Investigation of The Process of Supportive Education Designed for The Reading Skills of a Student with Hearing Loss in Inclusion Environment

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to examine the supportive service designed for the reading teaching of a student with hearing loss who is in the first grade primary school. The study was designed as an action research. The participant of this study consisted of a student with hearing loss who is in first grade primary school with his normally hearing peers, researcher/teacher, parents of the student, a classroom teacher, a teacher in the rehabilitation center and validity committee members. The data were obtained through researcher diary, interviews, observations, records of validity committee meetings, the documents. Data collection process and analysis were performed simultaneously. It was noted that the activities used in the supportive education were in parallel to the Turkish Curriculum and the Guidelines. The activities were diversified and systematically repeated. Inferring from the research findings, it can be said that the hearing loss students in the inclusion environment benefited from the supportive service practices designed for the reading skill acqusition and development.

Keywords

• Hearing loss,inclusion,supporting services,reading skills,Phonics Based Sentence Method

Kaynaştırma Ortamındaki İşitme Kayıplı Bir Öğrencinin İlkokuma Becerilerine Yönelik Destek Eğitim Sürecinin İncelenmesi*

Öz

Bu araştırmada, kaynaştırma ortamında ilkokul 1. sınıfa devam eden işitme kayıplı bir öğrencinin ilkokuma öğretimine yönelik destek eğitim hizmetinin incelenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Araştırma, eylem araştırması şeklinde desenlenmiştir. Katılımcılar; işitme kayıplı bir öğrenci, araştırmacı/öğretmen, aile, sınıf öğretmeni, rehabilitasyon merkezinde çalışan öğretmen, geçerlik komitesi üyeleridir. Araştırma verileri araştırmacı günlüğü, görüşmeler, gözlemler ile geçerlik komitesi toplantı kayıtları, belgeler kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Veri toplama süreci ve analizi eş zamanlı yürütülmüştür. Etkinlikler, Türkçe Öğretim Programı ve Kılavuz kitap paralelinde ve öğrencinin ihtiyaçlarından yola çıkılarak uygulanmış, etkinlikler çeşitlendirilmiş ve tekrarlanmıştır. Araştırma bulgularından yola çıkılarak kaynaştırma ortamındaki işitme kayıplı öğrencinin ilkokuma becerilerinin edinimi ve gelişimine yönelik sunulan destek eğitim uygulamalarından fayda sağladığı söylenebilir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• İşitme kaybı,kaynaştırma,destek eğitim,ilkokuma becerileri,Ses Temelli Cümle Yöntemi

Kaynakça

1. Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge: MIT Press.
2. Akay, E. (2015). Kaynaştırma ortamındaki işitme engelli öğrencilere destek eğitim odasında uygulanan Türkçe etkinliklerinin incelenmesi. Journal of Education & Special Education Technology, 1 (1), 1-14.
3. Akçamete, G. (1999). Improving question skills for students with hearing impairment. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 14 (2), 171-177.
4. Akman, B. (2002). Okulöncesi döneminde matematik. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23, 244-248.
5. Aktürk, Y ve Taş, A.M. (2011). İlk okuma-yazma öğretiminde ses temelli cümle yönteminin uygulanmasına ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri (Şanlıurfa/Viranşehir örneği). Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2 (1), 27-37.
6. Anthony, J.L. ve Lonigan, C.J. (2004). The nature of phonological awareness: converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96 (1), 43-55.
7. Ayata-Baran, N. (2007). Kaynaştırmaya devam eden işitme engelli öğrencilerin öykü şemalarının değerlendirilmesi. (Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.
8. Baker, J. M. ve Zigmond, N. (1995). The meaning and practice of inclusion for students with learning disabilities: Themes and implications from the five cases. The Journal of Special Education, 29 (2), 163-180.

