Yapay Zeka Çağında Öğretmen Mutluluğu

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 4 Sayı: 1, 53 - 80, 27.06.2025

Mustafa Fidan

https://doi.org/10.58650/educatione.1523304

Öz

Bu makale yapay zeka (YZ) ve öğretmenlik mesleği arasındaki ilişkiyi tartışmaktadır. Yapay zeka (YZ), makinelerin insan benzeri zeka sergileme yeteneğidir ve eğitim, öğretim ve öğrenme de dahil olmak üzere çeşitli uygulamaları vardır. YZ, sınırlı kaynaklarla durumlara uyum sağlayan ve insan zekasını taklit etmeyi amaçlayan akıllı makineler oluşturmayı içerir. Bilgisayarla görme, konuşma tanıma, makine öğrenimi, büyük veri ve doğal dil işleme gibi teknolojileri kapsar. Öğretmenlik mesleği, örgün eğitim yoluyla başkalarını etkilemeyi ve eğitmeyi ve etik standartlara bağlı kalmayı içerir. Etkili öğretmenler toplumsal ortak amaç ile değişim ajansı becerilerini birleştirir ve mesleki bilgi ve öğretim planlaması gibi niteliklere sahiptir. Öğrencilere ilham veren rol modellerdir. Birçok kişi yapay zekanın insan öğretmenlerin yerini alacağından korkarken, makale yapay zekanın eğitime getirdiği fırsatları vurguluyor. Dijital çağın öğretim üzerindeki etkilerini ve öğretmenlerin bu değişikliklere nasıl uyum sağlayabileceğini araştırıyor. İnceleme, YZ'nin etkili bir şekilde kullanılmasında öğretmen eğitiminin, bilgisinin ve yeterliliklerinin önemini vurgulamaktadır. Ayrıca, öğretmenlerin dijital becerilere sahip olması ve sınıfta teknolojiyi kullanması gerektiğinin de altını çiziyor. Makale, öğrenci çeşitliliği, öğrenme yöntemleri, öğretmen eğitimi ve öğretmenlerin YZ'nin pedagojik katkılarını anlama ihtiyacı dahil olmak üzere dijital çağın getirdiği değişiklikleri kabul etmektedir. Makale, öğretmenleri desteklemek için eğitim programları, sürekli destek, esnek öğretim stratejileri, işbirliği, destek sistemleri ve öz liderliğin önemini önermektedir. Genel olarak makale, YZ'nin öğretim üzerindeki olumlu etkisini, öğretmenlerin öğrenci gelişimini teşvik etmedeki önemini ve dolayısıyla öğretmen mutluluğunu vurgulamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yapay zeka , öğretmenlik mesleği , mutluluk , değişim

Teacher Happiness in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Öz

This article examines the possible relationships between the teaching profession and artificial intelligence. We are experiencing an era in which artificial intelligence technologies that can exhibit teacher-like or learner-like intelligence are important applications in education. The effects of the transformation brought by the age of artificial intelligence in the education process and the role of teachers were examined in this study using the literature review method. Leaving aside the concerns of whether artificial intelligence is replacing teachers in society; it is aimed to highlight the opportunities that artificial intelligence has brought. In this context, artificial intelligence has threats as well as opportunities for the teaching profession. According to the research findings, the pedagogical contributions of artificial intelligence tools and digital literacy skills have come to the fore in the pre-service and in-service continuous education planning of teachers. In addition, it is seen that teachers who can adapt to change, are flexible, agile and have high self-leadership capacity; and can manage themselves, their classes and artificial intelligence tools can come to the fore. In line with these results, it is recommended that teachers be strengthened with in-service support and pre-service teacher candidates be equipped with skills appropriate to the era. As in all situations of change and uncertainty, ensuring teacher effectiveness in the face of technological developments will indirectly contribute to the maintenance of teacher happiness. In an education system prepared according to these predictions, it can be said that artificial intelligence can be seen as a supportive, complementary component rather than a threat.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Artificial intelligence , teaching profession , happiness , change

