-

Öz

The main subject of this study is to determine effects of screen-reading to students’ attitudes towards reading. The research is conducted according to study mixed research model (mixed methods) that quantitative and qualitative research techniques are deal with together. In the research, from quantitative research models pre-test last-test group model; from qualitative research models, interview technique were used. Dependent variable of research is students’ the level of attitude towards the reading. Independent variable of research is the stage where reading texts were presented. Students in experiment group read determined text on computer screen; students in control group read it on printed paper. Working group of research consists of 41 students in total that study at 8/A and 8/B grades of public school in Kocaeli Province Kandıra District. Quantitative data of research was acquired by ‘Personal Information Form’, “Attitude scale for secondary school students for reading (Özbay and Uyar, 2009) and ‘Reading Texts’. Qualitative data of research was provided by semi-structured interview form. Qualitative data of research was analyzed by using content analysis, namely categoric analysis; and quantitative data was analyzed by transferring to “SPSS 17 for Windows” package programme. As a consequence of research, it was concluded that reading implementations from printed paper does not increase attitudes of students towards the reading, on the contrary it decreases; but implementations of screen-reading increases attitudes of students in experimental group towards the reading (p<.05). On the process of screen-reading, from qualitative data of research it was concluded that reading students did not feel any unwillingness; screen-reading encouraged students for screen-reading and it effected reading willingness of students positively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Screen reading, reading from printed paper, attitudes towards reading.

EKRANDAN OKUMANIN OKUMAYA YÖNELİK TUTUMA ETKİSİ

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı, ekrandan okumanın, öğrencilerin okumaya yönelik tutumlarına etkisini belirlemektir. Araştırma, nitel ve nicel analiz tekniklerinin birlikte kullanıldığı karma araştırma modeline (mixed methods) göre yürütülmüştür. Araştırmada nicel araştırma yöntemlerinden ön-test son-test kontrol gruplu model; nitel araştırma yöntemlerinden de mülâkat tekniği kullanılmıştır. Araştırmanın bağımlı değişkeni, öğrencilerin okumaya yönelik tutum düzeyleridir. Araştırmanın bağımsız değişkeni de okuma metninin sunulduğu ortamdır. Deney grubundaki öğrenciler belirlenen metinleri bilgisayar ekranından, kontrol grubundaki öğrenciler de basılı sayfadan okumuşlardır. Araştırmanın çalışma grubu, 2012-2013 öğretim yılında Kocaeli ili Kandıra ilçesindeki bir devlet ortaokulunun 8/A ve 8/B sınıflarında öğrenim görmekte olan toplam 41 öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Araştırmanın nicel verileri “Kişisel Bilgi Formu”, “İlköğretim İkinci Kademe Öğrencileri İçin Okumaya Yönelik Tutum Ölçeği” (Özbay ve Uyar, 2009) ve “Okuma Metinleri” ile elde edilmiştir. Nitel verileri de yarı yapılandırılmış mülâkat formu ile elde edilmiştir. Araştırmanın nitel verileri içerik analizi, içerik analizi türlerinden de kategorisel analiz kullanılarak; nicel verileri ise “SPSS 17 for Windows” paket programına aktarılarak analiz edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, uygulamaların yapıldığı ortaokulda basılı sayfadan okuma uygulamalarının kontrol grubu öğrencilerinin okumaya yönelik tutumlarını arttırmadığı, düşürdüğü; ancak ekrandan okuma uygulamalarının deney grubu öğrencilerinin okumaya yönelik tutumlarını arttırdığı sonucuna ulaşılmıştır (p < .05). Araştırmanın nitel verilerinden de ekrandan okuma sürecinde, öğrencilerin isteksizlik hissetmedikleri; ekrandan okumanın öğrencileri ekrandan okumaya isteklendirdiği ve öğrencilerin okumaya yönelik tutumlarını olumlu yönde etkilediği sonuçlarına ulaşılmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Ekrandan okuma, basılı sayfadan okuma, okumaya yönelik tutum

