Bibliometric Analysis of International Collaborations in Post-Earthquake Cultural Heritage Management: 2010-2025

Öz

This study conducts a bibliometric analysis of international collaborations in post-earthquake cultural heritage management from 2010 to 2025. A total of 2780 documents retrieved from Web of Science and Scopus databases were analyzed using R programming language and the Bibliometrix package. The research aims to systematically evaluate scientific productivity patterns, collaboration networks, research trends, and the intellectual structure of the field. The findings reveal that the field is a rapidly developing and dynamic research area with an annual growth rate of 11.01%. A significant increase in the number of publications has been observed particularly after 2020, reflecting the impact of major global earthquakes on academic interest. The international co-authorship rate was determined as 20.58% with an average of 4.15 co-authors per document. These data confirm the interdisciplinary and internationally collaborative nature of the field. Among the most influential publication sources, "International Journal of Architectural Heritage" and "Journal of Cultural Heritage" stand out with h-indices of 28. In terms of countries, Italy leads with 811 total citations, while the United Kingdom shows the highest performance in terms of quality with 32.4 average article citations. Lourenco P was identified as the most influential researcher in the field with an h-index of 15 and 983 total citations. Thematic analysis results reveal that the field develops around two main axes: "seismic vulnerability and conservation" and "earthquake and cultural heritage." Keyword network analysis shows that the concept of "vulnerability" serves as a bridge between different disciplines with a betweenness centrality of 185.60. Study results emphasize the increasing importance of remote sensing, 3D documentation, and artificial intelligence technologies, providing important insights for future research directions. The findings provide strategic guidance for policymakers regarding strengthening collaboration mechanisms and optimizing resource allocation.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Cultural Heritage
• Earthquake
• International Collaboration
• Bibliometric Analysis
• Disaster Management

Deprem Sonrası Kültürel Miras Yönetiminde Uluslararası İşbirliklerinin Bibliometrik Analizi: 2010-2025

Öz

Bu çalışma, 2010-2025 döneminde deprem sonrası kültürel miras yönetiminde uluslararası iş birliklerinin bibliometrik analizini gerçekleştirmektedir. Web of Science ve Scopus veri tabanlarından elde edilen 2780 belge, R programlama dili ve Bibliometrix paketi kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma, alandaki bilimsel üretkenlik kalıpları, iş birliği ağları, araştırma eğilimleri ve entelektüel yapının sistematik değerlendirmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bulgular, alanın %11,01'lik yıllık büyüme oranıyla hızla gelişen dinamik bir araştırma sahası olduğunu göstermektedir. Özellikle 2020 sonrası dönemde yayın sayılarında belirgin artış gözlemlenmekte olup bu durum küresel ölçekteki büyük depremlerin akademik ilgi üzerindeki etkisini yansıtmaktadır. Uluslararası ortak yazarlık oranı %20,58 olarak tespit edilmiş ve doküman başına ortalama 4,15 ortak yazar bulunmuştur. Bu veriler, alanın disiplinler arası ve uluslararası iş birliğine dayalı yapısını doğrulamaktadır. En etkili yayın kaynakları arasında "International Journal of Architectural Heritage" ve "Journal of Cultural Heritage" dergileri 28'lik h-indeksleriyle öne çıkmaktadır. Ülkeler açısından İtalya 811 toplam atıf ile liderlik konumunda bulunurken, Birleşik Krallık 32,4 ortalama makale atıfı ile nitelik açısından en yüksek performansı göstermektedir. Lourenco P, 15 h-indeksi ve 983 toplam atıf ile alanın en etkili araştırmacısı olarak tespit edilmiştir. Tematik analiz sonuçları, alanın "sismik kırılganlık ve koruma" ile "deprem ve kültürel miras" olmak üzere iki ana eksen etrafında geliştiğini ortaya koymaktadır. Anahtar kelime ağ analizi, "kırılganlık" kavramının 185,60 arasındalık merkezîliği ile farklı disiplinler arasında köprü görevi gördüğünü göstermektedir. Çalışma sonuçları, uzaktan algılama, 3D dokümantasyon ve yapay zekâ teknolojilerinin artan önemini vurgulamakta ve gelecekteki araştırma yönleri için önemli öngörüler sunmaktadır. Bulgular, politika yapıcılar için iş birliği mekanizmalarının güçlendirilmesi ve kaynak tahsisinin optimize edilmesi konularında stratejik rehberlik sağlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Kültürel Miras
• Deprem
• Uluslararası İş Birliği
• Bibliyometrik Analiz
• Afet Yönetimi

