A metaphorical classroom management model for intrinsic motivation: Happy cat learning motivation

Öz

This article aims to examine the concept of motivation, which lies at the core of the learning process, in depth by aiming to benefit from contemporary practices as well as classical theories while addressing students' intrinsic motivation from a holistic perspective. The article introduces the metaphorical and theoretically based ‘Happy Cat Model’ developed to increase the intrinsic motivation of primary school students. This model, based on the central role of motivation in the learning process, is based on the symbolic ‘nine lives’ of cats. Inspired by the metaphor, it covers nine authentic happiness domains that support students' cognitive, affective and social development: speaking, play, reading, writing, problem solving, mathematical thinking, emotional intelligence, technology use and self-care. Within the scope of the study, classical motivation approaches such as intrinsic motivation theory, self-efficacy, interest and achievement goal theories and literature based on contemporary practices were synthesised and the importance of intrinsic motivation in learning processes was emphasised. Each component of the model is considered as pedagogical tools that enrich students' learning experiences and sustain their motivation. As a result, the ‘Happy Cat Model’ is proposed as a unique teaching approach that encourages students' active participation in learning processes, is based on multidimensional development, and facilitates emotional bonding through the power of metaphorical expression.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• ıntrinsic motivation
• happiness
• metaphor
• primary school
• happy cat model
• classroom management

İçsel motivasyon için metaforik bir sınıf yönetim modeli: Mutlu kedi öğrenme motivasyonu

Öz

Bu makale, öğrencilerin içsel motivasyonunu bütüncül bir perspektifle ele alırken, klasik kuramların yanı sıra çağdaş uygulamalardan da yararlanmayı hedefleyerek, öğrenme sürecinin özünde yatan motivasyon kavramını derinlemesine irdelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Makale, ilkokul düzeyindeki öğrencilerin içsel motivasyonlarını artırmak amacıyla geliştirilen metaforik ve kuramsal temelli “Mutlu Kedi Modeli”ni tanıtmaktadır. Motivasyonun öğrenme sürecindeki merkezi rolünden hareketle oluşturulan bu model, kedilerin sembolik “dokuz canı” metaforundan ilham alarak, öğrencilerin bilişsel, duyuşsal ve sosyal gelişimlerini destekleyen dokuz özgün mutluluk alanını kapsamaktadır: konuşma, oyun, okuma, yazma, problem çözme, matematiksel düşünme, duygusal zekâ, teknoloji kullanımı ve öz bakım. Çalışma kapsamında, içsel motivasyon kuramı, öz-yeterlik, ilgi ve başarı hedefi teorileri gibi klasik motivasyon yaklaşımları ile çağdaş uygulamalara dayalı literatür sentezlenmiş; öğrenme süreçlerinde içsel güdülenmenin önemi vurgulanmıştır. Modelin her bir bileşeni, öğrencilerin öğrenme deneyimlerini zenginleştiren ve motivasyonlarını sürdürülebilir kılan pedagojik araçlar olarak ele alınmıştır. Sonuç olarak, “Mutlu Kedi Modeli”, öğrencilerin öğrenme süreçlerine aktif katılımını teşvik eden, çok yönlü gelişimi esas alan ve metaforik anlatım gücüyle duygusal bağ kurmayı kolaylaştıran özgün bir öğretim yaklaşımı olarak önerilmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İçsel motivasyon
• Mutluluk
• Metafor
• İlkokul
• Mutlu Kedi Modeli

Kaynakça

1. Adipat, S., Laksana, K., Busayanon, K., Asawasowan, A., & Adipat, B. (2021). Engaging students in the learning process with game-based learning: The fundamental concepts. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 4(3), 542–552. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.169
2. Altunkaya, H. (2018). The impact of activity-based oral expression course on speech self-efficacy of students. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(1), 137–150.
3. Anastasiadis, T., Lampropoulos, G., & Siakas, K. (2018). Digital game-based learning and serious games in education. International Journal of Advances in Scientific Research and Engineering, 4(12), 139–144.
4. Anderson, J. R. (1993). Problem solving and learning. American Psychologist, 48(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.35
5. Annuš, N. (2024). Education in the age of artificial intelligence. TEM Journal, 13(1), 404–413. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=1177261
6. Aubrey, C., & Godfrey, R. (2003). The development of children's early numeracy through Key Stage 1. British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), 821–840.
7. Aubrey, C., Godfrey, R., & Dahl, S. (2006). Early mathematics development and later achievement: Further evidence. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18, 27–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03217428
8. Balalle, H. (2024). Exploring student engagement in technology-based education in relation to gamification, online/distance learning, and other factors: A systematic literature review. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 9, 100870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100870

9. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.
10. Barman, A. G. T., & Hülya, Ö. (2024). Radyo, televizyon ve sinema eğitiminde oyun tabanlı öğrenmenin akademik motivasyona etkisi. Uluslararası İletişim ve Sanat Dergisi, 5(12), 26–45.
11. Bastug, M. (2014). The structural relationship of reading attitude, reading comprehension and academic achievement. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 4(4), 931–946.
12. Bigozzi, L., Vettori, G., & Incognito, O. (2023). The role of preschoolers’ home literacy environment and emergent literacy skills on later reading and writing skills in primary school: A mediational model. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1113822. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1113822
13. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. In P. Griffin, B. McGaw, & E. Care (Eds.), Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (pp. 17–66). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2
14. Black, M. (1979). More about metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (pp. 19–41). Cambridge University Press.
15. Boaler, J. (2009). Can mathematics problems help with the inequities in the world?: Discussion of Part II: Sociocultural factors. In B. Greer, S. Mukhopadhyay, S. A. Powell, & O. Zaslavsky (Eds.), Words and worlds: Modelling verbal descriptions of situations (pp. 139–146). Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087909383_009
16. Boctor, L. (2013). Active-learning strategies: The use of a game to reinforce learning in nursing education. A case study. Nurse Education in Practice, 13(2), 96–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2012.07.010
17. Bransford, J. D., & Schwartz, D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 61–100.
18. Brown, J. L., & Moffett, C. A. (1999). The hero’s journey: How educators can transform schools and improve learning. ASCD.
19. Bundick, M. J., Quaglia, R. J., Corso, M. J., & Haywood, D. E. (2014). Promoting student engagement in the classroom. Teachers College Record, 116(4), 1–34.
20. Cameron, L. (2003). Metaphor in educational discourse. A&C Black.
21. Cempron, D. N. L. (2021). Motor, play and self-care skills: An index of children's pre-indications. Online Submission, 9(5), 294–305.
22. Cerasoli, C. P., Nicklin, J. M., & Ford, M. T. (2014). Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: A 40-year meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 980–1008.
23. Chen, X., Xie, H., & Hwang, G. J. (2020). A multi-perspective study on artificial intelligence in education: Grants, conferences, journals, software tools, institutions, and researchers. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100005
24. Chen, Z. (2022). Exploring the application scenarios and issues facing Metaverse technology in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(5), 1975–1987. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2133148
25. Chen, Z. H., Chen, H. H. J., & Dai, W. J. (2018). Using narrative-based contextual games to enhance language learning: A case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(3), 186–198.
26. Chiu, T. K., Xia, Q., Zhou, X., Chai, C. S., & Cheng, M. (2023). Systematic literature review on opportunities, challenges, and future research recommendations of artificial intelligence in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100118
27. Cook, D. A., & Artino Jr, A. R. (2016). Motivation to learn: An overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997–1014.
28. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-6566(85)90023-6
29. Dichev, C., & Dicheva, D. (2017). Gamifying education: What is known, what is believed and what remains uncertain: A critical review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0042-5
30. Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75–88.
31. Er, Z. (2024). Examination of the relationship between mathematical and critical thinking skills and academic achievement. Pedagogical Research, 9(1), em0176. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14028
32. Fidan, M. (2023). Happy class. Disiplinlerarası Eğitim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 3(2), 426–439. https://doi.org/10.57135/jier.1346663
33. Fidan, M. (2024). Happy student in the age of artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence Theory and Applications, 4(1), 57–75
34. Filgona, J., Sakiyo, J., Gwany, D. M., & Okoronka, A. U. (2020). Motivation in learning. Asian Journal of Education and Social Studies, 10(4), 16–37.
35. Fischer, A., Greiff, S., & Funke, J. (2012). The process of solving complex problems. Journal of Problem Solving, 4(1), 19–42.
36. Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387.
37. Fox, K. R. (1999). The influence of physical activity on mental well-being. Public Health Nutrition, 2(3A), 411–418.
38. Freire, P. (1983). The importance of the act of reading. Journal of Education, 165(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205748316500103 (Original work published 1983.)
39. Galbraith, D. (2009). Writing as discovery. British Journal of Educational Psychology Monograph Series II, Number 6 – Teaching and Learning Writing, 5–26.
40. Gee, J. P. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 20–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/950566.950595
41. Gick, M. L. (1986). Problem-solving strategies. Educational Psychologist, 21(1–2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1986.9653026