9. Batu, E.M. (2000). Kaynaştırma, destek hizmetler ve kaynaştırmaya hazırlık etkinlikleri. Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 2 (4), 35-45.
10. Bogdan, R.C. ve Biklen, S.K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. (5. Baskı.). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
11. Bozkurt, Ş. (2002). İşitme engellilerde okuduğunu anlama becerilerinin değerlendirilmesi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Ankara: Ankara Üniversitesi.
12. Briscoe, J., Bishop, D.V.M. ve Norbury, C.F. (2001). Phonological processing, language, and literacy: A comparison of children with mild-to-moderate sensorineural hearing loss and those with spesific language impairment. J. Child Psychol. Psychiat., 42 (3), 329-340.
13. Buran, A. (2015). Eylem araştırması. F.N. Seggie ve Y. Bayyurt (eds), Nitel araştırma: Yöntem, teknik, analiz ve yaklaşımlar içinde (s. 43-59). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
14. Cabell, S.Q., Justice, L.M., Kaderavek, J.N., Turnbull, K.P. ve Breit-Smith, A. (2009). Emergent literacy: Lessons for success. San Diego: Plural Publishing.
15. Cawthon, S.W. (2001). Teaching strategies in inclusive classrooms with deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 6 (3), 212-225.
16. Cohen, E.J. ve Brady, M.P. (2011). Acquisition and generalization of word decoding in students with reading disabilities by integrating vowel pattern analysis and children’s literature. Education and Treatment of Children, 34 (1), 81-113.
17. Cohen, O. (1994). Inclusion should not include deaf students. Education Week, 13 (30), 35-40.
18. Connor, C.M. ve Zwolan, T.A. (2004). Examining multiple sources of influence on the reading comprehension skills of children who use cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 47(3), 509-526.
19. Creswell, J. W. (2005). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. (2. Baskı). Pearson Education.
20. Çelenk, S. (2005). İlkokuma-yazma öğretimi. (5. baskı). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
21. de Boer, A., Pijl, S.J. and Minnaert, A. (2011). Regular primary schoolteachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education: a review of the literature. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 15 (3), 331-353.
22. Deretarla, E. (2000). Kaynaştırma uygulaması yapılan ilköğretim okullarının 3. Sınıfına devam eden normal işiten ve işitme engelli çocukların okuduğunu anlama becerilerinin incelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
23. Duran, E. ve Akyol, H. (2010). Bitişik eğik yazı öğretimi çalışmalarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 8 (4), 817-838.
24. Easterbrooks, S. R. and Stephenson, B. (2006). An examination of twenty literacy, science, and mathematics practices used to educate students who are deaf or hard of hearing. American Annals of The Deaf, 151 (4), 384-397.
25. Easterbrooks, S. R., Lederberg, A. R., Miller, E. M., Bergeron, J. P. and Connor, C. M. (2008). Emergent literacy skills during early childhood in children with hearing loss: Strengths and weaknesses. The Volta Review, 108, 91-114.
26. Foster, S. and Cue, K. (2009). Roles and responsibilities of itinerant specialist teachers of deaf and hard of hearing students. American Annals of The Deaf, 153 (5), 435-449.
27. Friend, M. and Reising, M. (1993). Co-teaching: An overview of the past, a glimpse at the present, and considerations for the future. Preventing School Failure, 37 (4), 6-10.
28. Fung, P., Chow, B.W. and McBride-Chang, C. (2005). The impact of a dialogic reading program on deaf and hard-of-hearing kindergarten and early primary school–aged students in Hong Kong. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10 (1), 82-95.
29. Gay, L.M. Mills, G.E. and Arirasian, P.W. (2012). Educational research: Compentencies for analysis and applications. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
30. Geers, A.E., Brenner, C. and Davidson, L. (2003). Factors associated with development of speech perception skills in children implanted by age five. Ear Hear, 24, 24-35.
