Araştırma Makalesi

The effects of differentiated instruction on Turkish students’ L2 achievement, and student and teacher perceptions

Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2 31 Temmuz 2020
  • Ahmet Cihat Yavuz
PDF İndir
EN

The effects of differentiated instruction on Turkish students’ L2 achievement, and student and teacher perceptions

Abstract

Endeavors have been invested to account for inefficient instruction, which is frequently attributed to disregarding learner idiosyncrasies. As a matter of course, differentiated instruction has begun to receive scholarly and professional attention in the hopes of ameliorating learner outcomes through learner-aware teaching. Despite a great deal of recorded research, little is known about how differentiated instruction is prepared and operationalized. This study, conducted at a private high school in Istanbul, Turkey, investigated the impact of differentiated instruction on Turkish L2 learners’ L2 achievement along with the perceptions of learners and teacher. Two intact classes were selected as control (N=14) and DI group (N=8). The control group was exposed to traditional instruction, while the DI group received differentiated instruction guided by the principles of constructivism, multiple intelligence theory (Gardner, 1993), and the differentiated instruction framework of Tomlinson (1999). Data collected by means of L2 achievement tests revealed that DI group outperformed the control group in overall L2 achievement. Learner reflective essays revealed that Turkish L2 learners found differentiated instruction as distinctive, entertaining, engaging, instructive, and interest-related, while teacher reflective journals raised the issues of time constraints, needs for learner awareness and training about differentiated instruction.

Keywords

Kaynakça

  1. Affholder, L. P. (2003). Differentiated instruction in inclusive elementary classrooms (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Kansas, Education Faculty, Kansas.
  2. Alavinia, P., & Farhady, S. (2012). Using differentiated instruction to teach vocabulary in mixed ability classes with a focus on multiple intelligences and learning styles. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 2(4), 27-82.
  3. Aliakbari, M., & Haghighi, J. K. (2014). On the effectiveness of differentiated instruction in the enhancement of Iranian learners reading comprehension in separate gender education. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 182-189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.405
  4. Anderson, L.W. (1995). Individualized instruction. In L.W. Anderson (Ed.). Encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education, (pp. 155-161). Oxford: Pergamon.
  5. Baumgartner, T., Lipowski, M., & Rush, C. (2003). Increasing reading achievement of primary and middle school students through differentiated instruction. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Saint Xavier University, Education Faculty, Chicago.
  6. Beecher, M., & Sweeny, S. M. (2008). Closing the achievement gap with curriculum enrichment and differentiation: One school's story. Journal of Advanced Academics, 19(3), 502-530. https://doi.org/10.4219/jaa-2008-815
  7. Blaz, D. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A guide for foreign language teachers. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education, Inc.
  8. Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. California: Sage.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Dilbilim

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yazarlar

Ahmet Cihat Yavuz Bu kişi benim
0000-0002-3246-952X
Türkiye

Yayımlanma Tarihi

31 Temmuz 2020

Gönderilme Tarihi

2 Ağustos 2019

Kabul Tarihi

13 Temmuz 2020

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2020 Cilt: 6 Sayı: 2

Kaynak Göster

APA
Yavuz, A. C. (2020). The effects of differentiated instruction on Turkish students’ L2 achievement, and student and teacher perceptions. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 313-335. https://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.776002

Cited By