-

Öz

This study aims to examine the effects of community service-learning (CSL) on the emphatic skills, democratic attitudes, problem solving skills and critical thinking tendencies of teacher candidates. Designed as a static group pretest-posttest experimental study, it has a control and experimental group. Participants were a total of 90 early childhood teacher candidates, 45 in the control group and 45 in the experimental one. Data were collected by using Baron Cohen and Whelwright’s (2004) Empathy Scale adapted to Turkish by Bora and Baysan (2009), the Attitude Research Laboratory’s Democratic Attitudes Scale adapted to Turkish by Gözütok (1995), Heppner and Peterson’s (1982) Problem Solving Skills Inventory adapted to Turkish by Taylan (1990), and the American Philosophy Association’s (1990) Critical Thinking Scale adapted to Turkish by Kökdemir (2003). The data collected were analyzed by using the Independent Samples T-Test for differences between groups and the Paired Samples T-Test for differences within groups. The results showed that the CSL experience positively contributed to teacher candidates’ empathic skills, democratic attitudes, problem solving skills and critical thinking tendencies

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Community service-learning, empathic skills, democratic attitudes, problem solving, critical thinking

The effectiveness of community service-learning in teacher training / Topluma hizmet uygulamalarının öğretmen yetiştirmede etkililiği

Öz

Bu araştırmada, topluma hizmet uygulamalarının (THU) öğretmen adaylarının empatik becerilerine,  demokratik tutumlarına, problem çözme becerilerine ve eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerine etkisinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Statik grup öntest-sontest deneysel desen olarak tasarlanan bu araştırmada, bir deney bir de kontrol grubu bulunmaktadır. Çalışma grubu 45 deney grubunda 45 kontrol grubunda olmak üzere toplamda 90 okul öncesi öğretmen adayından oluşmaktadır. Araştırmada veriler; Baron Cohen ve Whelwright (2004) tarafından geliştirilen ve Bora ve Baysan (2009) tarafından uyarlanan Empati Ölçeği; Published for the Attitude Research Laboratory tarafından geliştirilen ve Gözütok (1995) tarafından uyarlanan Demokratik Tutum Ölçeği; Heppner ve Peterson (1982) tarafından geliştirilen ve Taylan (1990) tarafından uyarlanan Problem Çözme Becerileri Envanteri ve Amerika Felsefe Derneği tarafından (1990) geliştirilen ve Kökdemir (2003) tarafından uyarlanan Eleştirel Düşünme Ölçeği ile toplanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde, gruplar arası  farklar için Independet Samples T-Testi, grup içi farklar için ise Paired Samples T-Testi kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları THU deneyiminin öğretmen adaylarının empatik becerilerine, demokratik tutumlarına, problem çözme becerilerine ve eleştirel düşünme eğilimlerine olumlu yönde katkı sağladığını göstermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• Topluma hizmet uygulamaları, empatik beceriler, demokratik tutum, problem çözme, eleştirel düşünme

Kaynakça

1. Andrews, C. P. (2007). Service-Learning: Applications and Research in Business. Journal of Education for Business, 83(1), 19-26.
2. Astin, A. W., & Sax, L. (1998). How Undergraduates are Affected by Service Participation. Journal of Collage Student Development, 39(3), 251-263.
3. Battistoni, R. (1997). Service Learning and Democratic Citizenship Service Learning. General, Paper 86.
4. Berman, S. H. (2004). Teaching Civics: A Call to Action. Principal Leadership, 5(1), 16-20.
5. Billig, S. H. (2000). Research on K-12 school-based service-learning: The evidence builds. Phi Delta Kappan, 81(9), 658-664. http://www.denverzoo.org/downloads/ CLP_Billig_article.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 28.01.2015.
6. Billig, S. H. (2002). Support for K-12 service-learning practice: A brief review of the research. Educational Horizons, 80(4), 184-189. http://www.calstem.org/documents/ResearchonK-12SL.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 28.01.2015.
7. Billig, S., Root, S., & Jesse, D. (2005). The Relationship Between Quality Indicators of Service-Learning and Student Outcomes: Testing Professional Wisdom. In S. Billig, S. Root, & D. Jesse (Eds.), Advances in Service-Learning Research: Vol. 5. Improving Service-Learning Practice: Research Models to Enhance Impacts (pp. 97-115). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
8. Bora, E., & Baysan, L. (2009). Empati Ölçeği-Türkçe Formunun Üniversite Öğrencilerinde Psikometrik Özellikleri. Klinik Psikofarmakoloji Bülteni, 19(1), 39-47.