Kaynakça

1. Akkaya, N. (2011). İlköğretim 8. Sınıf Türkçe Dersinde Okuduğunu Anlama Stratejilerini Kullanmanın, Tutuma Etkileri. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 191, 68-77 http://dhgm.meb.gov.tr/yayimlar/dergiler/Milli_Egitim_Dergisi/191.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
2. Armstrong, S. and Warlick, D. (15 September 2004). The New Literacy. TechLearning: The Resource for Technology Education. http://dpts.sd57.bc.ca/~gthielmann/share/TechlearningNewLiteracy.pdf 02012 tarihinde adresinden erişilmiştir.
3. Baker, R. D. (2010). Comparing the Readability of Text Displays on Paper, E-book Readers, and Small Screen Devices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Texas, USA.
4. Banerjee, R. (26 April 2003). Self-Directed Learning in the Technological Age.Proceedings Supporting Interdisciplinary Inquiry: The Second Annual College of Education Research Conference. Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
5. Barnett, S. C. (2011). What Do Middle School Boys Read? An Observation of Middle School Boys’ Reading Choices. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Liberty University: Lynchburg, VA, USA.
6. Berger, N. E. (2010). The Effects of NOOKcolors on Reading and Comprehension in an English Language Learner (ELL) Classroom. https://www.google.com.tr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd1&cad=rja ved=0CCwQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fmedia.wix.com%2Fugd%2Fa649 73_a7c4540901e6e17aa7c216a75d966cb7.docx&ei=fdAnUatQiMy1BruygK AH&usg=AFQjCNGWZeHAIWDYxD4yyHO0JfwDcF70pA&sig2=unlM1e KfTvPoTNVQpYpIWA 15.02.2013 tarihinde adresinden erişilmiştir.
7. Castek, J., Coiro, J., Douglas, K. H., Laurie, A. H., Leu, D. J. and Zawilinski, L. (2007). Thinking About Our Future As Researchers: New Literacies, New Challenges, And New Opportunities. http://www.newliteracies.uconn.edu/pub_files/Thinking_about_our_future_a s_researchers.pdf 20.01.2013 tarihinde adresinden erişilmiştir.
8. Chauhan, P. and Lal, P. (2012). Impact of Information Technology on Reading Habits of College Students. IJRREST: International Journal of Research Review in Engineering Science and Technology, 1(1), 101-106. http://ijrrest.org/issues/ijrrest_vol-1_issue-1_024.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.