Kaynakça

1. Anastasopoulos, I., Gazetas, G., Loli, M., Apostolou, M., ve Gerolymos, N. (2010). Soil failure can be used for seismic protection of structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 8(2), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9145-2
2. Aria, M., ve Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of informetrics, 11(4), 959-975.
3. Avrami, E. (2010). Preserving Haiti’s Gingerbread Houses: 2010 Earthquake Mission Report. https://openarchive.icomos.org/id/eprint/2107/
4. Borri, A., Corradi, M., Castori, G., ve De Maria, A. (2015). A method for the analysis and classification of historic masonry. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(9), 2647-2665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9731-4
5. Boyoğlu, C. S., Chike, I., Caspari, G., ve Balz, T. (2023). Assessing the Impact of the 2023 Kahramanmaras Earthquake on Cultural Heritage Sites Using High-Resolution SAR Images. Heritage, 6(10), 6669-6690. https://doi.org/10.3390/heritage6100349
6. Champion, E., ve Rahaman, H. (2020). Survey of 3D digital heritage repositories and platforms. Virtual Archaeology Review, 11(23), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2020.13226
7. Commission, E., for Education Youth, S., ve Culture. (2022). Strengthening cultural heritage resilience for climate change – Where the European Green Deal meets cultural heritage. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/doi/10.2766/44688
8. DesRoches, R., Comerio, M., Eberhard, M., Mooney, W., ve Rix, G. J. (2011). Overview of the 2010 Haiti earthquake. Içinde Earthquake Spectra (C. 27, Sayı SUPPL. 1). Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3630129

9. Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., ve Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133, 285-296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070
10. Ersoz, A. B., Pekcan, O., Altun, M., Teke, T., ve Aydogmus, O. (2024). Utilizing digital technologies for rapid damage assessment and reconnaissance: the February 6, 2023 Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01925-w
11. Eze, E., ve Siegmund, A. (2024). Next-generation core competency gaps for disaster risk management and preparedness in UNESCO-designated heritage sites. Sustainable Futures, 8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100239
12. Freddi, F., Galasso, C., Cremen, G., Dall’Asta, A., Di Sarno, L., Giaralis, A., Gutiérrez-Urzúa, F., Málaga-Chuquitaype, C., Mitoulis, S. A., Petrone, C., Sextos, A., Sousa, L., Tarbali, K., Tubaldi, E., Wardman, J., ve Woo, G. (2021). Innovations in earthquake risk reduction for resilience: Recent advances and challenges. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102267
13. Gambilongo, L., Chieffo, N., ve Lourenço, P. B. (2024). A comprehensive approach to assess the seismic vulnerability of archaeological sites: the Wupatki Pueblo in Arizona. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 22(9), 4413-4445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-024-01942-9
14. Gara, F., Nicoletti, V., Arezzo, D., Cipriani, L., ve Leoni, G. (2023). Model Updating of Cultural Heritage Buildings Through Swarm Intelligence Algorithms. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2023.2277324
15. Gokceoglu, C. (2023). 6 FEBRUARY 2023 KAHRAMANMARAŞ – TÜRKİYE EARTHQUAKES: A GENERAL OVERVIEW. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XLVIII-M-1-2023, 417-424. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-xlviii-m-1-2023-417-2023
16. Gröger, G., ve Plümer, L. (2012). CityGML - Interoperable semantic 3D city models. Içinde ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (C. 71, ss. 12-33). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2012.04.004
17. Hartmann, R. (2014). Dark tourism, thanatourism, and dissonance in heritage tourism management: New directions in contemporary tourism research. Journal of Heritage Tourism, 9(2), 166-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743873X.2013.807266
18. ICCROM. (2023). Emergency response. https://www.iccrom.org/what-we-do/programmes/first-aid-and-resilience-cultural-heritage-times-crisis-far/emergency
19. International Search and Rescue Advisory Group. (2023). Urban Search and Rescue at Heritage Sites Guidance Note Urban Search and Rescue at Heritage Sites Urban Search and Rescue at Heritage Sites.
20. Jokilehto, J. (2000). Iccrom’s involvement in risk preparedness. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 39(1), 173-179. https://doi.org/10.1179/019713600806113275
21. Kafa Duran, E., ve Köşklük Kaya, N. (2020). Arkeolojik Alanlarda Uygulanan Bütünleme (Tamamlama) Müdahalelerinin Değerlendirilmesi: Metropolis Örneği. SDU FACULTY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES JOURNAL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, 50, 255-274.
22. Kahya, V., Genç, A. F., Sunca, F., Roudane, B., Altunişik, A. C., Yilmaz, S., Günaydin, M., Dok, G., Kirtel, O., Demir, A., Aykanat, B., Arslan, M. E., Saribiyik, A., Aydin, F., Aslan, B., Sezdirmez, T., Tatar, T., Emiroğlu, M., Atmaca, B., … Akgül, T. (2024). Evaluation of earthquake-related damages on masonry structures due to the 6 February 2023 Kahramanmaraş-Türkiye earthquakes: A case study for Hatay Governorship Building. Engineering Failure Analysis, 156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107855
23. Kilic, G. (2023). Assessment of historic buildings after an earthquake using various advanced techniques. Structures, 50, 538-560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.02.033
24. Kocaman, İ. (2023). The effect of the Kahramanmaraş earthquakes (Mw 7.7 and Mw 7.6) on historical masonry mosques and minarets. Engineering Failure Analysis, 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107225
25. Lagomarsino, S., ve Cattari, S. (2015). PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 13(1), 13-47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-014-9674-1
26. Lagomarsino, S., ve Podestà, S. (2004). Damage and vulnerability assessment of churches after the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthquake Spectra, 20(SPEC. 1). https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1767161
27. Li, Y., Du, Y., Yang, M., Liang, J., Bai, H., Li, R., ve Law, A. (2023). A review of the tools and techniques used in the digital preservation of architectural heritage within disaster cycles. Içinde Heritage Science (C. 11, Sayı 1). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40494-023-01035-x
28. Minos-Minopoulos, D., Dominey-Howes, D., ve Pavlopoulos, K. (2017). Vulnerability assessment of archaeological sites to earthquake hazard: An indicator based method integrating spatial and temporal aspects. Annals of Geophysics, 60(4). https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-7157
29. Murthy, M. (2013). HERITAGE AND RESILIENCE Issues and Opportunities for Reducing Disaster Risks. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327906144
30. Newman, J. P. (2020). Resilient Cultural Heritage: Learning from the Japanese Experience. World Bank Group. United States of America. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/ps57tw
31. Okamura, K., Fujisawa, A., Kondo, Y., Fujimoto, Y., Uozu, T., Ogawa, Y., Kaner, S., ve Mizoguchi, K. (2013). The Great East Japan Earthquake and cultural heritage: towards an archaeology of disaster. Antiquity, 87(335), 258-269.
