Aktif Bozucu Bastırma Tekniğinin Teorik Açıdan İncelenmesi

Öz

Bu makale, yeni bir bozucu bastırma tekniği olan aktif bozucu bastırma kontrolünü (ADRC) tartışmaktadır. Teknik, çeşitli endüstri sektörlerinde ve çeşitli araştırma alanlarında son zamanlarda uygulanan kontrol şemalarından biridir. Metodoloji, teorik bir bakış açısıyla detaylandırılmıştır. Ayrıca, kontrol teknikleri bazı kriterlere göre sınıflandırılmıştır. Bu makale, ADRC'nin kontrol tekniklerini kontrolör perspektifinden ifade etmeyi amaçlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Aktif bozucu bastırma kontolü
• bozucu bastırma
• total bozucu
• gürbüzlük

An Assessment of Active Disturbance Rejection Technique From a Theoretical Perspective

Abstract

This paper discusses a recent disturbance suppression technique namely, active disturbance rejection control (ADRC) from the theoretical perspective. The technique is one of the recently applied control schemes in various sectors of industry and several areas of research. The methodology is elaborated with a theoretical perspective. Furthermore, the control techniques are categorized by some criteria. The paper aims to express the control techniques of ADRC from controller’s perspective.

Keywords

• Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC)
• disturbance suppression
• total disturbance
• nonlinear control
• robustness

Kaynakça

1. Åarzén, K.-E. (1999). A simple event-based PID controller. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 32(2), 8687–8692. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)57482-0
2. Ahi, B., & Haeri, M. (2018). Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control from the Practical Aspects. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, 23(6), 2909–2919. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMECH.2018.2871880
3. Alonge, F., Cirrincione, M., D’Ippolito, F., Pucci, M., & Sferlazza, A. (2017). Robust Active Disturbance Rejection Control of Induction Motor Systems Based on Additional Sliding-Mode Component. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 64(7), 5608–5621. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2017.2677298
4. Bayrak, A., & Efe, M. Ö. (2021). A frequency domain comparison of disturbance observer based control schemes. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part I: Journal of Systems and Control Engineering, 095965182110365. https://doi.org/10.1177/09596518211036597
5. Chen, W.-H., Yang, J., Guo, L., & Li, S. (2016). Disturbance-Observer-Based Control and Related Methods—An Overview. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 63(2), 1083–1095. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2015.2478397
6. Chen Wei, Chen Yankun, Li Hongfeng, & Song Zhanfeng. (2012). Sensorless control of permanent magnet synchronous motor based on sliding mode observer. Proceedings of The 7th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference, 2582–2586. https://doi.org/10.1109/IPEMC.2012.6259266
7. Cui, W., Tan, W., Li, D., & Wang, Y. (2020). Tuning of linear active disturbance rejection controllers based on step response curves. IEEE Access, 8, 180869–180882. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3028459
8. Cui, W., Tan, W., Li, D., Wang, Y., & Wang, S. (2020). A Relay Feedback Method for the Tuning of Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Controllers. IEEE Access, 8, 4542–4550. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2963419

