27. Lind, E. A., & Van den Bos, K. (2002). When fairness works: toward a general theory of uncertainty management. Research In Organizational Behavior. (24), 181-223.
28. Luthans, F., & Youssef, C.M. (2004). Human, social, and now positive psychological capital management: investing in people for competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics. 33(2), 143-160.
29. Luthans, F., Youssef, C.M., & Avolio, B.J. (2007). Psychological Capital: Developing The Human Competitive Edge. USA: Oxford University Press.
30. Luthans, F., Avolio, B.J, Avey, J.B., & Norman, S.M. (2007). Positive psychological capital: measurement and relationship with performance and satisfaction. Personnel Psychology. (60), 541–572.
31. Luthans, F., Norman, S.M., Avolio, B.J., & Avey, J.B. (2008). The mediating role of psychological capital in the supportive organizational climate-employee performance relationship. Journal of Organizational Behavior. (29), 219-238.
32. Luthans, F., & Avolio, B.J. (2009). The‘‘point’’ of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior. (30), 291-307.
33. Mayes, B. T., & Allen, R. W. (1977). Toward a definition of organizational politics. Academy of Management Review. 2(4), 672-678.
34. Meydan, C.H., & Şeşen, H. (2015). Yapısal Eşitlik Modellemesi AMOS Uygulamaları. 2. Baskı. Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
35. Miller, B. K., Byrne, Z. S., Rutherford, M. A., & Hansen, A. M. (2009). Perceptions of organizational politics: a demonstration of the reliability generalization technique. Journal of Managerial Issues. 21(2), 280-300.
36. Mintzberg, H. (1985). The organization as political arena. Journal of Management Studies. 22(2), 133-154.
37. Morgan, G. (1998). Yönetim ve Örgüt Teorilerinde Metafor. İstanbul: MESS Yayın No:280.
38. Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 1(1), 173-197.
39. Nikpay, I., Farahbakhsh, S., & Zandkarimi, M. (2017). The role of psychology capital in reducing organizational silence of teachers in Khorramabad city. Journal of Scholl Psychology. 6(1), 132-160.
40. Oruç, E., & Kutanis, R.Ö. (2015). Pozitif psikolojik sermayenin örgüt içi politik davranışlara etkisi: akademisyenler üzerine etkisi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi. 7(3), 36-58.
41. Pinder, C. C., & Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management içinde. İngiltere: Emerald Group Publishing, 2001, 331-369.
42. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology. 88(5), 879-903.
43. SGK. (2018). Aylık İstatistik Bilgileri. Erişim Adresi: http://www.sgk.gov.tr/wps/portal/ sgk/tr/kurumsal/istatistik/aylik_istatistik_bilgileri. Erişim Tarihi: 29 Aralık 2018.
44. Snyder, C. R., Irving, L., & Anderson, J. R. (1991). Hope and health: measuring the will and the ways. C.R. Snyder ve D.R. Forsyth (Ed.). Handbook of Social and Clinical Psychology: The Health Perspective içinde. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon, 1991, 285-305.
45. Stajkovic, A.D., & Luthans, F. (1998). Social cognitive theory and self-efficacy: going beyond traditional motivational and behavioral approaches. Organizational Dynamics. (26), 62-74.
46. Tokmak, M.(2018). Kişilik özelliklerinin örgütsel sessizlik üzerindeki etkisine yönelik bir araştırma: banka çalışanları örneği, Hitit Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 11(3), 2219-2233.
47. TÜİK. (2019). Nüfus İstatistikleri. Erişim Adresi: http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod= temelist. Erişim Tarihi: 11 Şubat 2019.
48. Vigoda, E. (2000). Organizational politics, job attitudes, and work outcomes: exploration and implications for the public sector. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 57(3), 326-347.
49. Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Talmud, I. (2010). Organizational politics and job outcomes: the moderating effect of trust and social support. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 40(11), 2829-2861.
50. Wang, Y., Chang, Y., Fu, J., & Wang, L. (2012). Work-family conflict and burnout among Chinese female nurses: the mediating effect of psychological capital. BMC Public Health, 12(1), 915.
51. Yu, Y., & Liu, Q. (2016). The effect of psychological capital and organizational support on innovational behavior and silence behavior of technical innovation personnel in strategic emerging industry. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management. 6(06), 732-740.