SINIF ÖĞRETMENLERİNİN BİYOLOJİK ÇEŞİTLİLİK KONULARININ ÖĞRETİMİNDE SIKLIKLA KULLANDIKLARI YÖNTEMLER (ÇANAKKALETÜRKİYE)

Yıl 2011, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 1, 142 - 159, 14.01.2013

Emel Okur , Şükran Özdilek , Çavuş Şahin

Öz

Dünya üzerindeki tüm canlıların çeşitliliğini ifade eden biyolojik çeşitlilik, çevre konularından birisi olup, artan insan baskısından olumsuz yönde etkilenmektedir. Çevre eğitimi, insan baskısının doğal yaşam üzerine olumsuz etkilerini azaltmada ve sürdürülebilir bir geleceğin sağlanmasında önemli bir rol oynar. Biyoçeşitlilik konularının ilköğretim öğrencilerine öğretilmesinde etkili teknikler geliştirmeden önce, mevcut durumu ortaya koymak önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, "biyolojik çeşitlilik" kavramının öğretiminde yaygın sıklıkla kullanılan yöntemleri belirlemektir. Seksensekiz sınıf öğretmenine (4. ve 5. sınıf) anket çalışması uygulanmış; biyolojik çeşitlilik ve fen- teknoloji konularına ait diğer konuların öğretiminde, "düz anlatım, soru-cevap, problem çözme" yönteminin sıklıkla kullanıldığı belirlenmiştir.

Anahtar Sözcükler: çevre, biyolojik çeşitlilik eğitimi, ilköğretim, Türkiye, Çanakkale.