Kaynakça

• Alam, A. (2021, December). Should robots replace teachers? Mobilisation of AI and learning analytics in education. In 2021 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication, and Control (ICAC3) (pp. 1–12). IEEE.
• Altan, M. Z., & Özmusul, M. (2022). Geleceğin Türkiye’sinde öğretmen refahı: Öğretmenlik Meslek Kanununun kayıp parçası. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 24–42.
• Annuš, N. (2024). Education in the age of artificial intelligence. TEM Journal, 13(1), 404–413. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1222918
• Arnon, S., & Reichel, N. (2007). Who is the ideal teacher? Am I? Similarity and difference in perception of students of education regarding the qualities of a good teacher and of their own qualities as teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(5), 441–464.
• Ayers, W. (2015). To teach: The journey of a teacher. Teachers College Press.
• Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2017). Job demands–resources theory: Taking stock and looking forward. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 273–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000056
• Barnard, C. I. (1938). The functions of the executive. Harvard University press.
• Bates, A. W. (2015). Teaching in a digital age: Guidelines for designing teaching and learning. BCcampus.
• Beltman, S., Mansfield, C., & Price, A. (2011). Thriving not just surviving: A review of research on teacher resilience. Educational Research Review, 6(3), 185–207.
• Beteille, T., Ding, E., Molina, E., Pushparatnam, A., & Wilichowski, T. (2020). Three principles to support teacher effectiveness during COVID-19. https://doi.org/10.1596/33775
• Brocke, J. V., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Reimer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. ECIS 2009 Proceedings, 161. https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2009/161
• Brunetti, G. J. (2006). Resilience under fire: Perspectives on the work of experienced, inner-city high school teachers in the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(7), 812–825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.027
• Brusilovsky, P., & Peylo, C. (2003). Adaptive and intelligent web-based educational systems. International journal of artificial intelligence in education, 13(2-4), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.3233/IRG-2003-13(2-
• Caena, F., & Redecker, C. (2019). Aligning teacher competence frameworks to 21st century challenges: The case for the European Digital Competence Framework for Educators (Digcompedu). European Journal of Education, 54(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12345
• Celik, I. (2023). Towards Intelligent-TPACK: An empirical study on teachers’ professional knowledge to ethically integrate artificial intelligence (AI)-based tools into education. Computers in Human Behavior, 138, 107468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107468
• Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., et al. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66, 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00715-y
• Chen, X., Xie, H., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). A multi-perspective study on artificial intelligence in education: Grants, conferences, journals, software tools, institutions, and researchers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100005
• Chiu, T. K., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
• Chocarro, R., Cortiñas, M., & Marcos-Matás, G. (2021). Teachers’ attitudes towards chatbots in education: a technology acceptance model approach considering the effect of social language, bot proactiveness, and users’ characteristics. Educational Studies, 49(2), 295–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1850426
• Cooper, H. M. (1988). Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews. Knowledge in Society, 1, 104–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03177550
• Copper, J. M., & Semich, G. W. (2019). Professional development in the twenty-first century: YouTube teacher training and professional development. In Advanced Online Education and Training Technologies (pp. 185–199). IGI Global.
• Crawford-Ferre, H. G., & Wiest, L. R. (2012). Effective online instruction in higher education. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 11–18.
• Çelikten, M., Şanal, M., & Yeni, Y. (2005). Öğretmenlik mesleği ve özellikleri. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 207–237.
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (Eds.). (2007). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. John Wiley & Sons.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "what" and "why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
• Denyer, D., & Tranfield, D. (2009). Producing a systematic review. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 671–689). Sage Publications.
• Diener, E., & Ryan, K. (2009). Subjective well-being: A general overview. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(4), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/008124630903900402
• Easterlin, R. A. (2003). Explaining happiness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11176-11183. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1633144100