9. Chou, I-C. (2009). Exploring International ESL Students’ on-Screen Reading Behaviours with Two Academic Reading Purposes. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. The Ohio State University, USA.
10. Creswell, J. W. and Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Thousand Oaks, California, London: Sage.
11. Demirel, Ö. ve Ün, K. (1987). Eğitim Terimleri Sözlüğü. Ankara: Şafak Matbaası.
12. Du, Y. and Martin, B. (3-7 August 2008). Electronic Media and Leisure-Time Reading: Responses of School Librarians. International Association of School Librarians 2008 Conference Proceedings. Berkeley, CA, USA.
13. Ekiz, D. (2003). Eğitimde Araştırma Yöntem ve Metotlarına Giriş (Nitel, Nicel ve Eleştirel Kuram Metodolojileri). Ankara: Anı Yayınları.
14. Elliot, C., Livengood, K. and McGlamery, M. (5-12 March 2012). Ipads and Struggling Readers. In P. Resta (Ed.). Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2012 . Association for the Advancemend of Computing in Eucation, Chesapeake, USA Eshet-Alakai, Y. (2004). Digital Literacy: A Conceptual Framework for Survival Skills in Digital Era. JI. of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(1), 93-106. http://www.openu.ac.il/Personal_sites/download/Digital-literacy2004JEMH.pdf 22.10.2012 tarihinde adresinden erişilmiştir.
15. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison- Wesley: Reading MA.
16. Gardener, L. (2011). A Kindle in the Classroom: E-Reading Devices and Reading Habits. Language Arts Journal of Michigan, 27(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2168-149X.1832
17. Gardner, D. G., Dukes, R. L. and Discenza, R. (1993). Computer Use, SelfConfidence, and Attitudes: A Casual Analysis. Computers in Human Behaviour, 9(4), 427-440. DOI:10.1016/0747-5632(93)90033-O
18. Grace, K. E. (2011). Comparing the Ipad to Paper: Increasing Reading Comprehension in Digital Age. Unpublished master’s thesis. Graduate College of Bowling Green State University, USA.
19. Graneheim, U. H. and Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative Content Analysis in Nursing Concepts, Procedures and Measures to Achieve Trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24, 105-112. http://intraserver.nurse.cmu.ac.th/mis/download/course/lec_566823_Granehe im%20-%20Jan%2025.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
20. Güneş, F. (2010). Öğrencilerde Ekran Okuma ve Ekranik Düşünme. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7(14), 1-20.
21. Güneş, F. (2009). Hızlı Okuma ve Anlamı Yapılandırma. Ankara: Nobel YayınDağıtım.
22. Halme, O. (2011). E-Reading Devices as a New Medium for Newspaper Reading.Unpublished master’s thesis. Department of Marketing, Aalto University, School of Economics: Finland.
23. Holum, A. and Gahala, J. (2001). Critical Issue: Using Technology to Enhance Literacy Education. http://www.ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/content/cntareas/reading/li300.htm 002013 tarihinde adresinden erişilmiştir.
24. İşeri, K. (2010). İlköğretim İkinci Kademe Öğrencilerinin Tutumlarının İncelenmesi. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 7(2), 468-487. http://www.insanbilimleri.com/ojs/index.php/uib/article/view/1267/593#.UT K2VKIqxA0 adresinden erişilmiştir.
25. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J. and Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 1121 DOI:10.1177/1558689806298224
26. Karasar, N. (2012). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemi-Kavramlar-İlkeler-Teknikler. (baskı). Ankara: Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık.
27. Kayıpmaz, A. Ş. (2011). Probleme Dayalı Öğrenmenin İlköğretim 5. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Okumaya Yönelik Tutumlarına Etkisi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü: Afyonkarahisar.
28. Kuo, C-H. (2005). Wireless Technology in Higher Education: The Perceptions of Faculty and Students Concerning the Use of Wireless Laptops. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. College of Education of Ohio University, USA.
29. Lazarus, B. D. and Callahan, T. (2000). Attitudes Toward Reading Expressed by Elementary School Students Diagnosed With Learning Disabilities. Reading Psychology, 21, 271-282. DOI:10.1080/027027100750061921
30. Leu, D. J. (2002). The New Literacies: Research on Reading Instruction with the Internet and Other Digital Technologies. What Research Has to Say About Reading Instruction. In S. J. Samuels and A. E. Farstrup (Eds.). pp. 310-336. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
31. Leu, D. J. (2000). Literacy and Technology: Deictic Consequences for Literacy Education in an Information Age. Handbook of Reading Research, Volume III In M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson and R. Barr (Eds.). pp. 743770. Mahway, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
32. Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J. L. and Cammack, D. W. (2004). Toward a Theory of New Literacies Emerging From the Internet and Other Information and Communication Technologies. In R. B. Ruddell ve N. Unrau (Eds), Theoratical Models of and Processes of Reading (5th press). pp. 1570-1613. Newark, DE: International Reading Associations.
33. Levine, T. and Donitsa-Schmidt, S. (1998). Computer Use, Confidience, Attitudes, and Knowledge: A Casual Analysis. Computer in Human Behaviour, 14(1), 125-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0747-5632(97)00036-8