31. Girgin, Ü. (1987). Doğal işitsel-sözel yöntemle eğitim gören işitme engelli çocuklarda okuma-anlama davranışlarının irdelenmesi. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
32. Girgin, Ü. (2004). İşitme engelli çocuklarda okuma anlama stratejilerinin önemi ve kullanımı. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4 (8), 33-44.
33. Girgin, Ü. (2006). Evaluation of Turkish hearing impaired students’ reading camprehension with the miscue analysis inventory. International Journal of Special Education, 21 (3), 68-84.
34. Girgin, Ü. (2012). Phonic-based sentence method for students with hearing impairnment: A case study from Turkey. Berlin: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
35. Goldberg, H. and Lederberg, A. R. (2015). Acquisition of the alphabetic principle in deaf and hard-of-hearing preschoolers: The role of phonology in letter-sound learning. Reading and Writing, 28 (4), 509-525.
36. Gravenstede, L. (2009). Phonological awareness and decoding skills in deaf adolescents. Deafness and Education International, 11 (4), 171-190.
37. Griffith, P.L., Beach, S.A., Ruan, J. and Dunn, L. (2008). Literacy for young children: A guide for early childhood educators. CA: Corwin Press.
38. Halliday, L.F. and Bishop, D.V. (2005) Frequency discrimination and literacy skills in children with mild to moderate sensorineural hearing loss. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1187-1203.
39. Hardin, B. J., Jones, M. G., and Figueras, O. (2005). More than clocks and calendars: The construction of timekeepers by eleven kindergarten children in Mexico and the United States. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 19 (3), 223-241.
40. Harris, M. and Moreno, C. (2004). Deaf children’s use of phonological coding: Evidence from reading, spelling, and working memory. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 9 (3), 253-268.
41. Hegarty, S. (2001). Inclusive education-a case to answer. Journal of Moral Education, 30 (3), 243-249.
42. Heilman, A.W., Blair, T.R. and Rupley, W.H. (2002). Principles and practices of teaching reading. (10.Baskı). New Jersey: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
43. Hopwood, V. and Gallaway, C. (1999). Evaluating the linguistik experience of a deaf child in a mainstream class: A case study. Deafness and Education International, 1 (3), 172- 187.
44. Ingber, S. and Eden, S. (2011). Enhancing sequential time perception and storytelling ability of deaf and hard of hearing children. American Annals of the Deaf, 156 (4), 391-401.
45. İçden, G. (2003). Üniversite hazırlık sınıfı işitme engelli öğrencilerinin okuma sonrası soruları yanıtlamalarında “Soru Yanıt İlişkileri” stratejisinin kullanımı. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
46. James, D., Rajput, K., Brown, T., Sirimanna, T., Brinton, J. and Goswami, U. (2005). Phonological awareness in deaf children who use cochlear implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 48, 1511-1528.
47. Johnson, A.P. (2012). A short guide to action research. (4. Baskı). USA: Pearson Education, Inc.
48. Johnson, M.A. and Roberson, G.F. (1988). The language experience approach: Its use with young hearing-impaired students. American Annals of the Deaf, 133 (3), 223-225.
49. Karasu, H.P. ve Girgin, Ü. (2007). Kaynaştırmadaki işitme engelli öğrencilerin yazılı beceri düzeylerinin değerlendirilmesi. Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1, 467-488.
50. Karasu, H.P., Girgin, Ü. ve Uzuner, Y. (2012). İşitme engelli öğrenciler ve işiten öğrencilerin okuma becerilerinin formel olmayan okuma envanteri ile değerlendirilmesi. Anadolu Journal of Educational Sciences International, 2 (1), 65-88.
51. Karasu, H.P., Girgin, Ü. ve Gürgür, H. (2015). İşitme Engelli Bir Çocuğun Okuma Yazma Becerilerinin Dil Deneyim Yaklaşımı İle Desteklenmesi. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, 6 (1), 111-144.