Anahtar Kelimeler

çevre, biyolojik çeşitlilik eğitimi, ilköğretim, Türkiye, Çanakkale

Kaynakça

• Akaydın, G. & Güler, H. M. (2000). The importance of field trip at science education. In IV. Science Education Congress (p. 34-36). Ankara: Hacettepe University.
• Aksoy, B. (2004). Using of problem solving methods at environmental education. Journal of Pamukkale University Department of Education, 2 (4), 83-98. Retrieved November, 10, 2009 from http://pauegitimdergi.pau.edu.tr/Makaleler/1858439104_7- PROBLAM%20%c3%87%c3%96ZME%20Y%c3%96NTEM%c4%b 0N%c4%b0N%20%c3%87EVRE%20E%c4%9e%c4%b0T%c4%b0 M%c4%b0NDE%20UYGULANMASI.pdf
• Albayrak, S. A., Kalaycı, Ş., & Karataş, A. (2004). By geographical region of the provinces in Turkey, a key component of Socio-Economic Development-level analysis examining. Süleyman Demirel University İ.İ.B.F.Y. Journal, 9(2), 101-130. Retrieved December, 15, 2009 from http://iibf.sdu.edu.tr/dergi/files/2004-2-6.pdf
• Armstrong H. G. (2005). Environmental education in Tobago’s primary schools: a case study of coral reef education. Revisa de Bioogia Tropical 53 (1): 229-238. Retrieved May, 12, 2009 from http://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034- 77442005000300028&lng=es&nrm=iso&tlng=en
• Arslan, A. (2009). The History of ancient times philosophy (2nd Volume).
• İstanbul: Bilgi University Publisher.
• Başal, H. A., Atasoy, E., & Doğan, Y. (2001). Developing an environmental
• sensitivity scale for children. In IV. National Ecology and Environment
• Conference, Association of Biologs, 117- 123.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Data analysis handbook. Ankara: PegemA Publishing.
• CBD (2010). Convention on biological diversity, Retrieved December, 12, 2010 from http://www.cbd.int/2010/about/
• Çallıca, H., Erol, M., Sezgin,G., & Kavcar,N. (2000). A study related to the labratory applications in primary school institutions. In the fifth Congress of Science Education (p.217-219) Ankara: Hacettepe University.
• Çepel, N. (2008). Ecological problems and solutions (3 Press) Ankara: rd TUBITAK Popular Books Series.
• Çetin, G., Ertepınar, H., & Geban, Ö. (2004). Conceptual change approach to students' attitudes impact of ecology and biological success. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 26: 27-32. Retrieved May, 19, 2009 from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/200426GÜLCAN%20ÇETİN.pdf
• Çınar, D., Doğu, S., & Meydan, A. (2008). Attitudes of primary school teachers towards the environment. In B. Güven (Ed.), TheSseventh National Primary School Teaching Symposium Reports (p.79-82). Çanakkale: Çanakkale OnSekiz Mart University.
• Disinger, J. F. (1997). Environmental education research news. The Environmentalist, 17 (3), 153-156. Retrieved February, 12, 2008 from http://www.springerlink.com/content/m6130x2xr2416n31/fulltext.pdf
• Doğan, M., & Akaydın, G., (2000). National Agenda 21: Science education programmes and environmental education in Turkey. In The fourth Congress of Science Education (p.82-85) Ankara: Hacettepe University.
• Dobson, A. (2005). Monitoring global rates of biodiversity change: challenges that arise in meeting the Convention on Biological Diversity. Philosophical Transactions of The Royal Society, 360, 229-241. Retrieved August, 12, 2009 from http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/360/1454/229.full.pdf+ html
• Dori, Y. J., & Tall, R. T. (2000). Formal and ınformal collaborative projects: engaging in ındustry with environmental awareness. Science Education, 84 (1), 95- 113. Retrieved December, 31, 2010 from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1098- 237X(200001)84:1%3C95::AID-SCE7%3E3.0.CO;2-W/pdf
• Dreyfus, A., Wals, A.E.J., & Weelie, D.V. (1999). Biodiversity as a postmodern theme for environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 4:155-176. Retrieved June, 9, 2008 from http://cjee.lakeheadu.ca/index.php/cjee/article/view/326/270
• Dural B., & Aysel V. (2007). The role of bentic algas and sea savannahs in biodiversity in Turkish Aegean and Mediterranean shores. Acta Pharmaceutica Sciencia, 49, 85-118. Retrieved May, 12, 2009 From http://www.actapharmasciencia.org/pdf/2007%20vol%2049%20no1- 8.pdf
• Erten, S. (2004a). Biodiversity as a rising value in the international scale. The Journal of Hacettepe University, Faculty of Education, 27, 98-105. Retrieved May, 12, 2009 from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/200427SİNAN%20ERTEN.pdf
• Erten, S. (2004b). What are environmental education and awareness of environment, and how should the environment education be? The Journal of Environment and Human, no 65/66.
• Fernandez Lo Faso, R. P., Gemio, R. V., Garcia, J. C. E., Ceballas- Zuniga, E. G., Bueno, C., & Gallardo, J. M. (2006). Tench, Tinca tinca (L.), fish farms as a tool for enviromental education. Aquaculture International, 14, 209- 218.
• Galbraith, J. (2003). Connecting with plants: lessons for life. The Curriculum Journal, 14(2): 279-286.
• Gayford, G. (2000). Biodiversity Education: a teacher’s perspective. Environmental Education Research, 6 (4), 347- 361.
• Gerçek C. & Soran H. (2005). Experimental methods using biology teachers teaching determination of status. Hacettepe University Journal of Education, 29, 95- 102. Retrieved May, 12, 2009 from http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/200529CEM%20GERÇEK.pdf
• Giddens, A. (2005). Sociology. Ankara: Ayrac Publications.
• Gökçe, N., Erdoğan, K., Aktay, S., & Özden, M. (2007). Elementary students’ attitudes towards environment. Elementary Education Online, 6 (3), 452- 468.
• Görmez, K. (2007). The problems of environment. Ankara: Nobel Publisher.
• Haktanır, G. & Çabuk, B. (2000). Environment perceptions of preschool students. In The Fourth Congress of Science Education (p.76-79) Ankara: Hacettepe University.
• Hesapçıoğlu, M. (2008). Teaching principles and methods. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