9. Callahan, J. (2001). The Integration of Service-Learning in Teacher Education Major/Public and Community Service Minor at Providence Collage. In J. B. Anderson, K. J. Swick & J. Yff (Eds.), Service-Learning in Teacher Education: Enhancing The Growth of New Teachers, Their Students, and Communities (pp. 199-203). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
10. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Nitel, Nicel Araştırma Deseni ve Karma Yöntem Yaklaşımları (Çev. Ed. S. B. Demir). Ankara: Eğiten Kitap.
11. Donahue, D. (1999). Service-Learning for Preservice Teachers: Ethical Dilemmas for Practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 685-695.
12. Dunlap, M. (1998). Methods of Supporting Students’ Critical Reflection in Courses Incorporating Service-Learning. Teaching of Psychology, 25(3), 208-210.
13. Ellingson, D. R., & Jackson J. M. (2008). SALLT: Stories, Service Learning and Statistics. Connect: Journal of Youth & Family Ministry, Summer.
14. Erikson, J., & Anderson, J. (1997). Learning with Community: Concepts and Models for Service-Learning in Teacher Education. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.
15. Eyler, J. S. (2000). What do We Most Need to Know about The Impact of Service Learning on Student Learning?. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Special Isuue, 11-17.
16. Eyler, J. S. (2010). What International Service Learning Research Can Learn From Research on Service Learning. In R. G. Bringle, J. A. Hatcher, and S. G. Jones (Eds.), International Service Learning: Conceptual Frameworks and Research (Vol. 2, pp. 225-242). IUPUI Series on Service Learning Research. Sterling, Va.: Stylus.
17. Eyler, J. S., & Giles, D. E. Jr. (1999). Where’s The Learning in Service-Learning?. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
18. Furco, A. (1996). Service-Learning: A Balanced Approach to Experiential Education. In Taylor, B. and Corporation for National Service (Eds.), Expanding Boundaries: Serving and Learning (pp. 2-6). Washington, DC: Corporation for National Service.
19. Furco, A. (2003). Issues of Definition and Programme Diversity in the Study of Sercice-Learning. In S. H. H. Billig & A. S. Waterman (Eds.), Studying Sercive-Learning: Innovations in Educational Research Methodology. Matwah, NJ: Lawrance Erlbaum Associates.
20. GFCNS. (2000). Profiles of Success: Engaging Young People’s Hearts and Minds Through Service-Learning. The Grantmaker Forum on Community & National Service. CA.
21. Gottlieb, K., & Robinson, G. (Eds.). (2006). Apratical Guid for Integrating Civic Responsibility into The Curriculum (2. Eds.). Washington, DC: Community College Press.
22. Gözütok, D. (1995). Öğretmenlerin Demokratik Tutumları. Ankara: Türk Demokrasi Vakfı Yayınları.
23. Hollis, S. (2004). Blaming Me, Blaming You: Assessing Service Learning and Participants’ Tendency to Blame the Victim. Sociological Spectrum, 24, 575-600.
24. http://www.pacefunders.org/publ/pubs/GFCNS_ServiceLearning. Erişim tarihi: 20.01.2015.
25. Jackson, J. M. (2006). Service Learning Overview, Model & Outcomes. Service and Learning Leadership Training Project, Trinity Lutheran College. http://www.sallt.org/pdfs/SALLT_model_outcomes.pdf. Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2015.
26. Kavak, Y., Aydın, A., & Akbaba Altun, S. (2007). Öğretmen Yetiştirme ve Eğitim Fakülteleri, 1982-2007, (Öğretmenin Üniversitede Yetiştirilmesinin Değerlendirilmesi). http://www.yok.gov.tr/documents/10279/49665/yok_ogretmen_kitabi/. Erişim tarihi: 12.10.2014.
27. Kökdemir, D. (2003). Belirsizlik Durumlarında Karar Verme ve Problem Çözme. (Doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara).
28. Lake, V. E., & Jones, I. (2008). Service-Learning in Early Childhood Teacher Education: Using Service to Put Meaning Back into Learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 2146-2156.
29. Lemieux, C. M., & Allen, P. D. (2007). Service-Learning in Social Work Education: The State of Knowledge, Pedagogical Practicalities, and Practice Conundrums. Journal of Social Work Education, 43(2), 309-325.
30. Lin, C. Y., Wu, S. W.,Wu, S. F., Pan, B. S., & Liao, H. C. (2014). Effects of Service- Learning in a University in Taiwan. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 902-906.