34. Lin, C-C. and Lin, I. Y-J. (2009). “E-book Flood” for Changing EFL Learners’ Reading Attitudes. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on
35. Computers in Education [CDROM]. Asia-Pacific Society for Computers in Education, Hong Kong. Liu, Z. (2008). Paper to Digital: Documents in the Information Age. USA: Greenwood Publishing Group, Inc.
36. Liu, Z. (2005). Reading Behaviour in the Digital Environments. Changes over the Past Ten Years. Journal of Documentation, 61(6), 700-712. DOI:1108/00220410510632040
37. Maynard, S. and Cheyne, E. (2005). Can Electronic Textbooks Help Children to Learn. The Electronic Lbirary, 23(1), 103-115. DOI:1108/02640470510582781
38. Mazzoleni, A. K. (2012). Digital and Paper-Based: The Complex Literacies of Composition Students and Instructors. Unpublished master’s thesis. Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.
39. McGlinn, J. M. and Parrish, A. (2002). Accerelating ESL Students’ Reading Progress with Accerelated Reader. Reading Horizon, 42(3), 175-189. http://scholarworks.wmich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1186&context=r eading_horizons 10.05. 2012 tarihinde adresinden erişilmiştir.
40. Özbay, M. ve Uyar, Y. (2009). İlköğretim İkinci Kademe Öğrencileri İçin Okumaya Yönelik Tutum Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Journal of New World Sciences Academy Education Sciences, 4(2), 632-651.
41. Peek, S. L. (t.y.). Effects of READ 180 on Reading Comprehension for EighthGrade Students. Novus Scienta, 1(2), 1-13. https://www.google.com.tr/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1 &cad=rja&ved=0CC0QFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.valdosta.edu%2 Fnovusscientia%2FSPeekJournal.doc&ei=m6ZkUefILo-Q7AaVYHQBg&usg=AFQjCNGTOwTgIWbyrVYnQp1zXLLWEgOjIQ&sig2=n2 VAgH-csQRNshaHYIT45g&bvm=bv.44990110,d.d2k 14.03.2013 tarihinde adresinden erişilmiştir.
42. Pianfetti, E. S. (2001). Teachers and Technology: Digital Literacy through Professional Development. Language Arts, 78(3), 255-262. http://tl570classwiki.pbworks.com/f/digital+literacy+through+prof+develop. pdf 11.2012 tarihinde adresinden erişilmiştir.
43. Scott, L. S. (1999). The Accerelated Reader Program, Reading Achievements, and Attitudes of Students with Learning Disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. George State University, Atlanta-Georgia.
44. Shen, L-B. (2006). Computer Technology and College Students’ Reading Habits. Chia-nan Annual Bulletin, 32,559-572. http://lib.chna.edu.tw/bulletin/files/v32_559_572.pdf adresinden erişilmiştir.
45. Sommer, B. and Sommer, R. (1997). A Practical Guide to Behaviroral ResearchTools and Techniques. (4th press). New York: Oxford University Press, Inc. http://www.famusoa.net/mpowers/trandp/docs/15%20Interviews%20by%20 Sommer.pdf 15.10.2012 tarihinde adresinden erişilmiştir.
46. Sutherland-Smith, W. (2002). Weaving the Literacy Web: Changes in Reading from Page to Screen. Reading Teacher, 7(55), 662-669. http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30031173/sutherlandsmith-weavingthe200pdf 16.06.2012 tarihinde adresinden erişilmiştir.
47. Swalender, L. and Taube, K. (2007). Influences of Family Based Prerequisites Reading Attitude, and Self-Regulation on Reading Ability. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 206-230. DOI:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.01.002
48. Tavşancıl, E. ve Aslan, A. E. (2001). Sözel, Yazılı ve Diğer Materyaller İçin İçerik Analizi ve Uygulama Örnekleri. İstanbul: Epsilon Yayınları.
49. Temizkan, M. ve Sallabaş, M. E. (2009). Öğretmen Adaylarının Okuma ve Yazmaya Yönelik Tutumlarının Karşılaştırılması. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(27), 155-176. http://asosindex.com/journal-articlefulltext?id=593&part=1 07.06.2012 tarihinde adresinden erişilmiştir.
50. Toikka, T. (2007). Effective Screen Reading: Manage E-mailand the Internet More Efficiently. Canada: HRD Pres, Inc.
51. Totolo, A. (2007). Information Technology Adoption by Principals in Bostwana Secondary Schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Florida State University, USA.
52. Türkyılmaz, M. (2012). Bilgi İletişim Teknolojilerinin Okumaya Yönelik Tutuma Etkisi. Bilgi Dünyası, 13(2), 477-493. http://bd.org.tr/index.php/bd/article/view/80/pdf_75 adresinden erişilmiştir.
53. Vandendorpe, C. (2008). Reading on Screen: The New Media Sphere. A Companion to Digital Literary. In S. Schreibman and R. Siemens (Eds.). pp. 203-2 Malden, MA: Blackwell. http://nora.lis.uiuc.edu:3030/companion/view?docId=blackwell/9781405148 641/9781405148641.xml&chunk.id=ss1-54&toc.id=0&brand=9781405148641_brand 17.06.2012 tarihinde adresinden erişilmiştir.
54. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. ( baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
55. You, C. (2009). A Comparative Study of Second Language Reading Comprehension From Paper and Computer Screen. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Suranaree University of Technology: Thailand.
56. Wheldon, J. and Ahlberg, M. K. (2011). Visualizing Social Science Research: Maps, Methods and Meaning. USA: Library of Congress Cataloging-inPublication Data.
57. Williams, M. A. (2010). Examining the Efficacy of Using iPod Touches to Deliver Reading Comprehension Strategy Instruction and to Provide Electronic Text Support on the Reading Comprehension Performance of Sixth-Grade Students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Department of Educational Methodology, Policy, and Leadership and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon, USA.