• İflazoğlu, A. (2000). The use and application results of cooperational learning activities in Science Education lesson in the fifth grade of fundamental education. In The Fourth Congress of Science Education (p.162-168) Ankara: Hacettepe University
• Jones, L., & Howe, A. C. (1998). Engaging children in science(Second Edition). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Company.
• Kale, N. (2000). Education of environmental rights in primary school. In The Fifth Congress of Science Education (p.110-114) Ankara: Hacettepe University.
• Karabacak, E., Uysal, İ., & Öner, Ş. (2006). Flora of Kazdağı (Mt. Ida) Pseudo-Alpine Zone, Turkey. IV Balkan Botanical Congress, Sofia- Bulgaria, Scientific Area B No. 55.
• Karasar, N. (2003). Research methods. Ankara: Nobel Publishing.
• Kassas, M. (2002). Environmental education: biodiversity. The Environmentalist, 22, 345- 351. Retrieved January, 11, 2008 from http://www.springerlink.com/content/n8h7r32830817m03/fulltext.pdf
• Keating, M. (1993). The earth summit’s agenda for changed a plain language version of Agenda 21 and other Rio Agreements. (p 6-7) Genova Switzerland: Centre for Our Common Future)
• Koran, J. J., Koran, L. M., & Ellis, J. (1989). Evaluating the effectiviness of filed experiences: 1939-1989. Visitor Behaviour, 4 (2), 7-10.
• Martin, D. J. (1997). Elementary science methods, a contrustivist approach. New York: Delmar Publishers.
• MEB (Ministery of National Education) (2005). Elementary science and technology teachers' guide book 4. İstanbul: MEB Publisher.
• MEB (Ministery of National Education) (2006). Elementary science and technology teachers' guide book 5. Ankara: MEB Publisher.
• Özdemir, O. (2007). New perspective of environmental education: "Education for sustainable development purpose".Education and Science, 32(145), 24-38. Retrieved May, 12, 2009 from http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/view/813/166
• Özdemir, P. & Üstündağ, T. (2007). Science and technology in space celebrity science education program adam concerning the creative drama. Elementary Online, 6(2), 226-233. Retrieved July, 12, 2008 from http://www.ilkogretim-online.org.tr/vol6say2.html
• Özen, Ö., İşmen, A., Özekinci, U., Ayaz, A., Altınağaç, U., Ayyıldız, H., Cengiz, Ö. (2008). Biodiversity of fish in çanakkale’s shallow waters and population dynamics of economically young fish ındividuals. TUBITAK Proje No: 106T123 110p.
• Reigeluth, C. M. (1983). Instructional Design Theories and Models. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Robottom, I., & Kyburz- Graber, R. (2000). Recent ınternational developments in professional development in environmental education: reflections and issues. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 5 (1), 249- 267. Retrieved May, 05, 2008 from http://cjee.lakeheadu.ca/index.php/cjee/article/viewFile/312/242
• Robottom, I., & Suave, L. (2003). Reflecting on participatory research in environmental education: Some issues for methodology. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 8 (1),111- 128. Retrieved May, 05, 2008 from http://cjee.lakeheadu.ca/index.php/cjee/article/view/241/101
• Robottom, I. (2004). Environmental education and local initiatives: A rationale. International Examples and an Issue for Research, 3, 21– 28.
• Robottom, I. (2005). Critical Environmental Education Research: Re- Engaging the Debate. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 10 (1), 62- http://cjee.lakeheadu.ca/index.php/cjee/article/view/178/15
• Retrieved May, 05, 2008 from
• Rodriguez, A. J., & Kitchen, R. S. (2005). Preparing mathematics and science teachers for diverse classrooms, promising strategies for transformative pedagogy. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
• Sezgin, G., Çalışkan, S., Çallıca, H., Ellez, M. A., & Kavcar, N. (2000). A study related to the usage of problem-solving strategies in Science Education. In The Fourth Congress of Science Education (p.239-242) Ankara: Hacettepe University.
• Storksdieck, M., Ellenbogen, K., & Heimlich, E. J. (2005). Changing minds? Reassessing outcomes in free- choice environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 11 (3), 353- 369.
• Sünbül, A. M., & Yılmaz, H. (2003). Plan and assesment in teaching. Konya: Çizgi Publisher.
• Tok, C. V., Yalçın-Özdilek, Ş., Özkan, B., Gürkan, M., Sevim, İ., Topyıldız, H., Paksuz, S., & Kaya, S. (2007a). Literature-supported fauna inventory based on field study around the Mountain Ağı. ÇOMU Revolving Fund Project Report.
• Tok, C. V., Yalçın-Özdilek, Ş., Özkan, B., Gürkan, M., Sevim, İ., Topyıldız, H., Paksuz, S., & Kaya, S. (2007b). Literature-supported fauna inventory based on field study around Kirazlı. ÇOMU Revolving Fund Project Report.
• Ün- Açıkgöz, K. (2006). Active learning. İzmir: Kanyılmaz Press.
• Yalçın S. & Doğan S. (2007). Effects of science and technology lesson on environmental attitudes of primary school pupils. VI. National Symposium of Primary School Teacher Education, (Anatolia University (USOS), Nobel Press), p: 703- 705.
• Yalçın- Özdilek Ş., Kaska, Y., Olgun, O. S., & Sönmez B. (2006). Monitoring of Samandag Sea Turtles (Chelonia mydas and Carette caretta). TUBITAK Project No: YDABAG- 104Y055, 64p.
• Yalçın Özdilek, Ş. (2008). Natural and invading fish of Karamenderes. In A. Akdemir, O. Demircan, S. Yılmaz, T. Takaoğlu, C. Akbulak (Ed.), The Symposium of Ezine City Value (pp. 129-144). Çanakkale: Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University.
• Yıldız, K., Baykal, T., & Altın, M. (2000). An example of marshy field study oriented towards acknowledging the environment and comprehending its importance. The Fourth Congress of Science Education (pp.72-75) Ankara: Hacettepe University.
• Young, J. (2001). Linking EfS and Biodiversity? A UK-wide survey of the status of education within local biodiversity action plans. Environmental Education Research,7(4): 339-449.