42. Goleman, D. (1996). Duygusal Zeka (B. S. Yüksel, Trans.). Varlık Yayınları. (Original work published 1995.)
43. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2019). Teaching and researching reading (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315726274
44. Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007). What we know, what we still need to know: Teaching adolescents to write. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 313–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530642
45. Grewal, D., Brackett, M., & Salovey, P. (2006). Emotional intelligence and the self-regulation of affect. In D. K. Snyder, J. Simpson, & J. N. Hughes (Eds.), Emotion regulation in couples and families: Pathways to dysfunction and health (pp. 37–55). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11468-002
46. Guan, X., Sun, C., Hwang, G. J., Xue, K., & Wang, Z. (2022). Applying game-based learning in primary education: A systematic review of journal publications from 2010 to 2020. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(2), 534–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2022.2091611
47. Gugerty, L. (2006, October). Newell and Simon's logic theorist: Historical background and impact on cognitive modeling. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting (Vol. 50, No. 9, pp. 880–884). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120605000911
48. Guhl, P. (2019). The impact of early math and numeracy skills on academic achievement in elementary school. (Unpublished master's thesis). Eastern Illinois University. https://thekeep.eiu.edu/theses/4441
49. Güneş, F. (2016). Kağıttan ekrana okuma alanındaki gelişmeler (From paper to screen: Developments in the field of reading). Bartın University Journal of Faculty of Education, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.14686/buefad.v5i1.5000155474
50. Heckhausen, J., & Heckhausen, H. (Eds.). (2018). Motivation and action (2nd ed.). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65094-4
51. Holmes, W. (2023). The unintended consequences of artificial intelligence and education. UCL Discovery. https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/10165467/
52. Jääskä, E., & Aaltonen, K. (2022). Teachers’ experiences of using game-based learning methods in project management higher education. Project Leadership and Society, 3, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2022.100041
53. Jonassen, D. H. (2000). Computers as mindtools for schools: Engaging critical thinking (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
54. Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early math matters: Kindergarten number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 850–867. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014939
55. Jordan, P. J., & Troth, A. C. (2021). Managing emotions during team problem solving: Emotional intelligence and conflict resolution. In R. J. Burke & L. M. Cooper (Eds.), Emotion and performance (pp. 195–218). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780367854949-12
56. Kayaalp, F., Meral, E., & Başcı Namlı, Z. (2022). An analysis of the effect of writing-to-learn activities regarding students’ academic achievement and self-regulation skills in writing. Participatory Educational Research, 9(1), 324–348. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.18.9.1
57. Kucher, T. (2021). Principles and best practices of designing digital game-based learning environments. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 5(2), 213–223.
58. Kühn, S., Kugler, D. T., Schmalen, K., Weichenberger, M., Witt, C., & Gallinat, J. (2019). Does playing violent video games cause aggression? A longitudinal intervention study. Molecular Psychiatry, 24(8), 1220–1234. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41380-018-0031-7
59. Lazowski, R. A., & Hulleman, C. S. (2016). Motivation interventions in education: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(2), 602–640. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315617832
60. Lee, R. L., & Loke, A. Y. (2005). Health‐promoting behaviors and psychosocial well‐being of university students in Hong Kong. Public Health Nursing, 22(3), 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-1209.2005.220304.x
61. Li, C. (2017). Attitudes towards digital game-based learning of Chinese primary school English teachers. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh). https://hdl.handle.net/1842/31039
62. Limpo, T., & Alves, R. A. (2017). Relating beliefs in writing skill malleability to writing performance: The mediating role of achievement goals and self-efficacy. Journal of Writing Research, 9(2), 97–125. https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2017.09.02.01
63. Ling, Y., Zhou, L., Zhang, B., & Ren, H. (2024). Developing middle school students’ problem-solving ability through interdisciplinary project-based learning. Education for Chemical Engineers, 46, 43–53.
64. Maslow, A. H. (1954). The instinctoid nature of basic needs. Journal of Personality, 22, 326–347. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1954.tb01136.x
65. Mavroveli, S., Petrides, K. V., Sangareau, Y., & Furnham, A. (2009). Exploring the relationships between trait emotional intelligence and objective socio‐emotional outcomes in childhood. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79(2), 259–272.
66. McCloud, C. (2016). Have you filled a bucket today?: A guide to daily happiness for kids. Bucket Fillers. McManis, L. D., & Gunnewig, S. B. (2012). Finding the education in educational technology with early learners. Young Children, 67(3), 14–24.