32. Onescu, I., Lo Monaco, A., Grillanda, N., Mosoarca, M., D’Amato, M., Formisano, A., Milani, G., Clementi, F., ve Fofiu, M. (2024). Simplified Vulnerability Assessment of Historical Churches in Banat Seismic Region, Romania. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2024.2341054
33. Orr, S. A., Richards, J., ve Fatorić, S. (2021). Climate Change and Cultural Heritage: A Systematic Literature Review (2016–2020). Historic Environment: Policy and Practice, 12(3-4), 434-477. https://doi.org/10.1080/17567505.2021.1957264
34. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. Içinde The BMJ (C. 372). BMJ Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
35. Pallarés, F. J., Betti, M., Bartoli, G., ve Pallarés, L. (2021). Structural health monitoring (SHM) and Nondestructive testing (NDT) of slender masonry structures: A practical review. Construction and Building Materials, 297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123768
36. Parisi, F., Iovinella, I., Balsamo, A., Augenti, N., ve Prota, A. (2013). In-plane behaviour of tuff masonry strengthened with inorganic matrix-grid composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 45(1), 1657-1666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.09.068
37. Pinto, A. D. (2010). Denaturalizing “natural” disasters: Haiti’s earthquake and the humanitarian impulse. Open medicine, 4(4), e193-6. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21687340
38. Ramos, L. F., Marques, L., Lourenço, P. B., De Roeck, G., Campos-Costa, A., ve Roque, J. (2010). Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: Two case studies. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 24(5), 1291-1305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.01.011
39. Remondino, F., ve Rizzi, A. (2010). Reality-based 3D documentation of natural and cultural heritage sites-techniques, problems, and examples. Içinde Applied Geomatics (C. 2, Sayı 3, ss. 85-100). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-010-0025-x
40. Roca, P., Lourenço, P. B., ve Gaetani, A. (2019). Historic Construction and Conservation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429052767
41. Saisi, A., Gentile, C., ve Guidobaldi, M. (2015). Post-earthquake continuous dynamic monitoring of the Gabbia Tower in Mantua, Italy. Construction and Building Materials, 81, 101-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.02.010
42. Schaal, K., ve Evrensel, A. (2025). From Disaster Recovery to Saving Cultural Heritage: IAEA Boosts Assistance to Countries in Non-Destructive Testing. https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/news/from-disaster-recovery-to-saving-cultural-heritage-iaea-boosts-assistance-to-countries-in-non-destructive-testing
43. Sesana, E., Gagnon, A. S., Ciantelli, C., Cassar, J. A., ve Hughes, J. J. (2021). Climate change impacts on cultural heritage: A literature review. Içinde Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change (C. 12, Sayı 4). John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.710
44. Shrestha, S., Shrestha, B., Shakya, M., ve Maskey, P. N. (2017). Damage assessment of cultural heritage structures after the 2015 Gorkha, Nepal, earthquake: A case study of jagannath temple. Içinde Earthquake Spectra (C. 33, Sayı Special issue 1, ss. S363-S376). Earthquake Engineering Research Institute. https://doi.org/10.1193/121616EQS241M
45. Skublewska-Paszkowska, M., Powroznik, P., Smolka, J., Milosz, M., Lukasik, E., Mukhamedova, D., ve Milosz, E. (2021). Methodology of 3D scanning of intangible cultural heritage—The example of lazgi dance. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(23). https://doi.org/10.3390/app112311568
46. Soulakellis, N., Vasilakos, C., Chatzistamatis, S., Kavroudakis, D., Tataris, G., Papadopoulou, E.-E., Papakonstantinou, A., Roussou, O., ve Kontos, T. (2020). Post-Earthquake Recovery Phase Monitoring and Mapping Based on UAS Data. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(7), 447. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9070447
47. Soyukaya, N., Can, P., ve Açıkyıldız, B. (2023). DİYARBAKIR KALESİ VE BAZI KÜLTÜR VARLIKLARININ DEPREM SONRASI HASAR TESPİT ÇALIŞMASI. https://www.dkvd.org/public/uploads/files/D%C4%B0YARBAKIR_KALES%C4%B0_VE_D%C4%B0%C4%9EER_K%C3%9CLT%C3%9CR_VARLIKLARI%20_DEPREM_SONRASI_HASAR_TESP%C4%B0T%C4%B0_compressed%281%29.pdf
48. UNESCO. (1972). Convention concerning the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://whc.unesco.org/archive/convention-en.pdf
49. UNESCO. (2010). Managing disaster risks for world heritage. UNESCO.
50. Varolgüneş, S. (2025). A bibliometric analysis of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş Earthquakes: trends, gaps, and policy implications. Içinde Natural Hazards. Springer Science and Business Media B.V. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-025-07305-0
51. Yu, X., Hu, X., Song, Y., Xu, S., Li, X., Song, X., Fan, X., ve Wang, F. (2024). Intelligent assessment of building damage of 2023 Turkey-Syria Earthquake by multiple remote sensing approaches. npj Natural Hazards, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s44304-024-00003-0
52. Yu, Y., Raed, A. A., Peng, Y., Pottgiesser, U., Verbree, E., ve van Oosterom, P. (2025). How digital technologies have been applied for architectural heritage risk management: a systemic literature review from 2014 to 2024. npj Heritage Science, 13(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.1038/s40494-025-01558-5
53. Zonta, D., Pozzi, M., ve Zanon, P. (2008). Managing the historical heritage using distributed technologies. International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 2(3), 200-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15583050802063691
54. Zupic, I., ve Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429-472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629