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers & Education, 59(2), 423–435.
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., & York, C. S. (2006). Exemplary technology-using teachers: Perceptions of factors influencing success. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 23(2), 55–61.
• Faulkner, J., & Latham, G. (2016). Adventurous lives: Teacher qualities for 21st century learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 41(4), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.996253204212249
• Fidan, M. (2018). Yenilenen öz-liderlik ölçeğini üniversite öğrencileri örnekleminde Türkçeye uyarlama çalışması. Uluslararası Liderlik Eğitimi Dergisi (ULED), 2(2), 1–16.
• Fidan, M. (2020). COVID-19 belirsizliğinde eğitim: İlkokulda zorunlu uzaktan eğitime ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Uşak Üniversitesi Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 6(2), 24–43. https://doi.org/10.29065/usakead.736643
• Fidan, M. (2021). COVID-19 pandemisinde öğretmenlik. Maarif Mektepleri Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.46762/mamulebd.789097
• Fidan, M. (2022). Pedagogical agility in Turkey: Teachers agility in educational change and uncertainty days based on parents’ views. Yıldız Journal of Educational Research, 7(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.14744/yjer.2022.004
• Fisher, C. D. (2010). Happiness at work. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 384–412. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00270.x
• Fullan, M. G. (1993). Why teachers must become change agents. Educational Leadership, 50, 12–12. ERIC - EJ459419
• Galés, N. L., & Gallon, R. (2019). Educational agility. In Rethinking teacher education for the 21st century: Trends, challenges and new directions (pp. 98–111).
• Ghamrawi, N., Shal, T., & Ghamrawi, N. A. (2024). Exploring the impact of AI on teacher leadership: Regressing or expanding? Education and Information Technologies, 29(7), 8415–8433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12174-w
• Gocen, A., & Aydemir, F. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education and schools. Research on Education and Media, 12(1), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.2478/rem-2020-0003
• Goldberg, E. R., & Lannoye-Hall, C. (2023). Adapting learning materials for the digital age: Teacher education during emergency remote learning. In Handbook of Research on Advancing Teaching and Teacher Education in the Context of a Virtual Age (pp. 176–202). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-8407-4.ch009
• Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09336671
• Güler, N. (2020). Preparing to teach English language learners: Effect of online courses in changing mainstream teachers’ perceptions of English language learners. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 14(1), 83–96.
• Hanushek, E. A. (2011). The economic value of higher teacher quality. Economics of Education Review, 30(3), 466–479.
• Havighurst, R. J. (2023). Teaching. In Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/teaching Helliwell, J. F., Layard, R., Sachs, J., & De Neve, J. E. (2020). World Happiness Report 2020. Sustainable Development Solutions Network. https://happiness-report.s3.amazonaws.com/2020/WHR20.pdf
• Holmes, W. (2023). The unintended consequences of artificial intelligence and education. Education International: Brussels, Belgium. Retrieved from https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10179267/
• Hutchison, K., Paatsch, L., & Cloonan, A. (2020). Reshaping home–school connections in the digital age: Challenges for teachers and parents. E-Learning and Digital Media, 17(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753019899527
• Kilag, O. K., Miñoza, J., Comighud, E., Amontos, C., Damos, M., & Abendan, C. F. (2023). Empowering teachers: Integrating technology into livelihood education for a digital future. Excellencia: International Multi-Disciplinary Journal of Education, 1(1), 30–41. https://multijournals.org/index.php/excellencia-imje/article/view/3
• Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching, 23(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523
• Korthagen, F. A. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: Towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
• Levin, T., & Wadmany, R. (2006). Teachers’ beliefs and practices in technology-based classrooms: A developmental view. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39(2), 157–181.
• Long, D., & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
• Luckin, R., Holmes, W., Griffiths, M., & Forcier, L. B. (2016). Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. Pearson.
• Manisha, B. (2023). A step-by-step guide to writing a scientific review article. Journal of Breast Imaging, 5(4), 480–485. https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbad028
• Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. (1980). Self-management as a substitute for leadership: A social learning perspective. Academy of Management Review, 5(3), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1980.4288845