67. Niu, S. J., & Niemi, H. (2020). Teachers' support of students’ social-emotional and self-management skills using a solution-focused skillful-class method. The European Journal of Social & Behavioural Sciences, XXVII(3), 3095–3113. https://doi.org/10.15405/ejsbs.269
68. Noddings, N. (2006). Eğitim ve mutluluk (Z. Bilgin, Çev.). Kitap Yayınevi.
69. Norman, G. R. (1988). Problem‐solving skills, solving problems and problem‐based learning. Medical Education, 22(4), 279–286.
70. Nottingham, J., & Renton, M. (2016). Challenging learning through dialogue: Strategies to engage your students and develop their language of learning. Corwin Press.
71. Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560308222
72. Paris, S. G. (2005). Reinterpreting the development of reading skills. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(2), 184–202. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.40.2.3
73. Pautasso, M. (2013). Ten simple rules for writing a literature review. PLoS Computational Biology, 9(7), e1003149. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003149
74. Pho, A., & Dinscore, A. (2015). Game-based learning. Instructional Technology Committee, Association of College and Research Libraries, American Library Association.
75. Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall.
76. Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it? (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
77. Prensky, M. (2001). The games generations: How learners have changed. Digital Game-Based Learning, 1(1), 1–26.
78. Pressley, M. (2002). Metacognition and self-regulated comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 291–309). International Reading Association.
79. Rowe, J. P., Shores, L. R., Mott, B. W., & Lester, J. C. (2011). Integrating learning, problem solving, and engagement in narrative-centered learning environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21(1–2), 115–133.
80. Rowley, J., & Slack, F. (2004). Conducting a literature review. Management Research News, 27(6), 31–39.
81. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
82. Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9(3), 185–211. Savaş, S., Güler, O., Çoban, G., & Güzel, M. S. (2021). Eğitimde dijital oyunlar ve oyun ile öğrenme. International Journal of Active Learning, 6(2), 117–140.
83. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics (Vol. 2, pp. 142–175). Cambridge University Press.
84. Schunk, D. H. (2012). Attributions as motivators of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 245–266). Routledge.
85. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
86. Sezici, E., & Akkaya, D. D. (2020). The effect of preschool children’s motor skills on self-care skills. Early Child Development and Care, 190(6), 963–970. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2020.1737040
87. Skemp, R. R. (2012). The psychology of learning mathematics: Expanded American edition. Routledge.
88. Smit, E., & Smith, B. P. (2023). Dealing with death: The role of animal-themed literature in supporting children with grief and loss. Human-Animal Interactions, 1(1), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1079/hai.2023.0002
89. Snow, C. E. (2010). Academic language and the challenge of reading for learning about science. Science, 328(5977), 450–452. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1182597
90. Sukma, E., Mahyudin, R., Rahmatina, R., & Suriani, A. (2019, March). Problems in oral language teaching in primary school. In Seventh International Conference on Languages and Arts (ICLA 2018) (pp. 379–383). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icla-18.2019.62
91. Suvilehto, P. (2019). A study of animal characters as representations of humans: The animality/bibliotherapy test. Journal of Poetry Therapy, 32(2), 95–108.
92. Umay, A. (2003). Matematiksel muhakeme yeteneği. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(24), 234–245.
93. UNICEF. (2022, June). Primary school age education. UNICEF Data. https://data.unicef.org/topic/education/primary-education/
94. Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: Practice and theory. Cambridge University Press.
95. Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 271–360). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60019-2
96. Wang, H., Fu, T., Du, Y., et al. (2023). Scientific discovery in the age of artificial intelligence. Nature, 620(7948), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06221-2
97. Wang, L., & Wang, L. (2024). Relationships between motor skills and academic achievement in school-aged children and adolescents: A systematic review. Children, 11(3), 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/children11030336
98. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
99. Yeşilyaprak, B. (2001). Duygusal zekâ ve eğitim açısından doğurguları. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 25, 139–146.
100. Zhang, Y. (2009). Reading to speak: Integrating oral communication skills. English Teaching Forum, 47(1), 32–34.
101. Zhu, Z., Tanaka, E., Tomisaki, E., Watanabe, T., Sawada, Y., Li, X., Jiao, D., Ajmal, A., Matsumoto, M., Zhu, Y., & Anme, T. (2021). Do it yourself: The role of early self-care ability in social skills in Japanese preschool settings. School Psychology International, 43(1), 71–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/01430343211063211