-

Öz

The purpose of this study is to present whether the readiness levels of teacher candidates for online learning differ according to the variables like gender, age, department and employment. In accordance with this purpose, 599 third and fourth grade teacher candidates in three accessible state universities were chosen as participants by the researchers through convenience sampling method. Online learning readiness scale was used in this study to measure the readiness levels of teacher candidates for online learning. Measurement tools were distributed and obtained by the researchers and analyses were released through using statistical software programs. For the analysis of the data, t-test and one- way ANOVA analyses were done for unrelated samples. According to the results of the analyses, while there is a significant difference in teacher candidates’ self-directed learning in terms of their gender, significant differences were not found in terms of their computer/internet self-efficacy, control, motivation for learning and online communication selfefficacy. It was found that female teacher candidates had higher points in self-directed learning. It was found that teacher candidates did not show significant difference in terms of their sub factor readiness levels according to their department and age. While there is a significant difference in teacher candidates’ motivation for learning, it was not found a significant difference in their computer/internet self-efficacy, control, and online communication self-efficacy and self-directed learning self-efficacy. It was found that teacher candidates having no job had higher motivation in the motivation for learning dimension

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Readiness, online learning, readiness for online learning, teacher candidate, higher education

The examination of the readiness levels of teacher candidates for online learning in terms of various variables / Öğretmen adaylarının çevrimiçi öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşluk düzeylerinin çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi

Öz

The purpose of this study is to present whether the readiness levels of teacher candidates for online learning differ according to the variables like gender, age, department and employment. In accordance with this purpose, 599 third and fourth grade teacher candidates in three accessible state universities were chosen as participants by the researchers through convenience sampling method. Online learning readiness scale was used in this study to measure the readiness levels of teacher candidates for online learning. Measurement tools were distributed and obtained by the researchers and analyses were released through using statistical software programs. For the analysis of the data, t-test and one- way ANOVA analyses were done for unrelated samples. According to the results of the analyses, while there is a significant difference in teacher candidates’ self-directed learning in terms of their gender, significant differences were not found in terms of their computer/internet self-efficacy, control, motivation for learning and online communication self-efficacy. It was found that female teacher candidates had higher points in self-directed learning. It was found that teacher candidates did not show significant difference in terms of their sub factor readiness levels according to their department and age. While there is a significant difference in teacher candidates’ motivation for learning, it was not found a significant difference in their computer/internet self-efficacy, control, and online communication self-efficacy and self-directed learning self-efficacy. It was found that teacher candidates having no job had higher motivation in the motivation for learning dimension. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Hazır bulunuşluk, çevrimiçi öğrenme, çevrimiçi öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşluk, öğretmen adayı, yükseköğretim

Kaynakça

1. Allen, I. E. ve Seaman, J. (2013). Grade Change - Tracking Online Education in the United State. http://www.onlinelearningsurvey.com/reports/gradechange.pdf adresinden 05.07.2014 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
2. Demir Kaymak, Z. ve Horzum, M. B. (2013). Çevrimiçi öğrenme öğrencilerinin çevrimiçi öğrenmeye hazır bulunuşluk düzeyleri, algıladıkları yapı ve etkileşim arasındaki ilişki. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 13(3), 1783-1797.
3. Dray, B.J., Lowenthal, P.R., Miszkiewicz, M.J., Ruiz-Primo, M. A. ve Marczynski, K. (2011). Developing an instrument to assess student readiness for online learning: a validation study. Distance Education, 32(1), 29-47.
4. Fogerson, D. L. (2005). Readiness Factors Contributing to Participant Satisfaction in Online Higher Education Courses. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
5. Fraenkel, J. R. ve Wallen, N., E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. Mcreal.
6. Gunawardena, C. N. ve Duphorne, P. L. (2001, April). Which Learner Readiness Factors, Online Features, and CMC Related Learning Approaches are Associated with Learner Satisfaction in Computer Conferences? Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
7. Holmes, B. ve Gardner, J. (2006). e-Learning: Concepts and practice. London: SAGE Publications.
8. Horton, W. (2000). Designing web based training. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

9. Horzum, M. B. (2007). İnternet Tabanlı Eğitimde Etkileşimsel Uzaklığın Öğrenci Başarısı, Doyumu ve Öz-Yeterlik Algısına Etkisi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara.
10. Hung, M. L., Chou, C., Chen, C. H. ve Own, Z. Y. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning: Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55 (2010) 1080–1090.
11. Ibrahim, D. Z., Silong, A. D., ve Samah, B. A. (2002, February). Readiness and Attitude Towards Online Learning Among Virtual Students. In 15th Annual Conference of the Asian Association of Open Universities, Nueva Delhi, India.
12. İlhan, M. ve Çetin, B. (2013). Çevrimiçi öğrenmeye yönelik hazır bulunuşluk ölçeği’nin (ÇÖHBÖ) Türkçe formunun geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 3(2), 72-101.
13. Lau, C. Y., ve Shaikh, J. M. (2012). the impacts of personal qualities on online learning readiness at Curtin Sarawak Malaysia (CSM). Educational Research and Reviews, 7(20), 430-444.
14. Learnframe, (2000, August). Facts, Figures & Forces Behind e-Learning. An Abridgement http://www.learnframe.com/aboutelearning/elearningfacts.pdf 04.03.2012 tarihinde erişilmiştir. Report on e-Learning. adresinden
15. McVay, M. (2000). Developing a Web-Based Distance Student Orientation to Enhance Student Success in an online Bachelor's Degree Completion Program. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Nova Southeastern University.
16. Pillay, H., Irving, K., & Tones, M. (2007). Validation of the diagnostic tool for assessing tertiary students’ readiness for online learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 26(2), 217–234.
17. Reio, T. G., & Davis, W. (2005). Age and gender differences in self-directed learning readiness: A developmental perspective. International Journal of Self-Directed Learning, 2(1), 40-49.
18. Senemoğlu, N. (2009). Gelişim, öğrenme ve öğretim kuramdan uygulamaya. Ankara: PegemAkademi.
19. Smith, P. J. (2005). Learning preferences and readiness for online learning. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 25(1), 3-12.
20. Smith, P. J., Murphy, K. L., & Mahoney, S. E. (2003). Towards identifying factors underlying readiness for online learning: an exploratory study. Distance Education, 24(1), 57-67.
21. Valtonen, T., Kukkonen, J., Dillon, P., & Väisänen, P. (2009). Finnish high school students’ readiness to adopt online learning: Questioning the assumptions. Computers & Education, 53(3), 742-748.
22. Warner, D., Christie, G. ve Choy, S. (1998). Readiness of VET Clients for Flexible Delivery Including On-line Learning. Brisbane: Australian National Training Authority.
23. http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/38802/20031209-0000/ www.flexiblelearning.net.au/research/ReadinessoftheVETsectorforFDPRAC. rtf adresinden 04.03.2012 tarihinde erişilmiştir.
24. Yurdugül, H. ve Alsancak Sırakaya, D. (2013). Çevrimiçi öğrenme hazırbulunuşluluk ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Eğitim ve Bilim, 38(169), 391-406.