52. Kelly, L. (1996). The interaction of syntactic competence and vocabulary during reading by deaf students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1, 75-90.
53. Kelly, L. and Ewoldt, C. (1984). Interpreting nonverbatim cloze responses to evaluate program success and diagnose student needs for reading instruction. American Annals of the Deaf, 129 (1), 45-51.
54. Kırmızı, F.S. ve Ünal, E. (2016). İlk okuma yazma öğretimi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
55. Koç, R. (2012). Okuma yazma öğretimi yöntemleri ve “ses temelli cümle yöntemi” uygulaması. International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 7 (4), 2259-2268.
56. Kreimeyer, K.H., Crooke, P., Drye, C., Egbert, V. and Kleinn, B. (2000). Academic and social benefits of a co-enrollment model of inclusive education for deaf and hard-of-hearing children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5 (2), 174-185.
57. Lederberg, A.R., Schick, B. and Spencer, P.A. (2012). Language and literacy development of deaf and hard-of-hearing children: Succeses and challenges. Developmental Psychology, 30, 1-16.
58. Lim, SYC. and Simser, J. (2005). Auditory-verbal theraphy for children with hearing impairment. Annals Academy of Medicine, 34(4), 307-312.
59. Luetke-Stahlman, B. and Nielsen, D.C. (2003). The contribution of phonological awareness and receptive and expressive English to the reading ability of deaf students with varying degrees of exposure to accurate English. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 8(4), 464-484.
60. Marschark, M., Sapere, P., Convertino, C.M. and Mayer, C. (2009). Are deaf students’ reading challenges really about reading? American Annals of the Deaf, 154(4), 357-370.
61. McGee, L.M. and Morrow, L.M. (2005). Teaching literacy in kindergarten. New York: The Guildford Press.
62. MEB. (2015). Türkçe dersi (1-8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. Ankara: MEB
63. MEB. (2016). Türkçe ilkokul öğretmen kılavuz kitabı: 1. sınıf. Ankara: MEB
64. Miller, W.H. (2005). Improving early literacy: Strategies and activities for struggling students (K-3). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
65. Mills, G.E. (2003). Action research: A guide fort the teacher researcher. (2. Baskı). Merrill Prentice Hall.
66. Moeller, M. P., Hoover, B. M., Putman, C. A., Arbataitis, K., Bohnenkamp, G. and Peterson, B. (2007). Vocalizations of infants with hearing loss compared to infants with normal hearing. Part I: Phonetic development. Ear and Hearing, 28(5), 605-627.
67. Nielsen, D.C. and Luetke-Stahlman, B. (2002). The benefit of assessment-based language and reading instruction: Perspectives from a case study. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(2), 149-186.
68. Önal, M.N. (2002). Türkçenin eğitimi ve öğretiminde oyun tekerlemelerinin yeri ve önemi. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9, 1-17.
69. Pakulski, L.A. and Kaderavek, J.N. (2004). Facilitating literacy using experience boks: A case study of two children with hearing loss. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 25 (4), 179-188.
70. Powers, S. (2001). Investigating good practice in supporting deaf pupils in mainstream school. Educational Review, 53(2), 181-190.
71. Powers, S. (2002). From concepts to practice in deaf education: A United Kingdom perspective on inclusion. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 7(3), 230-243.
72. Rahim, Z.A. and Brown, M. (2015). Systematic phonics intervention and its impact on the development of phonics skills and speech perception among children with hearing loss using spoken language. Internatioanal Academic Research Journal of Social Science, 1(2), 206-210.
73. Reutzel, D.R. and Cooter, R.B. (2007). Strategies assessment and instruction: Helping every child succeed. (3.Baskı). New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
74. Salend, S. J. (1998). Creating inclusive classroom. (5th ed.) NJ: Pearson Education.
75. Sarı, H. (2008). Sınıf öğretmenlerinin ilkokuma ve yazma öğretiminde karşılaştıkları sorunlar. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Beykent Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