31. Ma, J., Zhu, Y., Nan, E., & Yu, Q. (2012). On Innovation of Teacher Education Practice Model from The View of Service-Learning. Procedia Encineering, 29, 3542-3546.
32. Madsen, S. R. (2004). Academic Service Learning in Human Resource Management Education. Journal of Education for Business, 79(6), 328-332.
33. McDonald, J., & Kromer, T. (2005). Service-Learning: A Way to Connect Science to the Community. Science Scope, 28(7), 46-48.
34. Melchior, A. (1999). Summary Report: National Evaluation of Learn and Serve America. Waltham, MA: Center for Human Resources, Brandeis University.
35. Moely, B. E., Mercer, S. H., Ilustre, D., Miron, D., & McFarland, M. (2002). Psycho-Metric Properties and Correlates of The Civic Attitudes and Skills Questionnaire (CASQ): A Measure of Student's Attitudes Related to Service Learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, 8 (2), 15-26.
36. Morgan, W., & Streb, M. (1999). How Quality Service-Learning Develops Civic Values. Bloomington, IN Indiana University.
37. Nelson, R. F. (2013). A Model for Using Service Learning in Teacher Education Programs. US-China Education Review, 3(1), 59-65.
38. O’Bannon, F. (1999). Service-Learning Benefits Our Schools. State Education Leader, 17(3).
39. Ramaley, J. A. (2000). Strategic Directions for Service-Learning Research: A Presidential Perspective. Michigan Journal of Community Service Learning, Special Issue. Fall 2000. 91-97.
40. Reich, R. (2005). Service-Learning and Multiple Models of Engaged Citizenship. Journal of Education, 186(1), 23-27.
41. Root, S. (1994). Service-Learning in Teacher Education: A Third Rationale. Michigan Journal of Cummunity Service-Learning, 1(1), 94-97.
42. Root, S., Callahan, J. & Sepanski, J. (2002). Service-Learning in Teacher Education: A Consideration of Qualitative and Quantitative Outcomes. In A. Furco & S. H. Billig (Eds.), Service-Learning: The Essence of The Pedagogy (pp. 223-244). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publisher.
43. Sandaran, S. C. (2012). Service Learning: Transforming Students, Communities and Universities. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 380-390.
44. Savaşır, İ., & Şahin, N. H. (1997). Bilişsel Davranışçı Terapilerde Değerlendirme: Sık Kullanılan Ölçekler. Ankara: Türk Psikologları Derneği Yayınları, No: 9.
45. Scales, P., & Blyth, D. (1997). Effects of Service-Learning on Youth: What We Know and What We Need to Know?. Generator, Winter, 6-9.
46. Sedlak, C. A., Doheny, M.O, Panthofer, N., & Anaya, E. (2003). Critical Thinking in Students' Service-Learning Experiences. College Teaching, Vol. 51(3) pp. 99-103.
47. Sigmon, R. L., & Pelletier, S. G. (Eds.). (1996). Journey to Service-Learning: Experiences from Independent Liberal Arts Colleges and Universities. Washington, DC: Council of Independent Colleges.
48. Smith, D. B. (2005). Accountability for Academics and Social Responsibility Through Service-Learning. Middle School Journal, 36(4), 20-25.
49. Swick, K. J. (2001). Service-Learning in Teacher Education: Building Learning Communities. The Clearing House, 74(5), 261-264.
50. Taylan, S. (1990). Heppner'in Problem Çözme Ölçeğini Uyarlama, Güvenirlik ve Geçerlik Çalışmaları. (Yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Ankara).
51. Tolleson Knee, R. (1999). Service-Learning in Social Work Education Building Democracy Through Informed Citizenship. University of Denver, Denver.
52. Verducci, S., & Pope, D. (2001). Rationales for Integrating Service-Learning in Teacher Education. In J. B. Anderson, K. J. Swick & J. Yff (Eds.), Service-Learning in Teacher Education: Enhancing The Growth of New Teachers, Their Students, and Communities (pp. 2-18). Washington, DC: American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education.
53. Vogelgesang, L. J., & A. W. Astin (2000). Comparing the Effects of Community Service and Service-Learning. Michigan Journal of Community Service-Learning 7, 25-34.
54. Yates, M., & Youniss, J. (1998). Community Service and Political Identity Development In Adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 495-512.
55. YÖK. (2011). Eğitim Fakültelerinde Uygulanan Topluma Hizmet Uygulamaları Dersi Yönergesi, 17.02.2011.