9. Dong, H., Huang, H., & Zhuang, Y. (2020). Heading Angle Controller Design of USV Based on Improved Sliding Mode Active Disturbance Rejection Control. Proceedings - 2020 Chinese Automation Congress, CAC 2020, (2), 3547–3551. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC51589.2020.9326809
10. Du, Y., Cao, W., She, J., & Fang, M. (2020). A Comparison Study of Three Active Disturbance Rejection Methods. Chinese Control Conference, CCC, 2020-July, 135–139. https://doi.org/10.23919/CCC50068.2020.9189230
11. Efe, M. Ö., & Kasnakoğlu, C. (2021). A nonlinear disturbance observer scheme for discrete time control systems. Turkish Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, 29(2), 1044–1060. https://doi.org/10.3906/ELK-2005-206
12. Fliess, M., & Join, C. (2013). Model-free control. International Journal of Control, 86(12), 2228–2252. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207179.2013.810345
13. Frikh, M. L., Soltani, F., Bensiali, N., Boutasseta, N., & Fergani, N. (2021). Fractional order PID controller design for wind turbine systems using analytical and computational tuning approaches. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 95(June 2020), 107410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107410
14. Garrido, R., & Luna, L. (2021). Robust ultra-precision motion control of linear ultrasonic motors: A combined ADRC-Luenberger observer approach. Control Engineering Practice, 111(March), 104812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conengprac.2021.104812
15. Guo, B.-Z., & Zhao, Z.-L. (2011). Extended State Observer for Nonlinear Systems with Uncertainty. IFAC Proceedings Volumes, 44(1), 1855–1860. https://doi.org/10.3182/20110828-6-IT-1002.00399
16. Han, J. (2009). From PID to active disturbance rejection control. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 56(3), 900–906. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2008.2011621
17. He, H., Si, T., Sun, L., Liu, B., & Li, Z. (2020). Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control for Three-Phase Voltage-Source PWM Rectifier. IEEE Access, 8, 45050–45060. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2978579
18. He, T., Wu, Z., Li, D., & Wang, J. (2020). A tuning method of active disturbance rejection control for a class of high-order processes. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 67(4), 3191–3201. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIE.2019.2908592
19. Kapoulea, S., Psychalinos, C., Elwakil, A. S., & HosseinNia, S. H. (2021). Realizations of fractional-order PID loop-shaping controller for mechatronic applications. Integration, 80(March), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vlsi.2021.04.009
20. Li, R., Li, T., Li, X., & Shen, H. (2016). Path following for underactuated ships control and simulation based on active disturbance rejection with sliding mode control. ICIC Express Letters, 10(6), 1415–1420.
21. Liu, R.-J., Liu, G.-P., Wu, M., & Nie, Z.-Y. (2014). Disturbance rejection for time-delay systems based on the equivalent-input-disturbance approach. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 351(6), 3364–3377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2014.02.015
22. Mishra, S. K., Jha, A. V., Verma, V. K., Appasani, B., Abdelaziz, A. Y., & Bizon, N. (2021). An optimized triggering algorithm for event-triggered control of networked control systems. Mathematics, 9(11), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/math9111262
23. Ozbek, N. S. (2019). An Evaluation of Model-Free Control Strategies for Quadrotor Type Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Proceedings - 2019 3rd International Conference on Applied Automation and Industrial Diagnostics, ICAAID 2019, (September), 25–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAAID.2019.8935001
24. Ramírez-Neria, M., Sira-Ramírez, H., Garrido-Moctezuma, R., & Luviano-Juárez, A. (2014). Linear active disturbance rejection control of underactuated systems: The case of the Furuta pendulum. ISA Transactions, 53(4), 920–928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2013.09.023
25. Shim, H., Park, G., Joo, Y., Back, J., & Jo, N. H. (2016). Yet another tutorial of disturbance observer: robust stabilization and recovery of nominal performance. Control Theory and Technology, 14(3), 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11768-016-6006-9
26. Wang, Y., Tan, W., Cui, W., Han, W., & Guo, Q. (2021). Linear active disturbance rejection control for oscillatory systems with large time-delays. Journal of the Franklin Institute, 358(12), 6240–6260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2021.06.016
27. Yoo, D., Yau, S. S.-T., & Gao, Z. (2006). On convergence of the linear extended state observer. 2006 IEEE Conference on Computer Aided Control System Design, 2006 IEEE International Conference on Control Applications, 2006 IEEE International Symposium on Intelligent Control, 1645–1650. https://doi.org/10.1109/CACSD-CCA-ISIC.2006.4776888
28. Yu, H., Guan, Z., Chen, T., & Yamamoto, T. (2020). Design of data-driven PID controllers with adaptive updating rules. Automatica, 121, 109185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.automatica.2020.109185
29. Zhou, Xiangyang, Wang, T., & Diallo, D. (2020). An active disturbance rejection sensorless control strategy based on sliding mode observer for marine current turbine. ISA Transactions, (xxxx). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2020.05.027
30. Zhou, Xuesong, Liu, M., Ma, Y., & Wen, S. (2020). Improved linear active disturbance rejection controller control considering bus voltage filtering in permanent magnet synchronous generator. IEEE Access, 8, 19982–19996. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2967395
31. Dong, H., Huang, H., & Zhuang, Y. (2020). Heading Angle Controller Design of USV Based on Improved Sliding Mode Active Disturbance Rejection Control. Proceedings - 2020 Chinese Automation Congress, CAC 2020, 2, 3547–3551. https://doi.org/10.1109/CAC51589.2020.9326809
32. Feng, H., & Guo, B. Z. (2017). Active disturbance rejection control: Old and new results. Annual Reviews in Control, 44, 238–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.05.003
33. Jiang, Z., Zhou, L., Zhang, Z., Jiang, F., & Cheng, L. (2019). An equivalent-input-disturbance-based sliding mode control approach for dc-dc buck converter system with mismatched disturbances. Chinese Control Conference, CCC, 2019-July, 639–644. https://doi.org/10.23919/ChiCC.2019.8865812
34. Sun, G., Li, Y., Jin, W., & Bu, L. (2017). A Nonlinear Three-Phase Phase-Locked Loop Based on Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Controller. IEEE Access, 5, 21548–21556. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2759166
35. Wang, Y. W., Zhang, W. A., & Yu, L. (2020). A Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control Approach to Position Synchronization Control for Networked Interconnected Motion System. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 7(4), 1746–1756. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCNS.2020.2999305
36. Du, Y., Cao, W., She, J., & Fang, M. (2020). A Comparison Study of Three Active Disturbance Rejection Methods. Chinese Control Conference, CCC, 2020-July, 135–139. https://doi.org/10.23919/CCC50068.2020.9189230
37. Wang, R., Hu, B., Sun, S., Man, F., Yu, Z., & Chen, Q. (2019). Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control for DC Side Voltage of Single-Phase Active Power Filters. IEEE Access, 7, 73095–73105. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2920626
38. Herbst, G. (2013). A Simulative Study on Active Disturbance Rejection Control (ADRC) as a Control Tool for Practitioners. Electronics, 2(4), 246–279. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics2030246