76. Sarıkaya, E. ve Uzuner, Y. (2013). İşitme engelli çocukların okuma-yazma öğrenmelerine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Eğitimde Nitel Araştırmalar Dergisi-ENAD, 1(1), 31-61.
77. Schirmer, B.R. (2000). Language and literacy development in children who are deaf. (2. Baskı). Boston: Ally and Bacon, Inc.
78. Schirmer, B.R. (2010). Teaching the struggling reader. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
79. Schirmer, B.R. and Schaffer, L. (2010). Implementation of the guided reading approach with elementary school deaf students. American Annals of the Deaf, 155(3), 377-385.
80. Stewart, D.A. and Clarke, B.R. (2003). Literacy and your deaf child: What every parent should know. Washington, DC: Gallaudet University Press.
81. Stinson, M.S. and Kluwin, T.N. (2003). Educational consequences of alternative school placement. M. Marschark and P.E. Spencer (Eds.), The Handbook of Deaf Studies, Language and Education içinde (s. 47-96). New York: Oxford University Press.
82. Thomas, D.R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.
83. Tok, Ş., Tok, T.N. ve Mazı, A. (2008). İlkokuma yazma öğretiminde çözümleme ve ses temelli cümle yöntemlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yöntemi, 53, 123-144.
84. Trezek, B.J. and Malmgren, K.W. (2005). The efficacy of utilizing a phonics treatment package with middle school deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 10(3), 256-271.
85. Trezek, B.J. and Wang, Y. (2006). Implications of utilizing a phonics-based reading curriculum with children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(2), 202-213.
86. Trezek, B.J., Wang, Y., Woods, D.G., Gampp, T.L. and Paul, P.V. (2007). Using visual phonics to supplement beginning reading instruction for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 12(3), 1-12.
87. Turan, Z., Küçüköncü, D.T., Cankuvvet, N. and Yolal, Y. (2012). Evaluation of language and listening skills of the children with hearing who use cochlear implants and hearing aids. Gulhane Med J., 54(2), 142-150.
88. Türkyılmaz, M. (2010). Bir ders aracı olarak dinleme metinlerinin anlamaya etkisi: “eskici” metni örnekleminde deneysel bir çalışma. Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(4), 207-220.
89. Uzuner, Y. (2008). Metacognitive strategies applied during correcting text-related answers of three students with hearing loss. Journals of Research in Special Educational Needs, 8(1), 47-54.
90. Uzuner, Y., İçden, G., Girgin, Ü., Beral, A. and Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2005). An examination of impacts of text related questions on story grammar acquisition of three Turkish youths with hearing loss. The Journal of Special Education, 20(2), 111-121.
91. Uzuner, Y., Kırcaali-İftar, G. ve Karasu, P. (2005). Comparing the effects of various procedures on reconstruction of narratives according to story grammar of a youth with hearing loss. Reading Matrix, 5(2), 15-27.
92. Vacca, J.L., Gove, M.K., Lenhart, L.A., Vacca, R.T., Burkey, L.C. and McKeon, C.A. (2003). Reading and learning to read. (5. Baskı). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
93. Wauters, L.N., Tellings, A.E.J.M. and Van Bon, W.H.J. (2007). Mode of acquisition as a factor in deaf children’s reading comprehension. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(2), 175-192.
94. Wauters, L.N., Van Bon, W.H.J. and Tellings, A.E.J.M. (2006). Reading comprehension of Dutch deaf children. Reading and Writing, 19, 49-76.
95. Worden, P.E. and Boettcher, W. (1990). Young children’s acquisition of alphabet knowledge. Journal of Reading Behavior, 22(3), 277-295.
96. Yaşar, Ö.K. (2008). Resmi ve özel kurumlarda görev yapan işitme engeliler öğretmenlerinin yeni ilkokuma ve yazma öğretim programına ilişkin görüşleri. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi, Ankara.
97. Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (9. baskı). Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.