• Masten, A. S., Best, K. M., & Garmezy, N. (1990). Resilience and development: Contributions from the study of children who overcome adversity. Development and Psychopathology, 2(4), 425–444.
• McCarthy, J. (2007). From here to human-level AI. Artificial Intelligence, 171(18), 1174–1182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artint.2007.10.009
• McKnight, K., O’Malley, K., Ruzic, R., Horsley, M. K., Franey, J. J., & Bassett, K. (2016). Teaching in a digital age: How educators use technology to improve student learning. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 48(3), 194–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2016.1175856
• Neck, C. P., & Houghton, J. D. (2006). Two decades of self‐leadership theory and research: Past developments, present trends, and future possibilities. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(4), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610663097
• Neck, C. P., Manz, C. C., & Houghton, J. D. (2019). Self-leadership: The definitive guide to personal excellence. Sage Publications.
• Oke, A., & Fernandes, F. A. P. (2020). Innovations in teaching and learning: Exploring the perceptions of the education sector on the 4th industrial revolution (4IR). Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6020031
• Oswald, M., Johnson, B., & Howard, S. (2003). Quantifying and evaluating resilience-promoting factors: Teachers’ beliefs and perceived roles. Research in Education, 70(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.70.5
• Patterson, J. H., Collins, L., & Abbott, G. (2004). A study of teacher resilience in urban schools. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 31(1), 3–11. ERIC - EJ774036
• Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
• Rich, P. J., & Hannafin, M. (2009). Video annotation tools: Technologies to scaffold, structure, and transform teacher reflection. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 52–67.
• Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). Conducting a literature review. Management Research News, 27(6), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409170410784185
• Seferoğlu, S. S. (2004). Öğretmen yeterlilikleri ve mesleki gelişim. Bilim ve Aklın Aydınlığında Eğitim, 58, 40–45.
• Sheppard, J. M., & Young, W. B. (2006). Agility literature review: Classifications, training and testing. Journal of Sports Sciences, 24(9), 919–932. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640410500457109
• Stronge, J. H. (2018). Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD. https://vulms.vu.edu.pk/Courses/EDU433/Downloads/Lecture%203.pdf
• Sullivan, F., Hillaire, G., Larke, L., & Reich, J. (2020). Using Teacher Moments during the COVID-19 pivot. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 303–313.
• Sutton, R. S. (2020). John McCarthy’s definition of intelligence. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 11(2), 66–67. https://doi.org/10.2478/jagi-2020-0007
• Tait, M. (2008). Resilience as a contributor to novice teacher success, commitment, and retention. Teacher Education Quarterly, 35(4), 57–75. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23479174
• Tarafdar, M., Pullins, E. B., & Ragu-Nathan, T. S. (2019). Technostress: Negative effect on performance and possible mitigations. Information Systems Journal, 29(1), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12113
• Veenhoven, R. (2023). Happiness. In: Maggino, F. (eds) Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_1224
• Verganti, R., Vendraminelli, L., & Iansiti, M. (2020). Innovation and design in the age of artificial intelligence. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 37(3), 212–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12523
• Wang, Y. (2021). Artificial intelligence in educational leadership: A symbiotic role of human-artificial intelligence decision-making. Journal of Educational Administration, 59(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-10-2020-0216
• Wenner, J. A., & Campbell, T. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134–171. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478
• Yilmaz, R., & Yilmaz, F. G. K. (2023). The effect of generative artificial intelligence (AI)-based tool use on students’ computational thinking skills, programming self-efficacy and motivation. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100147
• Yolcu, H. (2024). Yapay genel zekâ çağında öğretmen rolünün yeniden tanımlanması: Öngörüler. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi, 10(1), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.51948/auad.1383166
• York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we know about teacher leadership? Findings from two decades of scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255
• Young, M., & Muller, J. (2010). Three educational scenarios for the future: Lessons from the sociology of knowledge. European Journal of Education, 45(1), 11–27.
• Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
• Zehm, S. J., & Kottler, J. A. (1993). On being a teacher: The human dimension. Corwin Press.
• Zhao, Y., & Watterston, J. (2021). The changes we need: Education post COVID-19. Journal of Educational Change, 22(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09417-3